Depression, suicide risk, and workplace bullying: a comparative study of fly-in, fly-out and residential resource workers in Australia
Peta Miller A , Libby Brook A , Norman J. Stomski A B , Graeme Ditchburn A and Paul Morrison A
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations
A College of Science, Health, Engineering and Education, Murdoch University, 90 South Street, Murdoch, WA 6150, Australia. Email: pmiller@micwa.org.au; L.Brook@murdoch.edu.au; Graeme.Ditchburn@murdoch.edu.au; P.Morrison@murdoch.edu.au
B Corresponding author. Email: N.Stomski@murdoch.edu.au
Australian Health Review 44(2) 248-253 https://doi.org/10.1071/AH18155
Submitted: 21 May 2018 Accepted: 5 December 2018 Published: 18 April 2019
Abstract
Objectives The primary objective of this study was to establish whether clinical depression and increased suicide risk differed between Australian fly-in, fly-out (FIFO) workers and their residential counterparts in the resources sector. We also sought to identify whether bullying and social support were associated with depression and suicide risk in this cohort.
Methods A cross-sectional survey design was used. Completed questionnaires were received from 751 respondents who were employed in the Australian resources sector. Primary outcomes were assessed with the Beck Depression Inventory, Beck Hopelessness Scale and Negative Acts Questionnaire – Revised. A general linear model was used to examine the association between depression, hopelessness and predictive factors.
Results The results of a general linear model analysis demonstrated that depression (partial η2 = 0.02; P = 0.01) and hopelessness (partial η2 = 0.02; P = 0.02) were significantly higher in residential than FIFO workers. In addition, bullying was significantly associated with higher levels of depression (partial η2 = 0.11; P = 0.001) and hopelessness (partial η2 = 0.04; P = 0.001). Finally, increased social support was significantly associated with lower depression rates (partial η2 = 0.13; P = 0.001) and hopelessness (partial η2 = 0.14; P = 0.001).
Conclusions Interventions should be delivered to reduce depression and hopelessness in Australian resource workers, particularly through addressing workplace bullying and enhancing social support.
What is known about the topic? One-third of Australian resource workers experience psychosocial distress. Research examining factors that influence such distress is lacking.
What does this paper add? The results of this study demonstrate that clinical depression and suicide risk were significantly higher in residential resource workers than in FIFO workers. Depression and suicide risk were directly associated with workplace bullying. In addition, social support was an important protective factor against depression and bullying in Australian FIFO and residential resource workers.
What are the implications for practitioners? There is an urgent need to introduce interventions that reduce psychosocial distress in the resource sector, particularly through the mitigation of bullying
Additional keywords: cross-sectional study, mining industry, psychosocial distress.
References
[1] Australian Mines and Metals Association. Getting back on track: delivering the workplace relations framework Australia needs. 2013. Available at: https://www.pc.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0006/187827/sub0096-workplace-relations.pdf [verified 6 February 2019].[2] Storey K. Fly-in/fly-out and fly-over: mining and regional development in Western Australia. Aust Geogr 2001; 32 133–48.
| Fly-in/fly-out and fly-over: mining and regional development in Western Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[3] House of Representatives Standing Committee on Regional Australia. Cancer of the bush or salvation for our cities? Fly-in, fly-out and drive-in, drive-out workforce practices in Regional Australia. 2013. Available at: https://www.aph.gov.au/Parliamentary_Business/Committees/House_of_Representatives_Committees?url=ra/fifodido/report.htm [verified 6 February 2019].
[4] Shrimpton M, Storey KJ. The effects of offshore employment in the petroleum industry: a cross-national perspective. Washington, DC: US Department of the Interior, Minerals Management Service, Environmental Studies Program; 2001.
[5] Bowers J, Lo J, Miller P, Mawren D, Jones B. Psychological distress in remote mining and construction workers in Australia. Med J Aust 2018; 208 391–7.
| Psychological distress in remote mining and construction workers in Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 29747563PubMed |
[6] Education and Health Standing Committee. Shining a light on FIFO mental health. Perth: Parliament of Western Australia; 2014.
[7] Hoobler JM, Rospenda KM, Lemmon G, Rosa JA. A within-subject longitudinal study of the effects of positive job experiences and generalized workplace harassment on well-being. J Occup Health Psychol 2010; 15 434–51.
| A within-subject longitudinal study of the effects of positive job experiences and generalized workplace harassment on well-being.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 21058857PubMed |
[8] Kääriä S, Laaksonen M, Rahkonen O, Lahelma E, Leino-Arjas P. Risk factors of chronic neck pain: a prospective study among middle-aged employees. Eur J Pain 2012; 16 911–20.
| 22337254PubMed |
[9] Kivimäki M, Leino-Arjas P, Virtanen M, Elovainio M, Keltikangas-Järvinen L, Puttonen S, Vartia M, Brunner E, Vahtera J. Work stress and incidence of newly diagnosed fibromyalgia: prospective cohort study. J Psychosom Res 2004; 57 417–22.
| 15581643PubMed |
[10] Finne LB, Knardahl S, Lau B. Workplace bullying and mental distress: a prospective study of Norwegian employees. Scand J Work Environ Health 2011; 37 276–87.
| Workplace bullying and mental distress: a prospective study of Norwegian employees.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 21373722PubMed |
[11] Einarsen S, Nielsen MB. Workplace bullying as an antecedent of mental health problems: a five-year prospective and representative study. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 2015; 88 131–42.
| Workplace bullying as an antecedent of mental health problems: a five-year prospective and representative study.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 24840725PubMed |
[12] Nielsen MB, Mageroy N, Gjerstad J, Einarsen S. Workplace bullying and subsequent health problems. Tidssk Nor Laegeforen 2014; 134 1233–8.
| Workplace bullying and subsequent health problems.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[13] Velander F, Schineanu A, Liang W, Midford R. Digging for gold and coming up blue: a health survey in the mining industry. J Health Saf Environ 2010; 26 389–401.
[14] Gariépy G, Honkaniemi H, Quesnel-Vallee A. Social support and protection from depression: systematic review of current findings in Western countries. Br J Psychiatry 2016; 209 284–93.
| Social support and protection from depression: systematic review of current findings in Western countries.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 27445355PubMed |
[15] Beck AT, Steer RA, Brown GK. Depression inventory: second edition manual. San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation; 1996.
[16] Arbisi PA. Review of the Beck Depression Inventory-II. In: Plake BS, Impara JC, editors. The Fourteenth Mental Measurements Yearbook. Lincoln, NE: Buros Institute of Mental Measurements; 2001.
[17] Beck AT. BHS, Beck Hopelessness Scale. San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corp., New York, NY: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich; 1988.
[18] Lotito M, Cook E. A review of suicide risk assessment instruments and approaches. Mental Health Clinician 2015; 5 216–23.
| A review of suicide risk assessment instruments and approaches.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[19] McMillan D, Gilbody S, Beresford E, Neilly L. Can we predict suicide and non-fatal self-harm with the Beck Hopelessness Scale? A meta-analysis. Psychol Med 2007; 37 769–78.
| Can we predict suicide and non-fatal self-harm with the Beck Hopelessness Scale? A meta-analysis.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 17202001PubMed |
[20] Einarsen S, Hoel H, Notelaers G. Measuring exposure to bullying and harassment at work: validity, factor structure and psychometric properties of the negative acts questionnaire-revised. Work Stress 2009; 23 24–44.
| Measuring exposure to bullying and harassment at work: validity, factor structure and psychometric properties of the negative acts questionnaire-revised.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[21] Notelaers G, Einarsen S. The world turns at 33 and 45: defining simple cutoff scores for the Negative Acts Questionnaire – revised in a representative sample. Eur J Work Organ Psychol 2013; 22 670–82.
| The world turns at 33 and 45: defining simple cutoff scores for the Negative Acts Questionnaire – revised in a representative sample.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[22] Slade T, Johnston A, Teesson M, Whiteford H, Burgess P, Pirkis J, Saw S. The mental health of Australians 2: report on the 2007 National survey of mental health and wellbeing. Canberra: Department of Health and Ageing; 2009. Available at: http://www.health.gov.au/internet/main/publishing.nsf/Content/mental-pubs-m-mhaust2 [verified 31 January 2019].
[23] Kocalevent RD, Finck C, Perez-Trujillo M, Sautier L, Zill J, Hinz A. Standardization of the Beck Hopelessness Scale in the general population. J Ment Health 2017; 26 516–22.
| Standardization of the Beck Hopelessness Scale in the general population.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 27841054PubMed |
[24] Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS). Labor force Australia. 2018. Available at: http://www.abs.gov.au/AUSSTATS/abs@.nsf/DetailsPage/6202.0May%202018?OpenDocument [verified 6 February 2019].
[25] Johnson S. Social interventions in mental health: a call to action. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 2017; 52 245–7.
| Social interventions in mental health: a call to action.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 28280886PubMed |
[26] Wang J, Mann F, Lloyd-Evans B, Ma R, Johnson S. Associations between loneliness and perceived social support and outcomes of mental health problems: a systematic review. BMC Psychiatry 2018; 18 156
| Associations between loneliness and perceived social support and outcomes of mental health problems: a systematic review.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 29843662PubMed |
[27] Masi CM, Chen HY, Hawkley LC, Cacioppo JT. A meta-analysis of interventions to reduce loneliness. Pers Soc Psychol Rev 2011; 15 219–66.
| A meta-analysis of interventions to reduce loneliness. Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 20716644PubMed |
[28] Lutgen-Sandvik P, Tracy SJ, Alberts JK. Burned by bullying in the American workplace: prevalence, perception, degree and impact. J Manag Stud 2017; 44 837–62.
[29] Butterworth P, Leach LS, Kiely KM. The relationship between work characteristics, wellbeing, depression and workplace bullying: technical findings from a survey of 32–36 year old workers in Canberra and Queanbeyan. Canberra: Safe Work Australia; 2013.
[30] Dollard M, Bailey T, McLinton S, Richards P, McTernan W, Taylor A, Bond S. The Australian workplace barometer: report on psychosocial safety climate and worker health in Australia. Canberra: Safe Work Australia; 2012.
[31] Carter M, Thompson N, Crampton P, Morrow G, Burford B, Gray C, Illing J. Workplace bullying in the UK NHS: a questionnaire and interview study on prevalence, impact and barriers to reporting. BMJ Open 2013; 3 e002628
| Workplace bullying in the UK NHS: a questionnaire and interview study on prevalence, impact and barriers to reporting.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[32] O’Driscoll MP, Cooper-Thomas HD, Bentley T, Catley BE, Gardner DH, Trenberth L. Workplace bullying in New Zealand: a survey of employee perceptions and attitudes. Asia Pac J Hum Resour 2011; 49 390–408.
| Workplace bullying in New Zealand: a survey of employee perceptions and attitudes.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[33] Einarsen S, Raknes BI. Harassment in the workplace and the victimization of men. Violence Vict 1997; 12 247–63.
| Harassment in the workplace and the victimization of men.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 9477540PubMed |
[34] Leymann H. The content and development of mobbing at work. Eur J Work Organ Psychol 1996; 5 165–84.
| The content and development of mobbing at work.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[35] Nielsen MB, Skogstad A, Matthiesen SB, Glasø L, Aasland MS, Notelaers G, Einarsen S. Prevalence of workplace bullying in Norway: comparisons across time and estimation methods. Eur J Work Organ Psychol 2009; 18 81–101.
| Prevalence of workplace bullying in Norway: comparisons across time and estimation methods.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[36] Collinson DL. ‘Engineering humour’: masculinity, joking and conflict in shop-floor relations. Organ Stud 1988; 9 181–99.
| ‘Engineering humour’: masculinity, joking and conflict in shop-floor relations.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[37] Goffman E. Asylums: essays on the social situation of mental patients and other inmates. New York: Routledge; 2007.
[38] Henry P, Hamilton K, Watson S, McDonald M. FIFO/DIDO mental health research report 2013. Perth: Lifeline; 2013.
[39] Stohr MK, Walsh A. Corrections: the essentials. London: Sage; 2011.
[40] Gillen PA, Sinclair M, Kernohan WG, Begley CM, Luyben AG. Interventions for prevention of bullying in the workplace. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2017; 1 CD009778
| 28134445PubMed |
[41] Leiter MP, Day A, Oore DG, Spence Laschinger HK. Getting better and staying better: assessing civility, incivility, distress, and job attitudes one year after a civility intervention. J Occup Health Psychol 2012; 17 425–34.
| Getting better and staying better: assessing civility, incivility, distress, and job attitudes one year after a civility intervention.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 23066695PubMed |
[42] Osatuke K, Moore SC, Ward C, Dyrenforth SR, Belton L. Civility, respect, engagement in the workforce (CREW): nationwide organization development intervention at veterans health administration. J Appl Behav Sci 2009; 45 384–410.
| Civility, respect, engagement in the workforce (CREW): nationwide organization development intervention at veterans health administration.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[43] Murdoch M, Simon AB, Polusny MA, Bangerter AK, Grill JP, Noorbaloochi S, Partin MR. Impact of different privacy conditions and incentives on survey response rate, participant representativeness, and disclosure of sensitive information: a randomized controlled trial. BMC Med Res Methodol 2014; 14 90
| Impact of different privacy conditions and incentives on survey response rate, participant representativeness, and disclosure of sensitive information: a randomized controlled trial.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 25027174PubMed |
