Impact of the Medicare Chronic Disease Management program on the conduct of Australian dietitians’ private practices
Sarah Jansen A , Lauren Ball A C and Catherine Lowe BA Centre for Health Practice Innovation, Griffith University Gold Coast Campus, Parklands Drive, Southport, Qld 4222, Australia. Email: sarah.jansen@griffithuni.edu.au
B Dietitian Services Qld, Zillmere, Qld 4034, Australia. Email: cathlowe@bigpond.net.au
C Corresponding author. Email: l.ball@griffith.edu.au
Australian Health Review 39(2) 183-189 https://doi.org/10.1071/AH14074
Submitted: 23 December 2013 Accepted: 29 October 2014 Published: 17 December 2014
Abstract
Objective This study explored private practice dietitians’ perceptions of the impact of the Australian Chronic Disease Management (CDM) program on the conduct of their private practice, and the care provided to patients.
Methods Twenty-five accredited practising dietitians working in primary care participated in an individual semistructured telephone interview. Interview questions focussed on dietitians’ perceptions of the proportion of patients receiving care through the CDM program, fee structures, adhering to reporting requirements and auditing. Transcript data were thematically analysed using a process of open coding.
Results Half of the dietitians (12/25) reported that most of their patients (>75%) received care through the CDM program. Many dietitians (19/25) reported providing identical care to patients using the CDM program and private patients, but most (17/25) described spending substantially longer on administrative tasks for CDM patients. Dietitians experienced pressure from doctors and patients to keep their fees low or to bulk-bill patients using the CDM program. One-third of interviewed dietitians (8/25) expressed concern about the potential to be audited by Medicare. Recommendations to improve the CDM program included increasing the consultation length and subsequent rebate available for dietetic consultations, and increasing the number of consultations to align with dietetic best-practice guidelines.
Conclusions The CDM program creates challenges for dietitians working in primary care, including how to sustain the quality of patient-centred care and yet maintain equitable business practices. To ensure the CDM program appropriately assists patients to receive optimal care, further review of the CDM program within the scope of dietetics is required.
What is known about the topic? The Australian CDM program is designed to facilitate patients to receive subsidised multidisciplinary care for CDM. Dietetics is the third most utilised allied health profession within the CDM program.
What does this paper add? This paper demonstrates that dietitians experience challenges in providing services to patients using the CDM program, including pressure to keep fees down, high administrative load, difficulties accessing clear information on compliance requirements, and face barriers to providing best-practice care to patients with chronic disease.
What are the implications for practitioners? Changes to the Australian CDM program are required to help dietitians provide health care in line with best-practice guidelines for CDM, and sustainable business practices.
References
[1] Australian Government. Chronic disease. Canberra: Australian Government; 2012. Available from: http://www.health.gov.au/internet/main/publishing.nsf/Content/chronic [verified 4 August 2013].[2] Australian Bureau of Statistics. Chronic disease. Canberra: Australian Government; 2010. Available from: http://www.abs.gov.au/ausstats/abs@.nsf/0/895A3D95B6ACAE9CCA2573D200107617?opendocument [verified 4 August 2013].
[3] Wagner EH, Austin BT, Davis C, Hindmarsh M, Schaefer J, Bonomi A. Improving chronic illness care: translating evidence into action. Health Aff 2001; 20 64–78.
| Improving chronic illness care: translating evidence into action.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DC%2BD38%2FovVagug%3D%3D&md5=652016759563b49f034ce4e3e48da3b9CAS |
[4] Australian Government. Primary health care reform in Australia: report to support Australia’s first national primary health care strategy. Canberra: Australian Government; 2009.
[5] Australian Government. Chronic disease management (CDM) Medicare items. Canberra: Australian Government; 2013. Available from: http://www.health.gov.au/internet/main/publishing.nsf/Content/mbsprimarycare-chronicdiseasemanagement [verified 7 August 2013].
[6] Australian Government. Allied health services under Medicare − fact sheet. Canberra: Australian Government; 2012. Available from: http://www.health.gov.au/internet/main/publishing.nsf/Content/health-medicare-health_pro-gp-pdf-allied-cnt.htm [verified 4 August 2013].
[7] Cant RP, Foster MM. Update on Medicare-funded allied health chronic disease management consultations in dietetics and the five most referred professions in 2010. Nutr Dietetics 2013; 70 42–8.
| Update on Medicare-funded allied health chronic disease management consultations in dietetics and the five most referred professions in 2010.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[8] Cant RP. Patterns of delivery of dietetic care in private practice for patients referred under the Medicare Chronic Disease Management: results of a national survey. Aust Health Rev 2010; 34 197–203.
| Patterns of delivery of dietetic care in private practice for patients referred under the Medicare Chronic Disease Management: results of a national survey.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 20497733PubMed |
[9] Australian Government. Medicare Benefits Schedule statistics, item reports 10954. Canberra: Australian Government; 2013. Available from: www.medicareaustralia.gov.au/statistics/mbs_item.shtml [verified 7 August 2013].
[10] Dietitians Association of Australia. Accredited practising dietitians. Canberra: 2013. Available from: www.daa.asn.au/for-the-public/find-an-apd/what-is-an-accredited-practising-dietitian [verified April 2013].
[11] Dietitians Association of Australia. Dietitians Association of Australia membership work areas. Canberra: 2013.
[12] Ball L, Larsson R, Gerathy R, Hood P, Lowe C. Working profile of Australian private practice Accredited Practicing Dietitians. Nutr Dietetics 2013; 70 196–205.
[13] Australian Government. What is an audit? Your questions answered. Canberra: 2010. Available from http://www.medicareaustralia.gov.au/provider/files/what-is-an-audit-factsheet.pdf [verified 20 November 2014].
[14] Foster M, Cornwell P, Fleming J, Mitchell G, Tweedy S, Hart A, Haines T. Better than nothing? Restrictions and realities of enhanced primary care for allied health practitioners. Aust J Primary Health 2009; 15 326–34.
| Better than nothing? Restrictions and realities of enhanced primary care for allied health practitioners.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[15] Cant RP. Today’s profession: views and practices of private practice dietitians re Medicare Chronic Disease Management program. Nutr Dietetics 2010; 67 77–83.
| Today’s profession: views and practices of private practice dietitians re Medicare Chronic Disease Management program.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[16] Smith J, Flowers P, Larkins M. Interpretative phenomenological analysis. Theory, method and research. London: Sage Publications; 2009.
[17] Fade S. Using interpretative phenomenological analysis for public health nutrition and dietetic research: a practical guide. Proc Nutr Soc 2004; 63 647–53.
| Using interpretative phenomenological analysis for public health nutrition and dietetic research: a practical guide.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 15831138PubMed |
[18] Miles M, Huberman A. Qualitative data analysis. 2nd edn. London: Sage Publications; 2004.
[19] Fade SA, Swift JA. Qualitative research in nutrition and dietetics: data analysis issues. J Hum Nutr Diet 2011; 24 106–14.
| Qualitative research in nutrition and dietetics: data analysis issues.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DC%2BC3MjksVaqsw%3D%3D&md5=e303fa9e0e419450c25bef4f66851bd3CAS | 21091920PubMed |
[20] Dietitians Association of Australia. Evidence based practice guidelines for the nutritional management of type 2 diabetes mellitus for adults. Canberra: DAA; 2011. Available from: http://dmsweb.daa.asn.au/files/DINER/Guidelines%20endorsed%20by%20the%20%20Board%20(May)%20with%20tracked%20changes%20%20accepted(1)%20(2).pdf? [verified 20 November 2014].
[21] Dietitians Association of Australia. Best Practice Guidelines for the Treatment of Overweight & Obesity in Adults. Canberra: XXX; 2011. Available from: http://daa.asn.au/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/FINAL-DAA-obesity-guidelines-report-25th-January-2011-2.pdf [verified 20 November 2014].
[22] Monk A, Barry B, McClain K, Weaver T, Cooper N, Franz MJ. Practice guidelines for medical nutrition therapy provided by dietitians for persons with non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. J Am Diet Assoc 1995; 95 999–1006.
| Practice guidelines for medical nutrition therapy provided by dietitians for persons with non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DyaK2Mzos1yjug%3D%3D&md5=a62afc6eefd03b3fc203ca57e0ad91d1CAS | 7657915PubMed |
[23] Ministry of Health, New Zealand Guidelines Group. New Zealand Primary Care Handbook 3rd edn. Wellington: Ministry of Health; 2012. Available from: http://www.health.govt.nz/publication/new-zealand-primary-care-handbook-2012 [verified 20 November 2014].
[24] Australian Government. Better access to mental health care services. Canberra: 2014. Available from: http://www.health.gov.au/internet/main/publishing.nsf/Content/0F792912834609B4CA257BF0001B74FA/$File/patients2.pdf [verified 20 November 2014].
[25] Dietitians Association of Australia. National competency standards for entry level dietitians in Australia. Canberra; DAA; 2009. Available at: http://dmsweb.daa.asn.au/files/WorkingandStudying/Comptency_Standards_brochure_Nov10.pdf.pdf [verified 20 November 2014].
[26] Spencer L, O’Shea MC, Ball L, Desbrow B, Leveritt M. Attendance, weight and waist circumference outcomes of patients with type 2 diabetes receiving Medicare-subsidised dietetic services. Aust J Primary Health 2013; 20 291–7.
| Attendance, weight and waist circumference outcomes of patients with type 2 diabetes receiving Medicare-subsidised dietetic services.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[27] Neuman L. Social research methods: qualitative and quantitative approaches. 6th edn. Pearson International Edition; 2006.
[28] Australian Government. Chronic disease management combined preparation of a GP management plan and coordination of team care arrangements. Canberra: Australian Government; 2014. Available at: http://www.health.gov.au/internet/main/publishing.nsf/content/F17F6787B14E6CF1CA257BF0001B0AEC/$File/Fact%20Sheet%20-%20CDM%20-%20Patient%20Info%20-%20Feb%202014.pdf [verified 5 November 2014].
