General practitioners and consultation drift: the effects of supply-side changes and reforms on service delivery patterns
Michael J. Taylor A E , Dell Horey A , Charles Livingstone B , Siew-Pang Chan C and Hal Swerissen DA School of Public Health & Human Biosciences, Faculty of Health Sciences, La Trobe University, Bundoora, Vic. 3086, Australia. Email: d.horey@latrobe.edu.au
B Department of Health Social Science, Monash University, Commercial Road, Melbourne, Vic. 3004, Australia. Email: charles.livingstone@monash.edu
C Department of Mathematics and Statistics, Faculty of Science, Technology and Engineering, La Trobe University, Bundoora, Vic. 3086, Australia. Email: s.chan@latrobe.edu.au
D La Trobe University, Bundoora, Vic. 3086, Australia. Email: h.swerissen@latrobe.edu.au
E Corresponding author. Email: michael.taylor@latrobe.edu.au
Australian Health Review 37(5) 574-578 https://doi.org/10.1071/AH12160
Submitted: 16 March 2012 Accepted: 21 November 2012 Published: 1 May 2013
Journal Compilation © AHHA 2013
Abstract
Objectives To determine what types of supply-side change underpinned the recent decline in longer (Level C and D) consultation provision and to evaluate the impact of the May 2010 reforms in realigning Medicare with long-term health policy objectives.
Methods Retrospective analysis of Level C and D consultation provision by general practitioners (GPs) across Australia. Outcome measures were extent (number of consultations per providing GP) and participation (proportion of GPs providing these consultations).
Results The proportion of GPs participating in Level C consultation provision is substantial (96%) and constant; however, extent of provision per GP decreased by 21% between 2006 and 2010. Level D participation decreased from 72% during 2006 to a nadir of 62% in 2009, and extent of provision decreased by 26% between 2006 and 2010.
Conclusion Two distinct types of change underpinned the overall decline in Level C and D consultation provision. GPs appear to be providing Level C consultations less often, but the overwhelming majority still provide these consultations to some extent. The extent of provision of Level D consultations and the proportion of GPs providing them has decreased; an appreciable number of GPs simply stopped providing Level D consultations. Medicare reforms appear ineffective in realigning Medicare with long-term policy objectives.
What is known about the topic? Previous research has demonstrated that GP consultation delivery patterns under Medicare have changed profoundly in recent years, with provision of Level C and D GP consultations having declined substantially.
What does this paper add? This research shows that the overall decline in longer consultations is underpinned by distinct supply-side changes: (1) a decrease in average consultation provision per GP (for Levels C and D) and (2) the effective abandonment of Level D consultations by GPs. Medicare reforms do not appear to be entirely effective in addressing these supply changes.
What are the implications for practitioners? Despite their centrality to health policy objectives of improved preventive care, chronic disease management and mental healthcare, longer GP consultations are declining in very distinct ways. The ability of the current Medicare model to achieve these health policy objectives appears increasingly questionable.
References
[1] Taylor MJ, Horey D, Livingstone C, Swerissen H. Decline with a capital D: long-term changes in general practice consultation patterns across Australia. Med J Aust 2010; 193 80–3.| 20642408PubMed |
[2] Bracey A. Audit fears undermine government’s prevention push. Medical Observer. 3 April 2009. Available at http://www.medicalobserver.com.au/news/audit-fears-undermine-governments-prevention-push. [verified 11 March 2013].
[3] Roxon N. Medicare red tape slashed [media release]. 14 December 2009. Canberra: Minister for Health and Ageing; 2009. Available at http://www.health.gov.au/internet/ministers/publishing.nsf/Content/mr-yr09-nr-nr234.htm?OpenDocument&yr=2009&mth=12 [verified 11 March 2013].
[4] Australian Government Department of Health and Ageing. MBS Online. Canberra: Department of Health and Ageing; 2010. Available at http://www.health.gov.au/internet/mbsonline/publishing.nsf/Content/Medicare-Benefits-Schedule-MBS-1 [verified 11 March 2013]
[5] Australian Government. Taking preventative action: a response to Australia – the Healthiest Country by 2020. Canberra: Australian Government; 2010. Available at http://www.health.gov.au/internet/preventativehealth/publishing.nsf/Content/6B7B17659424FBE5CA25772000095458/$File/tpa.pdf [verified 11 March 2013]
[6] Britt H, Miller GC, Charles J, Henderson J, Bayram C, Valenti L. et al. General practice activity in Australia 1999–00 to 2008–09: 10 year data tables [General practice series no. 26]. Canberra: Australian Institute of Health and Welfare; 2009. Available at http://www.aihw.gov.au/publications/gep/gep-26-11014/gep-26-11014.pdf [verified 11 March 2013]
[7] Australia M. Medicare Australia Statistics. Canberra: Medicare Australia; 2010. Available at https://www.medicareaustralia.gov.au/statistics/mbs_group.shtml [verified 11 March 2013]
[8] Chow G. Tests of equality between sets of coefficients in two linear regressions. Econometrica 1960; 28 591–605.
| Tests of equality between sets of coefficients in two linear regressions.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[9] Jamtvedt G, Young JM, Kristoffersen DT, O’Brien MA, Oxman AD. Audit and feedback: effects on professional practice and health care outcomes. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2006;
| Audit and feedback: effects on professional practice and health care outcomes.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 16625533PubMed |
[10] Roxon N. Ensuring the integrity of Medicare: increased MBS compliance audits [media release]. 13 May 2008. Canberra: Minister for Health and Ageing; 2008. Available at http://www.health.gov.au/internet/ministers/publishing.nsf/Content/mr-yr08-nr-nr082.htm?OpenDocument&yr=2008&mth=5 [verified 11 March 2013]
[11] Webber T. What is wrong with Medicare? Med J Aust 2012; 196 18–9.
| What is wrong with Medicare?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 22256919PubMed |
[12] Masters C, Watt M. Professional Services Review: unnatural justice. Med J Aust 2012; 196 20–1.
| Professional Services Review: unnatural justice.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 22256920PubMed |
[13] Senate Community Affairs Reference Committee. Review of the Professional Services Review (PSR) scheme. Canberra: Parliament of Australia; 2011. Available at http://www.aph.gov.au/Parliamentary_Business/Committees/Senate_Committees?url=clac_ctte/completed_inquiries/2010-13/prof_serv_rev/report/report.pdf [verified 11 March 2013]
[14] Pohlmeier W, Ulrich V. An econometric model of the two-part decision making process in the demand for health care. J Hum Resour 1995; 30 339–61.
| An econometric model of the two-part decision making process in the demand for health care.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[15] Zewifel P. “Supplier-induced demand” in a model of physician behaviour. In: Perlman M, van der Gaag J, editors. Health, economics and health economics. Amsterdam: North-Holland Publishing Company; 1981. pp. 245–67.
