Bridging existing governance gaps: five evidence-based actions that boards can take to pursue high quality care
Sandra G. Leggat A B and Cathy Balding A
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations
A La Trobe University, Department of Public Health, Bundoora, Vic. 3085, Australia. Email: cathyb@qualityworks.com.au
B Corresponding author. Email: s.leggat@latrobe.edu.au
Australian Health Review 43(2) 126-132 https://doi.org/10.1071/AH17042
Submitted: 24 February 2017 Accepted: 28 September 2017 Published: 13 November 2017
Journal Compilation © AHHA 2019 Open Access CC BY-NC-ND
Abstract
Objective To explore the impact of the organisational quality systems on quality of care in Victorian health services.
Methods During 2015 a total of 55 focus groups were conducted with more than 350 managers, clinical staff and board members in eight Victorian health services to explore the effectiveness of health service quality systems. A review of the quality and safety goals and strategies outlined in the strategic and operating plans of the participating health services was also undertaken.
Results This paper focuses on the data related to the leadership role of health service boards in ensuring safe, high-quality care. The findings suggest that health service boards are not fully meeting their governance accountability to ensure consistently high-quality care. The data uncovered major clinical governance gaps between stated board and executive aspirations for quality and safety and the implementation of these expectations at point of care. These gaps were further compounded by quality system confusion, over-reliance on compliance, and inadequate staff engagement.
Conclusion Based on the existing evidence we propose five specific actions boards can take to close the gaps, thereby supporting improved care for all consumers.
What is known about this topic? Effective governance is essential for high-quality healthcare delivery. Boards are required to play an active role in their organisation’s pursuit of high quality care.
What does this paper add? Recent government reports suggest that Australian health service boards are not fully meeting their governance requirements for high quality, safe care delivery, and our research pinpoints key governance gaps.
What are the implications for practitioners? Based on our research findings we outline five evidence-based actions for boards to improve their governance of quality care delivery. These actions focus on an organisational strategy for high-quality care, with the chief executive officer held accountable for successful implementation, which is actively guided and monitored by the board.
Additional keywords: clinical governance, leadership, quality and safety, quality systems.
References
[1] Victorian Department of Health and Human Services. Report of the Review of Hospital Safety and Quality Assurance in Victoria. Targeting zero. Supporting the Victorian hospital system to eliminate avoidable harm and strengthen quality of care. Melbourne: Victorian Government; 2016. Available at: https://www2.health.vic.gov.au/hospitals-and-health-services/quality-safety-service/hospital-safety-and-quality-review [verified 16 October 2017].[2] Victorian Department of Health and Human Services. Better, safer care. Delivering a world-leading healthcare system. Melbourne: Victorian Government; 2016. Available at: https://www2.health.vic.gov.au/hospitals-and-health-services/quality-safety-service/hospital-safety-and-quality-review [verified 16 October 2017].
[3] Garling P. Final report of the special commission of inquiry: acute care services in NSW public hospitals. Sydney: NSW Government; 2008.
[4] Siddins M. Commentary on the King Edward inquiry: lessons we fail to learn. Aust Health Rev 2003; 26 28–9.
| Commentary on the King Edward inquiry: lessons we fail to learn.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[5] Davies G. Queensland public hospitals commission of inquiry report. Brisbane: Government of Queensland; 2005.
[6] Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Health Care (ACSQHC). Guide to the National Safety and Quality Health Service Standards for health service organisation boards. Sydney: ACSQHC; 2015.
[7] Jha A, Epstein A. Hospital governance and quality of care. Health Aff 2010; 29 182–7.
| Hospital governance and quality of care.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[8] Balding C. Create a great quality system in six months. Melbourne: Cathy Balding/Qualityworks PL; 2013.
[9] McLafferty I. Focus group interviews as a data collecting strategy. J Adv Nurs 2004; 48 187–94.
| Focus group interviews as a data collecting strategy.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[10] Joffe H, Yardley L. Content and thematic analysis. In: Marks DF, Yardley L, editors. Research methods for clinical and health psychology. San Francisco: Sage; 2004. pp. 56–68.
[11] Tong A, Sainsbury P, Craig J. Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. Int J Qual Health Care 2007; 19 349–57.
| Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[12] Baker GR, Denis J, Pomey M, Macintosh-Murray A. Effective governance for quality and patient safety in Canadian healthcare organizations. Ottawa: Canadian Health Services research Foundation and Canadian Patient Safety Institute; 2010.
[13] National Quality Board. Quality governance in the NHS – a guide for provider boards. London: National Quality Board; 2011.
[14] Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Health Care. Accreditation and the NSQHS Standards 2015. Available at: http://www.safetyandquality.gov.au/our-work/accreditation-and-the-nsqhs-standards/ [verified 21 May 2015].
[15] Ruiz U, Simon J. Quality management in health care: a 20-year journey. Int J Health Care Qual Assur 2004; 17 323–33.
| Quality management in health care: a 20-year journey.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[16] McDonald D, Richmond M, Sibbernsen D. Reprogramming the board: a comprehensive approach to aligning a company’s board of directors and management team. Aspatore Books; 2006.
[17] Australian Institute of Company Directors (AICD). The board’s role in clinical governance. Sydney: AICD, 2011.
[18] Auditor General Victoria. Auditor-General’s report. Managing patient safety in public hospitals. Melbourne: Auditor General Victoria; 2005.
[19] Millar R, Mannion R, Freeman T, Davies HTO. Hospital board oversight of quality and patient safety: a narrative review and synthesis of recent empirical research. Milbank Q 2013; 91 738–70.
| Hospital board oversight of quality and patient safety: a narrative review and synthesis of recent empirical research.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[20] Plsek PE, Greenhalgh T. Complexity science. The challenge of complexity in health care. BMJ 2001; 323 625–8.
| Complexity science. The challenge of complexity in health care.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3MrgvFOkuw%3D%3D&md5=c8bd50ff0ac156996a10f6ca43c37952CAS |
[21] Plsek PE, Wilson T. Complexity, leadership, and management in healthcare organisations. BMJ 2001; 323 746–9.
| Complexity, leadership, and management in healthcare organisations.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3MrjtVWjtg%3D%3D&md5=2e3cc6ee0af8740bfa739c9268fb63e0CAS |
[22] Denis J-L, Lamothe L, Langley A. The dynamics of collective leadership and strategic change in pluralistic organizations. Acad Manage J 2001; 44 809–37.
| The dynamics of collective leadership and strategic change in pluralistic organizations.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[23] Evans M. This is a test. Exams for governance boards on quality measures could be a way to improve care, accountability in hospitals. Mod Healthc 2009; 39 6–7.
[24] Machell S, Gough P, Naylor D, Nath V, Steward K. Putting quality first in the boardroom: improving the business of caring. London: The King’s Fund; 2010.
[25] Jiang HJ, Lockee C, Bass K, Fraser I. Board engagement in quality: findings of a survey of hospital and system leaders. J Healthc Manag 2008; 53 121–34.
[26] Standards Australia. Good governance principles. Canberra: Standards Australia; 2003.
[27] Balding C. Clinical governance. In: Day GE, Leggat SG, editors. Leading and managing health services: an Australasian perspective. Melbourne: Cambridge University Press; 2015.
[28] Scott I. What are the most effective strategies for improving quality and safety of health care? Intern Med J 2009; 39 389–400.
| What are the most effective strategies for improving quality and safety of health care?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DC%2BD1MvmvVarsQ%3D%3D&md5=9022e4174c1fddea84bb008811214d25CAS |
[29] Ham C. Improving the performance of health services: the role of clinical leadership. Lancet 2003; 361 1978–80.
| Improving the performance of health services: the role of clinical leadership.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[30] Leggat SG, Balding C. Achieving organisational competence for clinical leadership: the role of high performance work systems. J Health Organ Manag 2013; 27 312–29.
| Achieving organisational competence for clinical leadership: the role of high performance work systems.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[31] Bismark MM, Walter S, Studdert D. The role of boards in clinical governance: activities and attitudes among members of public health service boards in Victoria. Aust Health Rev 2013; 37 682–7.
| The role of boards in clinical governance: activities and attitudes among members of public health service boards in Victoria.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[32] Bismark MM, Studdert DM. Governance of quality of care: a qualitative study of health service boards in Victoria, Australia. BMJ Quality & Safety 2014; 23 474–82.
| Governance of quality of care: a qualitative study of health service boards in Victoria, Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[33] Hastings SE, Armitage GD, Mallison S, Jackson K, Suter E. Exploring the relationship between governance mechanisms in healthcare and health workforce outcomes: a systematic review. BMC Health Serv Res 2014; 14 479–93.
| Exploring the relationship between governance mechanisms in healthcare and health workforce outcomes: a systematic review.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[34] Nadler DA, Behan BA, Nadler MB. Building better boards: a blueprint for effective governance. San Francisco, CA: John Wiley & Sons; 2011.
[35] Leggat SG. Strategic planning. In: Day GE, Leggat SG, editors. Leading and managing health services: an Australasian perspective. Melbourne: Cambridge University Press; 2015.
[36] Leggat SG. Managing clinical processes: the search for value in health care organisation and performance. In: Sorensen R, Iedema R, editors. Managing clinical processes in health services. Chatswood: Elsevier; 2007.
[37] Llewellyn S, Tappin E. Strategy in the public sector: management in the wilderness. JMS 2003; 40 955–82.
| Strategy in the public sector: management in the wilderness.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[38] Mintzberg H. The rise and fall of strategic planning. New York: Free Press; 1994.
[39] Dixon-Woods M, Baker R, Charles K, Dawson J, Jerzembek G, Martin G, McCarthy I, McKee L, Minion J, Ozieranski P, Willars J, Wilkie P, West M. Culture and behaviour in the English National Health Service: overview of lessons from a large multimethod study. BMJ Qual Saf 2014; 23 106–15.
| Culture and behaviour in the English National Health Service: overview of lessons from a large multimethod study.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[40] De Vos M, Graafmans W, Kooistra M, Meijboom B, Van Der Voort P, Westert G. Using quality indicators to improve hospital care: a review of the literature. Int J Qual Health Care 2009; 21 119–29.
| Using quality indicators to improve hospital care: a review of the literature.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[41] Committee on Quality of Healthcare in America. Crossing the quality chasm. A new health system for the 21st century. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press; 2001.
[42] Berwick DM. A user’s manual for the IOM’s ‘quality chasm’ report. Health Aff 2002; 21 80–90.
| A user’s manual for the IOM’s ‘quality chasm’ report.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[43] Wagner C, Mannion R, Hammer A, Groene O, Arah OA, Dersarkissian M, Suñol R, DUQuE Project Consortium The associations between organizational culture, organizational structure and quality management in European hospitals. Int J Qual Health Care 2014; 26 74–80.
| The associations between organizational culture, organizational structure and quality management in European hospitals.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[44] Leggat SG, Dwyer J. Improving hospital performance: culture change is not the answer. Healthc Q 2005; 8 60–8.
| Improving hospital performance: culture change is not the answer.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
