Clinical care ratios for allied health practitioners: an update and implications for workforce planning

Cherie Hearn; Julie-Anne Ross; Adam Govier; Adam Ivan Semciw

doi:10.1071/AH24079

RESEARCH ARTICLE (Open Access)

Previous Next Contents Vol 48(5)

Clinical care ratios for allied health practitioners: an update and implications for workforce planning

Cherie Hearn

^A ^* , Julie-Anne Ross

^B , Adam Govier ^C and Adam Ivan Semciw

^D ^E

+ Author Affiliations

- Author Affiliations

^A Physiotherapy Department, Division of Allied Health and Rehabilitation, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Metro South Health, Brisbane, Qld, Australia.

^B Department of Allied Health, Division of Allied Health and Rehabilitation, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, Qld, Australia.

^C Department of Allied Health, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Central Adelaide Local Health Network, Adelaide, SA, Australia.

^D School of Allied Health, Human Services and Sport, La Trobe University, Bundoora, Vic, Australia.

^E Department of Allied Health, Northern Health, Epping, Vic, Australia.

^* Correspondence to: cherie.hearn@health.qld.gov.au

Australian Health Review 48(5) 562-568 https://doi.org/10.1071/AH24079

Submitted: 3 April 2024 Accepted: 3 July 2024 Published: 22 July 2024

© 2024 The Author(s) (or their employer(s)). Published by CSIRO Publishing on behalf of AHHA. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND)

Abstract

Objective

Clinical care ratios are used to quantify and benchmark the activity of allied health professionals. This study aims to review previous recommendations and identify what variables may influence them.

Method

Data was collected from the core allied health professions (audiology, nutrition and dietetics, occupational therapy, physiotherapy, podiatry, prosthetics and orthotics, psychology, social work and speech pathology) across eight Australian hospitals. Data for 113 staff who were casual or from smaller professions (audiology, podiatry, prosthetics and orthotics and psychology) were excluded due to insufficient numbers for analysis. The remaining data were analysed according to profession, seniority (tiers 1, 2 and 3) and employment status (permanent versus casual staff). A two-way ANOVA was performed to assess the association of clinical care ratios with tier, profession, employment status and gender.

Results

Data from 1246 staff from the five larger professions at participating hospitals were analysed. There were no interactions between profession and gender (P = 0.185) or employment status (P = 0.412). The relationship between clinical care ratio and profession was modified by tier (interaction term, P = 0.014), meaning that differences in clinical care ratios between professions depended on the tier.

Conclusion

This research has confirmed that clinical care ratios are a useful tool in workload management and determining staffing levels for allied health professionals. The recommendations from this research provide a starting point that can be finessed with reference to profession, model of care, workforce structure, governance and training requirements. This will lead to increased staff wellbeing and improved patient outcomes.

Keywords: allied health, benchmarking, caseload, clinical care, clinical care ratio, staffing ratios, workforce planning, workload.

References

1 PWC. Planning for the healthcare workforce of the future. 2024. Available at https://www.pwc.com.au/health/health-matters/workforce-healthcare.html

2 Schoo AM, Boyce RA, Ridoutt L, Santos T. Workload capacity measures for estimating allied health staffing requirements. Aust Health Rev 2008; 32(3): 548-58.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

3 Australian Government. Issues Paper: Allied health workforce data gap analysis. Department of Health NSW: Australian Government; 2022.

4 Solomon D, Graves N, Catherwood J. Allied health growth: what we do not measure we cannot manage. Hum Resour Health 2015; 13: 32.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

5 Fraher EP. An international call to arms to improve allied health workforce planning. J Allied Health 2011; 40: 43-9.
| Google Scholar | PubMed |

6 Cartmill L, Comans TA, Clark MJ, Ash S, Sheppard L. Using staffing ratios for workforce planning: evidence on nine allied health professions. Hum Resour Health 2012; 10: 2.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

7 Nancarrow S. Why is it so difficult to understand and plan the allied health workforce In Australia – and what is the solution? 2022. Available at https://ahpworkforce.com/workforce-planning/challenges-understanding-and-planning-the-allied-health-workforce-in-australia/ [updated 15 February 2022].

8 Simmons NC, Kuys SS. Trial of an allied health workload allocation model. Aust Health Rev 2011; 35(2): 168-75.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

9 New Zealand Government, Maori Health Authority. Health workforce plan 2023/24. Wellington: Health New Zealand; 2023.

10 Allied Health Professions Australia. Collection of allied health data. 2023. Available at https://ahpa.com.au/advocacy-priorities/collection-of-allied-health-data/

11 Scottish Executive National Health System. Allied Health Professions Workload Measurement and Management. Edinburgh: Scottish Executive; 2006.

12 Lauriers D. The caseload management planning tool: a resource for allied health professionals. Occup Ther 2011; 13(4): 18-9.
| Google Scholar |

13 Roth L, Le Saux C, Gilles I, Peytremann-Bridevaux I. Factors associated with intent to leave the profession for the allied health workforce: a rapid review. Med Care Res Rev 2024; 81(1): 3-18.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

14 Adams R. Progress in the development of recommended staffing levels for rural physiotherapy services. Services for Australian Rural and Remote Allied Health (SARRAH) National Conference, 26–28 August 2004. Alice Springs, Northern Territory, Australia; 2004. Available at https://www.researchgate.net/publication/237295051_Progress_in_the_development_of_recommended_staffing_levels_for_rural_physiotherapy_services

15 National Health Service. Job planning the clinical workforce – allied health professionals: A best practice guide. 2019. Available at https://www.england.nhs.uk/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/ahps-job-planning-best-practice-guide-2019.pdf

16 Hearn C, Govier A, Semciw AI. Clinical care ratios: quantifying clinical versus non-clinical care for allied health professions. Aust Health Rev 2017; 41: 321-6.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

17 National Allied Health Casemix Committee. Standards for Benchmarking Allied Health Services. Melbourne: RMIT University; 2003.

18 Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. Allied health non-individual patient attributable and clinical support activity NBPDS. In: Australian Institute of Health and Welfare, editor. Meteor Metadata Online Registry. Australian Government; 2018.

19 Stewart-Lord A, Beanlands C, Khine R, Shamah S, Sinclair N, Woods S, et al. The Role and Development of Advanced Clinical Practice Within Allied Health Professions: A Mixed Method Study. J Multidiscip Healthc 2020; 13: 1705-15.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

20 Raymer M, Swete Kelly P, O’Leary S. Developing and embedding an advanced practice musculoskeletal physiotherapy service in public specialist outpatient services in Queensland: A health service masterclass. Musculoskelet Sci Pract 2024; 70: 102917.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

21 HealthWork AHP Workforce. How Stealth Rationing and Bureaucracy Creep Are Reducing Your Allied Health Workforce Capacity. 2024. Available at https://ahpworkforce.com/workforce-planning/stealth-rationing-of-allied-health-services/?trk=article-ssr-frontend-pulse_little-text-block