Register      Login
Australian Health Review Australian Health Review Society
Journal of the Australian Healthcare & Hospitals Association
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Examination of the perception of communication and collaboration in a neonatal intensive care unit: a decade on, has it changed?

Laurene Aydon A C D , Kathy Martin A and Elizabeth Nathan B
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Neonatal Clinical Care Unit, King Edward Memorial Hospital, 374 Bagot Road, Subiaco, WA 6008, Australia. Email: kathy.martin@health.wa.gov.au

B Women and Infants Research Foundation Western Australia, 374 Bagot Road, Subiaco, WA 6008, Australia. Email: liz.nathan@uwa.edu.au

C School of Child and Paediatric Health, Centre for Neonatal Research and Education, University of Western Australia, 35 Stirling Highway, Crawley, WA 6009, Australia.

D Corresponding author. Email: laurene.aydon@health.wa.gov.au

Australian Health Review 38(3) 350-353 https://doi.org/10.1071/AH13150
Submitted: 26 July 2013  Accepted: 27 January 2014   Published: 8 May 2014

Abstract

Objective The aim of this study was to ascertain the perception of communication and collaboration within and between the groups of medicine and nursing in a neonatal unit.

Methods The study used an analytical cross-sectional design involving both doctors and nursing staff in the neonatal clinical care unit (NCCU). A quantitative questionnaire using a Likert scale format, accompanied by an open-ended question, provided a snapshot of the perception of communication and collaboration within the NCCU.

Results Significant differences were noted between the two disciplines. Medical staff were satisfied overall with the communication. They perceived communication was more open, timely and that a mutual understanding existed. They thought teamwork was good. As time of employment in NCCU lengthened, the understanding between the groups lessened. Problems with the handover information emerged for both medical and nursing staff. Both groups felt problems were due to the hierarchical system.

Conclusion Within the NCCU the perception of communication and collaboration is rated more highly by doctors. This has implications for the overall care of babies and for safety issues. Education is needed in the neonatal unit to identify and bridge gaps in communication and enhance teamwork.

What is known about this topic? Doctors rate their inter-professional communication and collaboration with nurses much higher than nursing staff in many areas of health care, including the neonatal clinical care unit.

What does this paper add? There has been little change in the perception of communication and collaboration in the neonatal unit over the past decade. This is despite a change in professional roles and an emphasis on working together to improve safety in medicine. This paper provides a snapshot experience of a neonatal unit striving to work together at the bedside, from admission to discharge.

What are the implications for practitioners? Strategies need to be implemented to educate the workforce to work together as a team to deliver total safe care.

Additional keywords: neonatal clinical care unit, safety, satisfaction perception.


References

[1]  Stelfox HT, Palmisani S, Scurlock C, Orav EJ, Bates DW. The ‘To Err is Human’ report and the patient safety literature. Qual Saf Health Care 2006; 15 174–8.
The ‘To Err is Human’ report and the patient safety literature.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DC%2BD28zjt1Wruw%3D%3D&md5=06d464a3a105c4dc58994029d0ad3a9bCAS | 16751466PubMed |

[2]  Weinger M, Blike G. Intubation mishap. AHRQ: case and commentary. 2003. Available at http://webmm.ahrq.gov/case.aspx?caseID=29 [verified 22 September 2012].

[3]  Katzenbach JR, Smith DK. The discipline of teams. Harv Bus Rev 1993; 71 111–20.
| 1:STN:280:DyaK3s3gt1Gktw%3D%3D&md5=7076c499093a4610941a3d1c51c615ddCAS | 10124632PubMed |

[4]  Donchin Y, Gopher D, Olin M, Badihi Y, Biesky M, Sprung CL, Pizov R, Cotev S. A look into the nature and causes of human errors in the intensive care unit. Crit Care Med 1995; 23 294–300.
A look into the nature and causes of human errors in the intensive care unit.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DyaK2M7ntFOmtw%3D%3D&md5=5e654342a08b4b5b83f1ef780f2e366bCAS | 7867355PubMed |

[5]  Suresh G, Horbar JD, Plsek P, Gray J, Edwards WH, Shiono PH, et al Voluntary anonymous reporting of medical errors for neonatal intensive care. Pediatrics 2004; 113 1609–18.
Voluntary anonymous reporting of medical errors for neonatal intensive care.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 15173481PubMed |

[6]  Manojlovich M, Antonakos C. Satisfaction of intensive care unit nurses with nurse–physician communication. J Nurs Adm 2008; 38 237–43.
Satisfaction of intensive care unit nurses with nurse–physician communication.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 18469617PubMed |

[7]  Thomas EJ, Sexton JB, Helmreich RL. Discrepant attitudes about teamwork among critical care nurses and physicians. Crit Care Med 2003; 31 956–9.
Discrepant attitudes about teamwork among critical care nurses and physicians.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 12627011PubMed |

[8]  Copnell B, Johnston L, Harrison D, Wilson A, Robson A, Mulcahy C, et al Doctors’ and nurses’ perceptions of interdisciplinary collaboration in the NICU, and the impact of a neonatal nurse practitioner model of practice. J Clin Nurs 2004; 13 105–13.
Doctors’ and nurses’ perceptions of interdisciplinary collaboration in the NICU, and the impact of a neonatal nurse practitioner model of practice.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 14687300PubMed |

[9]  Tonse NK, Raju SG, Higgins RD. Patient safety in the context of neonatal intensive care: research and educational opportunities. Pediatr Res 2011; 70 109–15.

[10]  Shortell SM, Rousseau DM, Gillies RR, Devers KJ, Simons TL. Organizational assessment in intensive care units (ICUs): construct development, reliability, and validity of the ICU nurse–physician questionnaire. Med Care 1991; 29 709–26.
Organizational assessment in intensive care units (ICUs): construct development, reliability, and validity of the ICU nurse–physician questionnaire.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DyaK3Mzkt1alsg%3D%3D&md5=1c26512cb31f2f9717c6871ae0c520b7CAS | 1875739PubMed |

[11]  Smith JR, Cole FS. Patient safety: effective interdisciplinary teamwork through simulation and debriefing in the neonatal ICU. Crit Care Nurs Clin North Am 2009; 21 163–79.
Patient safety: effective interdisciplinary teamwork through simulation and debriefing in the neonatal ICU.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 19460662PubMed |

[12]  Fernandez CV, Gillis-Ring J. Strategies for the prevention of medical error in pediatrics. J Pediatr 2003; 143 155–62.
Strategies for the prevention of medical error in pediatrics.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 12970626PubMed |

[13]  Sayre MM, McNeese Smith D, Leach L, Phillips L. An educational intervention to increase ‘speaking-up’ behaviors in nurses and improve patient safety. J Nurs Care Qual 2012; 27 154–60.
An educational intervention to increase ‘speaking-up’ behaviors in nurses and improve patient safety.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 22192938PubMed |

[14]  Brindley PG, Reynolds SF. Improving verbal communication in critical care medicine. J Crit Care 2011; 26 155–9.
Improving verbal communication in critical care medicine.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 21482347PubMed |

[15]  Leonard M, Graham S, Bonacum D. The human factor: the critical importance of effective teamwork and communication in providing safe care. Qual Saf Health Care 2004; 13 i85–90.
The human factor: the critical importance of effective teamwork and communication in providing safe care.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 15465961PubMed |

[16]  Kostopoulou O, Shepherd A. Fragmentation of treatment and the potential for human error in neonatal intensive care. Top Health Inf Manage 2000; 20 78–92.
| 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3M%2FgsVKksA%3D%3D&md5=ebb4b48098bc30ee72deac1a36089683CAS | 10977144PubMed |

[17]  Haftel HM, Hicks PJ. Assessing teamwork and communication in the authentic patient care learning environment. Pediatrics 2011; 127 601–3.
Assessing teamwork and communication in the authentic patient care learning environment.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 21382948PubMed |

[18]  Rose L. Interprofessional collaboration in the ICU: how to define? Nurs Crit Care 2011; 16 5–10.
Interprofessional collaboration in the ICU: how to define?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 21199549PubMed |