Free Standard AU & NZ Shipping For All Book Orders Over $80!
Register      Login
Australian Health Review Australian Health Review Society
Journal of the Australian Healthcare & Hospitals Association
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Evaluating the impact of junior doctors in quality improvement – a 10-year review

Charlotte Anne O’Leary https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1817-1524 A * , Laura Piu A and George Braitberg https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4013-3364 B C
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Quality Improvement and Patient Experience, The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, Vic., Australia.

B Department of Critical Care, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Vic., Australia.

C Austin Health, Heidelberg, Vic., Australia.

* Correspondence to: charlotte.a.oleary@gmail.com

Australian Health Review 47(4) 441-447 https://doi.org/10.1071/AH23037
Submitted: 9 October 2022  Accepted: 12 June 2023   Published: 4 July 2023

© 2023 The Author(s) (or their employer(s)). Published by CSIRO Publishing on behalf of AHHA.

Abstract

Objectives The importance of engaging junior doctors in quality improvement (QI) initiatives is well recognised. Junior doctors bring fresh perspectives and engage closely with patients, consumers, families and the healthcare team. They are well positioned to recognise inefficiencies in the system that may compromise safe, timely and effective care. To promote QI participation by our junior doctors our organisation created a specific role; the Improvement House Medical Officer (IHMO). The objective of this study is to describe and evaluate the IHMO rotation at the Royal Melbourne Hospital, a large tertiary hospital in Australia.

Methods A mixed-methods study was performed that involved a survey of previous IHMOs since 2011, including a review of the major QI projects undertaken by IHMOs.

Results Twenty-seven out of 40 IHMOs completed the survey. Doctors were attracted to the rotation to make an impact on the working conditions of junior doctors (selected by 20 respondents, 74%) and improve the quality of health care experienced by patients (18, 67%). Most respondents strongly agreed or agreed (22, 82%) that they used the skills gained in the rotation in their ongoing work. More than 40 QI projects have been led or co-led by IHMOs since 2011. Challenges of the role included the short timeframe of the rotation and the perceived slow pace of institutional change. Respondents found engaging other junior doctors with QI and understanding the hospital’s organisational structure to be barriers.

Conclusions The full engagement of junior doctors in QI upholds a healthcare culture that celebrates innovation and promotes patient safety. The IHMO rotation offers an immersive, experiential and impactful way to do so.

Keywords: education and training, governance, health services management, hospitals, quality and safety, medical services, multidisciplinary care, organisational culture.


References

[1]  Till A, Banerjee J, McKimm J. Supporting the engagement of doctors in training in quality improvement and patient safety. Br J Hosp Med 2015; 76 166–9.
Supporting the engagement of doctors in training in quality improvement and patient safety.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[2]  Lemer C, Moss F. Patient safety and junior doctors: are we missing the obvious? BMJ Qual Saf 2013; 22 8–10.
Patient safety and junior doctors: are we missing the obvious?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[3]  Ibrahim JE, Jeffcott S, Davis MC, et al. Recognizing junior doctors’ potential contribution to patient safety and health care quality improvement. J Health Organ Manag 2013; 27 273–86.
Recognizing junior doctors’ potential contribution to patient safety and health care quality improvement.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[4]  Francis R. Report of the Mid Staffordshire NHS Foundation Trust public inquiry: executive summary. The Stationery Office; 2013.

[5]  Roueche A, Hewitt J. ‘Wading through treacle’: quality improvement lessons from the frontline. BMJ Qual Saf 2012; 21 179–83.
‘Wading through treacle’: quality improvement lessons from the frontline.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[6]  Gamble J, Vaux E. Learning leadership skills in practice through quality improvement. Clin Med 2014; 14 12–5.
Learning leadership skills in practice through quality improvement.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[7]  Grant P. “The people not the policy”: quality improvement, junior doctors, and cultural change. Qual Manag Health Care 2011; 20 168–75.
“The people not the policy”: quality improvement, junior doctors, and cultural change.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[8]  Langley GJ, Moen RD, Nolan KM, et al. The improvement guide: a practical approach to enhancing organizational performance. John Wiley & Sons; 2009.

[9]  Taylor-Adams S, Vincent C. Systems analysis of clinical incidents: the London protocol. Clin Risk 2004; 10 211–20.
Systems analysis of clinical incidents: the London protocol.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[10]  Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Health Care. The NSQHS Standards. 2019. Available at https://www.safetyandquality.gov.au/standards/nsqhs-standards

[11]  Schmidt M, Aly R. A Call to Action. Improving clinician wellbeing and patient care and safety. 2021. Available at https://www.healthpolicyohio.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/CallToAction_Brief.pdf [accessed 18 April 2023].

[12]  The Royal Melbourne Hospital. About the RMH. 2021. Available at https://www.thermh.org.au/about/about-rmh

[13]  The Royal Melbourne Hospital. 2021‐22 Annual Report. 2022. Available at https://www.thermh.org.au/files/documents/Corporate/rmh-annual-report-2021-2022.pdf

[14]  Harris PA, Taylor R, Thielke R, et al. Research electronic data capture (REDCap)—A metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support. J Biomed Inform 2009; 42 377–81.
Research electronic data capture (REDCap)—A metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[15]  Harris PA, Taylor R, Minor BL, et al. The REDCap consortium: Building an international community of software platform partners. J Biomed Inform 2019; 95 103208
The REDCap consortium: Building an international community of software platform partners.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[16]  Hardacre J, Cragg R, Shapiro J, et al. What’s leadership got to do with it? Exploring links between quality improvement and leadership in the NHS. London: The Health Foundation; 2011.

[17]  Gilbert A, Hockey P, Vaithianathan R, et al. Perceptions of junior doctors in the NHS about their training: results of a regional questionnaire. BMJ Qual Saf 2012; 21 234–8.
Perceptions of junior doctors in the NHS about their training: results of a regional questionnaire.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[18]  Doran NJ, Bethune R, Watson J, et al. Empowering junior doctors: a qualitative study of a QI programme in South West England. Postgrad Med J 2018; 94 571–7.
Empowering junior doctors: a qualitative study of a QI programme in South West England.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[19]  Plsek PE, Greenhalgh T. The challenge of complexity in health care. BMJ 2001; 323 625–8.
The challenge of complexity in health care.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[20]  Khatri N, Brown GD, Hicks LL. From a blame culture to a just culture in health care. Health Care Manage Rev 2009; 34 312–22.
From a blame culture to a just culture in health care.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[21]  Wong BM, Etchells EE, Kuper A, et al. Teaching quality improvement and patient safety to trainees: a systematic review. Acad Med 2010; 85 1425–39.
Teaching quality improvement and patient safety to trainees: a systematic review.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[22]  The Health Foundation. Evidence scan: Involving junior doctors in quality improvement. London: The Health Foundation; 2011. Available at https://www.health.org.uk/publications/involving-junior-doctors-in-quality-improvement

[23]  Bernabeo EC, Conforti LN, Holmboe ES. The impact of a preventive cardiology quality improvement intervention on residents and clinics: a qualitative exploration. Am J Med Qual 2009; 24 99–107.
The impact of a preventive cardiology quality improvement intervention on residents and clinics: a qualitative exploration.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |