Register      Login
Australian Health Review Australian Health Review Society
Journal of the Australian Healthcare & Hospitals Association
EDITORIAL

Reducing surgical site infections: prioritising change in Australian and New Zealand healthcare

Kevin Tetsworth https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3069-4141 A *
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A The Wesley Hospital, Orthopaedic Trauma Queensland, Suite 22/Level 10 Evan Thomson Building, 21 Chasely Street, Auchenflower, Qld 4066, Australia.

* Correspondence to: reception@otq.net.au

Australian Health Review 48(5) 612-613 https://doi.org/10.1071/AH24190
Submitted: 17 July 2024  Accepted: 19 July 2024  Published: 15 August 2024

© 2024 The Author(s) (or their employer(s)). Published by CSIRO Publishing on behalf of AHHA.

Prevention of surgical site infections (SSIs) continues to be one of the most important issues facing all healthcare professionals. If a patient contracts an infection it can have a devastating effect on their life, something healthcare professionals are desperate to avoid, yet it remains an ongoing problem despite our best efforts.

Healthcare-associated infections are the most common hospital-acquired complication in Australian hospitals.1 Sutures, like all implanted materials, increase the probability of SSI,2 an important consideration because 67% of SSIs are confined to the incision.2 From an Australian perspective, SSIs adversely affect tens of thousands of patients each year and place an additional economic burden on the Australian national healthcare system.3 Post-surgery infections can cause significant harm and result in increased hospital stays, re-admissions, and re-operations, with each additional hospitalisation resulting in approximately A$42,102 in extra costs.1 Nevertheless, more than half (55%) of SSIs are avoidable, when infection control measures are complied with and adequate prevention guidelines are adopted.4,5

Prevention is absolutely still the key. The suture material used to close a wound can have a huge effect on the risk of infection, a concept that is not always recognised or widely promoted. However, one of the more innovative solutions already making a difference in clinical outcomes is the introduction of antibacterial sutures. Absorbable sutures with antibacterial protection are recommended for use as part of a bundle of care for preventing SSIs in wound closure after a surgical procedure.6

Using triclosan-coated sutures, as part of a bundle of care approach, can help reduce the risk of developing SSIs by 28%,7 from the meta-analysis study by de Jonge et al. (21 randomised controlled trials (RCT), 6462 patients, 95% CI: (14, 40%), P < 0.001). All triclosan-coated sutures in these RCT were Ethicon Plus Antibacterial Sutures (MONOCRYL™ Plus, VICRYL™ Plus, and PDS™ Plus). It is notable that Johnson & Johnson MedTech is driving the adoption of coated sutures by deciding to withdraw all non-antibacterial sutures from the Australian and New Zealand markets, effective 1 August 2024, in cases where they can be replaced with an antibacterial alternative. Prioritising this change and committing to using antibacterial sutures as part of a bundle of care approach in Australian hospitals has the potential to significantly reduce SSI infections, thereby improving patient care and clinical outcomes.

Data availability

Data sharing is not applicable as no new data were generated or analysed during this study.

Disclaimer

The views expressed in this publication are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily represent those of, and should not be attributed to the publisher, the journal owner or CSIRO.

Conflicts of interest

The author declares no conflicts of interest.

Declaration of funding

This research did not receive any specific funding.

References

Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Health Care. Selected best practices and suggestions for improvement for clinicians and health system managers. Hospital-Acquired Complication. 2018. Available at https://www.safetyandquality.gov.au/sites/default/files/migrated/Healthcare-associated-infection-detailed-fact-sheet.pdf [accessed 30 November 22].

Mangram AJ, Horan TC, Pearson ML, et al. Guideline for prevention of surgical site infection, 1999. Hospital Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 1999; 20(4): 247-278.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

Russo PL, Stewardson AJ, Cheng AC, et al. The prevalence of healthcare associated infections among adult inpatients at nineteen large Australian acute-care public hospitals: a point prevalence survey. Antimicrob Resist Infect Control 2019; 8: 114.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

Tsai DM, Caterson EJ. Current preventive measures for health-care associated surgical site infections: a review. Patient Saf Surg 2014; 8: 42.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

Umscheid CA, Mitchell MD, Doshi JA, Agarwal R, Williams K, Brennan PJ. Estimating the proportion of healthcare-associated infections that are reasonably preventable and the related mortality and costs. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2011; 32(2): 101-114.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

NICE. Medical Technology Guidance: Plus sutures for preventing surgical site infection. 2021. Available at https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/mtg59 [accessed March 2023].

de Jonge SW, Atema JJ, Solomkin JS, Boermeester MA. Meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis of triclosan-coated sutures for the prevention of surgical-site infection. Br J Surg 2017; 104: e118-e133.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |