An examination of suicide research and funding in New Zealand 2006–16: implications for new research and policies
Daniel D. L. Coppersmith A C , Shyamala Nada-Raja A and Annette L. Beautrais BA Department of Preventive and Social Medicine, University of Otago, PO Box 913, Dunedin, 9054, New Zealand. Email: shyamala.nada-raja@otago.ac.nz
B School of Health Sciences, University of Canterbury, Private Bag 4800, Christchurch, 8140, New Zealand. Email: Louis.beautrais@gmail.com
C Corresponding author. Email: daniel.dl.coppersmith@gmail.com
Australian Health Review 42(3) 356-360 https://doi.org/10.1071/AH16189
Submitted: 23 August 2016 Accepted: 8 February 2017 Published: 16 March 2017
Abstract
Objective Suicide is a significant public health problem in New Zealand, with the youth suicide rate being one of the highest among developed countries. Increased suicide rates in recent years suggest that the evidence base and research priorities for New Zealand suicide prevention need to be reassessed. To inform policy development, the aim of the present study was to evaluate all peer-reviewed New Zealand published suicide research and major grant allocations from 2006 to 2016.
Methods The methodology duplicated a recent Australian review of suicide prevention research and funding. Publications and grant funding allocations were assessed independently. Key research databases were searched in April 2016 for all suicide-related publications. Identified papers were then classified by research type, population focus and type of self-injurious behaviour. Citation indices were obtained for each publication. Annual reports, newsletters and summary data from four major New Zealand funding bodies (the Health Research Council of New Zealand, Marsden Fund, Lottery Health Research and the Ministry of Health) were reviewed for funding allocations. Identified grants were coded for type of project, type of self-injurious behaviour and target population. Descriptive analyses were performed.
Results In all, 104 published articles and 27 grants met review criteria. Total funding was NZ$12 677 261.62. Most published articles were epidemiological in nature and the most common type of grant was for an intervention.
Conclusions In the past decade, a substantial number of articles has been published and significant funding was invested in New Zealand’s suicide research. The present review suggests that future research investments should focus on effective translation of research findings into suicide prevention programs. Several pragmatic recommendations are proposed to help improve the evidence base and reduce New Zealand’s suicide rates.
What is known about the topic? Suicide prevention continues to be a national public health priority for New Zealand. Although much is known about the prevalence of suicidal behaviours in New Zealand, less is known about how well suicide research has addressed prevention priorities and specific target populations. Australian research found that research funding and publications were dominated by epidemiological studies rather than evaluation or intervention studies. It is yet to be determined whether these research and funding trends also apply for New Zealand.
What does this paper add? This study examined all peer-reviewed and published suicide research and all major suicide prevention projects that have been funded in New Zealand between 2006 and 2016. The purpose of the review was to summarise the evidence base, evaluate funding and determine the ability of the evidence base to inform policy development. The findings demonstrate that the New Zealand research trends are similar to those found in Australia, with most studies being epidemiological and few representative of interventions.
What are the implications for practitioners? This review highlights that there were few intervention and evaluation studies. Partnerships between practitioners and/or community organisations implementing interventions and researchers to systematically evaluate existing interventions and develop new evidence-based interventions would help improve the evidence base for New Zealand suicide prevention.
References
[1] Ministry of Health. Suicide facts: deaths and intentional self-harm hospitalisations 2012. Wellington: Ministry of Health; 2015.[2] McLoughlin AB, Gould MS, Malone KM. Global trends in teenage suicide: 2003–2014. QJM 2015; 108 765–80.
| Global trends in teenage suicide: 2003–2014.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DC%2BC2MrhtlamsQ%3D%3D&md5=d4b36b0ba5935d648fcb33bd0f6b3bf4CAS |
[3] Ministry of Health. New Zealand Suicide Prevention Strategy 2006–2016. Wellington: Ministry of Health ; 2006.
[4] Coronial Services of New Zealand. Annual provisional suicide statistics 2014/15. Wellington: Ministry of Health ; 2015.
[5] Curtin SC, Warner M, Hedegaard H. Increase in suicide in the United States, 1999–2014. NCHS Data Brief No. 241. 2016. Available at: https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/products/databriefs/db241.htm [verified 13 February 2017].
[6] Milner A, Page A. A rise in Australian suicide? A reflection on the 2016 cause of death statistics. Aust N Z J Psychiatry 2017; 51 99–100.
| A rise in Australian suicide? A reflection on the 2016 cause of death statistics.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[7] Robinson J, Pirkis J, Krysinska K, Niner S, Jorm AF, Dudley M, Schindeler E, De Leo D, Harrigan S. Research priorities in suicide prevention in Australia. A comparison of current research efforts and stakeholder-identified priorities. Crisis 2008; 29 180–90.
| Research priorities in suicide prevention in Australia. A comparison of current research efforts and stakeholder-identified priorities.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[8] Ribeiro JD, Franklin JC, Fox KR, Bentley KH, Kleiman EM, Chang BP, Nock MK. Self-injurious thoughts and behaviors as risk factors for future suicide ideation, attempts, and death: a meta-analysis of longitudinal studies. Psychol Med 2016; 46 225–36.
| Self-injurious thoughts and behaviors as risk factors for future suicide ideation, attempts, and death: a meta-analysis of longitudinal studies.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DC%2BC283it1emsA%3D%3D&md5=f1970ecb50f7792b1c488561665e1e87CAS |
[9] Butler AM, Malone K. Attempted suicide v. non-suicidal self-injury: behaviour, syndrome or diagnosis? Br J Psychiatry 2013; 202 324–5.
| Attempted suicide v. non-suicidal self-injury: behaviour, syndrome or diagnosis?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[10] Robinson J, Pirkis J. Research priorities in suicide prevention: an examination of Australian-based research 2007–11. Aust Health Rev 2014; 38 18–24.
| Research priorities in suicide prevention: an examination of Australian-based research 2007–11.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[11] Ministry of Health. Preventing suicide: Guidance for emergency departments. Wellington: Ministry of Health; 2016.
[12] Ministry of Health. Suicide Prevention Toolkit for District Health Boards. Wellington: Ministry of Health; 2015.
[13] Ministry of Health. Suicide Facts: Deaths and intentional self-harm hospitalisations 2013. Wellington: Ministry of Health; 2016.
[14] Ministry of Health. Suicide Facts: Deaths and intentional self-harm hospitalisations 2011. Wellington: Ministry of Health; 2014.
[15] Ministry of Health. Suicide Facts: Deaths and intentional self-harm hospitalisations 2010. Wellington: Ministry of Health; 2012.
[16] Hatcher S, Sharon C, House A, Collins N, Collings S, Pillai A. The ACCESS study: Zelen randomised controlled trial of a package of care for people presenting to hospital after self-harm. Br J Psychiatry 2015; 206 229–36.
[17] Hatcher S, Sharon C, Parag V, Collins N. Problem-solving therapy for people who present to hospital with self-harm: Zelen randomised controlled trial. Br J Psychiatry 2011; 199 310–6.
[18] Hatcher S, Coupe N, Wikiriwhi K, Durie M, Pillai A. Te Ira Tangata: a Zelen randomised controlled trial of a culturally informed treatment compared to treatment as usual in Māori who present to hospital after self-harm. Soc Psych Psych Epid 2016; 51 885–94.
| Te Ira Tangata: a Zelen randomised controlled trial of a culturally informed treatment compared to treatment as usual in Māori who present to hospital after self-harm.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[19] World Health Organization (WHO). Preventing suicide: a global imperative. Geneva: WHO; 2014.
[20] Chang S-S, Stuckler D, Yip P, Gunnell D. Impact of 2008 global economic crisis on suicide: time trend study in 54 countries. BMJ 2013; 347 f5329
| Impact of 2008 global economic crisis on suicide: time trend study in 54 countries.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[21] Nock MK. Recent and needed advances in the understanding, prediction, and prevention of suicidal behavior. Depress Anxiety 2016; 33 460–3.
| Recent and needed advances in the understanding, prediction, and prevention of suicidal behavior.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[22] Christensen H, Cuijpers P, Reynolds CF. Changing the direction of suicide prevention research: a necessity for true population impact. J Am Med Assoc Psychiatry 2016; 73 435–6.
[23] Innvær S, Vist G, Trommald M, Oxman A. Health policy-makers’ perceptions of their use of evidence: a systematic review. J Health Serv Res Policy 2002; 7 239–44.
| Health policy-makers’ perceptions of their use of evidence: a systematic review.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
