Register      Login
Australian Health Review Australian Health Review Society
Journal of the Australian Healthcare & Hospitals Association
RESEARCH ARTICLE (Open Access)

When we truly need single-use equipment, will we have enough? Single-use versus reusable anaesthesia equipment: a qualitative analysis of Western Australian hospitals

Justin Hii A , Mark Sharples A , Matthew Anstey A D and Forbes McGain C
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Hospital Avenue, Nedlands, Perth, WA 6009, Australia. Email: Justin.hii@health.wa.gov.au

B Royal Perth Hospital, Perth, GPO Box X2213, Perth, WA 6847, Australia. Email: Mark.sharples@health.wa.gov.au

C Western Health, PO Box 294, St Albans, Melbourne, Vic. 3021, Australia. Email: Forbes.mcgain@wh.org.au

D Corresponding author. Email: Matthew.anstey@health.wa.gov.au

Australian Health Review 44(3) 499-500 https://doi.org/10.1071/AH20101
Submitted: 14 May 2020  Accepted: 14 May 2020   Published: 29 May 2020

Journal Compilation © AHHA 2020 Open Access CC BY

The COVID-19 pandemic has exposed fragilities in the global medical equipment supply chain, most notably with regard to personal protective equipment (PPE). Some countries have compensated for shortages by reusing equipment designed for single use, leading to potential issues with inadequate decontamination.13 In addition, some guidelines have advocated the preferential selection of single-use airway equipment over reusable to mitigate the risk of cross-contamination, again leading to availability and sustainability issues.2,3 A combination of multiple- and single-use equipment would alleviate some pressure on supply chains, balancing resource and infection risk implications provided that reusable equipment can be adequately decontaminated according to manufacturer specifications.2,4

We conducted a survey across 17 Western Australian metropolitan private and public hospitals to assess rates of single-use compared with reusable anaesthesia equipment from September 2019 to January 2020, with a focus on airway equipment. Questionnaires were emailed to heads of department or anaesthetist equipment representatives and chief anaesthesia nurses and technicians. This audit received ethics approval as a quality improvement project at Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital via the Governance, Evidence, Knowledge and Outcomes (GEKO) system.

The response rate was 76.6%, with 23 individual respondents from 13 hospitals. Of the hospitals surveyed, 21.7% used single-use laryngoscope blades, with 8.7% using single-use laryngoscope handles and 87% using only single-use laryngeal mask airways. All hospitals (100%) used single-use face masks. The major drivers for a preference for disposable equipment were cost, convenience and cross-contamination risk.

The results of the survey, conducted before the COVID-19 pandemic, demonstrated a reliance on single-use airway equipment. Patient and staff safety, efficacy, user friendliness and upfront and ongoing costs in equipment procurement are essential factors, but ongoing availability and environmental effects are also important considerations. The consideration of reusable anaesthesia equipment may minimise reliance on supply chains, as well as providing cost-saving benefits and waste reduction while not compromising safety if equipment is adequately decontaminated.5 The COVID-19 pandemic has forced many anaesthetic teams to look at optimising their use of PPE and equipment, recognising that reducing wastage can prolong supply. After COVID-19, the anaesthetic community could contribute to ensuring future equipment availability by reconsidering routine use and dependence on single-use items and incorporating environmental assessments into procurement decisions.6


Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.



Acknowledgements

This research did not receive any specific funding.


References

[1]  Cook TM, El-Boghdadly K, McGuire B, McNarry AF, Patel A, Higgs A. Consensus guidelines for managing the airway in patients with COVID-19. Guidelines from the Difficult Airway Society, the Association of Anaesthetists, the Intensive Care Society, the Faculty of Intensive Care Medicine and the Royal College of Anaesthetists. Anaesthesia 2020; 75 785–99.
Consensus guidelines for managing the airway in patients with COVID-19. Guidelines from the Difficult Airway Society, the Association of Anaesthetists, the Intensive Care Society, the Faculty of Intensive Care Medicine and the Royal College of Anaesthetists.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 32221970PubMed |

[2]  Kobayashi LM, Marins BR, dos Dantos Costa PC, Perazzo H, Castro R. Extended use or reuse of N95 respirators during COVID-19 pandemic: an overview of national regulatory authorities’ recommendations. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2020;
Extended use or reuse of N95 respirators during COVID-19 pandemic: an overview of national regulatory authorities’ recommendations.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 32319884PubMed |

[3]  Anesthesia Patient Safety Foundation. FAQ on anaesthesia machine use, protection, and decontamination during the COVID-19 pandemic. 2020. Available at: https://www.apsf.org/faq-on-anesthesia-machine-use-protection-and-decontamination-during-the-covid-19-pandemic/ [verified April 2020].

[4]  Brewster DJ, Chrimes N, Do TBT, Fraser K, Groombridge CJ, Higgs A, Humar MJ, Leeuwenburg TJ, McGloughlin S, Newman FG, Nickson CP, Rehak A, Vokes D, Gatward JJ. Consensus statement: Safe Airway Society principles of airway management and tracheal intubation specific to the COVID-19 adult patient group. Med J Aust 2020;
Consensus statement: Safe Airway Society principles of airway management and tracheal intubation specific to the COVID-19 adult patient group.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 32356900PubMed |

[5]  McGain F, Ma SCY, Burrell RH, Percival VG, Roessler P, Weatherall WD, Weber IA, Kayak EA. Why be sustainable? The Australian and New Zealand College of Anaesthetists Professional Document PS64: Statement of Environmental Sustainability in Anaesthesia and Pain Medicine Practice and its accompanying background paper. Anaesth Intensive Care 2019; 47 413–22.
Why be sustainable? The Australian and New Zealand College of Anaesthetists Professional Document PS64: Statement of Environmental Sustainability in Anaesthesia and Pain Medicine Practice and its accompanying background paper.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 31684744PubMed |

[6]  Livingston E, Desai A, Berkwits M. Sourcing personal protective equipment during the COVID-19 pandemic. JAMA 2020; 323 1912–1914.
Sourcing personal protective equipment during the COVID-19 pandemic.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |