Free Standard AU & NZ Shipping For All Book Orders Over $80!
Register      Login
Australian Journal of Zoology Australian Journal of Zoology Society
Evolutionary, molecular and comparative zoology
Shopping Cart: ( empty )
You are here: Home > Journals > ZO > ZO06063
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Contents Vol 55(2)

Effects of sand erosion and current harvest practices on incubation of the flatback sea turtle (Natator depressus)

Andrea U. Koch A C , Michael L. Guinea A and Scott D. Whiting A B
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Faculty of Education, Health and Science, Charles Darwin University, Darwin, NT 0909, Australia.

B Present address: Marine Biodiversity Group, Department of Natural Resources, Environment and the Arts, PO Box 30, Palmerston, NT 0831, Australia.

C Corresponding author. Email: andrea.koch@cdu.edu.au

Australian Journal of Zoology 55(2) 97-105 https://doi.org/10.1071/ZO06063
Submitted: 21 July 2006  Accepted: 28 February 2007   Published: 28 May 2007

Abstract

A suitable gaseous, hydrous and thermal nest environment is essential for the development of sea turtle embryos. The harvest of partial clutches by indigenous people and changes in nest depth from wind erosion or predation have prompted questions about the impact of clutch size and nest depth on nest success and hatchling output. We investigated the impact of reduced clutch sizes and nest depths on flatback sea turtle (Natator depressus) eggs, using a hatchery on a natural beach and clutch sizes of 10, 30 and 50 eggs, deposited at depths of 25, 35 and 50 cm. Hatchlings were collected on emergence and their size, mass, scalation and locomotor performance were measured. Neither clutch size nor nest depth had a significant effect on hatching success, emergence success or escape success in this study. Smaller clutches had longer incubation durations due to the lower temperatures within the nest, presumably from the lower metabolic heat produced. Hatchlings from deeper nests emerged later in the night than did those from shallower nests. Within the context of this study, changes to clutch size and nest depth appear to have no detrimental effect on the fate of the remaining eggs and the condition and performance of hatchlings.


Acknowledgements

We thank all volunteers for their dedication to the research during the long nights in the field. Thanks to the Baumber family for their support during field trips and providing transport to the study site. Rolf Koch and Cherry Martin provided valuable support and useful comments on this work. Thanks to Keith McGuinness for statistical advice. Ellie Hayward from Charles Darwin University helped prepare the gonad specimens for histological examination. The Northern Territory Bureau of Meteorology provided climatic data and the Northern Territory Herbarium helped identify plant specimens. Experiments were conducted under licenses from the Parks and Wildlife Commission of the Northern Territory (Permit No. 13513) and the Northern Territory University Animal Ethics Committee (Reference No. A02015). This paper benefited from the comments of two anonymous reviewers.


References

Ackerman, R. A. (1977). The respiratory gas exchange of sea turtle nests. Respiration Physiology 31, 19–38.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed | Ackerman R. A. (1991). Physical factors affecting the water exchange of buried reptile eggs. In ‘Egg Incubation: Its Effects on Embryonic Development in Birds and Reptiles’. (Eds D. C. Deeming and M. W. J. Ferguson.) pp. 193–212. (Cambridge University Press: Cambridge.)

Ackerman R. A. (1997). The nest environment and the embryonic development of sea turtles. In ‘The Biology of Sea Turtles’. (Eds P. L. Lutz and J. A. Musick.) pp. 83–106. (CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL.)

Balasingam, E. (1967). The ecology and conservation of the leathery turtle Dermochelys coriacea (Linn.) in Malaya. Micronesica 3, 37–43.
Bancroft J. D., and Stevens A. (1982). ‘Theory and Practice of Histological Techniques.’ (Churchill Livingstone: Edinburgh.)

Blamires S. J. (1999). Quantifying the impact of predation on sea turtle nests by varanids at Fog Bay. M.Sc. Thesis, Northern Territory University, Darwin.

Booth, D. T. , and Astill, K. (2001a). Incubation temperature, energy expenditure and hatchling size in the green turtle (Chelonia mydas), a species with temperature-sensitive sex determination. Australian Journal of Zoology 49, 389–396.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Bustard H. R. (1972). ‘Sea Turtles: Natural History and Conservation.’ (Collins: Sydney.)

Bustard, H. R. , and Greenham, P. (1968). Physical and chemical factors affecting hatching in the green turtle, Chelonia mydas (L.). Ecology 49, 269–276.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Environment Australia (2003). ‘Recovery Plan for Marine Turtles in Australia.’ Prepared by the Marine Species Section Approvals and Wildlife Division, Environment Australia. Available at http://www.environment.gov.au/coasts/publications/turtle-recovery/ [Verified 19 April 2007]

Godfrey, M. H. , and Mrosovsky, N. (1997). Estimating the time between hatching of sea turtles and their emergence from the nest. Chelonian Conservation and Biology 2, 581–585.
Hall K. V. (1990). Hatching success of leatherback turtle (Dermochelys coriacea) clutches in relation to biotic and abiotic factors. In ‘Proceedings of the Tenth Annual Workshop on Sea Turtle Biology and Conservation’. (Eds T. H. Richardson, J. I. Richardson and M. Donnelly.) pp. 197–200. NOAA Technical Memorandum NMFS-SEFC-278. (National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration: Washington, DC.)

Hendrickson, J. R. (1958). The green sea turtle, Chelonia mydas (Linn.) in Malaya and Sarawak. Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London 130, 455–535.
Koch A. U. (2003). The effects of clutch size and nest depth on nest success and hatchling vigor of flatback sea turtles, Natator depressus. B.Sc. Honours Thesis, Northern Territory University, Darwin.

Koch, A. U. , and Guinea, M. L. (2006). Lower nesting success of flatback turtles caused by disorientation. Marine Turtle Newsletter 114, 16.
Limpus C. J., and Fleay A. (1983). Management and turtles. In ‘Proceedings of the Inaugural Great Barrier Reef Conference, August 28–September 2, 1983’. (Eds J. T. Baker, R. M. Carter, P. W. Sammarco and K. P. Stark.) pp. 83–88. (James Cook University Press: Townsville.)

Limpus, C. J. , Parmenter, C. J. , Baker, V. , and Fleay, A. (1983). The Crab Island sea turtle rookery in the northeastern Gulf of Carpentaria. Australian Wildlife Research 10, 173–184.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Marsh P. V., Chan E. H., and Liew H. C. (2006). Hatching success of the green turtle, Chelonia mydas eggs in relation to clutch size and seasonality in Redang Island, Terengganu, Malaysia. In ‘Proceedings of the 23rd Annual Symposium on Sea Turtle Biology and Conservation. NOAA Technical Memorandum NMFS-SEFSC-536’. (Ed. N. J. Pilcher). p. 17. (National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration: Washington, DC.)

McCulloch C. E., and Searle S. R. (2001). ‘Generalized, Linear, and Mixed Models.’ (John Wiley and Sons: New York.)

Miller J. D. (1999). Determining clutch size and hatching success. In ‘Research and Management Techniques for the Conservation of Sea Turtles’. (Eds K. L. Eckert, K. A. Bjorndal, F. A. Abreu-Grobois and M. Donnelly.) pp. 124–129. IUCN/SCC Marine Turtle Specialist Group Publication No. 4.

Miller J. D., and Limpus C. J. (1981). Incubation period. In ‘Proceedings of the Melbourne Herpetological Symposium’. (Eds C. B. Banks and A. A. Martin) pp. 66–73. (Zoological Board of Victoria: Melbourne.)

Mortimer J. A. (1999). Reducing threats to eggs and hatchlings: hatcheries. In ‘Research and Management Techniques for the Conservation of Sea Turtles’. (Eds K. L. Eckert, K. A. Bjorndal, F. A. Abreu-Grobois and M. Donnelly.) pp. 175–178. IUCN/SSC Marine Turtle Specialist Group.

Mortimer J. A., Ahmad Z., Kaslan S., Daud M. D., Sharma D., and Aikanathan S. (1993). Evaluation of the practice of splitting sea turtle egg clutches under hatchery conditions in Malaysia. In ‘13th Annual Symposium on Sea Turtle Biology and Conservation’. (Eds B. A. Schroeder and B. E. Witherington.) pp. 118–120. NOAA Tech. Memo. NMFS-SEFSC-341.

Mrosovsky, N. (1968). Nocturnal emergence of hatchling sea turtles: control by thermal inhibition of activity. Nature 220, 1338–1339.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed | Packard G. C. (1991). Physiological and ecological importance of water to embryos of oviparous reptiles. In ‘Egg Incubation: Its Effects on Embryonic Development in Birds and Reptiles’. (Eds D. C. Deeming and M. W. J. Ferguson.) pp. 213–228. (Cambridge University Press: Cambridge.)

Packard, G. C. (1999). Water relations of Chelonian eggs and embryos: is wetter better? American Zoologist 39, 289–303.
Packard G. C., and Packard M. J. (1988). The physiological ecology of reptilian eggs and embryos. In ‘Biology of the Reptilia’. (Eds C. Gans and R. B. Huey.) pp. 523–606. (Alan R. Liss: New York.)

Pilcher, N. J. , and Enderby, S. (2001). Effects of prolonged retention in hatcheries on green turtle (Chelonia mydas) hatchling swimming speed and survival. Journal of Herpetology 35, 633–638.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Pritchard P. C. H., and Mortimer J. A. (1999). Taxonomy, external morphology, and species identification. In ‘Research and Management Techniques for the Conservation of Sea Turtles’. (Eds K. L. Eckert, K. A. Bjorndal, F. A. Abreu-Grobois and M. Donnelly.) pp. 21–38. IUCN/SCC Marine Turtle Specialist Group Publication No. 4.

R Development Core Team (2006). ‘R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing.’ R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. Available online: http://www.R-project.org

Standora, E. A. , and Spotila, J. R. (1985). Temperature dependent sex determination in sea turtles. Copeia 1985, 711–722.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Stout M. A. (1996). The correlation between the clutch size and hatching success as well as the number of hatchlings and the emergence success of Atlantic loggerhead sea turtles (Caretta caretta). In ‘Proceedings of the 15th Annual Workshop on Sea Turtle Biology and Conservation’. (Eds J. A. Keinath, D. E. Barnard, J. A. Musick and B. A. Dell.) pp. 309–312. NOAA Technical Memorandum NMFS-SEFSC-387.

Van Rhijn, F. A. (1979). Optic orientation in hatchlings of the sea turtle, Chelonia mydas. Marine Behaviour and Physiology 6, 105–121.
Vanderleley R. (1996). Nesting ecology of flatback sea turtles of West Alligator Head and Field Island, Kakadu National Park. M.Sc. Thesis, Northern Territory University, Darwin.

Wyneken, J. , and Salmon, M. (1992). Frenzy and postfrenzy swimming activity in loggerhead, green and leatherback hatchlings. Copeia 1992, 478–484.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Yntema, C. L. (1979). Incubation temperature and sex ratio in hatchling loggerhead turtles: a preliminary report. Marine Turtle Newsletter 11, 9–10..