Factors associated with re-presentation to emergency departments in elderly people with pain
Rebecca Howard A D , Andrew Hannaford A and Tracey Weiland B CA Hospital Admission Risk Program, St Vincent’s Hospital Melbourne, 41 Victoria Parade, Fitzroy, Vic. 3065, Australia.
B Emergency Practice Innovation Centre (EPIC), St Vincent’s Hospital Melbourne, 41 Victoria Parade, Fitzroy, Vic. 3065, Australia.
C Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Vic. 3052, Australia.
D Corresponding author. Email: rebecca.howard@svha.org.au
Australian Health Review 38(4) 461-466 https://doi.org/10.1071/AH13233
Submitted: 10 December 2013 Accepted: 18 April 2014 Published: 8 July 2014
Abstract
Objectives To identify medical, social and demographic factors associated with increased risk of 30-day re-presentation to the emergency department (ED) in elderly people presenting with pain.
Methods We undertook a single site, prospective observational study of all patients aged >65 years discharged from the ED with pain. Data were collected on possible medical, social and demographic predictors of ED readmission. Participants were a subset of all elderly patients presenting to the ED with pain, and received follow-up case management as part of the hospital’s rapid response, assessment and care planning program for elderly people.
Results Over 8 months, 356 people were eligible for inclusion in the study; of these, 189 consented to case management and to participate in the study. Three factors statistically increased odds of re-presentation to ED within 30 days: (1) prescription of opioids (P = 0.003); (2) the presence of Home and Community Care Services (P = 0.03); and (3) the absence of a gait aid (P = 0.019). Nineteen per cent of eligible patients re-presented to ED within 30 days of initial presentation.
Conclusion These findings contribute to current debate about opioid prescription and effective pain management in the elderly. The study highlights the need for routine follow-up care of older people discharged from the ED with pain, particularly those discharged home with opioids or with complex care needs.
What is known about the topic? Re-presentation rates within 28 days for all-comers to the emergency department (ED) are collected and reported as part of routine service monitoring and evaluation. Presentation rates for elderly people to EDs have been escalating over the past decade; however, the risk factors that lead to re-presentations for elderly people have not been documented. Similarly, increasing concern about the prescription of opioids in elderly people is documented; however, its impact on ED re-presentations has not been reported. Innovative models of care are emerging to stem the rise in ED demand; however, their role and impact on re-presentation rates are not documented for this subgroup of ED presenters.
What does this paper add? This research has demonstrated that ED re-presentation rates for elderly people with pain are higher than overall ED re-presentation rates. This article has identified three risk factors that significantly increase the risk of re-presentation in this population, including the prescription of opioid analgesics. Qualitative data have identified that elderly people prescribed opioids require extensive education and support to manage the medication side effects.
What are the implications for practitioners? Practitioners should be aware that elderly people with pain are a higher risk group for ED re-presentation, particularly those prescribed opioid analgesics or with complex care needs. Discharge planning and assessment of supports should be routinely instigated to manage medication side effects, and follow-up services put in place where inadequate. Improved provision of written information in multiple languages for patients who cannot read English should also be initiated.
References
[1] Lowthian J, Curtis A, Jolley D, Stoelwinder J, McNeil J, Cameron P. Demand at the emergency department front door: 10-year trends in presentations. Med J Aust 2012; 196 128–32.| Demand at the emergency department front door: 10-year trends in presentations.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 22304608PubMed |
[2] Lowthian J, Curtis A, Stoelwinder J, McNeil J, Cameron P. Emergency demand and repeat attendances. Int Med J 2013; 43 554–60.
| Emergency demand and repeat attendances.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DC%2BC3s3lsl2gtQ%3D%3D&md5=088f4123c561ae241490ba2da36a6170CAS |
[3] Begg S, Vos T, Barker B, Stevenson C, Stanley L, Lopez A. The burden of disease and injury in Australia 2003. Catalogue no. PHE 82. Canberra: Australian Institute of Health and Welfare; 2007. Available at http://www.aihw.gov.au/publication-detail/?id=6442467990 [verified 19 November 2013].
[4] Department of Human Services (DHS). Improving care: hospital admission risk program. Melbourne: Metropolitan Health and Aged Care Services Division, Victorian Government Department of Human Services; 2006. Available at http://www.health.vic.gov.au/harp/downloads/improvingcare.pdf [verified 20 May 2014].
[5] Wheeler M. Pain assessment and management in the patient with mild to moderate cognitive impairment. Home Healthc Nurse 2006; 24 354–9.
| Pain assessment and management in the patient with mild to moderate cognitive impairment.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 16849938PubMed |
[6] National Pain Strategy. Pain management for all Australians. Developed by the National Pain Summit Initiative. 2010. Available at http://www.painaustralia.org.au/images/pain_australia/NPS/National%20Pain%20Strategy%202011.pdf [verified 20 May 2014].
[7] Narcessian E. Pain comfort assessment guide. 1991. Available at http://www.partnersagainstpain.com/printouts/Patient-Comfort-Assessment-Guide.pdf [verified 18 March 2014].
[8] Alam MK, Rao MB, Cheng F-C. Sample size determination in logistic regression. Indian J Stat 2010; 72B 58–75.
[9] Australian Bureau of Statistics. Census community profiles: greater Melbourne. 2011. Available at http://www.censusdata.abs.gov.au/census_services/getproduct/census/2011/communityprofile/2GMEL [verified 11 March 2014].
[10] Australian Institute of Health and Welfare (AIHW). Older Australians at a glance, 4th edn. Catalogue no. AGE52. Canberra: AIHW; 2007. Available at http://www.aihw.gov.au/publication-detail/?id=6442468045&tab=2 [verified 11 March 2014].
[11] Moore G, Gerdtz M, Manias E, Hepworth G, Dent A. Socio-demographic and clinical characteristics of re-presentation to an Australian inner-city emergency department: implications for service delivery. BMC Public Health 2007; 7 320
| Socio-demographic and clinical characteristics of re-presentation to an Australian inner-city emergency department: implications for service delivery.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 17996112PubMed |
[12] Rolita L, Spegman A, Tang X, Cronstein B. Greater number of narcotic analgesic prescriptions for osteoarthritis is associated with falls and fractures in elderly adults. J Am Geriatr Soc 2013; 61 335–40.
| Greater number of narcotic analgesic prescriptions for osteoarthritis is associated with falls and fractures in elderly adults.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 23452054PubMed |
[13] Solomon D, Rassen J, Glynn R, Garneau K, Levin R, Lee J, Schneeweiss S. The comparative safety of opiods for nonmalignant pain in older adults. Arch Intern Med 2010; 170 1979–86.
| The comparative safety of opiods for nonmalignant pain in older adults.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 21149754PubMed |
[14] Roxburgh A, Bruno R, Larance B, Burns L. Prescription of opioid analgesics and related harms in Australia. Med J Aust 2011; 195 280–4.
| Prescription of opioid analgesics and related harms in Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 21895598PubMed |
