Do female dingo–dog hybrids breed like dingoes or dogs?
Marina S. Cursino A , Lana Harriott B , Benjamin L. Allen C , Matthew Gentle D and Luke K.-P. Leung A EA School of Animal Studies, University of Queensland, Gatton, Qld 4343, Australia.
B School of Veterinary Science, University of Queensland, Gatton, Qld 4343, Australia.
C University of Southern Queensland, Institute for Agriculture and the Environment, Toowoomba, Qld 4350, Australia.
D Pest Animal Research Centre, Biosecurity Queensland, Department of Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry, Toowoomba, Qld 4350, Australia.
E Corresponding author. Email: luke.leung@uq.edu.au
Australian Journal of Zoology 65(2) 112-119 https://doi.org/10.1071/ZO17005
Submitted: 21 February 2017 Accepted: 29 June 2017 Published: 25 July 2017
Abstract
Hybridisation between animals that breed once (e.g. dingoes) and twice (e.g. domestic dogs) annually may produce offspring that breed either way. This question was investigated by determining the breeding seasonality of female dingo–dog hybrids in south-east Queensland, Australia, through evaluating macroscopic and histological features of 71 female reproductive tracts. All animals were sourced from urban areas where levels of hybridisation are generally high. Most animals trapped in summer were pups less than 6 months of age. A peak of uterus diameter and weight coincided with a peak of corpus luteum in winter. The follicular phase was characterised by growing follicles, ~1–3 mm wide, in late summer and autumn. Only two of the animals (1.4%) showed out-of-season reproductive cycles: one was found with corpus luteum in summer and another in autumn. Our data clearly show that hybrids have a single annual breeding season in winter, exhibiting the same breeding seasonality as dingoes. Our findings are similar to those found in the New Guinea singing dog. Future studies should be conducted to understand and exploit the mechanism and drivers of the breeding seasonality of dingo–dog hybrids to develop more effective management of their populations.
References
Al-Bassam, M. A., Thomson, R. G., and O’Donnell, L. (1981). Normal postpartum involution of the uterus in the dog. Canadian Journal of Comparative Medicine 45, 217–232.| 1:STN:280:DyaL387otlygtw%3D%3D&md5=cf0655fb72d310960d89f86a75c99369CAS |
Al-Mufti, W., Bomsel-Helmreich, O., and Christidès, J. P. (1988). Oocyte size and intrafollicular position in polyovular follicles in rabbits. Journal of Reproduction and Fertility 82, 15–25.
| Oocyte size and intrafollicular position in polyovular follicles in rabbits.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DyaL1c7hvVGmtA%3D%3D&md5=6fb41d1c31fe9babcd91a8c6c1227eceCAS |
Allen, B. L., Fleming, P. J. S. S., Allen, L. R., Engeman, R. M., Ballard, G., and Leung, L. K.-P. P. (2013a). As clear as mud: a critical review of evidence for the ecological roles of Australian dingoes. Biological Conservation 159, 158–174.
| As clear as mud: a critical review of evidence for the ecological roles of Australian dingoes.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Allen, B. L., Goullet, M., Allen, L. R., Lisle, A., and Leung, L. K.-P. P. (2013b). Dingoes at the doorstep: preliminary data on the ecology of dingoes in urban areas. Landscape and Urban Planning 119, 131–135.
| Dingoes at the doorstep: preliminary data on the ecology of dingoes in urban areas.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Allen, B. L., Higginbottom, K., Bracks, J. H., Davies, N., and Baxter, G. S. (2015). Balancing dingo conservation with human safety on Fraser Island: the numerical and demographic effects of humane destruction of dingoes. Australasian Journal of Environmental Management 22, 197–215.
| Balancing dingo conservation with human safety on Fraser Island: the numerical and demographic effects of humane destruction of dingoes.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Alm, H., Kuhlmann, S., Langhammer, M., Tuchscherer, A., Torner, H., and Reinsch, N. (2010). Occurrence of polyovular follicles in mouse lines selected for high fecundity. The Journal of Reproduction and Development 56, 449–453.
| Occurrence of polyovular follicles in mouse lines selected for high fecundity.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Catling, P. C. (1979). Seasonal variation in plasma testosterone and testis in captive male dingoes, Canis familiaris dingo. Australian Journal of Zoology 27, 939–944.
| Seasonal variation in plasma testosterone and testis in captive male dingoes, Canis familiaris dingo.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Catling, P. C., Corbett, L. K., and Newsome, A. E. (1992). Reproduction in captive and wild dingoes (Canis familiaris dingo) in temperate and arid environments of Australia. Wildlife Research 19, 195–209.
| Reproduction in captive and wild dingoes (Canis familiaris dingo) in temperate and arid environments of Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Claridge, A. W., Spencer, R. J., Wilton, A. N., Jenkins, D. J., Dall, D., and Lapidge, S. J. (2014). When is a dingo not a dingo? Hybridisation with domestic dogs. In ‘Carnivores of Australia: Past, Present and Future’. (Eds A. S. G. and C. R. Dickman.) pp. 151–172. (CSIRO Publishing: Melbourne.)
Concannon, P. W. (2011). Reproductive cycles of the domestic bitch. Animal Reproduction Science 124, 200–210.
| Reproductive cycles of the domestic bitch.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC3MXlvFWhtbs%3D&md5=a06762e1462868e3dc1a6922b214d696CAS |
Corbett, L. K. (1988). Social dynamics of a captive dingo pack – population regulation by dominant female infanticide. Ethology 78, 177–198.
| Social dynamics of a captive dingo pack – population regulation by dominant female infanticide.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Corbett, L. K. (2001). ‘The Dingo in Australia and Asia.’ 2nd. edn. (J.B. Books: Adelaide.)
Corbett, L. K. (2008). Canis lupus ssp. dingo. IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Version 2010.4. Available at: www.iucnredlist.org [accessed 20 April 2011].
Elledge, A. E., Allen, L. R., Carlsson, B. L., Wilton, A. N., and Leung, L. K. P. (2008). An evaluation of genetic analyses, skull morphology and visual appearance for assessing dingo purity: implications for dingo conservation. Wildlife Research 35, 812–820.
| An evaluation of genetic analyses, skull morphology and visual appearance for assessing dingo purity: implications for dingo conservation.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
England, G. C. W., Russo, M., and Freeman, S. L. (2009). Follicular dynamics, ovulation and conception rates in bitches. Reproduction in Domestic Animals 44, 53–58.
| Follicular dynamics, ovulation and conception rates in bitches.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Fleming, P., Corbett, L., Harden, R., and Thomson, P. (Eds) (2001). ‘Managing the Impacts of Dingoes and Other Wild Dogs.’ (Bureau of Rural Science: Canberra.)
Fleming, P. J. S., Allen, B. L., and Ballard, G.-A. (2012). Seven considerations about dingoes as biodiversity engineers: the socioecological niches of dogs in Australia. Australian Mammalogy 34, 119–131.
| Seven considerations about dingoes as biodiversity engineers: the socioecological niches of dogs in Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Freedman, A. H., Gronau, I., Schweizer, R. M., Ortega-Del Vecchyo, D., Han, E., Silva, P. M., Galaverni, M., Fan, Z., Marx, P., Lorente-Galdos, B., Beale, H., Ramirez, O., Hormozdiari, F., Alkan, C., Vilà, C., Squire, K., Geffen, E., Kusak, J., Boyko, A. R., Parker, H. G., Lee, C., Tadigotla, V., Wilton, A., Siepel, A., Bustamante, C. D., Harkins, T. T., Nelson, S. F., Ostrander, E. A., Marques-Bonet, T., Wayne, R. K., and Novembre, J. (2014). Genome sequencing highlights the dynamic early history of dogs. PLOS Genetics 10, e1004016.
| Genome sequencing highlights the dynamic early history of dogs.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Glen, A. S., and Dickman, C. R. (2005). Complex interactions among mammalian carnivores in Australia, and their implications for wildlife management. Biological Reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society 80, 387–401.
| Complex interactions among mammalian carnivores in Australia, and their implications for wildlife management.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Green, B., and Catling, P. (1977). The biology of the dingo. In ‘Australians Animals and Their Environment’. (Eds H. Messel and S. T. Butler.) pp. 49–60. (Shakespeare Head Press: Sydney.)
Jackson, S. M., Groves, C. P., Fleming, P. J. S., Aplin, K. P., Eldridge, M. D. B., Gonzalez, A., and Helgen, K. M. (2017). The wayward dog: is the Australian native dog or dingo a distinct species? Zootaxa , .
Johnston, S. D., Root Kustritz, M. V., and Olson, P. N. S. (2001). ‘Canine and Feline Theriogenology.’ (WB Saunders.)
Jones, E., and Stevens, P. L. (1988). Reproduction in wild canids, Canis familiaris, from the Eastern Highlands of Victoria. Wildlife Research 15, 385–397.
| Reproduction in wild canids, Canis familiaris, from the Eastern Highlands of Victoria.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Kennelly, J. J., Johns, B. E., Breidenstein, C. P., and Roberts, J. D. (1977). Predicting female coyote breeding dates from fetal measurements. Journal of Wildlife Management 41, 746–750.
| Predicting female coyote breeding dates from fetal measurements.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Knowlton, F. F., and Whittemore, S. L. (2001). Pulp cavity – tooth width ratios from known-age and wild-caught coyotes determined by radiography. Wildlife Society Bulletin 29, 239–244.
Koler-Matznick, J., Brisbin Il, J., and Mc Intyer, J. (2001). The New Guinea singing dog: a living primitive dog. In ‘Dogs Through Time: an Archaeological Perspective. Proceedings, International Council for Archaeozoology Annual Meeting’. (Ed. S. J. Crockford.) pp. 239–247. (Archaeopress: Oxford.)
Koler-Matznick, J., Yates, B. C., Bulmer, S., and Brisbin, I. L. J. (2007). The New Guinea singing dog: its status and scientific importance. Australian Mammalogy 29, 47–56.
| The New Guinea singing dog: its status and scientific importance.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Letnic, M., Ritchie, E. G., and Dickman, C. R. (2012). Top predators as biodiversity regulators: the dingo Canis lupus dingo as a case study. Biological Reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society 87, 390–413.
| Top predators as biodiversity regulators: the dingo Canis lupus dingo as a case study.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Lucci, C. M., Amorim, C. A., Rodrigues, A. P. R., Figueiredo, J. R., Báo, S. N., Silva, J. R. V., and Gonçalves, P. B. D. (1999). Study of preantral follicle population in situ and after mechanical isolation from caprine ovaries at different reproductive stages. Animal Reproduction Science 56, 223–236.
| Study of preantral follicle population in situ and after mechanical isolation from caprine ovaries at different reproductive stages.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DyaK1Mvis1ajtA%3D%3D&md5=29e7b8fb80fd060c5d783e811916bf32CAS |
Lunardon, N. T., Silva-Santos, K. C., Justino, R. C., Dessunti, G. T., Seneda, M. M., and Martins, M. I. M. (2015). Population estimate of the preantral follicles and frequency of multioocyte follicles in prepubertal and adult bitches. Theriogenology 83, 1015–1020.
| Population estimate of the preantral follicles and frequency of multioocyte follicles in prepubertal and adult bitches.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DC%2BC2MvltFSgsA%3D%3D&md5=0f7160a51b47e53f549e9f53f3adfe9cCAS |
Major, R. (2009). Predation and hybridisation by feral dogs (Canis lupus familiaris) – key threatening process listing. New South Wales Department of Environment, Climate Change, and Water.
Payan-Carreira, R., and Pires, M. A. (2008). Multioocyte follicles in domestic dogs: a survey of frequency of occurrence. Theriogenology 69, 977–982.
| Multioocyte follicles in domestic dogs: a survey of frequency of occurrence.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DC%2BD1c3ks1ShsQ%3D%3D&md5=40afc8ade0021e51f9fd56379fb98093CAS |
Purcell, B. (2010). ‘Dingo.’ (CSIRO Publishing: Melbourne.)
Reynaud, K., de Lesegno, C. V., Chebrout, M., Thoumire, S., and Chastant-Maillard, S. (2009). Follicle population, cumulus mucification, and oocyte chromatin configuration during the periovulatory period in the female dog. Theriogenology 72, 1120–1131.
| Follicle population, cumulus mucification, and oocyte chromatin configuration during the periovulatory period in the female dog.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD1MXht1Wmt7zJ&md5=c3e0d6d29c14a8dde6e003d1db29904aCAS |
Reynaud, K., Fontbonne, A., Saint-Dizier, M., Thoumire, S., Marnier, C., Tahir, M. Z., Meylheuc, T., and Chastant-Maillard, S. (2012). Folliculogenesis, ovulation and endocrine control of oocytes and embryos in the dog. Reproduction in Domestic Animals 47, 66–69.
| Folliculogenesis, ovulation and endocrine control of oocytes and embryos in the dog.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Silva-Santos, K. C., and Seneda, M. M. (2011). Multioocyte follicles in adult mammalian ovaries. Animal Reproduction 8, 58–67.
Silva-Santos, K. C., Santos, G. M. G., Siloto, L. S., Hertel, M. F., Andrade, E. R., Rubin, M. I. B., Sturion, L., Melo-Sterza, F. A., and Seneda, M. M. (2011). Estimate of the population of preantral follicles in the ovaries of Bos taurus indicus and Bos taurus taurus cattle. Theriogenology 76, 1051–1057.
| Estimate of the population of preantral follicles in the ovaries of Bos taurus indicus and Bos taurus taurus cattle.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DC%2BC3MfgvFamug%3D%3D&md5=65f4b5584fad53ffc869eb31cb4315f6CAS |
Smith, B. (Ed.) (2015). ‘The Dingo Debate: Origins, Behaviour and Conservation.’ (CSIRO Publishing: Melbourne.)
Stankiewicz, T., Błaszczyk, B., and Udała, J. (2009). A study on the occurrence of polyovular follicles in porcine ovaries with particular reference to intrafollicular hormone concentrations, quality of oocytes and their in vitro fertilization. Anatomia, Histologia, Embryologia 38, 233–239.
| A study on the occurrence of polyovular follicles in porcine ovaries with particular reference to intrafollicular hormone concentrations, quality of oocytes and their in vitro fertilization.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DC%2BD1MzntFGhsQ%3D%3D&md5=bf0721834af0910518ff733e96026bcaCAS |
Stephens, D., Wilton, A. N., Fleming, P. J. S., and Berry, O. (2015). Death by sex in an Australian icon: a continent-wide survey reveals extensive hybridization between dingoes and domestic dogs. Molecular Ecology 24, 5643–5656.
| Death by sex in an Australian icon: a continent-wide survey reveals extensive hybridization between dingoes and domestic dogs.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC2MXhvVyitbbN&md5=4975ff2faccdb299c8eb8c46ba9d00a1CAS |
Telfer, E., and Gosden, R. G. (1987). A quantitative cytological study of polyovular follicles in mammalian ovaries with particular reference to the domestic bitch (Canis familiaris). Journal of Reproduction and Fertility 81, 137–147.
| A quantitative cytological study of polyovular follicles in mammalian ovaries with particular reference to the domestic bitch (Canis familiaris).Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DyaL1c%2FjsFyisA%3D%3D&md5=435265a322d2a1bd364ed6cd92137a23CAS |
Thomson, P. C. (1992). The behavioural ecology of dingoes activity patterns, breeding season and pup rearing. Methods 19, 519–530.
Tingen, C., Kim, A., and Woodruff, T. K. (2009). The primordial pool of follicles and nest breakdown in mammalian ovaries. Molecular Human Reproduction 15, 795–803.
| The primordial pool of follicles and nest breakdown in mammalian ovaries.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Wilton, A. (2001). DNA methods of assessing dingo purity. In ‘A Symposium on the Dingo’. (Eds C. R. Dickman and D. Lunney.) pp. 49–56. (Royal Zoological Society of New South Wales: Sydney.)
Woodall, P. F., Pavlov, P., and Tolley, L. K. (1993). Comparative dimensions of testes, epididymides and spermatozoa of Australian dingoes (Canis familiaris dingo) and domestic dogs (Canis familiaris familiaris) – some effects of domestication. Australian Journal of Zoology 41, 133–140.
| Comparative dimensions of testes, epididymides and spermatozoa of Australian dingoes (Canis familiaris dingo) and domestic dogs (Canis familiaris familiaris) – some effects of domestication.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |