Free Standard AU & NZ Shipping For All Book Orders Over $80!
Register      Login
Australian Health Review Australian Health Review Society
Journal of the Australian Healthcare & Hospitals Association
RESEARCH ARTICLE (Open Access)

Hunter and New England HealthPathways: a 4-year journey of integrated care

Jane S. Gray A , Judith R. Swan A E , Margaret A. Lynch A B , Tracey M. Tay A , Marika-Jane Mackenzie B , John H. Wiggers C , Karen A. Harrison A , Robert C. McDonald D , Ian P. O’Dea B , Louise M. Harrigan A , Sandra M. Fitzgerald B and on behalf of the Hunter and New England HealthPathways Steering Committee
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Partnerships, Innovation & Research, Hunter New England Local Health District, 56 Stewart Avenue, Hamilton East, NSW 2303, Australia. Email: Jane.Gray@hnehealth.nsw.gov.au; Margaret.Lynch@hnehealth.nsw.gov.au; Tracey.Tay@hnehealth.nsw.gov.au; Karen.Harrison@hnehealth.nsw.gov.au; Louise.Harrigan.@hnehealth.nsw.gov.au

B Hunter New England Central Coast Primary Health Network, Suite 11, 125 Bull Street, Newcastle West, NSW 2302, Australia. Email: mmackenzie@hneccphn.com.au; IOdea@hneccphn.com.au; sfitzgerald@hneccphn.com.au

C Population Health Hunter New England Local Health District, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, Longworth Avenue, Wallsend, NSW 2287, Australia. Email: John.Wiggers@hnehealth.nsw.gov.au

D BMcD Consulting, Newcastle, NSW 2300, Australia. Email: bmcdonald@bmcdconsulting.com

E Corresponding author. Email: Judith.Swan@hnehealth.nsw.gov.au

Australian Health Review 42(1) 66-71 https://doi.org/10.1071/AH16197
Submitted: 31 August 2016  Accepted: 9 December 2016   Published: 20 February 2017

Journal compilation © AHHA 2018 Open Access CC BY-NC-ND

Abstract

Objective This paper describes the 4-year journey of Hunter and New England HealthPathways – a password-protected web-based portal designed to provide localised evidence-informed clinical and referral information to support general practice at the point of care.

Methods A process evaluation was conducted in 2013, with a case study comparison performed in 2014 to assess impact of HealthPathways on patient referral and access to specialist care, followed by a review in 2016 of utilisation of the online portal to assess whether healthcare providers continued to access HealthPathways.

Results Increased utilisation was correlated with an increase in the number of pathways published online. Clinical leadership and the process of developing pathways built relationships between primary care and specialist teams. Case studies indicated that a comprehensive approach to pathway implementation accompanied by service redesign resulted in higher pathway use and improved access to specialist care. Senior management support and a formal partnership between major health care providers led to strong governance of HealthPathways and the delivery of other integrated care initiatives. There was significant growth in utilisation over the 4 years, increasing to an average of 6679 sessions per month in 2016 and more general practices reported use of HealthPathways.

Conclusions HealthPathways is a vehicle for building strong foundations to support system change and integrated care. The critical elements for acceptability, growth and sustainability are the strong relationships between primary care and specialist clinicians, as well as formal partnerships that are built from the processes used to develop HealthPathways.

What is known about the topic? HealthPathways and similar web-based evidence-informed guidelines aimed at improving system integration are increasing in Australia. There are few published papers that describe approaches to inform the ongoing implementation of such programs.

What does this paper add? This paper describes iterative methodology for evaluating complex programs, such as HealthPathways, that identifies the critical factors required to build sustainable models of integrated care.

What are the implications for practitioners? The 4-year experience of Hunter and New England HealthPathways provides an approach to improve the implementation, sustainability and spread of similar programs and associated integrated care initiatives.


References

[1]  HealthPathways Community Canterbury District Health Board and Streamliners NZ. HealthPathways Community Web Site. Available at: http://www.healthpathwayscommunity.org/About.aspx [verified 19 December 2016].

[2]  HealthPathways Community Canterbury District Health Board and Streamliners NZ. HealthPathways Community Newsletter: 2016 in numbers. Available at: http://www.healthpathwayscommunity.org/News/LatestNews/tabid/772/ArticleID/1581/Default.aspx [verified 17 January 2017].

[3]  Runciman W, Hunt T, Hannaford N, Hibbert P, Westbrook J, Coiera E, Day R, Hindmarsh D, McGlynn E, Braithwaite J. CareTrack: assessing the appropriateness of health care delivery in Australia. Med J Aust 2012; 197 100–5.
CareTrack: assessing the appropriateness of health care delivery in Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[4]  Runciman W, Coiera E, Day R, Hannaford N, Hibbert P, Hunt T, Westbrook J, Braithwaite J. Towards the delivery of appropriate health care in Australia. Med J Aust 2012; 197 78–81.
Towards the delivery of appropriate health care in Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[5]  Brennan N, Mattick K, Ellis T. The map of medicine: a review of evidence for its impact on healthcare. Health Info Libr J 2011; 28 93–100.
The map of medicine: a review of evidence for its impact on healthcare.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[6]  Clarke A, Blundell N, Forde I, Musila N, Spitzer D, Naqvi S, Browne J. Can guidelines improve referral to elective surgical specialties for adults? A systematic review. Qual Saf Health Care 2010; 19 187–94.
Can guidelines improve referral to elective surgical specialties for adults? A systematic review.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[7]  McGeoch G, McGeoch P, Shand B. Is HealthPathways effective? An online survey of hospital clinicians, general practitioners and practice nurses. N Z Med J 2015; 128 36–46.

[8]  Timmins N, Ham C. The quest for integrated health and social care: a case study in Canterbury New Zealand. London: The Kings Fund; 2013.

[9]  McGeoch G, Anderson I, Gibson J, Gullery C, Kerr D, Shand B. Consensus pathways: evidence into practice. N Z Med J 2015; 128 86–96.

[10]  Robinson S, Varhol R, Bell C, Quirk F, Durrington L. HealthPathways: creating a pathway for health systems reform. Aust Health Rev 2015; 39 9–11.
HealthPathways: creating a pathway for health systems reform.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[11]  McDonald B. Process evaluation of the Hunter and New England HealthPathways. Newcastle: BMcD Consulting; 2013.

[12]  Hunter and New England HealthPathways Evaluation Committee. Evaluation of Hunter and New England HealthPathways: Phase 2 Report. 2014.

[13]  Harris M, Lloyd J, Krastev Y, Fanaian M, Davies G, Zwar N, Liaw S. Routine use of clinical management guidelines in Australian general practice. Aust J Primary Health 2014; 20 41–6.
Routine use of clinical management guidelines in Australian general practice.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |