Evidence-based law making on voluntary assisted dying
Ben P. White A B and Lindy Willmott AA Australian Centre for Health Law Research, Faculty of Law, Queensland University of Technology, GPO Box 2434, Brisbane, Qld 4001, Australia. Email: l.willmott@qut.edu.au
B Corresponding author. Email: bp.white@qut.edu.au
Australian Health Review 44(4) 544-546 https://doi.org/10.1071/AH19201
Submitted: 10 September 2019 Accepted: 19 November 2019 Published: 29 November 2019
Journal Compilation © AHHA 2020 Open Access CC BY-NC-ND
Abstract
Voluntary assisted dying is a major social policy issue with significant implications for the health system, health and medical professionals and the wider community. Voluntary assisted dying is now lawful in Victoria in limited circumstances, and other states are likely to follow Victoria and legalise the practice. In the same way that we expect the making of health policy and the provision of health care to be evidence based, so too should we should expect evidence-based law making from our parliamentarians on this important topic.
What is known about the topic? The importance of evidence when making health policy and providing evidence-based medical care is well accepted. Australian states are actively considering laws about voluntary assisted dying.
What does this paper add? This paper argues that evidence-based law making by parliamentarians is needed as they deliberate proposed voluntary assisted dying laws. There has been limited recognition of the value of evidence-based approaches in the discipline of law.
What are the implications for practitioners? A failure by parliaments to adequately consider evidence can lead to suboptimal law making. When this occurs about important health issues, such as voluntary assisted dying, it leads to problematic regulatory frameworks for patients, health professionals and health systems.
References
[1] White B, Willmott L. Future of assisted dying reform in Australia. Aust Health Rev 2018; 42 616–620.| Future of assisted dying reform in Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 30465706PubMed |
[2] Baicker K, Chandra A. Evidence-based health policy. N Engl J Med 2017; 377 2413–15.
| Evidence-based health policy.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 29262287PubMed |
[3] Sackett DL, Rosenberg WM, Muir Gray JA, Haynes RB, Richardson WS. Evidence based medicine: what it is and what it isn’t. BMJ 1996; 312 71
| Evidence based medicine: what it is and what it isn’t.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 8555924PubMed |
[4] Cartwright C. FactCheck Q&A: do 80% of Australians and up to 70% of Catholics and Anglicans support euthanasia laws? The Conversation 1 May 2017. Available at: https://theconversation.com/factcheck-qanda-do-80-of-australians-and-up-to-70-of-catholics-and-anglicans-support-euthanasia-laws-76079 [verified 20 November 2019].
[5] Australian Medical Association. Euthanasia and physician assisted suicide 2016. 2016. Available at: https://ama.com.au/position-statement/euthanasia-and-physician-assisted-suicide-2016 [verified 20 November 2019].
[6] The Royal Australasian College of Physicians. Statement on voluntary assisted dying – November 2018. 2018. Available at: https://www.racp.edu.au/docs/default-source/advocacy-library/racp-voluntary-assisted-dying-statement-november-2018.pdf?sfvrsn=761d121a_4 [verified 20 November 2019].
[7] The Royal Australian College of General Practitioners. Voluntary assisted dying legislation. 2019. Available at: https://www.racgp.org.au/advocacy/position-statements/view-all-position-statements/clinical-and-practice-management/voluntary-assisted-dying-legislation [verified 20 November 2019].
[8] Palliative Care Australia. Position statement. Palliative care and voluntary assisted dying. 2019. Available at: http://palliativecare.org.au/wp-content/uploads/dlm_uploads/2019/09/2019-VAD-position-statement-Final.pdf [verified 20 November 2019].
[9] Australian Nursing and Midwifery Federation (ANMF). ANMF position statement. Voluntary assisted dying. 2019. Available at: http://anmf.org.au/documents/policies/PS_Assisted_Dying.pdf [verified 20 November 2019].
[10] Rachlinski JJ. Evidence-based law. Cornell Law Rev 2011; 96 901–24.
[11] Legislative Council Legal and Social Issues Committee. Inquiry into end of life choices: final report. Melbourne: Parliament of Victoria; 2016. Available at: https://www.parliament.vic.gov.au/file_uploads/LSIC_pF3XBb2L.pdf [verified 20 November 2019].
[12] Joint Committee on End of Life Choice, Parliament of Western Australia. Report 1. My life, my choice. 2018. Available at: https://www.parliament.wa.gov.au/Parliament/commit.nsf/%28Report+Lookup+by+Com+ID%29/71C9AFECD0FAEE6E482582F200037B37/$file/Joint%20Select%20Committe%20on%20the%20End%20of%20Life%20Choices%20-%20Report%20for%20Website.pdf [verified 20 November 2019].
[13] Cairney P, Oliver K. Evidence-based policymaking is not like evidence-based medicine, so how far should you go to bridge the divide between evidence and policy? Health Res Policy Syst 2017; 15 35
| 28446185PubMed |
[14] Merlin T, Weston A, Tooher R. Extending an evidence hierarchy to include topics other than treatment: revising the Australian ‘levels of evidence’. BMC Med Res Methodol 2009; 9 34
| Extending an evidence hierarchy to include topics other than treatment: revising the Australian ‘levels of evidence’.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 19519887PubMed |
[15] Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Vist GE. GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. BMJ 2008; 336 924
| GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 18436948PubMed |
[16] Downie J. Reliability of evidence. End-of-life law and policy in Canada. Halifax: Health Law Institute, Dalhousie University; n.d. Available at: http://eol.law.dal.ca/?page_id=966 [verified 20 November 2019].
[17] van der Heide A, van Delden JJM, Onwuteaka-Philipsen BD. End-of-life decisions in the Netherlands over 25 years. N Engl J Med 2017; 377 492–4.
| End-of-life decisions in the Netherlands over 25 years.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 28767342PubMed |
[18] Chambaere K, Vander Stichele R, Mortier F, Cohen J. Recent trends in euthanasia and other end-of-life practices in Belgium. N Engl J Med 2015; 372 1179–81.
| Recent trends in euthanasia and other end-of-life practices in Belgium.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 25776935PubMed |
[19] Oregon Health Authority. Oregon Death with Dignity Act. 2018 data summary. 2019. Available at: https://www.oregon.gov/oha/PH/PROVIDERPARTNERRESOURCES/EVALUATIONRESEARCH/DEATHWITHDIGNITYACT/Documents/year21.pdf [verified 20 November 2019].
