The impact of recent physiotherapy graduates in the workforce: a study of Curtin University entry-level physiotherapists 2000–2004
Amanda J. Mulcahy A D , Sue Jones B , Geoff Strauss C and Ian Cooper AA Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Perth, WA 6009, Australia.
B Faculty of Teaching and Learning, Curtin University of Technology, Bentley, WA 6102, Australia.
C School of Physiotherapy, Curtin University of Technology, Bentley, WA 6102, Australia.
D Corresponding author. Email: amanda.mulcahy@health.wa.gov.au
Australian Health Review 34(2) 252-259 https://doi.org/10.1071/AH08700
Submitted: 6 October 2008 Accepted: 15 June 2009 Published: 25 May 2010
Abstract
Physiotherapy is the largest healthcare contributor after nursing and medicine and it is important to understand its employment characteristics. This study aimed to explore workforce trends for recent physiotherapy graduates, including satisfaction and motivating factors, and future career intentions. A self-administered questionnaire was provided to contactable entry-level physiotherapy graduates (2000–2004) from Curtin University. Of 256 respondents (62.9%), 76.5% were employed full-time. A total of 45% of physiotherapists worked in the public health system; 79.3% worked in cities; 92.2% were clinicians. Top salaries were earned by those completing more continuing professional development hours, working privately, in rural locations and males. A total of 65% (n = 118) of respondents believed they would leave physiotherapy within 10 years. The best aspects of working in physiotherapy were ‘helping people’, ‘flexibility’ and ‘working in a healthcare team’. Major areas for improvement were ‘remuneration’, ‘skill recognition’ and ‘marketing’. This study suggests serious implications for the future of the health; planning to avert shortages is essential.
What is known about the topic? Few recent studies have examined the extent to which physiotherapists may become dissatisfied and leave their professions, and much of the evidence is anecdotal.
What does the paper add? Through a self-administered survey, it was found that satisfaction with physiotherapy was indicated by 72.0% of respondents, with higher levels amongst rural workers, those completing more continuing professional development and senior physiotherapists.
What are the implications for practitioners? Health workforce planning must take into consideration that many graduates predicted a relatively short-term physiotherapy career. The most satisfied graduates were goal-oriented and developing a career path as evidenced by professional body membership, participation in more continuing professional development and working in a senior position.
Acknowledgements
The authors acknowledge Curtin University of Technology and Nola Cecins, Dr Graeme Wright, Peter McKinnon, Jennifer Lalor, Paul Davey, Duncan Hardman, Dr Peter Dewar, Robert Mulcahy, Kylie Mulcahy and James MacWatt.
[1]
[2]
[3]
[4]
[5] Schofield DJ, Fletcher SL. The physiotherapy workforce is ageing, becoming more masculinised, and is working longer hours: a demographic study. Aust J Physiother 2007; 53 121–6.
| PubMed | [verified 27 April 2010].
[12] Crosbie J, Gass E, Jull G, Morris M, Rivett D, Ruston S, Sheppard L, Sullivan J, et al. Sustainable undergraduate education and professional competency. Aust J Physiother 2002; 48 5–7.
| PubMed | [verified 20 May 2006].
[15]
[16]
[17]
[18]
[19]
[20]
[21]
[22]
[23] Westbrook M, Nordholm L. Work experiences of recent physiotherapy graduates. Aust J Physiother 1982; 28 16–24.
[verified 10 October 2007].
[25] Braithwaite D, Emery J, De Lusignan S, Sutton S. Using the internet to conduct surveys of health professionals: a valid alternative? Fam Pract 2003; 20 545–51.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed | [verified 30 April 2006].
[30] Bent A. Allied health in central Australia: challenges and rewards in remote area practice. Aust J Physiother 1999; 45 203–12.
| PubMed |
[31]
[32] Rozier CK, Hamilton B, Hersh-Cochran M. Gender-based income differences for physical therapist managers. Phys Ther 1998; 78 43–51.
| PubMed | CAS |
[33] Rozier CK, Raymond M, Goldstein M, Hamilton B. Gender and physical therapy career success factors. Phys Ther 1998; 78 690–704.
| PubMed | CAS |
[34] Speakman HG, Pleasant JM, Sutton GB. The job satisfaction of physical therapists. Physiother Res Int 1996; 1 247–54.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed | CAS |
[35] Harkson DG, Unterreiner A, Shepard K. Factors related to job turnover in physical therapy. Phys Ther 1982; 62 1465–70.
| PubMed | CAS |
[36] Lysack C, McNevin N, Dunleavy K. Job choice and personality: a profile of Michigan occupational and physical therapists. J Allied Health 2001; 30 75–82.
| PubMed | CAS |
[37] Pearl M. Factors physical therapists use to make career decisions. Phys Ther 1990; 70 105–7.
| CAS | PubMed |
