Register      Login
Australian Journal of Zoology Australian Journal of Zoology Society
Evolutionary, molecular and comparative zoology
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Choice of monitoring method can influence estimates of usage of artificial hollows by vertebrate fauna

Reannan Honey A , Christopher M. McLean B , Brad R. Murray A , Michael N. Callan https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3528-3050 C and Jonathan K. Webb https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4822-6829 A *
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A School of Life Sciences, University of Technology Sydney, Broadway, NSW 2007, Australia.

B Specialist Research Services, Gosford, NSW 2250, Australia.

C Habitech Innovation & Management, 2/86 Russell Street, Bathurst, NSW 2795, Australia.

* Correspondence to: Jonathan.Webb@uts.edu.au

Handling Editor: Paul Cooper

Australian Journal of Zoology 69(1) 18-25 https://doi.org/10.1071/ZO21012
Submitted: 29 April 2021  Accepted: 13 October 2021   Published: 23 November 2021

© 2021 The Author(s) (or their employer(s)). Published by CSIRO Publishing

Abstract

The loss of hollow-bearing trees is a key threat for many hollow-dependent taxa. Nesting boxes have been widely used to offset tree hollow loss, but they have high rates of attrition, and, often, low rates of usage by target species. To counter these problems, chainsaw carved hollows (artificial cavities cut into trees) have become a popular alternative, yet little research has been published on their effectiveness. We examined the usage of 150 chainsaw carved hollows by cavity-dependent fauna in the central west of New South Wales using observations from traditional inspection methods and remote cameras. Between October 2017 and April 2019, we detected 21 species of vertebrates (two reptile, one amphibian, 10 bird, and eight mammal species) inside chainsaw carved hollows, but the number of species detected was dependent on the chosen monitoring method. We detected six species inside hollows during physical inspections, whereas remote cameras detected 21 species entering hollows. Cameras detected eight species using hollows as breeding sites, whereas physical inspections detected just four species. Cameras detected two threatened mammals (squirrel glider (Petaurus norfolcensis) and greater glider (Petauroides volans)) raising young inside hollows, yet we failed to detect these species during physical inspections. For birds, the two methods yielded equivalent results for detection of breeding events. Overall, our study showed that few cavity-dependent species used chainsaw carved hollows as breeding sites. This highlights how artificial hollows are not a substitute for retaining naturally occurring hollows in large trees and revegetation programs.

Keywords: biodiversity, camera trap, chainsaw carved hollow, habitat loss, habitat use, threatened species.


References

Baker-Gabb D (2011) National recovery plan for the superb parrot Polytelis swainsonii. (Victorian Government Department of Sustainability and Environment (DSE), Melbourne.)

Barnes, CP, Rose, AB, and Debus, SJS (2005). Breeding behaviour and diet of a family of barking owls Ninox connivens in south-eastern Queensland. Australian Field Ornithology 22, 182–195.

Beyer, GL, and Goldingay, RL (2006). The value of nest boxes in the research and management of Australian hollow-using arboreal marsupials. Wildlife Research 33, 161–174.
The value of nest boxes in the research and management of Australian hollow-using arboreal marsupials.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Bradshaw, CJA (2012). Little left to lose: deforestation and forest degradation in Australia since European colonization. Journal of Plant Ecology 5, 109–120.
Little left to lose: deforestation and forest degradation in Australia since European colonization.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Carey AB, Gill JD (1983) Direct habitat improvements – some recent advances. In ‘Snag Habitat Management: proceedings of the symposium’. pp. 80–87. (USDA Forest Service General Technical Report RM-99: Fort Collins, CO.)

Cooke, R, Wallis, R, Hogan, F, White, J, and Webster, A (2006). The diet of powerful owls (Ninox strenua) and prey availability in a continuum of habitats from disturbed urban fringe to protected forest environments in south-eastern Australia. Wildlife Research 33, 199–206.
The diet of powerful owls (Ninox strenua) and prey availability in a continuum of habitats from disturbed urban fringe to protected forest environments in south-eastern Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Dillon M, McNellie M, Oliver I (2011) Assessing the extent and condition of native vegetation in NSW. Monitoring, evaluation and reporting program. (Technical report series. Ofice of Environment and Heritage, Sydney)

Environment Protection Authority (2014) Identifying hollow-bearing and recruitment trees. (NSW Environment Protection Authority, Sydney)

Evans, MC (2016). Deforestation in Australia: drivers, trends and policy responses. Pacific Conservation Biology 22, 130–150.
Deforestation in Australia: drivers, trends and policy responses.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Gano, RD, and Mosher, JA (1983). Artificial cavity construction: an alternative to nest boxes. Wildlife Society Bulletin 11, 74–76.

Garnett S, Szabo J, Dutson G (2010) ‘The action plan for Australian birds 2010.’ (CSIRO Publishing)

Gibbons P, Lindenmayer D (2002) ‘Tree hollows and wildlife conservation in Australia.’ (CSIRO)

Goldingay, RL, Rohweder, D, and Taylor, BD (2012). Will arboreal mammals use rope-bridges across a highway in eastern Australia? Australian Mammalogy 35, 30–38.
Will arboreal mammals use rope-bridges across a highway in eastern Australia?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Goldingay, RL, Rueegger, NN, Grimson, MJ, and Taylor, BD (2015). Specific nest box designs can improve habitat restoration for cavity-dependent arboreal mammals. Restoration Ecology 23, 482–490.
Specific nest box designs can improve habitat restoration for cavity-dependent arboreal mammals.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Goldingay, RL, Thomas, KJ, and Shanty, D (2018). Outcomes of decades long installation of nest boxes for arboreal mammals in southern Australia. Ecological Management & Restoration 19, 204–211.
Outcomes of decades long installation of nest boxes for arboreal mammals in southern Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Griffiths, SR, Semmens, K, Watson, SJ, and Jones, CS (2020). Installing chainsaw-carved hollows in medium-sized live trees increases rates of visitation by hollow-dependent fauna. Restoration Ecology 28, 1225–1236.
Installing chainsaw-carved hollows in medium-sized live trees increases rates of visitation by hollow-dependent fauna.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Harper, MJ, McCarthy, MA, and van der Ree, R (2005). The use of nest boxes in urban natural vegetation remnants by vertebrate fauna. Wildlife Research 32, 509–516.
The use of nest boxes in urban natural vegetation remnants by vertebrate fauna.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Kavanagh, RP (1996). The breeding biology and diet of the masked owl Tyto novaehollandiae near Eden, New South Wales. Emu 96, 158–165.

Kavanagh RP (1997) Ecology and management of large forest owls in south-eastern Australia. PhD thesis, University of Sydney, Sydney.

Kavanagh RP, Loyn RH, Smith GC, Taylor RJ, Catling PC (2004) Which species should be monitored to indicate ecological sustainability in Australian forest management? In ‘Conservation of Australia’s forest fauna’. (Ed. D Lunney) pp. 959–987. (Royal Zoological Society of NSW: NSW, Australia)

Keith D (2006) ‘Ocean shores to desert dunes: the native vegetation of New South Wales and the ACT.’ (Department of Environment and Conservation (NSW): Sydney, Australia)

Kerle A (2004) A cautionary tale: decline of the common brushtail possum Trichosurus vulpecula and common ringtail possum Pseudocheirus peregrinus in the woodlands of the western slopes and plains of New South Wales. In ‘The biology of australian possums and gliders’. (Eds RL Goldingay, SM Jackson) pp. 71–84. (Surrey Beatty & Sons Pty Ltd: Chipping Norton, NSW)

Koch, A, Munks, S, and Driscoll, D (2008). The use of hollow-bearing trees by vertebrate fauna in wet and dry Eucalyptus obliqua forest, Tasmania. Wildlife Research 35, 727–746.
The use of hollow-bearing trees by vertebrate fauna in wet and dry Eucalyptus obliqua forest, Tasmania.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Law, B, Gonsalves, L, Chidel, M, and Brassil, T (2016). Subtle use of a disturbance mosaic by the south-eastern long-eared bat (Nyctophilus corbeni): an extinction-prone, narrow-space bat. Wildlife Research 43, 153–168.
Subtle use of a disturbance mosaic by the south-eastern long-eared bat (Nyctophilus corbeni): an extinction-prone, narrow-space bat.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Le Roux, DS, Ikin, K, Lindenmayer, DB, Bistricer, G, Manning, AD, and Gibbons, P (2016a). Effects of entrance size, tree size and landscape context on nest box occupancy: considerations for management and biodiversity offsets. Forest Ecology and Management 366, 135–142.
Effects of entrance size, tree size and landscape context on nest box occupancy: considerations for management and biodiversity offsets.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Le Roux, DS, Ikin, K, Lindenmayer, DB, Bistricer, G, Manning, AD, and Gibbons, P (2016b). Enriching small trees with artificial nest boxes cannot mimic the value of large trees for hollow-nesting birds. Restoration Ecology 24, 252–258.
Enriching small trees with artificial nest boxes cannot mimic the value of large trees for hollow-nesting birds.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Lindenmayer, D, Crane, M, Blanchard, W, Okada, S, and Montague-Drake, R (2016). Do nest boxes in restored woodlands promote the conservation of hollow-dependent fauna? Restoration Ecology 24, 244–251.
Do nest boxes in restored woodlands promote the conservation of hollow-dependent fauna?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Lindenmayer, DB, Blanchard, W, Blair, D, McBurney, L, Taylor, C, Scheele, BC, Westgate, MJ, Robinson, N, and Foster, C (2021). The response of arboreal marsupials to long-term changes in forest disturbance. Animal Conservation 24, 246–258.
The response of arboreal marsupials to long-term changes in forest disturbance.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Lindenmayer, DB, Crane, M, Evans, MC, Maron, M, Gibbons, P, Bekessy, S, and Blanchard, W (2017). The anatomy of a failed offset. Biological Conservation 210, 286–292.
The anatomy of a failed offset.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Lindenmayer, DB, and Laurance, WF (2017). The ecology, distribution, conservation and management of large old trees. Biological Reviews 92, 1434–1458.
The ecology, distribution, conservation and management of large old trees.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 27383287PubMed |

Lindenmayer, DB, Laurance, WF, Franklin, JF, Likens, GE, Banks, SC, Blanchard, W, Gibbons, P, Ikin, K, Blair, D, McBurney, L, Manning, AD, and Stein, JAR (2014). New policies for old trees: averting a global crisis in a keystone ecological structure. Conservation Letters 7, 61–69.
New policies for old trees: averting a global crisis in a keystone ecological structure.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Lindenmayer, DB, MacGregor, CI, Cunningham, RB, Incoll, RD, Crane, M, Rawlins, D, and Michael, DR (2003). The use of nest boxes by arboreal marsupials in the forests of the Central Highlands of Victoria. Wildlife Research 30, 259–264.
The use of nest boxes by arboreal marsupials in the forests of the Central Highlands of Victoria.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Lindenmayer, DB, Welsh, A, Donnelly, C, Crane, M, Michael, D, Macgregir, C, McBurney, L, Montague-Drake, R, and Gibbons, P (2009). Are nest boxes a viable alternative source of cavities for hollow-dependent animals? Long-term monitoring of nest box occupancy, pest use and attrition. Biological Conservation 142, 33–42.
Are nest boxes a viable alternative source of cavities for hollow-dependent animals? Long-term monitoring of nest box occupancy, pest use and attrition.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Mackowski CM (1984) The ontogeny of hollow in blackbutt (Eucalyptus pilularis) and its relevance to the management of forests for possums, gliders and timber. In ‘Possums and gliders’. (Eds A Smith, I Hume) pp. 553–567. (Surrey Beatty & Sons Pty Ltd)

Mattheck, C, Bethge, K, and Erb, D (1993). Failure criteria for trees. Arboricultural Journal 17, 201–209.
Failure criteria for trees.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

McComb, LB, Lentini, PE, Harley, DKP, Lumsden, LF, Antrobus, JS, Eyre, AC, and Briscoe, NJ (2019). Feral cat predation on Leadbeater’s possum (Gymnobelideus leadbeateri) and observations of arboreal hunting at nest boxes. Australian Mammalogy 41, 262–265.
Feral cat predation on Leadbeater’s possum (Gymnobelideus leadbeateri) and observations of arboreal hunting at nest boxes.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

McLean, CM, Bradstock, R, Price, O, and Kavanagh, RP (2015). Tree hollows and forest stand structure in Australian warm temperate Eucalyptus forests are adversely affected by logging more than wildfire. Forest Ecology and Management 341, 37–44.
Tree hollows and forest stand structure in Australian warm temperate Eucalyptus forests are adversely affected by logging more than wildfire.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

McLean, CM, Kavanagh, RP, Penman, T, and Bradstock, R (2018). The threatened status of the hollow dependent arboreal marsupial, the greater glider (Petauroides volans), can be explained by impacts from wildfire and selective logging. Forest Ecology and Management 415, 19–25.
The threatened status of the hollow dependent arboreal marsupial, the greater glider (Petauroides volans), can be explained by impacts from wildfire and selective logging.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

McNabb, E, and Greenwood, J (2011). A powerful owl disperses into town and uses an artificial nest-box. Australian Field Ornithology 28, 65–75.

Meek, PD, Ballard, G-A, Vernes, K, and Fleming, PJS (2015). The history of wildlife camera trapping as a survey tool in Australia. Australian Mammalogy 37, 1–12.
The history of wildlife camera trapping as a survey tool in Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Menkhorst P, Knight F (2011) ‘A field guide to the mammals of Australia.’ 3rd edn. (Oxford University Press: South Melbourne, Vic)

Menkhorst, PW (1984). Use of nest boxes by forest vertebrates in Gippsland: acceptance, preference and demand. Wildlife Research 11, 255–264.
Use of nest boxes by forest vertebrates in Gippsland: acceptance, preference and demand.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Mering, ED, and Chambers, CL (2014). Thinking outside the box: a review of artifcial roosts for bats. Wildlife Society Bulletin 38, 741–751.
Thinking outside the box: a review of artifcial roosts for bats.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Norman, FI, and Riggert, TL (1977). Nest boxes as nest sites for Australian waterfowl. The Journal of Wildlife Management 41, 643–649.
Nest boxes as nest sites for Australian waterfowl.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

O’Connell AF, Nicholls JD, Karanth KU (Eds) (2011) ‘Camera traps in animal ecology: methods and analyses.’ (Springer: Tokyo)

Ozolins, A, Brack, C, and Freudenberger, D (2001). Abundance and decline of isolated trees in the agricultural landscapes of central New South Wales, Australia. Pacific Conservation Biology 7, 195–203.
Abundance and decline of isolated trees in the agricultural landscapes of central New South Wales, Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Parnaby H, Lunney D, Fleming MR (2011) Four issues influencing the management of hollow using bats of the Pilliga forests of inland New South Wales. In ‘The biology and conservation of Australasian bats’. (Eds BS Law, P Eby, D Lunney, LF Lumsden) pp. 399–420. (Royal Zoological Society of NSW: Mosman, NSW)

Paull D, Kerle A (2004) Recent decline of the common brushtail and common ringtail possums in the Pilliga forest, New South Wales? In ‘The biology of Australian possums and gliders’. (Eds RL Goldingay, SM Jackson) pp. 85–90. (Surrey Beatty & Sons Pty Limited: Chipping Norton, NSW)

Pell, AS, and Tidemann, CR (1997). The ecology of the common myna in urban nature reserves in the Australian Capital Territory. Emu 97, 141–149.
The ecology of the common myna in urban nature reserves in the Australian Capital Territory.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Remm, J, and Lõhmus, A (2011). Tree cavities in forests – the broad distribution pattern of a keystone structure for biodiversity. Forest Ecology and Management 262, 579–585.

Rogers, AM, Griffin, AS, van Rensburg, BJ, and Kark, S (2020). Noisy neighbours and myna problems: interaction webs and aggression around tree hollows in urban habitats. Journal of Applied Ecology 57, 1891–1901.
Noisy neighbours and myna problems: interaction webs and aggression around tree hollows in urban habitats.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Rueegger, N (2017). Artificial tree hollow creation for cavity-using wildlife – trialling an alternative method to that of nest boxes. Forest Ecology and Management 405, 404–412.
Artificial tree hollow creation for cavity-using wildlife – trialling an alternative method to that of nest boxes.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Saunders, DA, Smith, GT, and Rowley, I (1982). The availability and dimensions of tree hollows that provide nest sites for cockatoos (Psittaciformes) in Western Australia. Australian Wildlife Research 9, 541–556.
The availability and dimensions of tree hollows that provide nest sites for cockatoos (Psittaciformes) in Western Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Smith, AP, and Lindenmayer, D (1988). Tree hollow requirements of Leadbeater’s possum and other possums and gliders in timber production ash forests of the Victorian Central Highlands. Australian Wildlife Research 15, 347–362.
Tree hollow requirements of Leadbeater’s possum and other possums and gliders in timber production ash forests of the Victorian Central Highlands.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Stagoll, K, Lindenmayer, DB, Knight, E, Fischer, J, and Manning, AD (2012). Large trees are keystone structures in urban parks. Conservation Letters 5, 115–122.
Large trees are keystone structures in urban parks.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Stanton M (2011) Barking owl diet in the Pilliga forests of northern New South Wales. Master’s thesis, University of New England.

Stojanovic, D, Owens, G, Young, CM, Alves, F, and Heinsohn, R (2021a). Do nest boxes breed the target species or its competitors? A case study of a critically endangered bird. Restoration Ecology 29, e13319.
Do nest boxes breed the target species or its competitors? A case study of a critically endangered bird.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Stojanovic, D, Rayner, L, Cobden, M, Davey, C, Harris, S, Heinsohn, R, Owens, G, and Manning, AD (2021b). Suitable nesting sites for specialized cavity dependent wildlife are rare in woodlands. Forest Ecology and Management 483, 118718.
Suitable nesting sites for specialized cavity dependent wildlife are rare in woodlands.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Stoneman, GL, Rayner, ME, and Bradshaw, FJ (1997). Comment: Size and age parameters of nest trees used by four species of parrot and one species of cockatoo in south-west Australia: critique. Emu 97, 94–96.
Comment: Size and age parameters of nest trees used by four species of parrot and one species of cockatoo in south-west Australia: critique.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Suckling, GC, and Goldstraw, P (1989). Progress of sugar glider, Petaurus breviceps, establishment at Tower Hill State Game Reserve, Victoria. Victorian Naturalist 106, 179–183.

Terry, W, Goldingay, RL, and van der Ree, R (2021). Can chainsaw carved hollows provide an effective solution to the loss of natural tree cavities for arboreal mammals? Forest Ecology and Management 490, 119122.
Can chainsaw carved hollows provide an effective solution to the loss of natural tree cavities for arboreal mammals?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Tews, J, Brose, U, Grimm, V, Tielbörger, K, Wichmann, MC, Schwager, M, and Jeltsch, F (2004). Animal species diversity driven by habitat heterogeneity/diversity: the importance of keystone structures. Journal of Biogeography 31, 79–92.
Animal species diversity driven by habitat heterogeneity/diversity: the importance of keystone structures.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Walker, J, Bullen, F, and Williams, BG (1993). Ecohydrological changes in the Murray–Darling Basin. I. The number of trees cleared over two centuries. Journal of Applied Ecology 30, 265–273.
Ecohydrological changes in the Murray–Darling Basin. I. The number of trees cleared over two centuries.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Webb, JK, and Shine, R (1997). Out on a limb: conservation implications of tree-hollow use by a threatened snake species (Hoplocephalus bungaroides: Serpentes, Elapidae). Biological Conservation 81, 21–33.
Out on a limb: conservation implications of tree-hollow use by a threatened snake species (Hoplocephalus bungaroides: Serpentes, Elapidae).Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Welbourne, DJ, Claridge, AW, Paull, DJ, and Ford, F (2019). Improving terrestrial squamate surveys with camera-trap programming and hardware modifications. Animals 9, 388.
Improving terrestrial squamate surveys with camera-trap programming and hardware modifications.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Wormington, KR, and Lamb, D (1999). Tree hollow development in wet and dry sclerophyll eucalypt forest in south-east Queensland, Australia. Australian Forestry 62, 336–345.
Tree hollow development in wet and dry sclerophyll eucalypt forest in south-east Queensland, Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Wormington, KR, Lamb, D, McCallum, HI, and Moloney, DJ (2002). Habitat requirements for the conservation of arboreal marsupials in dry sclerophyll forests of southeast Queensland, Australia. Forest Science 48, 217–227.
Habitat requirements for the conservation of arboreal marsupials in dry sclerophyll forests of southeast Queensland, Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |