Ward rounds: the next focus for quality improvement?
Owen M. BradfieldAustralian Health Review 34(2) 193-196 https://doi.org/10.1071/AH09797
Submitted: 17 June 2009 Accepted: 9 February 2010 Published: 25 May 2010
Abstract
The Garling Report, published in November 2008, was a public inquiry into the provision and governance of Acute Care Services in New South Wales Public Hospitals. Garling’s 139 recommendations, aimed at modernising clinical care and equipment, include better supervision of junior staff, multidisciplinary teamwork, structured clinical handover and improved culture within health services. Garling also made specific recommendations about ward rounds, arguing that they should be daily, supervised and multidisciplinary. Given the importance of ward rounds in planning and evaluating treatment, implementation of these recommendations will require further evidence, engagement of senior clinicians and cultural change. This article discusses some of the barriers to Garling’s recommendations.
[1]
[2] Skinner CA, Braithwaite J, Frankum B, Kerridge RK, Goulston KJ. Reforming New South Wales public hospitals: an assessment of the Garling inquiry. Med J Aust 2009; 190(2): 78–9.
| PubMed | [verified 30 April 2009].
[19] Morjikian RL, Kimball B, Joynt J. Leading change: the nurse executive’s role in implementing new care delivery models. J Nurs Adm 2007; 37(9): 399–404.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed | [verified 24 May 2009].
[22] Busby A, Gilchrist B. The role of the nurse in the medical ward round. J Adv Nurs 1992; 17 339–46.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed | CAS | [verified 23 May 2009].