Free Standard AU & NZ Shipping For All Book Orders Over $80!
Register      Login
Australian Journal of Zoology Australian Journal of Zoology Society
Evolutionary, molecular and comparative zoology
RESEARCH ARTICLE (Open Access)

Positive and negative effects of phoretic mites on the reproductive output of an invasive bark beetle

Lisa K. Hodgkin A B , Mark A. Elgar A and Matthew R. E. Symonds A
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Department of Zoology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Vic. 3010, Australia.

B Corresponding author. Email: l.hodgkin@pgrad.unimelb.edu.au

Australian Journal of Zoology 58(3) 198-204 https://doi.org/10.1071/ZO10034
Submitted: 13 May 2010  Accepted: 12 August 2010   Published: 23 September 2010

Abstract

When multiple species coexist upon a single host, their combined effect on the host can be unpredictable. We explored the effect of phoretic mites on the reproductive output of the five-spined bark beetle, Ips grandicollis. Using correlative approaches and experimental manipulation of mite numbers we examined how mite load affected the number, size and condition of bark beetle offspring produced. We found that mites have both negative and positive consequences on different aspects of bark beetle reproduction. Females from which mites were removed were more fecund and produced larger offspring than females with mites, implying a cost of mite loads. However, when mites were present on females, those bearing the highest mite loads produced offspring that were larger and in better condition, indicating a beneficial effect of mites. These data suggest that phoretic interactions between mites and bark beetles differ over the course of the host’s lifespan, with either the mites interacting in different ways with different life stages of the host (parasitic on adult, mutualistic with larvae), and/or the beetles being host to different mite assemblages over their lifetime.

Additional keywords: Acari, commensalism, ectoparasite, host reproduction, mutualism, Scolytinae, symbiosis.


Acknowledgements

We thank Dr Bruce Halliday (CSIRO Entomology, Canberra) for assistance in the identification of mite families and advice on mite biology. Hancocks Victorian Plantations allowed us access to the Woodend pine plantation. Michael Magrath provided statistical guidance and Therèsa Jones provided feedback on experimental design and interpretation. We also thank the three referees for their input, and the Animal Behaviour and Evolution Group at the University of Melbourne for general discussion. Financial support was provided by grants to MAE and MRES from the Australian Research Council. This research complies with the current laws in Australia.


References

Bentz, B. J. , and Six, D. L. (2006). Ergosterol content of fungi associated with Dendroctonus ponderosae and Dendroctonus rufipennis (Coleoptera: Curculionidae, Scolytinae). Annals of the Entomological Society of America 99, 189–194.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | CAS | Eickwort G. C. (1994). Evolution and life-history patterns of mites associated with bees. In ‘Mites: Ecological and Evolutionary Analyses of Life-history Patterns’. (Ed. M. A. Houck.) pp. 218–251. (Chapman and Hall: New York.)

Fitze, P. S. , Tschirren, B. , and Richner, H. (2004). Life history and fitness consequences of ectoparasites. Journal of Animal Ecology 73, 216–226.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Grimaldi D. , and Engel M. S. (2005). ‘Evolution of the Insects.’ (Cambridge University Press: Cambridge.)

Grossman, J. D. , and Smith, R. J. (2008). Phoretic mite discrimination among male burying beetle (Nicrophorus investigator) hosts. Annals of the Entomological Society of America 101, 266–271.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Walter D. E. , and Proctor H. C. (1999). ‘Mites: Ecology, Evolution and Behaviour.’ (UNSW Press: Sydney.)

Wood, S. L. (1982). The bark and ambrosia beetles of north and central America (Coleoptera: Scolytidae), a taxonomic monograph. Great Basin Naturalist Memoirs 6, 1–1359.