Organisational development in a rural hospital in Australia
Suzanne Young A D , Sandra Leggat B , Pauline Stanton C and Tim Bartram AA La Trobe Business School, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Vic. 3086, Australia. Email: t.bartram@latrobe.edu.au
B School of Public Health, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Vic. 3086, Australia. Email: S.Leggat@latrobe.edu.au
C School of Management, RMIT Melbourne, RMIT University, GPO Box 2476, Melbourne VIC 3001, Australia. Email: pauline.stanton@rmit.edu.au
D Corresponding author. Email: s.h.young@latrobe.edu.au
Australian Health Review 39(2) 127-135 https://doi.org/10.1071/AH14039
Submitted: 4 March 2014 Accepted: 3 November 2014 Published: 22 January 2015
Abstract
Objective This paper analyses an organisational development project that aimed to change the organisational culture and improve people management systems and processes. The questions addressed were: was the change process a success; how was success defined; and what were the barriers to its progress?
Methods We examined the process of change over a 3-year period. The organisational development intervention is described and analysed. Qualitative methods, including document review, in-depth interviews and focus groups, participant observation, newsletters and diary entries were used to gather the data. A variant of competing values was used to analyse the data.
Results We sought to build trust with all managers and encouraged reflection by conducting feedback sessions, presentations, workshops and one-on-one and group discussions. A cross-site action group was established to encourage organisation-wide participation in the project. However, it was clear that stakeholders had different understandings and perceptions of the problems facing the organisation. The project faltered when a leadership development intervention was organised.
Conclusions The existence of at least four different organisational ‘worlds’ and identities, according to different professional groupings with different goals, languages and values, was evident. The relationship between the researcher and subjects was key in terms of whether the researcher is seen as an ‘expert’ or as a ‘facilitator’. In bringing about change, we need to work with the Chief Executive Officer in empowering others. Hence, the researchers need to engage in continual dialogue across boundaries and within groups as well as at individual levels to provide support for organisational change.
What is known about the topic? Evidence suggests that change processes often fail, that success in one part of the organisation may not translate into organisation-level performance and that change may fail to deliver expected organisation-wide results. Fluctuating organisational expectations may render managers unable to understand the shifting world and the confusion, anxiety and stress that middle managers experience as part of the change process may impede decision making.
What does this paper add? This paper reports on a single case study of an organisational development project in a rural health service in Australia. The contribution of this paper is in demonstrating the different worlds of each of the actors involved. Moreover, it shows that building relationships is key.
What are the implications for practitioners? The relationship between the researcher and subjects is key in terms of whether the researcher is seen as an ‘expert’ or as a ‘facilitator’. The researchers need to engage in continual dialogue across boundaries and within groups, as well as at individual levels, to provide support for organisational change. The research also demonstrates the importance of middle managers in facilitating communication between senior management and employees.
Additional keywords: boundaries, health care, human resource management.
References
[1] Australian Government. A national health and hospitals network for Australia’s future. Delivering the reforms. Canberra: Australian Government; 2010.[2] Berwick DM. Eleven worthy aims for clinical leadership of health care reform. JAMA 1994; 272 797–802.
| Eleven worthy aims for clinical leadership of health care reform.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DyaK2czlvV2lsA%3D%3D&md5=8fb39b8fe6820bc07ad5411152d6cc29CAS | 8078145PubMed |
[3] Edmonstone J, Havergal M. The death (and rebirth?) or organization development. Health Manpow Manage 1995; 21 28–33.
| The death (and rebirth?) or organization development.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DyaK2MzhtVehsQ%3D%3D&md5=74391cdfa468436622bace1bb7e6b109CAS | 10143048PubMed |
[4] MacLeod MLP, Zimmer LV. Rethinking emancipation and empowerment in action research: lessons from small hospitals. Can J Nurs Res 2005; 37 68–84.
[5] Palmer I, Dunford R, Akin G. Managing organizational change: a multiple perspectives approach. 2nd edn. Boston: McGraw-Hill Irwin; 2009.
[6] Taylor-Bianco A, Schemerhorn J. Self regulation, strategic leadership and paradox in organizational change. J Organ Change Manage 2006; 19 457–70.
| Self regulation, strategic leadership and paradox in organizational change.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[7] Lüscher LS, Lewis MW. Organizational change and managerial sensemaking: working through paradox. Acad Manage J 2008; 51 221–40.
| Organizational change and managerial sensemaking: working through paradox.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[8] Cinite I, Duxbury LE, Higgins C. Measurement of perceived organizational readiness for change in the public sector. Br J Manage 2009; 20 265–77.
| Measurement of perceived organizational readiness for change in the public sector.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[9] Lewin K. Frontiers in group dynamics. Hum Relat 1947; 1 5–41.
| Frontiers in group dynamics.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[10] Herzig S, Jimmieson N. Middle managers’ uncertainty management during organizational change. Leadersh Organ Dev J 2006; 27 628–45.
| Middle managers’ uncertainty management during organizational change.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[11] Goodman P, Rousseau D. Organizational change that produces results: the linkage approach. Acad Manage Exec 2004; 18 7–19.
| Organizational change that produces results: the linkage approach.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[12] Huy QN. Emotional balancing of organizational continuity and radical change: the contribution of middle managers. Adm Sci Q 2002; 47 31–69.
| Emotional balancing of organizational continuity and radical change: the contribution of middle managers.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[13] van de Ven AH, Poole MS. Explaining development and change in organizations. Acad Manage Rev 1995; 20 510–40.
| Explaining development and change in organizations.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[14] Chisholm R, Elden M. Features of emerging action research. Hum Relat 1993; 46 275–98.
| Features of emerging action research.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[15] van de Van A. Suggestions for studying strategy process: a research note. Strateg Manage J 1992; 13 169–88.
| Suggestions for studying strategy process: a research note.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[16] Pettigrew A, Woodman R, Cameron K. Studying organizational change and development: challenges for future research. Acad Manage J 2001; 44 697–713.
| Studying organizational change and development: challenges for future research.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[17] Woodman R. Organizational change and development: new arenas for inquiry and action. J Manage 1989; 15 205–28.
| Organizational change and development: new arenas for inquiry and action.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[18] Glouberman S, Mintzberg H. Managing the care of health and the cure of disease. Part 1: differentiation. Health Care Manage Rev 2001; 26 56–69.
| Managing the care of health and the cure of disease. Part 1: differentiation.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3M3ksFShuw%3D%3D&md5=fe9298c454bd3873df547e24b07b8a69CAS | 11233354PubMed |
[19] Quinn RE, Rohrbaugh J. A spatial model of effectiveness criteria: towards a competing values approach to organizational analysis. Manage Sci 1983; 29 363–77.
| A spatial model of effectiveness criteria: towards a competing values approach to organizational analysis.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[20] Miles MB, Huberman MA. Qualitative data analysis: an expanded sourcebook. 2nd edn. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications; 1994.
[21] Yin R. Case study research: design and methods. 2nd edn. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications; 1994.
[22] Healy M, Perry C. Comprehensive criteria to judge validity and reliability of qualitative research within the realism paradigm. Qual Mark Res 2000; 3 118–26.
| Comprehensive criteria to judge validity and reliability of qualitative research within the realism paradigm.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[23] Cole M, Harris S, Berneth J. Exploring the implications of vision, appropriateness, and execution of organizational change. Leadersh Organ Dev J 2006; 27 352–67.
| Exploring the implications of vision, appropriateness, and execution of organizational change.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[24] Kotter J. Leading change: why transformation efforts fail. Harv Bus Rev 1995; 73 59–67.
[25] Stanton P Young S Bartram T Leggat S
[26] Callan VJ, Gallois C, Mayhew M, Grice TA, Tluchowska M, Boyce R. Restructuring the multi-professional organization: professional identity and adjustment to change in a public hospital. J Health Hum Serv Adm 2007; 29 448–77.
| 17571468PubMed |
[27] Eden C, Huxham C. Action research for management research. Br J Manage 1996; 7 75–86.
| Action research for management research.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[28] Iannello KP. Decision without hierarchy: feminist interventions in organization theory and practice. New York: Routledge; 1992.
[29] Armstrong-Stassen M. Determinants of how managers cope with organizational downsizing. Appl Psychol 2006; 55 1–26.
| Determinants of how managers cope with organizational downsizing.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[30] Bartunek JM, Rousseau DM, Rudolph JW, De Palma JA. On the receiving end: sensemaking, emotion, and assessments of an organizational change initiated by others. J Appl Behav Sci 2006; 42 182–206.
| On the receiving end: sensemaking, emotion, and assessments of an organizational change initiated by others.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[31] Boyatzis R. An overview of intentional change from a complexity perspective. J Manage Dev 2006; 25 607–23.
| An overview of intentional change from a complexity perspective.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[32] Bryant M, Wolfram Cox J. The expression of suppression: loss of emotional labour in narratives of organizational change. J Manage Organ 2006; 12 116–30.
| The expression of suppression: loss of emotional labour in narratives of organizational change.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[33] Bolton SC. Changing faces: nurses as emotional jugglers. Sociol Health Illn 2001; 23 85–100.
| Changing faces: nurses as emotional jugglers.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[34] Mann S. A health-care model of emotional labour: an evaluation of the literature and development of a model. J Health Organ Manag 2005; 19 304–17.
| A health-care model of emotional labour: an evaluation of the literature and development of a model.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 16206916PubMed |
[35] Øvretveit J. Leading improvement. J Health Organ Manag 2005; 19 413–30.
| Leading improvement.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 16375065PubMed |
[36] Mintzberg H. Managing care and cure: up and down, in and out. Health Serv Manage Res 2002; 15 193–206.
| Managing care and cure: up and down, in and out.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 12184839PubMed |
[37] Nielsen K, Randall R, Albertsen K. Participants’ appraisals of process issues and the effects of stress management interventions. J Organ Behav 2007; 28 793–810.
| Participants’ appraisals of process issues and the effects of stress management interventions.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[38] Bennett H, Durkin M. The effects of organisational change on employee psychological attachment. An exploratory study. J Manag Psychol 2000; 15 126–46.
| The effects of organisational change on employee psychological attachment. An exploratory study.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[39] Pfeffer J. Managing with power: politics and influence in organizations. Boston: Harvard Business School; 1992.
[40] Huzzard T, Ahlberg BM, Ekman M. Constructing interorganizational collaboration: the action researcher as boundary subject. Action Res 2010; 8 293–314.
| Constructing interorganizational collaboration: the action researcher as boundary subject.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[41] Cooney R, Sewell G. Complex change management program shaping the other: maintaining expert managerial status in a complex change management program. Group Organ Manage 2008; 33 685–711.
| Complex change management program shaping the other: maintaining expert managerial status in a complex change management program.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
