Predaceous diving beetles (Coleoptera : Dytiscidae) may affect the success of amphibian conservation efforts
Jose W. Valdez
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations
Department of Bioscience – Kalø, Aarhus University, Grenåvej 14, 8410, Rønde, Denmark. Email: jose.valdez@bios.au.dk
Australian Journal of Zoology 66(6) 352-355 https://doi.org/10.1071/ZO19039
Submitted: 29 May 2019 Accepted: 5 August 2019 Published: 19 August 2019
Abstract
The role of invertebrate predation in shaping vertebrate communities is often overlooked. This is evident with predaceous diving beetles (Coleoptera: Dytiscidae), which are often the top predator in many aquatic freshwater habitats. During weekly monitoring of a reintroduction for an endangered frog, a group of a dozen adult diving beetles were encountered attacking and quickly dismembering and consuming a tadpole. A single adult diving beetle was also discovered burrowing its head inside and consuming a tadpole approximately 3–4 times its size by seemingly piercing its prey to suck out its liquefied remains. This is in contrast with the well known behaviour of adult dytiscids, which involves tearing prey into small pieces with their chewing mouthparts. Although dytiscids are known to occasionally consume vertebrates such as tadpoles, adults are typically considered scavengers, and this communal predatory behaviour and feeding method have not previously been documented. Moreover, over 80% of the tadpoles in the monitored site were found in ponds with no beetles and despite representing only a quarter of all ponds, half of the tadpoles across the landscape were in ponds free of diving beetles, demonstrating a possible influence of diving beetles on tadpoles. These observations may have implications for amphibian conservation since management efforts are not typically concerned with naturally occurring ubiquitous threats such as those from small invertebrate predators, as it has rarely been observed in nature. Although amphibian conservation plans expect some losses from natural predation, diving beetles may affect conservation efforts such as captive breeding and reintroductions with populations where every individual is critical to success.
References
Awan, A. R., and Smith, G. R. (2009). The roles of predator identity and group size in the antipredator responses of American toad (Bufo americanus) and bullfrog (Rana catesbeiana) tadpoles. Behaviour 146, 225–243.| The roles of predator identity and group size in the antipredator responses of American toad (Bufo americanus) and bullfrog (Rana catesbeiana) tadpoles.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Biega, A., Greenberg, D. A., Mooers, A. O., Jones, O. R., and Martin, T. E. (2017). Global representation of threatened amphibians ex situ is bolstered by non-traditional institutions, but gaps remain. Animal Conservation 20, 113–119.
| Global representation of threatened amphibians ex situ is bolstered by non-traditional institutions, but gaps remain.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Bilton, D. T. (2014). Dispersal in Dytiscidae. In ‘Ecology, Systematics, and the Natural History of Predaceous Diving Beetles (Coleoptera: Dytiscidae)’. (Ed. D. A. Yee.) pp. 387–407. (Springer: Dordrecht, Netherlands.)
Bittel, J. (2019). Brutal beetles kept world’s rarest fish from breeding – until now. National Geographic. Available at: https://www.nationalgeographic.com/animals/2019/03/endangered-devils-hole-pupfish-breeding-breakthrough [accessed 05 March 2019].
Cabrera-Guzmán, E., Crossland, M. R., and Shine, R. (2012). Predation on the eggs and larvae of invasive cane toads (Rhinella marina) by native aquatic invertebrates in tropical Australia. Biological Conservation 153, 1–9.
| Predation on the eggs and larvae of invasive cane toads (Rhinella marina) by native aquatic invertebrates in tropical Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Clulow, S., Gould, J., James, H., Stockwell, M., Clulow, J., and Mahony, M. (2018). Elevated salinity blocks pathogen transmission and improves host survival from the global amphibian chytrid pandemic: implications for translocations. Journal of Applied Ecology 55, 830–840.
| Elevated salinity blocks pathogen transmission and improves host survival from the global amphibian chytrid pandemic: implications for translocations.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Cobbaert, D., Bayley, S. E., and Greter, J.-L. (2010). Effects of a top invertebrate predator (Dytiscus alaskanus; Coleoptera: Dytiscidae) on fishless pond ecosystems. Hydrobiologia 644, 103–114.
| Effects of a top invertebrate predator (Dytiscus alaskanus; Coleoptera: Dytiscidae) on fishless pond ecosystems.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Culler, L. E., Ohba, S., and Crumrine, P. (2014). Predator–prey interactions of dytiscids. In ‘Ecology, Systematics, and the Natural History of Predaceous Diving Beetles (Coleoptera: Dytiscidae)’. (Ed. D. A. Yee.) pp. 363–386. (Springer: Dordrecht, Netherlands.)
Davy-Bowker, J. (2002). A mark and recapture study of water beetles (Coleoptera: Dytiscidae) in a group of semi-permanent and temporary ponds. Aquatic Ecology 36, 435–446.
| A mark and recapture study of water beetles (Coleoptera: Dytiscidae) in a group of semi-permanent and temporary ponds.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Drummond, H., and Wolfe, G. W. (1981). An observation of a diving beetle larva (Insecta: Coleoptera: Dytiscidae) attacking and killing a garter snake, Thamnophis elegans (Reptilia: Serpentes: Colubridae). Coleopterists Bulletin 35, 121–124.
Germano, J. M., and Bishop, P. J. (2009). Suitability of amphibians and reptiles for translocation. Conservation Biology 23, 7–15.
| Suitability of amphibians and reptiles for translocation.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 19143783PubMed |
Germano, J. M., Field, K. J., Griffiths, R. A., Clulow, S., Foster, J., Harding, G., and Swaisgood, R. R. (2015). Mitigation-driven translocations: are we moving wildlife in the right direction? Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 13, 100–105.
| Mitigation-driven translocations: are we moving wildlife in the right direction?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Gould, J., Valdez, J. W., Clulow, S., and Clulow, J. (2019). Diving beetle offspring oviposited in amphibian spawn prey on the tadpoles upon hatching. bioRxiv , 666008.
| Diving beetle offspring oviposited in amphibian spawn prey on the tadpoles upon hatching.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Harding, G., Griffiths, R. A., and Pavajeau, L. (2016). Developments in amphibian captive breeding and reintroduction programs. Conservation Biology 30, 340–349.
| Developments in amphibian captive breeding and reintroduction programs.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 26306460PubMed |
Heatwole, H., and Rowley, J. (2018). ‘Status of Conservation and Decline of Amphibians: Australia, New Zealand, and Pacific Islands.’ (CSIRO Publishing: Melbourne.)
Heil, J. (2018). From zero to 40. Available at: https://www.fws.gov/cno/newsroom/Highlights/2018/zero_to_40 [accessed 15 March 2019].
IUCN (2018). The IUCN red list of threatened species. Version 2018–2. Available at: http://www.iucnredlist [accessed 13 March 2019].
Kehl, S. (2014). Morphology, anatomy, and physiological aspects of dytiscids. In ‘Ecology, Systematics, and the Natural History of Predaceous Diving Beetles (Coleoptera: Dytiscidae)’. (Ed. D. A. Yee.) pp. 173–198. (Springer: Dordrecht, Netherlands.)
Klop‐Toker, K., Valdez, J., Stockwell, M., Clulow, S., Clulow, J., and Mahony, M. (2018). Community level impacts of invasive mosquitofish may exacerbate the impact to a threatened amphibian. Austral Ecology 43, 213–224.
| Community level impacts of invasive mosquitofish may exacerbate the impact to a threatened amphibian.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Kruse, K. C. (1983). Optimal foraging by predaceous diving beetle larvae on toad tadpoles. Oecologia 58, 383–388.
| Optimal foraging by predaceous diving beetle larvae on toad tadpoles.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 28310339PubMed |
Melisi, C. J., and Piorkowski, M. D. (2016). Predation of a pupfish by a fishing spider subsequently stolen by a diving beetle. The Southwestern Naturalist 61, 135–137.
| Predation of a pupfish by a fishing spider subsequently stolen by a diving beetle.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Michel, M. J., and Adams, M. M. (2009). Differential effects of structural complexity on predator foraging behavior. Behavioral Ecology 20, 313–317.
| Differential effects of structural complexity on predator foraging behavior.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Miguélez, D., and Valladares, L. F. (2008). Seasonal dispersal of water beetles (Coleoptera) in an agricultural landscape: a study using Moericke traps in northwest Spain. Annales de la Société Entomologique de France 44, 317–326.
| Seasonal dispersal of water beetles (Coleoptera) in an agricultural landscape: a study using Moericke traps in northwest Spain.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Nordberg, E. J., Edwards, L., and Schwarzkopf, L. (2018). Terrestrial invertebrates: an underestimated predator guild for small vertebrate groups. Food Webs 15, e00080.
| Terrestrial invertebrates: an underestimated predator guild for small vertebrate groups.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Pearman, P. B. (1995). Effects of pond size and consequent predator density on two species of tadpoles. Oecologia 102, 1–8.
| Effects of pond size and consequent predator density on two species of tadpoles.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 28306800PubMed |
Rall, B. C., Vucic‐Pestic, O., Ehnes, R. B., Emmerson, M., and Brose, U. (2010). Temperature, predator–prey interaction strength and population stability. Global Change Biology 16, 2145–2157.
| Temperature, predator–prey interaction strength and population stability.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Rubbo, M., Mirza, R., Belden, L., Falkenbach, J., Storrs, S., and Kiesecker, J. (2006). Evaluating a predator–prey interaction in the field: the interaction between beetle larvae (predator) and tadpoles (prey). Journal of Zoology 269, 1–5.
| Evaluating a predator–prey interaction in the field: the interaction between beetle larvae (predator) and tadpoles (prey).Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Tejedo, M. (1993). Size-dependent vulnerability and behavioral responses of tadpoles of two anuran species to beetle larvae predators. Herpetologica 49, 287–294.
Valdez, J. W., Stockwell, M. P., Klop-Toker, K., Clulow, S., Clulow, J., and Mahony, M. J. (2015). Factors driving the distribution of an endangered amphibian toward an industrial landscape in Australia. Biological Conservation 191, 520–528.
| Factors driving the distribution of an endangered amphibian toward an industrial landscape in Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Valdez, J. W., Klop-Toker, K., Stockwell, M. P., Fardell, L., Clulow, S., Clulow, J., and Mahony, M. J. (2019). Informing compensatory habitat creation with experimental trials: a 3-year study of a threatened amphibian. Oryx 53, 310–320.
| Informing compensatory habitat creation with experimental trials: a 3-year study of a threatened amphibian.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
von May, R, Biggi, E, Cárdenas, H, Diaz, M. I., Alarcón, C, Herrera, V, Santa-Cruz, R, Tomasinelli, F, Westeen, E. P., Sánchez-Paredes, C. M., Larson, J. G., Title, P. O., Grundler, M. R., Grundler, M. C., Davis Rabosky, A. R., and Rabosky, D. L. (2019). Ecological interactions between arthropods and small vertebrates in a lowland Amazon rainforest. Amphibian & Reptile Conservation 13, 65–77.
Vredenburg, V. T. (2004). Reversing introduced species effects: experimental removal of introduced fish leads to rapid recovery of a declining frog. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 101, 7646–7650.
| Reversing introduced species effects: experimental removal of introduced fish leads to rapid recovery of a declining frog.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 15136741PubMed |
Wellborn, G. A., Skelly, D. K., and Werner, E. E. (1996). Mechanisms creating community structure across a freshwater habitat gradient. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 27, 337–363.
| Mechanisms creating community structure across a freshwater habitat gradient.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Yee, D. A. (2010). Behavior and aquatic plants as factors affecting predation by three species of larval predaceous diving beetles (Coleoptera: Dytiscidae). Hydrobiologia 637, 33–43.
| Behavior and aquatic plants as factors affecting predation by three species of larval predaceous diving beetles (Coleoptera: Dytiscidae).Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Yee, D. A. (2014). ‘Ecology, Systematics, and the Natural History of Predaceous Diving Beetles (Coleoptera: Dytiscidae).’ (Springer: Dordrecht, Netherlands.)
Zippel, K., Johnson, K., Gagliardo, R., Gibson, R., McFadden, M., Browne, R., Martinez, C., and Townsend, E. (2011). The Amphibian Ark: a global community for ex situ conservation of amphibians. Herpetological Conservation and Biology 6, 340–352.
