Free Standard AU & NZ Shipping For All Book Orders Over $80!
Register      Login
Australian Health Review Australian Health Review Society
Journal of the Australian Healthcare & Hospitals Association
RESEARCH ARTICLE

A new venture in interdisciplinary student learning in a co-located health service

Kathryn Powell A B , Nigel Stocks A and Caroline Laurence A
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Discipline of General Practice, School of Population Health, The University of Adelaide North Terrace, Adelaide, SA 5005, Australia. Email: nigel.stocks@adelaide.edu.au; caroline.laurence@adelaide.edu.au

B Corresponding author. Email: powkj001@gmail.com

Australian Health Review 40(2) 205-209 https://doi.org/10.1071/AH14241
Submitted: 9 December 2014  Accepted: 9 July 2015   Published: 7 September 2015

Abstract

Learning about interdisciplinary health approaches is important for students of health professions. Yet, interdisciplinary learning programs are sparse within primary health clinics. Larger health care complexes, such as superclinics in Australia, offer interdisciplinary learning opportunities for health, but also pose difficulties. This case study describes the introduction of an interdisciplinary student learning program in Adelaide, South Australia, over a 1-year period. The objectives of the program were for students to: (1) understand the range of patient needs in primary healthcare (PHC); (2) identify circumstances in which the involvement of another professional may benefit patients; and (3) learn more about team work. Despite barriers, the practice environment was found to be suitable for student learning. Program modifications were made in response to the need for scheduled time for clinic staff to work with students, non-simultaneous student placements, a need for a coordinator, the availability of discipline-specific supervision and the need to provide incentives for students to participate, particularly giving course credits or recognition. Embedding interdisciplinary programs in a clinic setting requires time and resources. The present case study demonstrates that larger PHC clinics have the potential to implement interdisciplinary learning programs based on an authentic learning approach.


References

[1]  Prideaux D. Medical education in Australia: much has changed but what remains? Med Teach 2009; 31 96–100.
Medical education in Australia: much has changed but what remains?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 19330667PubMed |

[2]  Jackson C, Askew D. Is there a polyclinic alternative acceptable to general practice? The ‘beacon’ practice model. Br J Gen Pract 2008; 58 733
Is there a polyclinic alternative acceptable to general practice? The ‘beacon’ practice model.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 18826791PubMed |

[3]  Department of Health and Ageing. GP super clinics national program guide 2010. Canberra: Australian Government; 2010.

[4]  Stocks NP, Frank O, Linn AM, Anderson K, Meertens S. Vertical integration of teaching in Australian general practice: a survey of regional training providers. Med J Aust 2011; 194 S75–8.
| 21644858PubMed |

[5]  Larsen K, Perkins D. Training doctors in general practices: a review of the literature. Aust J Rural Health 2006; 14 173–7.
Training doctors in general practices: a review of the literature.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 17032291PubMed |

[6]  Joseph S, Diack L, Garton F, Haxton J. Interprofessional education in practice. Clin Teach 2012; 9 27–31.
Interprofessional education in practice.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 22225889PubMed |

[7]  Bridges DR, Davidson RA, Odegard PS, Maki IV, Tomkowiak J. Interprofessional collaboration: three best practice models of interprofessional education. Med Educ Online 2011; 16 6035
Interprofessional collaboration: three best practice models of interprofessional education.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[8]  Lombardi MM. Authentic learning for the 21st century: an overview. Educause Learning Initiative 2007; 1 1–12.

[9]  Rule AC. The components of authentic learning. J Authenic Learning 2006; 3 1–10.

[10]  Littlewood S, Ypinazar V, Margolis SA, Scherpbier A, Spencer J, Dornan T. Early practical experience and the social responsiveness of clinical education: systematic review. BMJ 2005; 331 387–91.
Early practical experience and the social responsiveness of clinical education: systematic review.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 16096306PubMed |

[11]  Yardley S, Brosnan C, Richardson J. The consequences of authentic early experience for medical students: creation of mētis. Med Educ 2013; 47 109–19.
The consequences of authentic early experience for medical students: creation of mētis.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 23278830PubMed |

[12]  Herrington J, Kervin L. Authentic learning supported by technology: ten suggestions and cases of integration in classrooms. Educ Media Int 2007; 44 219–36.
Authentic learning supported by technology: ten suggestions and cases of integration in classrooms.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[13]  Oandasan I, Reeves S. Key elements for interprofessional education. Part 1: the learner, the educator and the learning context. J Interprof Care 2005; 19 21–38.
Key elements for interprofessional education. Part 1: the learner, the educator and the learning context.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 16096143PubMed |

[14]  Meah YS, Smith EL, Thomas DC. Student‐run health clinic: novel arena to educate medical students on systems-based practice. Mount Sinai J Med 2009; 76 344–56.
Student‐run health clinic: novel arena to educate medical students on systems-based practice.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[15]  Copley JA, Allison HD, Hill AE, Moran MC, Tait JA, Day T. Making interprofessional education real: a university clinic model. Aust Health Rev 2007; 31 351–7.
Making interprofessional education real: a university clinic model.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 17669056PubMed |

[16]  Tullmann DF, Shilling AM, Goeke LH, Wright EB, Littlewood KE. Recreating simulation scenarios for interprofessional education: an example of educational interprofessional practice. J Interprof Care 2013; 27 426–8.
Recreating simulation scenarios for interprofessional education: an example of educational interprofessional practice.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 23672604PubMed |

[17]  Sheu LC, Zheng P, Coelho AD, Lin LD, O’Sullivan PS, O’Brien BC, Yu AY, Lai CJ. Learning through service: student perceptions on volunteering at interprofessional hepatitis B student-run clinics. J Cancer Educ 2011; 26 228–33.
Learning through service: student perceptions on volunteering at interprofessional hepatitis B student-run clinics.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 20652476PubMed |

[18]  Frakes K-A, Tyzack Z, Miller M, Davies L, Swanston A, Brownie S. The Capricornia project: developing and implementing an interprofessional student-assisted allied health clinic. Brisbane: Clinical Education and Training (ClinEdQ), Queensland Health; 2011. Available at: www.health.qld.gov.au/clinedq/Documents/capdocall.pdf [verified 28 February 2013].

[19]  Hodge P, Wright S, Barraket J, Scott M, Melville R, Richardson S. Revisiting ‘how we learn’ in academia: practice‐based learning exchanges in three Australian universities. Stud High Educ 2011; 36 167–83.
Revisiting ‘how we learn’ in academia: practice‐based learning exchanges in three Australian universities.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[20]  Frakes K-a, Brownie S, Davies L, Thomas J, Miller M-E, Tyack Z. Capricornia Allied Health Partnership (CAHP): a case study of an innovative model of care addressing chronic disease through a regional student-assisted clinic. Aust Health Rev 2014; 38 483–6.
Capricornia Allied Health Partnership (CAHP): a case study of an innovative model of care addressing chronic disease through a regional student-assisted clinic.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 25099212PubMed |

[21]  Appleby N, Dunt D, Southern D, Young D. General practice integration in Australia. Primary health services provider and consumer perceptions of barriers and solutions. Aust Fam Physician 1999; 28 858–63.
| 1:STN:280:DyaK1MvisFGntg%3D%3D&md5=58c8839d539746980cb617b093f0fe16CAS | 10495544PubMed |

[22]  Axelsson R, Axelsson SB. Integration and collaboration in public health: a conceptual framework. Int J Health Plann Manage 2006; 21 75–88.
Integration and collaboration in public health: a conceptual framework.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 16604850PubMed |

[23]  Pearce R, Laurence CO, Black LE, Stocks N. The challenges of teaching in a general practice setting. General Practice Med Ed – for Debate 2007; 187 129

[24]  Herrington J, Reeves TC, Oliver R. Authentic learning environments. New York: Springer; 2014.