Patient experiences and outcomes in a South Australian stand-alone Hospital in the Home program
Timothy J. Schultz
A * , Candice Oster B , Aubyn Pincombe A , Andrew Partington A , Alan Taylor A , Jodi Gray A , Alicia Murray C , Jennifer McInnes C , Cassandra Ryan C and Jonathan Karnon A
A
B
C
Abstract
This study aimed to compare clinical outcomes for patients admitted to Hospital in the Home (HITH) and traditional (bricks-and-mortar) hospitals and explore patient and carer experiences.
A mixed methods approach including triangulation of quantitative and qualitative data was used. Quantitative outcomes were compared using augmented inverse propensity weighting to adjust for differences in patient characteristics between groups. Qualitative data was collected by focus groups and interviews and analysed using reflexive thematic analysis. The study took place in metropolitan Adelaide and one adjacent regional health network in 2020–22. Participants were patients discharged from either hospital setting with 1 of 22 eligible diagnoses. Hospital administrative data informed a comparison of outcomes that included mortality, rate of emergency department re-presentations and re-admissions, length of stay and incidence of complications.
Patients treated in HITH were less unwell than traditional hospital patients. There were no safety or quality concerns identified in the clinical outcomes. Of 2095 HITH patients, the in-patient mortality rate was 0.2%, and 2.3% experienced a return to a bricks-and-mortar hospital during the HITH admission. For HITH patients, the mortality rate after 30 days was lower (−1.3%, 95% CI −2 to −0.5, P = 0.002), as were re-presentations in 28 days (−7.2%, 95% CI −9.5 to −5, P < 0.0001), re-admissions in 28 days (−4.9%, 95% CI −6.7 to −3.2, P < 0.001) and complications (−0.6%, 95% CI −0.8 to −0.5, P < 0.001). Interviews of 35 patients and six carers found that HITH was highly accepted and preferred by patients. HITH was perceived to free up resources for other, more acutely unwell patients.
HITH was preferred by patients and at least as effective in delivering quality health care as a traditional hospital, although the potential for unobserved confounding must be acknowledged.
Keywords: acceptability of health care, health services research, hospital, hospital-at-home, Hospital in the Home, model of care, quality and safety, routinely collected health data.
References
1 Shepperd S, Iliffe S, Doll HA, et al. Admission avoidance hospital at home. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2016; 9: CD007491.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
2 Arsenault-Lapierre G, Henein M, Gaid D, et al. Hospital-at-Home Interventions vs In-Hospital Stay for Patients With Chronic Disease Who Present to the Emergency Department: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. JAMA Netw Open 2021; 4: e2111568.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
3 Curioni C, Silva AC, Damião J, et al. The Cost-Effectiveness of Homecare Services for Adults and Older Adults: A Systematic Review. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2023; 20(4): 3373.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
4 Leong MQ, Lim CW, Lai YF. Comparison of Hospital-at-Home models: a systematic review of reviews. BMJ Open 2021; 11: e043285.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
5 Sriskandarajah S, Hobbs J, Roughead E, et al. Safety and effectiveness of ‘hospital in the home’ and ‘outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy’ in different age groups: A systematic review of observational studies. Int J Clin Pract 2018; 72: e13216.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
6 Varney J, Weiland TJ, Jelinek G. Efficacy of hospital in the home services providing care for patients admitted from emergency departments: an integrative review. Int J Evid Based Healthc 2014; 12: 128-141.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
7 Qaddoura A, Yazdan-Ashoori P, Kabali C, et al. Efficacy of Hospital at Home in Patients with Heart Failure: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. PLoS One 2015; 10: e0129282.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
8 Gonçalves-Bradley DC, Iliffe S, Doll HA, et al. Early discharge hospital at home. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2017; 6: CD000356.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
9 Jeppesen E, Brurberg KG, Vist GE, et al. Hospital at home for acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2012; CD003573.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
10 Ojoo JC, Moon T, McGlone S, et al. Patients’ and carers’ preferences in two models of care for acute exacerbations of COPD: results of a randomised controlled trial. Thorax 2002; 57: 167-169.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
11 Chua CMS, Ko SQ, Lai YF, et al. Perceptions of Hospital-at-Home Among Stakeholders: a Meta-synthesis. J Gen Intern Med 2022; 37: 637-650.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
12 SA Health. My Home Hospital. 2022. Available at https://www.sahealth.sa.gov.au/wps/wcm/connect/public+content/sa+health+internet/services/hospitals/my+home+hospital/my+home+hospital. [accessed 14 November 2022].
13 O’Cathain A, Murphy E, Nicholl J. Three techniques for integrating data in mixed methods studies. BMJ 2010; 341: c4587.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
14 Sekhon M, Cartwright M, Francis JJ. Acceptability of healthcare interventions: an overview of reviews and development of a theoretical framework. BMC Health Serv Res 2017; 17: 88.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
15 Rubin DB, van der Laan MJ. Empirical Efficiency Maximization: Improved Locally Efficient Covariate Adjustment in Randomized Experiments and Survival Analysis. Int J Biostat 2008; 4: 5.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
16 Tan Z. Bounded, efficient and doubly robust estimation with inverse weighting. Biometrika 2010; 97: 661-682.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
17 Imbens GW. The Role of the Propensity Score in Estimating Dose-Response Functions. Biometrika 2000; 87: 706-710.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
18 Robins JM, Hernán MÁ, Brumback B. Marginal Structural Models and Causal Inference in Epidemiology. Epidemiology 2000; 11: 550-560.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
19 Brookhart MA, Stürmer T, Glynn RJ, et al. Confounding control in healthcare database research: challenges and potential approaches. Med Care 2010; 48: S114-S120.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
20 Department of Health and Aged Care. COVID-19 reporting. 2023. Available at https://www.health.gov.au/topics/covid-19/reporting?language=und#covid19-impact-on-hospitals. [accessed 20 December 2023].
21 Leine M, Wahl AK, Borge CR, et al. Feeling safe and motivated to achieve better health: Experiences with a partnership-based nursing practice programme for in-home patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. J Clin Nurs 2017; 26: 2755-2764.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
22 Schofield I, Knussen C, Tolson D. A mixed method study to compare use and experience of hospital care and a nurse-led acute respiratory assessment service offering home care to people with an acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Int J Nurs Stud 2006; 43: 465-476.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
23 Wang Y, Haugen T, Steihaug S, et al. Patients with acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease feel safe when treated at home: a qualitative study. BMC Pulm Med 2012; 12: 45.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
24 Wang X, Stewart C, Lee G. Patients’ and caregivers’ perceptions of the quality of hospital-at-home service: A scoping review. J Clin Nurs 2024; 33: 817-838.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
