Investigating allied health professionals’ attitudes, perceptions and acceptance of an electronic medical record using the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology
Alison Qvist A , Leanne Mullan
B C * , Lemai Nguyen D , Karen Wynter B I , Bodil Rasmussen B E F G , Min Goh A and Kath Feely A H
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
H
I
Abstract
This study aimed to investigate allied health professionals’ (AHPs’) perspectives pre- and post-implementation of an electronic medical record (EMR) in a tertiary health service in Australia and examine factors influencing user acceptance.
Data were collected pre- and post-EMR implementation via cross-sectional online surveys based on the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Usage of Technology (UTAUT). All AHPs at a large tertiary hospital were invited to complete the surveys. Data analysis included descriptive analysis, Mann–Whitney U tests for pre-post item- and construct-level comparison and content analysis of free-text responses. The theoretical model was empirically tested using partial least squares structural equation modelling.
AHPs had positive attitudes toward EMR use both pre- and post-implementation. Compared to pre-implementation, AHPs felt more positive post-implementation about system ease of use and demonstrated decreased anxiety and apprehension regarding EMR use. AHPs felt they had adequate resources and knowledge to use EMR and reported real-time data accessibility as a main advantage. Disadvantages of EMR included an unfriendly user interface, system outages and decreased efficiency.
As AHPs increase EMR system familiarity, their positivity towards its use increases. An understanding of what influences AHPs when implementing new compulsory technology can inform change management strategies to improve adoption.
Keywords: allied health, allied health clinical informatics, allied health professional, electronic health record, electronic medical record, EMR, hospital, physiotherapist, technology, Unified Theory of Technology.
References
1 Baumann LA, Baker J, Elshaug AG. The impact of electronic health record systems on clinical documentation times: A systematic review. Health Policy 2018; 122(8): 827-836.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
2 Woods L, Eden R, Canfell OJ, Nguyen KH, Comans T, Sullivan C. Show me the money: how do we justify spending health care dollars on digital health? Med J Aust 2023; 218(2): 53-57.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
3 Sly B, Russell AW, Sullivan C. Digital interventions to improve safety and quality of inpatient diabetes management: A systematic review. Int J Med Inform 2022; 157: 104596.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
4 Austin JA, Barras MA, Woods LS, Sullivan CM. The effect of digitization on the safe management of anticoagulants. Appl Clin Inform 2022; 13(4): 845-856.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
5 Hodgson T, Burton-Jones A, Donovan R, Sullivan C. The role of electronic medical records in reducing unwarranted clinical variation in acute health care: systematic review. JMIR Med Inform 2021; 9(11): e30432.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
6 Sutton RT, Pincock D, Baumgart DC, Sadowski DC, Fedorak RN, Kroeker KI. An overview of clinical decision support systems: benefits, risks, and strategies for success. NPJ Digit Med 2020; 3(17): 17.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
7 Campanella P, Lovato E, Marone C, Fallacara L, Mancuso A, Ricciardi W, Specchia ML. The impact of electronic health records on healthcare quality: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Public Health 2016; 26(1): 60-64.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
8 Roberts DL, Noble BN, Wright MJ, Nelson EA, Shaft JD, Rakela J. Impact of computerized provider order entry on hospital medical errors. J Clin Outcomes Manage 2013; 20(3): 109-115.
| Google Scholar |
9 McCarthy B, Fitzgerald S, O’Shea M, Condon C, Hartnett-Collins G, Clancy M, Sheehy A, Denieffe S, Bergin M, Savage E. Electronic nursing documentation interventions to promote or improve patient safety and quality care: A systematic review. J Nurs Manag 2019; 27(3): 491-501.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
10 Menachemi N, Collum TH. Benefits and drawbacks of electronic health record systems. Risk Manag Healthc Policy 2011; 4: 47-55.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
11 Ross J, Stevenson F, Lau R, Murray E. Factors that influence the implementation of e-health: a systematic review of systematic reviews (an update). Implementation Sci 2016; 11: 146.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
12 Ajami S, Bagheri-Tadi T. Barriers for adopting electronic health records (EHRs) by physicians. Acta Inform Med 2013; 21(2): 129-134.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
13 Wynter K, Holton S, Nguyen L, Sinnott H, Wickramasinghe N, Crowe S, Rasmussen B. Nurses’ and midwives’ experiences of the first phase of the implementation of an electronic medical records system. Aust Health Rev 2021; 46(2): 188-196.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
14 Hennington A, Janz BD. Information systems and healthcare XVI: physician adoption of electronic medical records: applying the UTAUT model in a healthcare context. Commun Assoc Inf Sys 2007; 19(1): 5.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
15 Venkatesh V, Morris MG, Davis FD, Davis GB. User acceptance of information technology: toward a unified view. MIS Q 2003; 27: 425-478.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
16 Dwivedi YK, Rana NP, Jeyaraj A, Clement M, Williams MD. Re-examining the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT): Towards a Revised Theoretical Model. Inf Syst Front 2019; 21(3): 719-734.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
17 Venkatesh V, Thong JYL, Xu X. Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology: a synthesis and the road ahead. J Assoc Inf Syst 2016; 17(5): 328-376.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
18 Janssen A, Donnelly C, Elder E, Pathmanathan N, Shaw T. Electronic medical record implementation in tertiary care: factors influencing adoption of an electronic medical record in a cancer centre. BMC Health Serv Res 2021; 21: 23.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
19 Kim S, Lee KH, Hwang H, Yoo S. Analysis of the factors influencing healthcare professionals’ adoption of mobile electronic medical record (EMR) using the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology (UTAUT) in a tertiary hospital. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2015; 16: 12.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
20 Maillet É, Mathieu L, Sicotte C. Modeling factors explaining the acceptance, actual use and satisfaction of nurses using an Electronic Patient Record in acute care settings: An extension of the UTAUT. Int J Med Inform 2015; 84(1): 36-47.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
21 Chau PYK, Hu PJ. Examining a model of information technology acceptance by individual professionals: an exploratory study. J Manage Inf Sy 2002; 18(4): 191-229.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
22 Mishra V, Liebovitz D, Quinn M, Kang L, Yackel T, Hoyt R. Factors that influence clinician experience with electronic health records. Perspect Health Inf Manag 2002; 19(1): 1f.
| Google Scholar |
23 Holtz B, Krein S. Understanding nurse perceptions of a newly implemented electronic medical record system. J Technol Hum Serv 2011; 29(4): 247-262.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
24 McGinn CA, Grenier S, Duplantie J, Shaw N, Sicotte C, Mathieu L, Leduc Y, Légaré F, Gagnon MP. Comparison of user groups’ perspectives of barriers and facilitators to implementing electronic health records: a systematic review. BMC Med 2011; 9: 46.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
25 Shaker HA, Farooq MU, Dhafar KO. Physicians’ perception about electronic medical record system in Makkah Region, Saudi Arabia. Avicenna J Med 2015; 5(1): 1-5.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
26 Lambooij MS, Drewes HW, Koster F. Use of electronic medical records and quality of patient data: different reaction patterns of doctors and nurses to the hospital organization. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2017; 17(1): 17.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
27 Tubaishat A. Evaluation of electronic health record implementation in hospitals. Comput Inform Nurs 2017; 35(7): 364-372.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
28 Strudwick G, McGillis Hall L, Nagle L, Trbovich P. Acute care nurses’ perceptions of electronic health record use: A mixed method study. Nurs Open 2018; 5(4): 491-500.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
29 Hung S-Y, Nakayama M, Chen CC, Tsai F-L. Physician perceptions of electronic medical records: the impact of system service quality, and generation/experience gaps. Int J Healthc Technol Manage 2019; 17(4): 229-254.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
30 Jebwab RM, Manias E, Hutchinson A, Dobroff N, Redley B. Understanding nurses’ perceptions of barriers and enablers to use of a new electronic medical record system in Australia: a qualitative study. Int J Med Inform 2022; 158: 10654.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
31 Allied Health Professions Australia. Allied health professions. Allied Health Professions; 2022. Available at https://ahpa.com.au/allied-health-professions/ [verified 10 November 2022].
32 Eden R, Burton-Jones A, Grant J, Collins R, Staib A, Sullivan C. Digitising an Australian university hospital: qualitative analysis of staff-reported impacts. Aust Health Rev 2020; 44(5): 677-689.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
33 Eden R, Burton-Jones A, Staib A, Sullivan C. Surveying perceptions of the early impacts of an integrated electronic medical record across a hospital and healthcare service. Aust Health Rev 2020; 44(5): 690-698.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
34 Schaper LK, Pervan GP (editors) An investigation of factors affecting technology acceptance and use decisions by Australian allied health therapists. 40th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS'07). IEEE; 2007. 10.1109/HICSS.2007.69
35 Schwarz M, Coccetti A, Draheim M, Gordon G. Perceptions of allied health staff of the implementation of an integrated electronic medical record across regional and metropolitan settings. Aust Health Rev 2020; 44(6): 965-972.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
36 Maunder K, Walton K, Williams P, Ferguson M, Beck E, Ayre E, Hoggle L. Uptake of nutrition informatics in Australia compared with the USA. Nutr Diet 2015; 72: 291-298.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
37 Victoria State Government Health and Human Services. Allied health: therapy and science disciplines – position paper. 2016. March 30. Available at https://content.health.vic.gov.au/sites/default/files/migrated/files/collections/policies-and-guidelines/a/ah-position-paper---categories.pdf
38 Benitez J, Henseler J, Castillo A, Schubert F. How to perform and report an impactful analysis using partial least squares: Guidelines for confirmatory and explanatory IS research. Inf Manage 2020; 57(2): 103168.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
40 Hair JF, Risher JJ, Sarstedt M, Ringle CM. When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM. Eur Bus Rev 2019; 31(1): 2-24.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
41 Hossain A, Quaresma R, Rahman H. Investigating factors influencing the physicians’ adoption of electronic health record (HER) in healthcare system of Bangladesh: An empirical study. Int J Inf Manage 2019; 44: 76-87.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
42 Ho KF, Chang PC, Kurniasari MD, Susanty S, Chung MH. Determining factors affecting nurses’ acceptance of a care plan system using a modified technology acceptance model 3: structural equation model with cross-sectional data. Int J Med Inform 2020; 8(5): e15686.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
43 Luyten J, Marneffe W. Examining the acceptance of an integrated electronic health records system: Insights from a repeated cross-sectional design. Int J Med Inform 2021; 150: 104450.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
44 Wang H, Tao D, Yu N, Qu X. Understanding consumer acceptance of healthcare wearable devices: An integrated model of UTAUT and TTF. Int J Med Inform 2020; 139: 104156.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
45 Ringle CM, Wende S, Becker JM. SmartPLS 3. Boenningstedt: SmartPLS GmbH; 2015. Available at http://www.smartpls.com
46 Braun V, Clarke V. Thematic analysis. In: Cooper H, Camic PM, Long DL, Panter AT, Rindskopf D, Sher KJ, editors. APA handbook of research methods in psychology, Vol. 2. Research designs: Quantitative, qualitative, neuropsychological, and biological. American Psychological Association; 2012. pp. 57–71.
47 Department of Health and Aged Care. Factsheet, allied health 2019. Australian Government; 2021. Available at https://hwd.health.gov.au/resources/publications/factsheet-alld-2019.html
49 Carayon P, Cartmill R, Blosky MA, Brown R, Hackenberg M, Hoonakker P, Hundt AS, Norfolk T, et al. ICU nurses; acceptance of electronic health records. J Am Med Inf Assoc 2011; 18(6): 812-819.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
50 De Veer AJ, Francke AL. Attitudes of nursing staff towards electronic patient records: a questionnaire survey. Int J Nurs Stud 2010; 47(7): 846-854.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
51 Hackl WO, Hoerbst A, Ammenwerth E. “Why the hell do we need electronic health records?”: EHR acceptance among physicians in private practice in Austria: a qualitative study. Methods Inf Med 2011; 50(1): 53-61.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
52 Nguyen L, Bellucci E, Nguyen LT. Electronic health records implementation: An evaluation of information system impact and contingency factors. Int J Med Inform 2014; 83: 779-796.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
53 Sequist TD, Cullen T, Hays H, Taualii MM, Simon SR, Bates DW. Implementation and use of an electronic health record within the Indian Health Service. J Am Med Inf Assoc 2007; 14(2): 191-197.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
54 Brandsma T, Stoffers J, Schrijver I. Advanced technology use by care professionals. Inter J Environ Res Public Health 2020; 17(3): 742.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
55 Sligo J, Gauld R, Roberts V, Villa L. A literature review for large-scale health information system project planning, implementation and evaluation. Int J Med Inform 2017; 97: 86-97.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
56 Fennelly O, Cunningham C, Grogan L, Cronin H, O’Shea C, Roche M, Lawlor F, O’Hare N. Successfully implementing a national electronic health record: a rapid umbrella review. Int J Med Inform 2020; 144: 104281.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
57 Aboueid S, Pouliot C, Hermosura BJ, Bourgeault I, Giroux I. Dietitians’ perspectives on the impact of multidisciplinary teams and electronic medical records on dietetic practice for weight management. Can J Diet Pract Res 2020; 81(1): 2-7.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
58 Bossen C, Jensen LG, Udsen FW. Evaluation of a comprehensive EHR based on the DeLone and McLean model for IS success: approach, results, and success factors. Int J Med Inform 2013; 82(10): 940-953.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
59 Shachak A, Kuziemsky C, Petersen C. Beyond TAM and UTAUT: future directions for HIT implementation research. J Biomed Inform 2019; 100: 103315.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
60 Allied Health Professionals Australia. About AHPA. 2023. Available at https://ahpa.com.au/about-ahpa/#:~:text=Allied%20health%20professionals%20represent%20almost%20a%20third%20of,and%20deliver%20over%20200%20million%20health%20services%20annually
61 Heinsch M, Wyllie J, Carlson J, Wells H, Tickner C, Kay-Lambkin F. Theories informing ehealth implementation: systematic review and typology classification. J Med Internet Res 2021; 23(5): e18500.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
62 Blut M, Chong AYL, Tsigna Z, Venkatesh V. Meta-analysis of the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT): challenging its validity and charting a research agenda in the red ocean. J Assoc Inf Syst 2022; 23(1): 13-95.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
