Register      Login
Australian Health Review Australian Health Review Society
Journal of the Australian Healthcare & Hospitals Association
RESEARCH ARTICLE (Open Access)

Effects of frequent PATient moves on patient outcomes in a large tertiary Hospital (the PATH study): a prospective cohort study

Joan Webster A D , Karen New B , Mary Fenn C , Mary Batch A , Alyson Eastgate A , Selena Webber A and Anthony Nesbit C
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Level 2, Centre for Clinical Nursing, Royal Brisbane and Women’s Hospital, Butterfield Street, Herston, Qld 4029, Australia. Email: mary.batch@health.qld.gov.au; alyson.eastgate@health.qld.gov.au; sw@grimminc.com

B School of Nursing Midwifery and Social work, Level 3, Chamberlain building, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, Qld 4072, Australia. Email: k.new@uq.edu.au

C Patient Flow Unit, Royal Brisbane and Women’s Hospital, Butterfield Street, Herston, Qld 4029, Australia. Email: mary.fenn@health.qld.gov.au; anthony.nesbit@health.qld.gov.au

D Corresponding author. Email: joan.webster@health.qld.gov.au

Australian Health Review 40(3) 324-329 https://doi.org/10.1071/AH15095
Submitted: 20 May 2015  Accepted: 17 June 2015   Published: 21 September 2015

Journal Compilation © AHHA 2016

Abstract

Objective The aim of the present study was to investigate the incidence of and patient outcomes associated with frequent patient moves.

Methods In a prospective cohort study, any bed move and the reason for the move were documented. Patients were assessed on admission for anxiety, social support and delirium. Adverse events, length of stay and satisfaction were recorded. Patients moved three or more times were compared with those moved less than three times.

Results In all, 566 patients admitted to a tertiary referral hospital were included in the study. Of these, 156 patients (27.6%) were moved once, 46 (8.1%) were moved twice and 28 (4.9%) were moved at least three times. Those moved three or more times were almost threefold more likely to have an adverse event recorded compared with those moved fewer times (relative risk (RR) 2.75; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.18, 6.42; P = 0.02) and to have a hospital stay twice as long (RR 7.10; 95% CI 2.60, 11.60; P = 0.002). Levels of satisfaction and anxiety were not affected by frequent moves and there was no effect on delirium.

Conclusion Frequent bed moves affect patient safety and prolong length of stay.

What is known about the topic? Retrospective and qualitative studies suggest that patient safety and costs may be affected by frequent patient moves.

What does this paper add? The present study is the first prospective study to assess the negative effects of frequent patient moves on specific patient outcomes, such as adverse events, length of stay and satisfaction with care.

What are the implications for practitioners? Within- and between-ward moves may affect patient safety. Patients should be moved only when there is a clear and unavoidable reason for doing so.

Additional keywords: healthcare costs, patient safety, patient transfer.


References

[1]  Blay N, Duffield CM, Gallagher R. Patient transfers in Australia: implications for nursing workload and patient outcomes. J Nurs Manag 2012; 20 302–10.
Patient transfers in Australia: implications for nursing workload and patient outcomes.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 22519607PubMed |

[2]  Garling P. Special commission of inquiry. Acute Care Services in NSW public hospitals. 2008. Available at: http://www.dpc.nsw.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0003/34194/Overview_-_Special_Commission_Of_Inquiry_Into_Acute_Care_Services_In_New_South_Wales_Public_Hospitals.pdf [verified 18 August 2015].

[3]  Kanak MF, Titler M, Shever L, Fei Q, Dochterman J, Picone DM. The effects of hospitalization on multiple units. Appl Nurs Res 2008; 21 15–22.
The effects of hospitalization on multiple units.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 18226759PubMed |

[4]  Goulding L, Adamson J, Watt I, Wright J. Patient safety in patients who occupy beds on clinically inappropriate wards: a qualitative interview study with NHS staff. BMJ Qual Saf 2012; 21 218–24.
Patient safety in patients who occupy beds on clinically inappropriate wards: a qualitative interview study with NHS staff.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 22101102PubMed |

[5]  Ong MS, Coiera E. A systematic review of failures in handoff communication during intrahospital transfers. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf 2011; 37 274–84.
| 21706987PubMed |

[6]  Cohen MD, Hilligoss PB. The published literature on handoffs in hospitals: deficiencies identified in an extensive review. Qual Saf Health Care 2010; 19 493–7.
| 20378628PubMed |

[7]  Ong MS, Coiera E. Safety through redundancy: a case study of in-hospital patient transfers. Qual Saf Health Care 2010; 19 e32
| 20671076PubMed |

[8]  Hendrich AL, Lee N. Intra-unit patient transports: time, motion, and cost impact on hospital efficiency. Nurs Econ 2005; 23 157–64.
| 16189980PubMed |

[9]  Blay N, Donoghue J, Mitten-Lewis S. A retrospective comparative study of patients with chest pain and intra-ward transfers. Aust Health Rev 2002; 25 145–54.
A retrospective comparative study of patients with chest pain and intra-ward transfers.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 12046142PubMed |

[10]  Baillie L. Mixed-sex wards and patient dignity: nurses and patients perspectives. Br J Nurs 2008; 17 1220–5.
Mixed-sex wards and patient dignity: nurses and patients perspectives.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 18974690PubMed |

[11]  Bonner HK, Frost SJ, Smith MG, Williams EJ. Do patients really mind mixed sex bays in an emergency assessment unit? Acute Med 2009; 8 119–22.
| 21603664PubMed |

[12]  Bryant D, Adams J. Experience of mixed-sex bays in a general hospital. Nurs Stand 2009; 24 41–6.
Experience of mixed-sex bays in a general hospital.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 20069815PubMed |

[13]  Mezey G, Hassell Y, Bartlett A. Safety of women in mixed-sex and single-sex medium secure units: staff and patient perceptions. Br J Psychiatry 2005; 187 579–82.
Safety of women in mixed-sex and single-sex medium secure units: staff and patient perceptions.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 16319412PubMed |

[14]  Brodsky-Israeli M, DeKeyser Ganz F. Risk factors associated with transfer anxiety among patients transferring from the intensive care unit to the ward. J Adv Nurs 2011; 67 510–18.
Risk factors associated with transfer anxiety among patients transferring from the intensive care unit to the ward.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 21073503PubMed |

[15]  Brooke J, Hasan N, Slark J, Sharma P. Efficacy of information interventions in reducing transfer anxiety from a critical care setting to a general ward: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Crit Care 2012; 27 425e9–15.

[16]  Gustad LT, Chaboyer W, Wallis M. ICU patient’s transfer anxiety: a prospective cohort study. Aust Crit Care 2008; 21 181–9.
ICU patient’s transfer anxiety: a prospective cohort study.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 18805700PubMed |

[17]  Coyle MA. Transfer anxiety: preparing to leave intensive care. Intensive Crit Care Nurs 2001; 17 138–43.
Transfer anxiety: preparing to leave intensive care.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DC%2BD387jsVSmsA%3D%3D&md5=1a8c42d6ae83627bc99174a6a3b350dfCAS | 11868684PubMed |

[18]  Chaboyer W, Thalib L, Alcorn K, Foster M. The effect of an ICU liaison nurse on patients and family’s anxiety prior to transfer to the ward: an intervention study. Intensive Crit Care Nurs 2007; 23 362–9.
The effect of an ICU liaison nurse on patients and family’s anxiety prior to transfer to the ward: an intervention study.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 17681470PubMed |

[19]  Inouye SK, van Dyck CH, Alessi CA, Balkin S, Siegal AP, Horwitz RI. Clarifying confusion: the confusion assessment method. A new method for detection of delirium. Ann Intern Med 1990; 113 941–8.
Clarifying confusion: the confusion assessment method. A new method for detection of delirium.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DyaK3M%2Flt1yisQ%3D%3D&md5=0d493f16cff2573003cd94c566b70434CAS | 2240918PubMed |

[20]  Wei LA, Fearing MA, Sternberg EJ, Inouye SK. The Confusion Assessment Method: a systematic review of current usage. J Am Geriatr Soc 2008; 56 823–30.
The Confusion Assessment Method: a systematic review of current usage.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 18384586PubMed |

[21]  Hestermann U, Backenstrass M, Gekle I, Hack M, Mundt C, Oster P, Thomas C. Validation of a German version of the Confusion Assessment Method for delirium detection in a sample of acute geriatric patients with a high prevalence of dementia. Psychopathology 2009; 42 270–6.
Validation of a German version of the Confusion Assessment Method for delirium detection in a sample of acute geriatric patients with a high prevalence of dementia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 19521144PubMed |

[22]  Zigmond AS, Snaith RP. The hospital anxiety and depression scale. Acta Psychiatr Scand 1983; 67 361–70.
The hospital anxiety and depression scale.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DyaL3s3nvFWjug%3D%3D&md5=12d7e5022af5264d81be3b40fb65324dCAS | 6880820PubMed |

[23]  Crawford JR, Henry JD, Crombie C, Taylor EP. Normative data for the HADS from a large non-clinical sample. Br J Clin Psychol 2001; 40 429–34.
| 1:STN:280:DC%2BD38%2FjsVyntg%3D%3D&md5=baf4226c4b874c41063ee1d2f46f5681CAS | 11760618PubMed |

[24]  Webster J, Linnane J, Dibley L, Hinson J, Starrenburg S, Roberts J. Measuring social support in pregnancy: can it be simple and meaningful? Birth 2000; 27 97–101.
Measuring social support in pregnancy: can it be simple and meaningful?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3MzgtV2lsg%3D%3D&md5=680fb7a15c166108a6b8146af8f43db8CAS | 11251486PubMed |

[25]  Mohammad KI, Gamble J, Creedy DK. Prevalence and factors associated with the development of antenatal and postnatal depression among Jordanian women. Midwifery 2011; 27 e238–45.
Prevalence and factors associated with the development of antenatal and postnatal depression among Jordanian women.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DC%2BC3MbpsFyqsQ%3D%3D&md5=84d47108f55c740be313356e47ce80bcCAS | 21130548PubMed |

[26]  Emmanuel EN, Creedy DK, St John W, Brown C. Maternal role development: the impact of maternal distress and social support following childbirth. Midwifery 2011; 27 265–72.
Maternal role development: the impact of maternal distress and social support following childbirth.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 19656594PubMed |

[27]  Victorian Government Health Information. Section A: fees for admitted patients. Available at: http://health.vic.gov.au/feesman/fees1.htm [verified 24 November 2014].

[28]  Webster J, Davies H, Stankiewicz M, Fleming LC. Estimating the time involved in managing the ‘unoccupied bed’: a time and motion study. Nurs Econ 2011; 29 317–22.
| 22360106PubMed |

[29]  Giangiulio M, Aurilio L, Baker P, Brienza B, Moss E, Twinem N. Initiation and evaluation of an Admission, Discharge, Transfer [ADT] nursing program in a pediatric setting. Issues Compr Pediatr Nurs 2008; 31 61–70.
Initiation and evaluation of an Admission, Discharge, Transfer [ADT] nursing program in a pediatric setting.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 18569197PubMed |