Himalayan tahr (Hemitragus jemlahicus) recreational hunting values
Geoffrey Kerr
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations
Lincoln University, Department of Environmental Management, PO Box 85084, Lincoln University, Lincoln 7647, New Zealand. Email: geoffrey.kerr@lincoln.ac.nz
Wildlife Research 46(2) 114-126 https://doi.org/10.1071/WR18027
Submitted: 13 February 2018 Accepted: 27 October 2018 Published: 16 January 2019
Abstract
Context: Himalayan tahr (Hemitragus jemlahicus) are a valued game resource that can cause environmental harm, requiring control of tahr populations below policy-prescribed thresholds. Effective game management requires understanding of the benefits to hunters of game resources and how hunter behaviours change in response to changes in hunt attributes, including game-animal densities, hunt duration, presence of other hunters and travel distance.
Aims: To identify the value of recreational Himalayan tahr hunting and how that value is affected by changes in hunt attributes for different types of hunter, thereby identifying the value of tahr as a recreational resource and opportunities for enhancing recreational hunting experiences.
Methods: Hunter differences were explored through factor analysis and cluster analysis, which identified three different groups of hunters on the basis of motivations and hunting activity. Preferences for hunt attributes were explored with a choice experiment that used a pivot design around actual travel distances to measure the relative importance of hunt-related attributes. Latent class analysis of choice experiment responses identified three discrete groups of hunters who sought different activity settings.
Key results: Results showed the high value of recreational tahr hunting for all three groups of tahr hunters. Tahr hunters were uniformly focussed on trophy bull tahr, and reduced probabilities of securing a trophy would diminish recreational hunting effort significantly. Hunting activity was not affected by adult female tahr populations. These results suggest that managing tahr to low densities, but improving trophy potential, can provide concurrent environmental and recreational benefits.
Conclusions: Changes in hunt attributes, such as trophy potential and presence of other hunters, have significant effects on hunt benefits, site choice and the amount of recreational tahr hunting.
Implications: The present study identified potential gains from active management of Himalayan tahr and tahr hunters.
Additional keywords: Choice experiment, latent class analysis, recreation.
References
Andrews, R. L., and Currim, I. S. (2003). Retention of latent segments in regression-based marketing models. International Journal of Research in Marketing 20, 315–321.| Retention of latent segments in regression-based marketing models.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Aryal, A., Dhakal, M., Panthi, S., Yadav, B.P., Shrestha, U.B., Bencini, R., Raubienheimer, C., and Ji, W. (2015). Is trophy hunting of bharal (blue sheep) and Himalayan tahr contributing to their conservation in Nepal? Hystrix, the Italian Journal of Mammalogy 26, 85–88.
Banwell, D. B., and Pinney, M. R. W. (2015). ‘The Himalayan Tahr: New Zealand Big Game Records Series, Volume Eight.’ (Halcyon Press: Auckland.)
Bhatnagar, Y. V., and Lovari, S. (2008). Hemitragus jemlahicus. In ‘The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2008’. (International Union for Conservation of Nature.) Available at http://www.iucnredlist.org/details/9919/0 [Verified 9 January 2018].
Bolton, N. (2017). Himalayan tahr control plan: annual report 2015/2016. Report to the New Zealand Conservation Authority, 7 & 8 February 2017. Department of Conservation, Christchurch, New Zealand. Available at ftp://public:public@ftp.doc.govt.nz/Public/nzca/public-papers/2017/2017-02-nzca-public-papers-february-2017.pdf [Verified 4 January 2018].
Boxall, P. C., and Macnab, B. (2000). Exploring the preferences of wildlife recreationists for features of boreal forest management: a choice experiment approach. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 30, 1931–1941.
| Exploring the preferences of wildlife recreationists for features of boreal forest management: a choice experiment approach.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Boxall, P. C., Adamowicz, W. L., Swait, J., Williams, M., and Louviere, J. (1996). A comparison of stated preference methods for environmental valuation. Ecological Economics 18, 243–253.
| A comparison of stated preference methods for environmental valuation.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Bullock, C. H., Elston, D. A., and Chalmers, N. A. (1998). An application of economic choice experiments to a traditional land use: deer hunting and landscape change in the Scottish highlands. Journal of Environmental Management 52, 335–351.
| An application of economic choice experiments to a traditional land use: deer hunting and landscape change in the Scottish highlands.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Caughley, G. (1966). Mortality patterns in mammals. Ecology 47, 906–918.
| Mortality patterns in mammals.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Caughley, G. (1970). Eruption of ungulate populations. Ecology 51, 53–72.
| Eruption of ungulate populations.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Chambers, D. (2017). Exotic goats back on Table Mountain. Times Live 14 July 2017. Available at https://www.timeslive.co.za/news/sci-tech/2017-07-14-exotic-goats-back-on-table-mountain/ [Verified 14 January 2018].
Cruz, J., Thomson, C., Parkes, J. P., Gruner, I., and Forsyth, D. M. (2017). Long-term impacts of an introduced ungulate in native grasslands: Himalayan tahr (Hemitragus jemlahicus) in New Zealand’s southern Alps. Biological Invasions 19, 339–349.
| Long-term impacts of an introduced ungulate in native grasslands: Himalayan tahr (Hemitragus jemlahicus) in New Zealand’s southern Alps.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Davys, T. R., Forsyth, D. M., and Hickling, G. J. (1999). Recreational Himalayan thar (Hemitragus jemlahicus) hunters in Canterbury, New Zealand: a profile and management implications. New Zealand Journal of Zoology 26, 1–9.
| Recreational Himalayan thar (Hemitragus jemlahicus) hunters in Canterbury, New Zealand: a profile and management implications.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Delibes-Mateos, M., Giergiczny, M., Caro, J., Viñuela, J., Riera, P., and Arroyo, B. (2014). Does hunters’ willingness to pay match the best hunting options for biodiversity conservation? A choice experiment application for small-game hunting in Spain. Biological Conservation 177, 36–42.
| Does hunters’ willingness to pay match the best hunting options for biodiversity conservation? A choice experiment application for small-game hunting in Spain.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
DOC (1993). ‘Himalayan Thar Control Plan. Canterbury Conservancy Conservation Management Series No.’ 3. (Department of Conservation: Christchurch, New Zealand.) Available at http://www.doc.govt.nz/Documents/conservation/threats-and-impacts/animal-pests/tahr/thar-plan-1993.pdf [Verified 3 January 2019].
DOC (2015). ‘Operational Plan for Tahr Control in the Eastern South Island Region: 1st July 2015 to 30th June 2016.’ (Department of Conservation: Wellington, New Zealand.) Available at https://www.nzta.govt.nz/assets/resources/general-circulars/docs/eem-manual-2013.pdf [Verified 1 January 2019]
Donne, T. E. (1924). ‘The Game Animals of New Zealand: an Account of their Introduction, Acclimatization and Development.’ (J. Murray: London.)
Engelman, M., Lagerkvist, C.-J., and Gren, I.-M. (2016). ‘Hunting Value of Wild Boar in Sweden: a Choice Experiment. Working Paper 01/2016.’ (Department of Economics, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences: Uppsala, Sweden.)
Flueck, W. T. (2010). The slippery slope of exporting invasive species: the case of Himalayan tahr arriving in South America. Biological Invasions 12, 1467–1475.
| The slippery slope of exporting invasive species: the case of Himalayan tahr arriving in South America.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Forsyth, D. M., and Tustin, K. G. (2001). Advances in New Zealand mammalogy 1990–2000: Himalayan tahr. Journal of the Royal Society of New Zealand 31, 251–261.
| Advances in New Zealand mammalogy 1990–2000: Himalayan tahr.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Forsyth, D. M., Ramsey, D. S. L., Veltman, C. J., Allen, R. B., Allen, W. J., Barker, R. J., Jacobson, C. L., Nicol, S. J., Richardson, S. J., and Todd, C. R. (2013). When deer must die: large uncertainty surrounds changes in deer abundance achieved by helicopter- and ground-based hunting in New Zealand forests. Wildlife Research 40, 447–458.
| When deer must die: large uncertainty surrounds changes in deer abundance achieved by helicopter- and ground-based hunting in New Zealand forests.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Fraser, K. W. (2001). ‘Introduced Wildlife in New Zealand: a Survey of General Public Views. Science Series No. 23.’ (Landcare Research: Lincoln, New Zealand.)
Green Party (2017). ‘Green Party of New Zealand Conservation Policy.’ Available at https://www.greens.org.nz/sites/default/files/conservation_20170621_0.pdf [Verified 1 February 2018].
Greene, W. H., and Hensher, D. A. (2003). A latent class model for discrete choice analysis: contrasts with mixed logit. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological 37, 681–698.
| A latent class model for discrete choice analysis: contrasts with mixed logit.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Haener, M. K., Boxall, P. C., and Adamowicz, W. L. (2001). Modeling recreation site choice: do hypothetical choices reflect actual behavior? American Journal of Agricultural Economics 83, 629–642.
| Modeling recreation site choice: do hypothetical choices reflect actual behavior?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Haener, M. K., Boxall, P. C., Adamowicz, W. L., and Kuhnke, D. H. (2004). Aggregation bias in recreation site choice models: resolving the resolution problem. Land Economics 80, 561–574.
| Aggregation bias in recreation site choice models: resolving the resolution problem.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Holmes, T. P., and Adamowicz, W. L. (2003). Attribute-based methods. In ‘A Primer on Nonmarket Valuation’. (Eds P. Champ, K. J. Boyle and T. C. Brown.) pp. 171–219. (Kluwer Academic Publishers: Dordrecht, Netherlands.)
Hughey, K. F. D., and Parkes, J. P. (1996). Thar management: planning and consultation under the Wild Animal Control Act. In ‘Proceedings of Pest Summit ‘95’. (Ed. D. J. Hamilton.) The Royal Society of New Zealand Miscellaneous Series 31, pp. 85–90. (SIR Publishing: Wellington, New Zealand.)
Hughey, K. F. D., and Wason, K. M. (2005). Management of Himalayan tahr in New Zealand: high country farmer perspectives and implications. AERU research report no. 276. Agribusiness and Economics Research Unit, Lincoln University, Lincoln, New Zealand.
Hughey, K. F. D., Kerr, G. N., and Cullen, R. (2013). ‘Public Perceptions of New Zealand’s Environment: 2013.’ (EOS Ecology: Christchurch, New Zealand.)
Hussain, A., Zhang, D., and Armstrong, J. B. (2004). Willingness to pay for hunting leases in Alabama. Southern Journal of Applied Forestry 28, 21–27.
Hussain, A., Munn, I. A., Edwards, S. L., and Hunt, K. (2016). Economic valuation of hunter access on Mississippi wildlife management areas: discrete-count data modelling. Forest Science 62, 513–524.
| Economic valuation of hunter access on Mississippi wildlife management areas: discrete-count data modelling.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Hutcheson, G. D., and Sofroniou, S. N. (1999). ‘The Multivariate Social Scientist: Introductory Statistics Using Generalized Linear Models.’ (Sage Publications: Thousand Oaks, CA.)
Hynes, S., Hanley, N., and Scarpa, R. (2008). Effects on welfare measures of alternative means of accounting for preference heterogeneity in recreational demand models. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 90, 1011–1027.
| Effects on welfare measures of alternative means of accounting for preference heterogeneity in recreational demand models.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Kerr, G. N. (1996). Recreation values and Kai Tahu management: the Greenstone and Caples Valleys. New Zealand Economic Papers 30, 19–38.
| Recreation values and Kai Tahu management: the Greenstone and Caples Valleys.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Kerr, G. N., and Abell, W. (2014). Big game hunting in New Zealand: per-capita effort and expenditure in 2011–2012. New Zealand Journal of Zoology 41, 124–138.
| Big game hunting in New Zealand: per-capita effort and expenditure in 2011–2012.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Kerr, G. N., and Abell, W. (2016). What are they hunting for? Investigating heterogeneity among sika deer (Cervus nippon) hunters. Wildlife Research 43, 69–79.
| What are they hunting for? Investigating heterogeneity among sika deer (Cervus nippon) hunters.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Kerr, G. N., and Hughey, K. F. D. (2014). Tahr run holders’ survey 2014: Summary. Unpublished report. Department of Environmental Management, Lincoln University, Lincoln, New Zealand.
Kerr, G. N., and Sharp, B. M. H. (2010). Choice experiment adaptive design benefits: a case study. The Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 54, 407–420.
| Choice experiment adaptive design benefits: a case study.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Kerr, G. N., and Woods, A. (2010). New Zealand big game hunting values: a benefit transfer study. Land Environment and People report no. 23. Lincoln University, Lincoln, New Zealand.
Knoche, S., and Lupi, F. (2011). The economic value of publicly accessible deer hunting land. The Journal of Wildlife Management 76, 462–470.
| The economic value of publicly accessible deer hunting land.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Krausman, P. R. (2002). ‘Introduction to Wildlife Management: the basics.’ (Prentice-Hall: Upper Saddle River, NJ.)
Kuhnke, D. H. (2007). The influence of forested landscape attributes on hunter site choice and participation. Forestry Chronicle 83, 490–501.
| The influence of forested landscape attributes on hunter site choice and participation.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Long, J. L. (2003). ‘Introduced Mammals of the World: their History, Distribution and Influence.’ (CSIRO Publishing: Melbourne.)
Loomis, J. B., Donnelly, D. M., Sorg, C. F., and Oldenburg, L. (1985). ‘Net Economic Value of Hunting Unique Species in Idaho: Bighorn Sheep, Mountain Goat, Moose, and Antelope.’ USDA Forest Service Resource Bulletin RM-10. (Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station: Fort Collins, CO.)
Lovelock, B. (2015). Troubled-shooting: the ethics of helicopter-assisted guided trophy hunting by tourists for tahr. In ‘Animals and Tourism: Understanding Diverse Relationships’. (Ed. K. Markwell.) pp. 91–105. (Channel View Publications: Bristol, UK.)
Magar, S. G. (2017). Hunting season begins at Dhorpatan Hunting Reserve. Available at www.myrepublica.com/news/16743/ [Verified 14 January 2018].
Marshall, D. (1991). ‘Himalayan Thar Management Policy.’ (Department of Conservation: Wellington, New Zealand.)
Martinez-Jauregui, M., Herruzo, A. C., and Campos, P. (2015). What does hunting market price reflect? The role of species, landscape and management. Wildlife Research 42, 280–289.
| What does hunting market price reflect? The role of species, landscape and management.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Martínez-Jauregui, M., Herruzo, A. C., Campos, P., and Soliño, M. (2016). Shedding light on the self-consumption value of recreational hunting in European Mediterranean forests. Forest Policy and Economics 69, 83–89.
| Shedding light on the self-consumption value of recreational hunting in European Mediterranean forests.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Mattsson, L., Boman, M., and Ezebilo, E. E. (2014). More or less moose: how is the hunting value affected? Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research 29, 170–173.
| More or less moose: how is the hunting value affected?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
McCollum, D. W., and Boyle, K. J. (2005). The effect of respondent experience/knowledge in the elicitation of contingent values: an investigation of convergent validity, procedural invariance and reliability. Environmental and Resource Economics 30, 23–33.
| The effect of respondent experience/knowledge in the elicitation of contingent values: an investigation of convergent validity, procedural invariance and reliability.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Mensah, J. T., and Elofsson, K. (2017). An empirical analysis of hunting lease pricing and value of game in Sweden. Land Economics 93, 292–308.
| An empirical analysis of hunting lease pricing and value of game in Sweden.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Miller, C. A., and Vaske, J. J. (2003). Individual and situational influences on declining hunter effort in Illinois. Human Dimensions of Wildlife 8, 263–276.
| Individual and situational influences on declining hunter effort in Illinois.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Mingie, J. C. (2015). Estimating the economic value of big game hunting in Georgia: a nonmarket approach. PhD Thesis. University of Georgia, Athens, GA.
Mingie, J. C., Poudyal, N. C., Bowler, J. M., Mengakm, M. T., and Siry, J. P. (2017). Big game hunter preferences for hunting club attributes: a choice experiment. Forest Policy and Economics 78, 98–106.
| Big game hunter preferences for hunting club attributes: a choice experiment.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Morey, E., Thacher, J., and Breffle, W. (2006). Using angler characteristics and attitudinal data to identify environmental preference classes: a latent-class model. Environmental and Resource Economics 34, 91–115.
| Using angler characteristics and attitudinal data to identify environmental preference classes: a latent-class model.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Morrison, M. D., Blamey, R. K., and Bennett, J. W. (2000). Minimising payment vehicle bias in contingent valuation studies. Environmental and Resource Economics 16, 407–422.
| Minimising payment vehicle bias in contingent valuation studies.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Munn, I., Hussain, A., Hudson, D., and West, B. C. (2011). Hunter preferences and willingness to pay for hunting leases. Forest Science 57, 189–200.
New Mexico Fish and Game (2018). ‘Water Canyon Wildlife Management Area.’ Available at http://www.wildlife.state.nm.us/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/Water-Canyon-GAIN-WMA-NMDGF.pdf [Verified 10 January 2018].
Nugent, G. (1992). Big-game, small-game, and gamebird hunting in New Zealand: hunting effort, harvest, and expenditure in 1988. New Zealand Journal of Zoology 19, 75–90.
| Big-game, small-game, and gamebird hunting in New Zealand: hunting effort, harvest, and expenditure in 1988.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Nugent, G., and Henderson, R. (1990). Putting a value on hunting in the Oxford RHA. New Zealand Wildlife Summer, 39–40.
Nylund, K. L., Asparouhov, T., and Muthén, B. O. (2007). Deciding on the number of classes in latent class analysis and growth mixture modeling: a Monte Carlo simulation Study. Structural Equation Modeling 14, 535–569.
| Deciding on the number of classes in latent class analysis and growth mixture modeling: a Monte Carlo simulation Study.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
NZTA (2013a). ‘Economic Evaluation Manual: First edition, Amendment 0.’ (New Zealand Transport Agency: Wellington, New Zealand.) Available at https://www.nzta.govt.nz/assets/resources/general-circulars/docs/eem-manual-2013.pdf [Verified 13 December 2019]
NZTA (2013b). ‘Economic Evaluation Manual (Volume 1): First Edition, Amendment 1.’ (New Zealand Transport Agency: Wellington, New Zealanad.) Available at http://www.nzta.govt.nz/resources/economic-evaluation-manual/economic-evaluation-manual/docs/eem-2013-update-factors.pdf
Parkes, J.P. (1988). A Review of the Options to Manage Himalayan Thar (Hemitragus jemlahicus) in New Zealand. New Zealand Forest Service report to the Department of Conservation, FAE 3.07. (Forest Research Institute: Rangiora, New Zealand.)
Parkes, J. P. (2009). Management of Himalayan thar (Hemitragus jemlahicus) in New Zealand: the influence of Graeme Caughley. Wildlife Research 36, 41–47.
| Management of Himalayan thar (Hemitragus jemlahicus) in New Zealand: the influence of Graeme Caughley.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Parkes, J. P., and Thomson, C. (1995). ‘Management of Thar. Part I: Thar-Vegetation-Harvest Model Development. Pat II: Diet of That, Chamois and Possums. Science for Conservation No. 7.’ (Department of Conservation: Wellington, New Zealand.)
Parkes, J. P., and Thomson, C. (1999). ‘Impact of Himalayan Tahr (Hemitragus jemlahicus) on Snow Tussock in the Southern Alps.’ Science for Conservation No. 132. (Department of Conservation: Wellington, New Zealand.)
Ramsey, D. (2018). Tahr density estimates from aerial surveys preliminary results. Report prepared for the New Zealand Department of Conservation. (Arthur Rylah Institute: Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia.)
Rose, J., Bliemer, M. C. J., Hensher, D. A., and Collins, A. T. (2008). Designing efficient stated choice experiments in the presence of reference alternatives. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological 42, 395–406.
| Designing efficient stated choice experiments in the presence of reference alternatives.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Sandrey, R. A., and Simmons, D. G. (1984). ‘Recreation Demand Estimation in New Zealand: an Example of the Kaimanawa and Kaweka Forest Parks.’ Department of Horticulture, Landscape and Parks Bulletin No. 40. (Lincoln College: Canterbury, New Zealand.)
Sathyakumar, S., Rawat, G. S., and Johnsingh, A. J. T. (2015). Chapter 57. Himalayan tahr Hemitragus jemlahicus. In ‘Mammals of South Asia, Vol. 2’. (Eds A. J. T. Jognsingh and N. Manjrekar.) pp. 385–408. (Universities Press: Hyderabad, India.)
Scarpa, R., Thiene, M., and Tempesta, T. (2007). Latent class count models of total visitation demand: days out hiking in the eastern Alps. Environmental and Resource Economics 38, 447–460.
| Latent class count models of total visitation demand: days out hiking in the eastern Alps.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Seitzer, S. (1994). Tahr & chamois monarchs or misfits? New Zealand Geographer 23, 48–64.
Shen, J. (2009). Latent class model or mixed logit model? A comparison by transport mode choice data. Applied Economics 41, 2915–2924.
| Latent class model or mixed logit model? A comparison by transport mode choice data.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Shoji, Y., and Tsuge, T. (2015). Heterogeneous preferences for winter nature-based tours in sub-frigid climate zones: a latent class approach. Tourism Economics 21, 387–407.
| Heterogeneous preferences for winter nature-based tours in sub-frigid climate zones: a latent class approach.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Soliño, M., Farizo, B. A., and Campos, P. (2016). Hunters’ preferences and willingness to pay for driven hunts in southern Europe. Wildlife Research 43, 649–654.
| Hunters’ preferences and willingness to pay for driven hunts in southern Europe.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Tustin, K. G. (2011). ‘New Zealand’s Mountain Monarchs.’ (Halcyon Publishing: Auckland.)
Vaske, J. J. (2008). ‘Survey Research and Analysis: Applications in Parks, Recreation and Human Dimensions.’ (Venture Publishing: State College, PA.)
Wallmo, K. (2003). Economic choice modelling: the use of social preference data to inform white-tailed deer management in Michigan. PhD dissertation, Department of Fisheries and Wildlife, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI.
Ward, J. H. (1963). Hierarchical grouping to optimize an objective function. Journal of the American Statistical Association 58, 236–244.
| Hierarchical grouping to optimize an objective function.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Ward, K. J., Stedman, R. C., Luloff, A. E., Shortle, J. S., and Finley, J. C. (2008). Categorizing deer hunters by typologies useful to game managers: a latent-class model. Society & Natural Resources 21, 215–229.
| Categorizing deer hunters by typologies useful to game managers: a latent-class model.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Whitehead, J. C., and Wicker, P. (2018). Estimating willingness to pay for a cycling event using a willingness to travel approach. Tourism Management 65, 160–169.
| Estimating willingness to pay for a cycling event using a willingness to travel approach.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Wodzicki, K. A. (1950). ‘Introduced Mammals of New Zealand.’ DSIR Bulletin No. 98. (DSIR: Wellington.)
Woods, A., and Kerr, G. N. (2010). Recreational game hunting: motivations, satisfactions and participation. Land, Environment and People report no. 18. Lincoln University. Lincoln, New Zealand.
