Does the introduced bumblebee, Bombus terrestris (Apidae), prefer flowers of introduced or native plants in Australia?
Andrew B. HingstonGeography and Environmental Studies, University of Tasmania, Private Bag 78, Hobart, Tas. 7001, Australia. Email: hingston@utas.edu.au
Australian Journal of Zoology 53(1) 29-34 https://doi.org/10.1071/ZO04048
Submitted: 17 June 2004 Accepted: 15 December 2004 Published: 24 February 2005
Abstract
Proponents of importation of the European bumblebee, Bombus terrestris (L.), into Australia for pollination of commercial greenhouse crops argue that this species will have little impact on Australian native ecosystems because it prefers to forage on flowers of introduced species of plants rather than Australian native plants. However, data presented as evidence of preference for introduced plants have been equivocal. This study compared the attractiveness of introduced and Australian native plants to free-foraging B. terrestris in a garden at the interface between an urban area and native vegetation in the Australian island of Tasmania, where a feral population of B. terrestris had been established for over 10 years. No evidence was found to support the proposal that B. terrestris forages on flowers of introduced plants in preference to those of Australian native plants. The numbers of B. terrestris seen foraging per 1000 flowers did not differ significantly between introduced plants and Australian native plants, and the preferred food sources of B. terrestris included flowers of both introduced and Australian native species. Because B. terrestris forages frequently on many species of both introduced and native plants, assessments of its ecological impacts must include the effects of altered pollination on recruitment rates in both introduced weeds and native plants, and reduced quantities of nectar and pollen of native plants on recruitment rates of dependent fauna.
Acknowledgments
I thank Alex Buchanan for advice on nomenclature of plant species, an anonymous referee for helpful comments, and Maj-Britt di Folco for discussions on statistical techniques.
Andersson, S. (1988). Size-dependent pollination efficiency in Anchusa officinalis (Boraginaceae): causes and consequences. Oecologia 76, 125–130.
Cooke, A. (2001). Bumblebees under study. Practical Hydroponics and Greenhouses 59, 20–24.
Goulson, D. (2003). Effects of introduced bees on native ecosystems. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution and Systematics 34, 1–26.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Hingston, A. B. , and McQuillan, P. B. (1998a). Does the recently introduced bumblebee Bombus terrestris (Apidae) threaten Australian ecosystems? Australian Journal of Ecology 23, 539–549.
Ohashi, K. , and Yahara, T. (2002). Visit larger displays but probe proportionally fewer flowers: counterintuitive behaviour of nectar-collecting bumble bees achieves an ideal free distribution. Functional Ecology 16, 492–503.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Robertson, A. W. , and Macnair, M. R. (1995). The effects of floral display size on pollinator service to individual flowers of Myosotis and Mimulus. Oikos 72, 106–114.
Williams, N. M. , Minckley, R. L. , and Silveira, F. A. (2001). Variation in native bee faunas and its implications for detecting community changes. Conservation Ecology 5, 7.[Verified 13 January 2005]