Haematology patients’ desire to access metropolitan hospital expertise
Pam McGrathCentre for Community Science, Population & Social Health Program, Griffith Health Institute, LO5, Level 1, Logan Campus, Griffith University, Meadowbrook, Qld 4131, Australia. Postal Address: PO Box 1307, Kenmore, Qld 4069, Australia. Email: pmcgrathgu@gmail.com; p.mcgrath@griffith.edu.au
Australian Health Review 40(3) 251-256 https://doi.org/10.1071/AH15006
Submitted: 13 January 2015 Accepted: 17 July 2015 Published: 31 August 2015
Abstract
Objective To date, there is limited research to inform an understanding of cancer patients’ choice as to location of treatment. This paper makes a contribution by providing findings on a group of regional, rural and remote cancer patients, namely those diagnosed with a haematological malignancy, who have to relocate for specialist care in Queensland, Australia.
Methods A descriptive qualitative method was used based on 45 in-depth interviews with haematology patients living in Queensland who were supported by the Leukaemia Foundation of Queensland.
Results Four key factors were found to affect the decision making of patients who prefer to travel to metropolitan hospitals for specialist haematology treatments, namely access to own doctor, bonds and familiarity with metropolitan staff, desire for ‘quality’ specialist care and a distrust of local clinical care and, for some, the absence of usual barriers to visiting the metropolitan area.
Conclusions There are a group of patients who have experiences that lead them to distrust non-metropolitan hospitals and motivate them to travel long distances to attend specialist treating centres for ‘quality’ care. The literature affirms the concerns of this group. It is the hope and expectation in publishing this article that these patients’ concerns will be taken into consideration in the development of health services and policy so that eventually all regional, rural and remote patients will be provided with equitable choice with regard to the location of accessing specialist care.
What is known about the topic? The literature on haematology patients’ experiences with and preferences for local verses metropolitan hospital treatment is limited.
What does this paper add? To date, research on relocation for specialist treatment has documented the hardships for both patients and their families associated with distance from major treating hospitals. Although affirming the difficulties associated with travel and the desire of most haematology patients to be treated locally, this article completes the picture with detailed findings on a subset of patients who would prefer to travel to a metropolitan centre for treatment.
What are the implications for practitioners? The issues with regard to relocation for specialist treatment are complex and associated with a range of ‘trade-offs’, both positive and negative, for haematology patients. Thus, with regard to both service delivery and health policy decision making, the full range of factors needs to be taken into consideration. This paper indicates that, for a subgroup of haematology patients, their experience and beliefs about issues of quality of care are paramount.
Additional keywords: patient choice, qualitative research, regional, relocation, remote, rural, survivorship.
References
[1] Payne S, Jarrett N, Jeffs D. The impact of travel on cancer patients’ experiences of treatment: a literature review. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl) 2000; 9 197–203.| The impact of travel on cancer patients’ experiences of treatment: a literature review.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DC%2BD38%2FpvFelsw%3D%3D&md5=45ab7396c7dbdbcb210cbd4ef893dd96CAS |
[2] George M, Ngo P, Prawira A. Rural oncology: overcoming the tyranny of distance for improved cancer care. J Oncol Pract 2014; 10 e146–9.
| Rural oncology: overcoming the tyranny of distance for improved cancer care.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 24667293PubMed |
[3] Baird G, Flynn R, Baxter G, Donnelly M, Lawrence J. Travel time and cancer care: an example of the inverse care law? Rural Remote Health 2008; 8 1003–13.
| 1:STN:280:DC%2BD1cjksVCmug%3D%3D&md5=0f638778c58b6b6a3c4cf5f4b50a9d0bCAS | 19012470PubMed |
[4] Gordon L, Ferguson M, Chambers S, Dunn J. Fuels, beds, meals and meds: out-of-pocket expenses for patients with cancer in rural Queensland. Can Forum 2009; 33 206–12.
[5] McGrath P, Holewa H, Etcheverry P. Surviving the crisis of relocation for specialist treatment in haematology: insights from New Zealand. Illn Crisis Loss 2011; 19 233–47.
| Surviving the crisis of relocation for specialist treatment in haematology: insights from New Zealand.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[6] McGrath P. ‘It’s horrendous – but really, what can you do?’ Preliminary findings on the financial impact of relocation for specialist treatment. Aust Health Rev 2000; 23 94–103.
| ‘It’s horrendous – but really, what can you do?’ Preliminary findings on the financial impact of relocation for specialist treatment.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3M%2FmtlCjtw%3D%3D&md5=394010ccf78c1cdabfaf6dc346544b43CAS | 11186065PubMed |
[7] McGrath P. Relocation for leukaemia treatment: a description of need. Aust Health Rev 1998; 21 143–54.
| Relocation for leukaemia treatment: a description of need.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DyaK1M3ovVKhtw%3D%3D&md5=eb9a5fad04887f6aa9c75a07ec20227eCAS | 10537552PubMed |
[8] Mathews M, West R, Buebler S. How important are out of pocket costs to rural patient’s cancer care decisions? Can J Rural Med 2009; 14 54–60.
| 19379628PubMed |
[9] Gott M, Stevens T, Small N. User involvement in cancer care: exclusion and empowerment. Bristol: The Policy Press; 2000.
[10] McCarthy A, Hegney D, Brown L, Gilbar P, Brodribb TR, Swales J. Characteristics of chemotherapy practice in rural and remote area health facilities in Queensland. Aust J Rural Health 2003; 11 138–44.
| 12950397PubMed |
[11] McGrath P. Overcoming the distance barrier in relation to treatment for haematology patients: Queensland findings. Aust Health Rev 2015; 39 344–50.
| Overcoming the distance barrier in relation to treatment for haematology patients: Queensland findings.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[12] Mayan M. Essentials of qualitative inquiry. Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press; 2009.
[13] Australian Institute of Health and Welfare (AIHW), Cancer Australia, Australiasian Association of Cancer Registries. Cancer survival and prevalence in Australia: cancers diagnosed from 1982–2004. Cancer Series No. 42 Catalogue No. CAN 38. Canberra: AIHW; 2008.
[14] Jong KE, Vale P, Armstrong B. Rural inequalities in cancer care and outcome. Med J Aust 2005; 182 13–14.
| 15651940PubMed |
[15] Underhill C, Bartel R, Goldstein D, Snodgrass H, Begbie S, Yates P, White K, Jong K, Grogan P. Mapping oncology services in regional and rural Australia. Aust J Rural Health 2009; 17 321–9.
| Mapping oncology services in regional and rural Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 19930199PubMed |
[16] Baird AG, Donnelly CM, Miscampell NT, Wemyss HD. Centralisation of cancer services in rural areas has disadvantages. BMJ 2000; 320 717
| 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3c7nslKjsw%3D%3D&md5=0349d7746b1e21faddee9dc31abff9edCAS | 10710600PubMed |
[17] Campbell NC, Elliott AM, Sharp L, Ritchie LD, Cassidy J, Little J. Rural factors and survival from cancer: analysis of Scottish cancer registrations. Br J Cancer 2000; 82 1863–6.
| Rural factors and survival from cancer: analysis of Scottish cancer registrations.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3c3ps1WisQ%3D%3D&md5=970982000af26b6284edfc15b35fd734CAS | 10839303PubMed |
[18] Jones AP, Haynes R, Sauerzapf V, Crawford SM, Zhao H, Forman D. Travel times to health care and survival from cancers in northern England. Eur J Cancer 2008; 44 269–74.
| Travel times to health care and survival from cancers in northern England.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DC%2BD1c%2FltVKisg%3D%3D&md5=120bfd4149cbe34c0520d2bd07908149CAS | 17888651PubMed |
[19] Grimison P, Phillips F, Butow P, White K, Yip D, Sardelic F, Underhill C, Tse R, Simes R, Turley K, Raymond C, Goldstein D. Are visiting oncologists enough? A qualitative study of the needs of Australian rural and regional cancer patients, carers and health professionals. Asia Pac J Clin Oncol 2013; 9 226–38.
| Are visiting oncologists enough? A qualitative study of the needs of Australian rural and regional cancer patients, carers and health professionals.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 22989350PubMed |
[20] Butow PN, Phillips F, Schweder J, White K, Underhill C, Goldstein D. Psychosocial well-being and supportive care needs of cancer patients living in urban and rural/regional areas: a systematic review. Support Care Cancer 2012; 20 1–22.
| Psychosocial well-being and supportive care needs of cancer patients living in urban and rural/regional areas: a systematic review.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 21956760PubMed |
[21] Sabesan S, Roberts LJ, Aiken P, Joshi A, Larkins S. Timely access to specialist medical oncology services closer to home for rural patients: experience from the Townsville teleoncology model. Aust J Rural Health 2014; 22 156–9.
| Timely access to specialist medical oncology services closer to home for rural patients: experience from the Townsville teleoncology model.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 25123618PubMed |
[22] Sabesan S, Larkins S, Evans R. Telemedicine for rural cancer in north Queensland: bringing cancer care home. Aust J Rural Health 2012; 20 259–64.
| Telemedicine for rural cancer in north Queensland: bringing cancer care home.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 22998200PubMed |
