Articles citing this paper
Designing a funding system for rehabilitation services Part 2 achieving efficiency and quality of care
Stephen Duckett, Len Gray and Anna Howe
18(4) pp.62 - 77
8 articles found in Crossref database.
The Effect of the Introduction of a Case-Mix−Based Funding Model of Rehabilitation for Severe Stroke: An Australian Experience
Brock Kim A.,
Vale Stephen J., Cotton Susan M.
Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. 2007 88(7). p.827
A therapy-relevant casemix classification system for school-age children with disabilities
Dyson Maree,
Duckett Stephen J., Allen Felicity C.L.
Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. 2000 81(5). p.634
Resource allocation for community-based therapy
Murchland Sonya, Wake-Dyster Wendy
Disability and Rehabilitation. 2006 28(22). p.1425
Have we come full circle?
Hanson Ralph
Medical Journal of Australia. 1998 168(11). p.561
Selecting Patients for Rehabilitation After Acute Stroke: Are There Variations in Practice?
Ilett Paul A.,
Brock Kim A.,
Graven Christine J., Cotton Susan M.
Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. 2010 91(5). p.788
Balance and mobility outcomes for stroke patients: a comprehensive audit
Hill Kieth,
Ellis Paul,
Bernhardt Julie,
Maggs Patricia, Hull Susan
Australian Journal of Physiotherapy. 1997 43(3). p.173
Toward a New Payment System for Inpatient Rehabilitation
Saitto Carlo,
Marino Claudia,
Fusco Danilo,
Arcà Massimo, Perucci Carlo A.
Medical Care. 2005 43(9). p.856
Subacute casemix classification for stroke rehabilitation in Australia. How well does AN-SNAP v2 explain variance in outcomes?
Kohler Friedbert,
Renton Roger,
Dickson Hugh G.,
Estell John, Connolly Carol E.
Australian Health Review. 2011 35(1). p.1
