Documentation of limitation of medical therapy at the time of a rapid response team call
K. Sundararajan A B C , A. Flabouris A B , Alexander Keeshan A and Tracey Cramey AA Intensive Care Unit, Critical Care Services, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, SA 5000, Australia. Email: arthas.flabouris@health.sa.gov.au; tracey.cramey@health.sa.gov.au
B Discipline of Acute Care Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA 5000, Australia.
C Corresponding author. Email: krishnaswamy.sundararajan@health.sa.gov.au
Australian Health Review 38(2) 218-222 https://doi.org/10.1071/AH13138
Submitted: 15 January 2013 Accepted: 12 December 2013 Published: 4 March 2014
Abstract
Objectives The aims of the present study were to: (1) describe the documentation process of limitation of medical therapy (LMT) orders at the time of a rapid response team (RRT) call; and (2) compare documented LMT orders not associated with an RRT call (control, Group 1) with LMT orders documented at the time of an RRT call (Group 2).
Methods A descriptive study, over a 6-month period (February–August 2011), involving the review of the medical records of patients prospectively identified as either Group 1 or Group 2.
Results There were 994 RRT calls; of these, 50 patients (5%) had an LMT order documented by the RRT. A cardiac arrest was the trigger for the RRT for six patients (12%). Patients in Group 1 (n = 50) and Group 2 were of similar median age (80.5 vs 78.5 years; P = 0.30), LMTs were recorded at a similar time of day (15 : 30 vs 15 : 55 hours; P = 0.52) and day of the week (weekend: 32% vs 35%; P = 0.72). Comparing group 2 with Group 1, the RRT was less likely to document a not-for-resuscitation (NFR; 31 (62%) vs 49 (98%); P < 0.01) or a not-for-ICU (NFICU; 18 (36%) vs 41 (82%); P < 0.01) order, but more likely to document a not-for-RRT call (NFRRT; 31 (62%) vs 22 (44%); P = 0.04) and modified RRT calling criteria (MRRT; 4 (8%) vs 0 (0%); P = 0.04) orders. For Group 2 compared with Group 1 orders, involvement of the patient in the decision making process (9 (18%) vs 25 (50%); P < 0.01) or the next of kin (29 (58%) vs 45 (90%); P < 0.01) was documented less often.
Conclusions Documentation of LMT orders at the time of an RRT call is less likely to include documented involvement of patients or their next of kin, and is more likely to be an NFRRT or MRRT order. These findings have implications for overall clinical governance.
What is known about the topic? RRT are not infrequently involved in documenting LMT orders.
What does this paper add? This is the first study in Australasia to look into the timing and circumstances surrounding the issuing of a NFR order during an RRT call. The study findings clarify the type of LMT orders documented by RRT and to what extent patients, their carers and senior medical staff are involved.
What are the implications for practitioners? Our findings indicate that, in the setting of a rapid response system, there is a need to consider beyond the narrow interpretation of the NFR order, when a NFRRT may also be appropriate. This will require standardisation of such nomenclature, and training and education of those involved in documenting and interpreting such orders. Equally, it will require a different approach to the discussion with patients and their carers as to what the implications of an NFRRT order are. The findings also have significant implications as to the senior medical oversight of LMT, in particular for RRT, for whom it is their first encounter with such patients. Finally, the findings suggest that consideration be given to better delineating the documentation of the role of nursing staff when setting LMT orders.
Additional keyword: not for resuscitation.
References
[1] Truog RD, Waisel DB, Burns JP. Do-not-resuscitate orders in the surgical setting. Lancet 2005; 365 733–5.| 15733701PubMed |
[2] Jones DA, McIntyre T, Baldwin I, Mercer I, Kattula A, Bellomo R. The medical emergency team and end-of-life care: a pilot study. Crit Care Resusc 2007; 9 151–6.
| 17536983PubMed |
[3] Connors AF, Dawson NV, Desbiens NA, Fulkerson WJ, Goldman L, Knaus WA. A controlled trial to improve care for seriously ill hospitalized patients. The study to understand prognoses and preferences for outcomes and risks of treatments (SUPPORT). The SUPPORT Principal Investigators. JAMA 1995; 274 1591–8.
| A controlled trial to improve care for seriously ill hospitalized patients. The study to understand prognoses and preferences for outcomes and risks of treatments (SUPPORT). The SUPPORT Principal Investigators.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[4] The Critical Care Committee Optimum care for hopelessly ill patients. A report of the Clinical Care Committee of the Massachusetts General Hospital. N Engl J Med 1976; 295 362–4.
| Optimum care for hopelessly ill patients. A report of the Clinical Care Committee of the Massachusetts General Hospital.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 934224PubMed |
[5] Fried C. Editorial: terminating life support: out of the closet. N Engl J Med 1976; 295 390–1.
| Editorial: terminating life support: out of the closet.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DyaE283itVeisw%3D%3D&md5=c757322315e0402fd3d45c55159d8bbbCAS | 934229PubMed |
[6] Chen J, Flabouris A, Bellomo R, Hillman K, Finfer S. The medical emergency team system and not-for-resuscitation orders: results from the MERIT study. Resuscitation 2008; 79 391–7.
| The medical emergency team system and not-for-resuscitation orders: results from the MERIT study.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 18952354PubMed |
[7] Burns JP, Edwards J, Johnson J, Cassem NH, Truog RD. Do-not-resuscitate order after 25 years. Crit Care Med 2003; 31 1543–50.
| Do-not-resuscitate order after 25 years.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 12771631PubMed |
[8] Cantor MD, Braddock CH, Derse AR, Edwards DM, Logue GL, Nelson W, et al Do-not-resuscitate orders and medical futility. Arch Intern Med 2003; 163 2689–94.
| Do-not-resuscitate orders and medical futility.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 14662622PubMed |
[9] Cook D, Rocker G, Marshall J, Sjokvist P, Dodek P, Griffith L, et al Withdrawal of mechanical ventilation in anticipation of death in the intensive care unit. N Engl J Med 2003; 349 1123–32.
| Withdrawal of mechanical ventilation in anticipation of death in the intensive care unit.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3sXnsV2jtLc%3D&md5=47bb137e0da8c3cd84d24993baab5f28CAS | 13679526PubMed |
[10] Ewanchuk M, Brindley PG. Perioperative do-not-resuscitate orders: doing ‘nothing’ when ‘something’ can be done. Crit Care 2006; 10 219
| Perioperative do-not-resuscitate orders: doing ‘nothing’ when ‘something’ can be done.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 16834763PubMed |
[11] Feder S, Matheny RL, Loveless RS, Rea TD. Withholding resuscitation: a new approach to prehospital end-of-life decisions. Ann Intern Med 2006; 144 634–40.
| Withholding resuscitation: a new approach to prehospital end-of-life decisions.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 16670132PubMed |
[12] Teno J, Lynn J, Wenger N, Phillips RS, Murphy DP, Connors AF, et al Advance directives for seriously ill hospitalized patients: effectiveness with the patient self-determination act and the SUPPORT intervention. SUPPORT Investigators. Study to Understand Prognoses and Preferences for Outcomes and Risks of Treatment. J Am Geriatr Soc 1997; 45 500–7.
| 1:STN:280:DyaK2s3lsFektg%3D%3D&md5=1b3f37dace52940ab90f9af29e67383cCAS | 9100721PubMed |
[13] Holley A, Kravet SJ, Cordts G. Documentation of code status and discussion of goals of care in gravely ill hospitalized patients. J Crit Care 2009; 24 288–92.
| Documentation of code status and discussion of goals of care in gravely ill hospitalized patients.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 19327289PubMed |
[14] Calam B, Andrew R. CPR or DNR? End-of-life decision making on a family practice teaching ward. Can Fam Physician 2000; 46 340–6.
| 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3c7lsFSrsg%3D%3D&md5=6356a0d6f1ee8a14fd1227a50cc216faCAS | 10690490PubMed |
[15] Tulsky JA, Chesney MA, Lo B. How do medical residents discuss resuscitation with patients? J Gen Intern Med 1995; 10 436–42.
| How do medical residents discuss resuscitation with patients?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DyaK28%2FjslentA%3D%3D&md5=322333852fe88c852e50d708dd89e0c1CAS | 7472700PubMed |
[16] Walker KA, Peltier H, Mayo RL, Kearney CD. Impact of writing ‘comfort measures only’ orders in a community teaching hospital. J Palliat Med 2010; 13 241–5.
| Impact of writing ‘comfort measures only’ orders in a community teaching hospital.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 19827969PubMed |
[17] Simpson SH. A study into the uses and effects of do-not-resuscitate orders in the intensive care units of two teaching hospitals. Intensive Crit Care Nurs 1994; 10 12–22.
| A study into the uses and effects of do-not-resuscitate orders in the intensive care units of two teaching hospitals.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DyaK2c7pvVGntw%3D%3D&md5=e08d8d365c4a998bc598a9ad4438c2a2CAS | 8148601PubMed |
[18] Hillman K, Parr M, Flabouris A, Bishop G, Stewart A. Redefining in-hospital resuscitation: the concept of the medical emergency team. Resuscitation 2001; 48 105–10.
| Redefining in-hospital resuscitation: the concept of the medical emergency team.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3MzmsFGgtQ%3D%3D&md5=fb4f2e72d88b40697d8e2e24e6de9bdaCAS | 11426471PubMed |
[19] Flabouris A, Chen J, Hillman K, Bellomo R, Finfer S. Timing and interventions of emergency teams during the MERIT study. Resuscitation 2010; 81 25–30.
| Timing and interventions of emergency teams during the MERIT study.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 19913973PubMed |
[20] MERIT Study Investigators Introduction of the medical emergency team (MET) system: a cluster-randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2005; 365 2091–7.
| Introduction of the medical emergency team (MET) system: a cluster-randomised controlled trial.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 15964445PubMed |
[21] Parr MJ, Hadfield JH, Flabouris A, Bishop G, Hillman K. The medical emergency team: 12 month analysis of reasons for activation, immediate outcome and not-for-resuscitation orders. Resuscitation 2001; 50 39–44.
| The medical emergency team: 12 month analysis of reasons for activation, immediate outcome and not-for-resuscitation orders.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3Mnnt1Ojuw%3D%3D&md5=f137e968ec35b317f2fbbede80747322CAS | 11719127PubMed |
[22] Vazquez R, Gheorghe C, Grigoriyan A, Palvinskaya T, Amoateng-Adjepong Y, Manthous CA. Enhanced end-of-life care associated with deploying a rapid response team: a pilot study. J Hosp Med 2009; 4 449–52.
| Enhanced end-of-life care associated with deploying a rapid response team: a pilot study.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 19753581PubMed |
[23] Hofmann JC, Wenger NS, Davis RB, Teno J, Connors AF, Desbiens N, et al Patient preferences for communication with physicians about end-of-life decisions. SUPPORT Investigators. Study to Understand Prognoses and Preference for Outcomes and Risks of Treatment. Ann Intern Med 1997; 127 1–12.
| Patient preferences for communication with physicians about end-of-life decisions. SUPPORT Investigators. Study to Understand Prognoses and Preference for Outcomes and Risks of Treatment.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DyaK2szjvF2jug%3D%3D&md5=3fc26b77e5a6e3d4e90cb82d454085ccCAS | 9214246PubMed |
[24] Coventry C, Flabouris A, Sundararajan K, Cramey T. Rapid response team calls to patients with a pre-existing not for resuscitation order. Resuscitation 2013; 84 1035–9.
| Rapid response team calls to patients with a pre-existing not for resuscitation order.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 23376582PubMed |
[25] Hignett CL, Forsyth DR, Connor GD. Improving the documentation and appropriateness of cardiopulmonary resuscitation decisions. J R Soc Med 1995; 88 136–40.
| 1:STN:280:DyaK2M3ntFGktQ%3D%3D&md5=29fc2f0519a7b2e42f3b118990f05f40CAS | 7752156PubMed |
[26] Detering KM, Hancock AD, Reade MC, Silvester W. The impact of advance care planning on end of life care in elderly patients: randomised controlled trial. BMJ 2010; 340 c1345
| The impact of advance care planning on end of life care in elderly patients: randomised controlled trial.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 20332506PubMed |
[27] Becerra M, Hurst SA, Junod Perron N, Cochet S, Elger BS. ‘Do not attempt resuscitation’ and ‘cardiopulmonary resuscitation’ in an inpatient setting: factors influencing physicians’ decisions in Switzerland. Gerontology 2011; 57 414–21.
| 21099190PubMed |
[28] Downar J, Barua R, Rodin D, Lejnieks B, Gudimella R, McCredie V, et al Changes in end of life care 5 years after the introduction of a rapid response team: a multicentre retrospective study. Resuscitation 2013; 84 1339–44.
| Changes in end of life care 5 years after the introduction of a rapid response team: a multicentre retrospective study.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 23499898PubMed |
[29] Collins N, Phelan D, Marsh B, Sprung CL. End-of-life care in the intensive care unit: the Irish Ethicus data. Crit Care Resusc 2006; 8 315–20.
| 17227268PubMed |
[30] Lo B, McLeod GA, Saika G. Patient attitudes to discussing life-sustaining treatment. Arch Intern Med 1986; 146 1613–15.
| Patient attitudes to discussing life-sustaining treatment.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DyaL283mvVWrtA%3D%3D&md5=6943f9fa947e808794db2fab22e8c825CAS | 3729645PubMed |
[31] Emanuel LL, Barry MJ, Stoeckle JD, Ettelson LM, Emanuel EJ. Advance directives for medical care: a case for greater use. N Engl J Med 1991; 324 889–95.
| Advance directives for medical care: a case for greater use.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DyaK3M7lsF2qsA%3D%3D&md5=2387e8c73a4c32b8f6688dac4df65d71CAS | 2000111PubMed |
[32] Cohn S, Fritz ZB, Frankau JM, Laroche CM, Fuld JP. Do not attempt cardiopulmonary resuscitation orders in acute medical settings: a qualitative study. QJM 2013; 106 165–77.
| Do not attempt cardiopulmonary resuscitation orders in acute medical settings: a qualitative study.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DC%2BC3s7ms1Kgsw%3D%3D&md5=cc2c0ef83004be95ad47d1546410233aCAS | 23185026PubMed |
