Approaches to management of complaints and notifications about health practitioners in Australia
Claudette S. Satchell A C , Merrilyn Walton A , Patrick J. Kelly A , Elizabeth M. Chiarella A , Suzanne M. Pierce A , Marie T. Nagy A , Belinda Bennett B and Terry Carney AA The University of Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia. Email: merrilyn.walton@sydney.edu.au; p.kelly@sydney.edu.au; mary.chiarella@sydney.edu.au; spie2144@uni.sydney.edu.au, terry.carney@sydney.edu.au
B Queensland University of Technology, 2 George Street, Brisbane, Qld 4000, Australia. Email: belinda.bennett@qut.edu.au
C Corresponding author. Email: claudette.satchell@sydney.edu.au
Australian Health Review 40(3) 311-318 https://doi.org/10.1071/AH15050
Submitted: 26 March 2015 Accepted: 27 July 2015 Published: 23 November 2015
Abstract
In 2005, the Australian Productivity Commission made a recommendation that a national health registration regimen and a consolidated national accreditation regimen be established. On 1 July 2010, the National Registration and Accreditation Scheme (NRAS) for health practitioners came into effect and the Australian Health Practitioner Regulation Agency (AHPRA) became the single national oversight agency for health professional regulation. It is governed by the Health Practitioner Regulation National Law Act (the National Law). While all states and territories joined NRAS for registration and accreditation, NSW did not join the scheme for the handling of complaints, but retained its existing co-regulatory complaint-handling system. All other states and territories joined the national notification (complaints) scheme prescribed in the National Law. Because the introduction of NRAS brings with it new processes and governance around the management of complaints that apply to all regulated health professionals in all states and territories except NSW, where complaints management remains largely unchanged, there is a need for comparative analysis of these differing national and NSW approaches to the management of complaints/notifications about health professionals, not only to allow transparency for consumers, but also to assess consistency of decision making around complaints/notifications across jurisdictions. This paper describes the similarities and differences for complaints/notifications handling between the NRAS and NSW schemes and briefly discusses subsequent and potential changes in other jurisdictions.
References
[1] Seibert C. Rethinking professional regulation. Econ Aff 2007; 27 77–80.| Rethinking professional regulation.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[2] Burau V, Vrangbæk K. Institutions and non-linear change in governance. Management 2008; 22 350–67.
[3] Lloyd-Bostock SM, Hutter BM. Reforming regulation of the medical profession: the risks of risk-based approaches. Health, Risk & Society 2008; 10 69–83.
| Reforming regulation of the medical profession: the risks of risk-based approaches.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[4] Ayres I, Braithwaite J. Responsive regulation. New York: Oxford University Press; 1992.
[5] Snowball K. Review of the national registration and accreditation scheme for health professions. Consultation paper August 2014. Melbourne: Australian Health Ministers’ Advisory Council; 2014.
[6] Legislative Council of the Parliament of Victoria. Report No. 2. Review of the National Registration and Accreditation Scheme for health professions. Melbourne: Parliament of Victoria; 2014. Available at: http://www.parliament.vic.gov.au/file_uploads/Final_version_AHPRA_report_30314_nnVxPmWJ.pdf [verified 20 July 2015].
[7] Health Practitioner Regulation National Law 2009 www.ahpra.gov.au
[8] Australian Health Ministers Advisory Council (AHMAC). Attachment B. Intergovernmental Agreement for a National Registration and Accreditation Scheme for the health professions. 2008. Available at: http://www.ahpra.gov.au/About-AHPRA/Ministerial-directives-and-communiques.aspx [verified 20 July 2015].
[9] Chiarella M, White J. Which tail wags which dog? Exploring the interface between health professional regulation and health professional education. Nurse Educ Today 2013; 33 1274–8.
| Which tail wags which dog? Exploring the interface between health professional regulation and health professional education.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 23490436PubMed |
[10] Walton M, Smith-Merry J, Healy J, McDonald F. Health complaint commissions in Australia: time for a national approach to data collection. Aust Rev Public Affairs 2012; 11 1–18.
[11] Australian Health Practitioner Regulation Agency (AHPRA). Health complaints entities. 2015. Available at: http://www.ahpra.gov.au/Notifications/About-notifications/Working-with-health-complaints-entities/Health-complaints-entities.aspx [verified 20 July 2015].
[12] Practitioner Regulation Subcommittee, Australian Health Ministers’ Advisory Council (AHMAC). National Registration and Accreditation Scheme for the health professions consultation paper: proposed arrangements for handling complaints, and dealing with performance, health and conduct matters. Canberra: AHMAC; 2008.
[13] Dodd P. Maintaining consumer focus in health complaints: the key to national best practice: Response to the Consultation Paper on national health complaints handling. Sydney: Public Interest Advocacy Centre; 2008.
[14] Australian Health Practitioner Regulation Agency (AHPRA). Health profession agreements. 2015. Available at: http://www.ahpra.gov.au/Publications/Health-profession-agreements.aspx [verified 20 July 2015].
[15] Carney T. Commentary: regulatory dividends of scandal – the Chelmsford legacy? Australas Psychiatry 2013; 21 220–3.
| Commentary: regulatory dividends of scandal – the Chelmsford legacy?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 23720466PubMed |
[16] Thomas D. ‘Medicine called to account: health complaints mechanisms in Australasia.’ Australian Studies in Health Services Administration No 93. Sydney: University of NSW Press; 2002.
[17] Breen KJ. National registration legislative proposals need more work and more time. Med J Aust 2009; 191 464–5.
| 19835545PubMed |
[18] Parliament of New South Wales. Joint Parliamentary Committee on the Health Care Complaints Commission. Undated. Available at: http://www.parliament.nsw.gov.au/healthcarecomplaints [verified 20 July 2015].
[19] Health Professions Councils Authority. About us. 2015. Available at: http://www.hpca.nsw.gov.au/About-Us/default.aspx [verified 20 July 2015].
[20] Committee on the Health Care Complaints Commission. Inquiry into internal complaint handling in private health practices. Report No. 15/53. Available at: http://www.parliament.nsw.gov.au/prod/parlment/committee.nsf/0/eb3f5ffea1d86dd6ca25722f0082c370/$FILE/Final%20Report.pdf [verified 20 July 2015].
[21] Health Practitioner Regulation National Law. 2009 (NSW) s 150 www.legislation.nsw.gov.au
[22] Health Care Complaints Act, 1993 www.legislation.nsw.gov.au
[23] Freckelton I. The margins of professional regulation: disjunctions, dilemmas and deterrence. Law Context 2006; 23 148
[24] Freckelton I. Regulating health practitioner professionalism. Law Context 2006; 23 1
[25] Reid A. To discipline or not to discipline: managing poorly performing doctors. Law Context 2006; 23 91
[26] Chantler C, Ashton R. The purpose and limits to professional self-regulation. JAMA 2009; 302 2032–3.
| The purpose and limits to professional self-regulation.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD1MXhsVSrtLzN&md5=be22ba9706cbdf7b83e4af8032827393CAS | 19903927PubMed |
[27] Shaw K, Cassel CK, Black C, Levinson W. Shared medical regulation in a time of increasing calls for accountability and transparency: comparison of recertification in the United States, Canada, and the United Kingdom. JAMA 2009; 302 2008–14.
| Shared medical regulation in a time of increasing calls for accountability and transparency: comparison of recertification in the United States, Canada, and the United Kingdom.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD1MXhsVSrtrfK&md5=a8eb87709ce57f276270a8bd9dbae355CAS | 19903922PubMed |
[28] Walshe K. Regulating health professionals. In: Healy J, Dugdale P, editors. ‘Patient safety first: responsive regulation in health care’. Crows Nest, NSW: Allen & Unwin; 2009. pp. 144–146.
[29] Parliament of Victoria Legislative Council Legal and Social Issues Legislation Committee Inquiry into the Performance of the Australian Health Practitioner Regulation Agency. 2014. Available at: http://www.parliament.vic.gov.au/file_uploads/Final_version_AHPRA_report_30314_nnVxPmWJ.pdf [verified 20 July 2015].
[30] Snowball K. Review of the national registration and accreditation scheme for health professions. Consultation paper August 2014. Melbourne: Australian Health Ministers’ Advisory Council; 2014. pp 86–87. http://www.coaghealthcouncil.gov.au/Projects/NRAS [verified 30 September 2015].
[31] Nursing and Midwifery Board of Australia. Internationally qualified nureses and midwives. 2015. Available at: http://www.nursingmidwiferyboard.gov.au/Registration-and-Endorsement/International.aspx [verified 20 July 2015].
[32] George MK, Joseph R. Complaints procedures in the NHS: are they fair and valid? Clin Govern: Int J 2009; 14 183–8.
| Complaints procedures in the NHS: are they fair and valid?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[33] Kuhlmann E, Allsop J, Saks M. Professional governance and public control: a comparison of healthcare in the United Kingdom and Germany. Curr Sociol 2009; 57 511–28.
| Professional governance and public control: a comparison of healthcare in the United Kingdom and Germany.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[34] Breen KJ. National registration legislative proposals need more work and more time. Med J Aust 2009; 191 464–5.
| 19835545PubMed |
[35] Adrian A, Chiarella M. Professional conduct: a casebook of disciplinary decisions relating to professional conduct matters. 2nd edition. Sydney: Nurses and Midwives Board of New South Wales; 2010
