Effects of compulsory rural vocational training for Australian general practitioners: a qualitative study
Sarah A. Bayley A , Parker J. Magin A B C , Jennifer M. Sweatman A and Catherine M. Regan AA General Practice Training Valley to Coast, Newbolds Building, Gavey Street, Mayfield, NSW 2304, Australia. Email: sarah.bayley@gptvtc.com.au; jmpws@yahoo.com.au; cathy.regan@gptvtc.com.au
B University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW 2308, Australia.
C Corresponding author. Email: parker.magin@newcastle.edu.au
Australian Health Review 35(1) 81-85 https://doi.org/10.1071/AH09853
Submitted: 1 November 2009 Accepted: 23 June 2010 Published: 25 February 2011
Abstract
Background. Increasing the recruitment of doctors, including general practitioners (GPs), to rural areas is recognised as a health priority internationally. Australian GP trainees (registrars) complete a mandatory minimum of 6 months training in a rural area. The rationale for this includes the expectation of increased likelihood of a future choice of rural practice location.
Method. A qualitative study employing semistructured in-depth interviews and a modified grounded methodology. Participants were 15 registrars from an Australian GP postgraduate training program.
Results. Though generally a rewarding clinical learning experience, negative aspects of the rural placement included the disruption to personal lives of rural relocation and the stresses involved in higher levels of clinical responsibility. These stressors could undermine rather than enhance clinical confidence. Anxiety and depression were accompaniments for some registrars. Intention to practice rurally was little influenced by this compulsory placement.
Conclusions. Findings of positive effects on rural practice destination in studies of medical undergraduates should not be generalised to GP registrars. The positive clinical learning experience of most registrars in rural terms must be balanced with the social dislocation involved in rural relocation and the adverse effects of the rural experience, for some registrars, on professional confidence and psychological well being.
What is known about the topic? The rationale for compulsory rural placements during general practitioner vocational training includes an assumption that this will increase rural GP workforce. Undergraduate training in rural environments is known to enhance recruitment to rural practice.
What does this paper add? Despite considerable positive educational and training outcomes for many registrars, compulsory rural training placements cause significant social dislocation for many registrars and were in this study associated with psychological morbidity in some registrars. Placements are unlikely to significantly increase rural GP workforce.
What are the implications for practitioners? Compulsory rural placements can be a negative experience for GP registrars. Findings of positive effects of rural training experience on career intentions and rural workplace destination in studies of medical undergraduates should not be generalised to compulsory rural placements for general practice registrars.
References
[1] Medical Labour Force. Canberra: Australian Institute of Health and Welfare; 2006.[2] Strategic Plan 2007–2010. Melbourne: Rural Health Workforce Australia; 2007.
[3] Rourke JT, Strasser R. Education for rural practice in Canada and Australia. Acad Med 1996; 71 464–9.
| Education for rural practice in Canada and Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DyaK2s3mvF2ltw%3D%3D&md5=568f401fe0a698f0db5978c0d14ecc69CAS | 9114863PubMed |
[4] The Australian general practice training program transition policies. Policy number 1.2.1, 1.2.2. Canberra: GPET Ltd; 2008.
[5] Charles DM, Ward AM, Lopez DG. Experiences of female general practice registrars: are rural attachments encouraging them to stay? Aust J Rural Health 2005; 13 331–6.
| Experiences of female general practice registrars: are rural attachments encouraging them to stay?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 16313527PubMed |
[6] Panozzo S, Laurence C, Black L, Poole L. Exploration of the preconceptions of living in a rural community by general practitioner registrar partners. Aust J Rural Health 2009; 17 167–70.
| Exploration of the preconceptions of living in a rural community by general practitioner registrar partners.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 19469782PubMed |
[7] Dunbabin JS, Levitt L. Rural origin and rural medical exposure: their impact on rural and remote medical workforce in Australia. Rural Remote Health 2003; 3 212 http://www.rrh.org.au/publishedarticles/article_print_212.pdf
| 1:STN:280:DC%2BD2M3kt1SlsQ%3D%3D&md5=ce24c641910ed831d9ba4ecb83281e0fCAS | 15877502PubMed |
[8] Brooks RG, Walsh M, Mardon RE, Lewis M, Clawson A. The roles of nature and nurture in the recruitment and retention of primary care physicians in rural areas: a review of the literature. Acad Med 2002; 77 790–8.
| The roles of nature and nurture in the recruitment and retention of primary care physicians in rural areas: a review of the literature.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 12176692PubMed |
[9] Dunbabin JS, McEwin K, Cameron I. Postgraduate medical placements in rural areas: their impact on the rural medical workforce. Rural Remote Health 2006; 6 481 [verified 7 January 2011]. http://www.rrh.org.au/publishedarticles/article_print_481.pdf
| 16594864PubMed |
[10] Rolfe IE, Pearson SA, O’Connell DL, Dickinson JA. Finding solutions to the rural doctor shortage: the roles of selection versus undergraduate medical education at Newcastle. Aust N Z J Med 1995; 25 512–7.
| Finding solutions to the rural doctor shortage: the roles of selection versus undergraduate medical education at Newcastle.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DyaK287lsVChsg%3D%3D&md5=122872bb9b5df6665dca47d414b11d6eCAS | 8588774PubMed |
[11] Wilkinson D, Laven G, Pratt N, Beilby J. Impact of undergraduate and postgraduate rural training, and medical school entry criteria on rural practice among Australian general practitioners: national study of 2414 doctors. Med Educ 2003; 37 809–14.
| Impact of undergraduate and postgraduate rural training, and medical school entry criteria on rural practice among Australian general practitioners: national study of 2414 doctors.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 12950945PubMed |
[12] General Practice Education and Training. Specialist registrar perceptions of general practice training. 2005. Available at http://www.agpt.com.au//view/document.shtml?w44073-fzhesxh.pdf [verified 14 January 2011].
[13] Larkins SL, Spillman M, Vanlint JW, Hays RB. Stress, personal and educational problems in vocational training. A prospective cohort study. Aust Fam Physician 2003; 32 473–5.
| 12833779PubMed |
[14] Miles M, Huberman A. Early steps in data analysis. In: Qualitative Data analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook. 2nd edn. London: Sage Publications; 1994: pp. 50–74.
[15] Pathman DE. Medical education and physicians’ career choices: are we taking credit beyond our due? Acad Med 1996; 71 963–8.
| Medical education and physicians’ career choices: are we taking credit beyond our due?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DyaK2s3ntFSgsA%3D%3D&md5=35a2b13e5c27583a52e05a9a3a5edae5CAS | 9125983PubMed |
