Register      Login
Australian Health Review Australian Health Review Society
Journal of the Australian Healthcare & Hospitals Association
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Trial of labour versus elective repeat caesarean section:A cost-effectiveness analysis

Allison Shorten, Donald E Lewis and Brett Shorten

Australian Health Review 21(1) 8 - 28
Published: 1998

Abstract

For subsequent births, women who have experienced previous caesarean section facea choice between elective caesarean section and trial of labour. The study reported inthis paper utilises Australian hospital data to compare birth outcomes and healthsystem costs of these two options. Although trial of labour is more expensive if the resultis an emergency caesarean section, high rates of successful vaginal delivery mean that,overall, trial of labour is found to be 30- per cent less expensive than elective caesareansection. It is estimated that trial of labour remains the most cost-effective option aslong as less than 68- per cent of women require emergency caesarean section. This studyhighlights the potential importance of more accurate information about a broaderrange of costs and outcomes in order for stronger conclusions to be drawn.

https://doi.org/10.1071/AH980008

© AHHA 1998

Committee on Publication Ethics

PDF (266 KB) Export Citation

Share

Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on LinkedIn Share via Email

View Dimensions

View Altmetrics