Corrigendum to: Measuring clinician experience in value-based health care initiatives: a 10-item core clinician experience measure
Reema Harrison , Louise A Ellis , Maryam Sina , Ramya Walsan , Rebecca Mitchell , Ramesh Walpola , Glen Maberly , Catherine Chan and Liz Hay
Australian Health Review https://doi.org/10.1071/AH24003_CO
Published: 24 June 2024
This article corrects Australian Health Review 48, 140–166. doi:10.1071/AH24003
The authors regret that there was an error in Table 1. The correct Table 1 is shown below:
Table 1.
10-item clinician experience measure (CEM-10) domains and items.
| Domain | Items | |
|---|---|---|
| 1. Quality of care | 1. I am confident that I am able to provide high quality patient care. | |
| 2. I am able to be responsive to the needs of individual patients to create a positive patient experience | ||
| 3. I am able to provide care aligned with the currently accepted best practice | ||
| 2. Interprofessional collaboration | 4. My colleagues and I make changes to our working approaches based on each others feedback | |
| 5. My colleagues and I share decision-making power with each other | ||
| 3. Psychological safety | 6. Members of staff in my organisational unit are able to talk about problems and tough issues | |
| 7. I feel safe to present new ideas and challenges current practice in my organisational unit | ||
| 4. Clinician engagement | 8. I have the opportunity to participate in decision-making in my service/s | |
| 9. My voice is heard in the process of making change in my service/s | ||
| 10. My contributions are valued in decision making in my services |
