Density-dependent plasticity of sequential mate choice in a bushcricket (Orthoptera : Tettigoniidae)
Gerlind U. C. LehmannDepartment of Zoology, University of Western Australia, 35 Stirling Highway, Crawley 6009, WA. Present address: Institut für Zoologie, Abteilung Evolutionsbiologie, Königin-Luise-Straße 1–3, 14195 Berlin, Germany. Email: gerlind.lehmann@t-online.de
Australian Journal of Zoology 55(2) 123-130 https://doi.org/10.1071/ZO06105
Submitted: 29 December 2006 Accepted: 27 March 2007 Published: 28 May 2007
Abstract
Mate choice is a common phenomenon in animals and several factors have been proposed as being involved in the acceptance or rejection of a partner. I investigated the effect of population density on the mate-sampling behaviour of female Xederra charactus (bushcrickets). In my study, female bushcrickets adjusted the tactic of sequential mate sampling in response to mate density, visiting a series of up to five different males per night. Under low-density conditions, females visited fewer males in a night and were less likely to reject a copulation attempt than females under high-density conditions. Rejection of a male occurred during 29% of copulations in areas of high population density, but during only 8% in areas of low population density. Moreover, at low densities, females were less likely to reject mates later in the night, which can be interpreted as a reaction to the time constraints of a finite nightly mating period. Females in high-density populations also more often chose males with a higher mass of the spermatophore-producing accessory glands. Due to such choice, females might receive a larger nuptial gift at mating. These results are consistent with tactical models of search behaviour in which females adjust their behaviour to the number of potential mates and the length of the mating period.
Acknowledgements
This study would not have been possible without the help of Winston J. Bailey, who invited me to the University of Western Australia, Zoology Department, and provided office and research space during my stay. Arne Lehmann helped with the field experiments. I thank Gregory Voigt (Conservation and Land Management, CALM, Busselton) for his help and the opportunity to work inside the national park. Brenton Knott generously lent me camping equipment for the field experiments. Darryl Gwynne, Klaus-Gerhard Heller, Robert Hickson, Arne Lehmann and two anonymous referees gave helpful criticism on the manuscript and Robert Hickson improved the English. The research was funded by a postdoctoral grant from the DAAD.
Alatalo, R. V. , Carlson, A. , and Lundberg, A. (1988). The search cost in mate choice of the pied flycatcher. Animal Behaviour 36, 289–291.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Arnqvist, G. , and Nilsson, T. (2000). The evolution of polyandry: multiple mating and female fitness in insects. Animal Behaviour 60, 145–164.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed |
Bakker, T. C. M. , and Milinski, M. (1991). Sequential female choice and the previous male effect in sticklebacks. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 29, 205–210.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Bonduriansky, R. (2001). The evolution of male mate choice in insects: a synthesis of ideas and evidence. Biological Reviews 76, 305–339.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed |
Gwynne, D. T. , and Simmons, L. W. (1990). Experimental reversal of courtship roles in an insect. Nature 346, 172–174.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Milinski, M. , and Bakker, T. C. M. (1992). Costs influence sequential mate choice in sticklebacks, Gasterosteus aculeatus. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences 250, 229–233.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Simmons, L. W. , and Bailey, W. J. (1990). Resource influenced sex roles of zaprochiline tettigoniids (Orthoptera: Tettigoniidae). Evolution 44, 1853–1868.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Simmons, L. W. , and Kvarnemo, C. (2006). Costs of breeding and their effects on the direction of sexual selection. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences 273, 465–470.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Thomas, F. , Liautard, C. , Cézilly, F. , and Renaud, F. (1998). A finite time horizon influences sequential mate choice in male Gammarus aequicauda (Amphipoda). Canadian Journal of Zoology 76, 401–405.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Thornhill, R. (1984). Alternative female choice tactics in the scorpion-fly Hylobittacus apicalis (Mecoptera) and their implications. American Zoologist 24, 367–383.
Vahed, K. (1998). The function of nuptial feeding in insects: a review of empirical studies. Biological Reviews 73, 43–78.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Vahed, K. (2007). All that glisters is not gold: sensory bias, sexual conflict and nuptial feeding in insects and spiders. Ethology 113, 105–127.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Valone, T. J. (2006). Are animals capable of Bayesian updating? An empirical review. Oikos 112, 252–259.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Voigt, C. C. , Lehmann, G. U. C. , Michener, R. H. , and Joachimski, M. M. (2006). Nuptial feeding is reflected in tissue nitrogen isotope ratios of female katydids. Functional Ecology 20, 656–661.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Wagner, W. E. (1998). Measuring female preferences. Animal Behaviour 55, 1029–1042.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed |
Wagner, W. E. , Smeds, M. R. , and Wiegmann, D. D. (2001). Experience affects female responses to male song in the variable field cricket Gryllus lineaticeps (Orthoptera, Gryllidae). Ethology 107, 769–776.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Wiegmann, D. D. , Real, L. A. , Capone, T. A. , and Ellner, S. (1996). Some distinguishing features of models of search behavior and mate choice. American Naturalist 147, 188–204.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Wong, B. B. M. , Jennions, M. D. , and Keogh, J. S. (2004). Sequential male mate choice in a fish, the Pacific blue-eye Pseudomugil signifier. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 56, 253–256.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |