Free Standard AU & NZ Shipping For All Book Orders Over $80!
Register      Login
Wildlife Research Wildlife Research Society
Ecology, management and conservation in natural and modified habitats

Just Accepted

This article has been peer reviewed and accepted for publication. It is in production and has not been edited, so may differ from the final published form.

Flock size does not influence escape decisions of urban lawn-foraging birds

Jin-Ming Zhao 0000-0003-2305-7643, Xiangrong Song, Xiaoyu Yang, Yue Xie, Xiaonong Yang

Abstract

Context. Predator avoidance is considered as a key evolutionary driver shaping aggregation behavior. An overlooked aspect in the study of predator avoidance is whether individuals can make better escape decisions (i.e., gain greater benefits) when in larger groups. Escape decisions encompass when to flee (FID: the distance at which an animal moves away from approaching threats), how far to flee (distance fled, DF), flight direction (FD) and whether to seek refuge. Aim. This study evaluates the influence of flock size on the FID, DF and FD in urban birds. Methods. We studied a series of escape behaviors of eight urban lawn-foraging bird species in Huaibei city, China, approached by one, two or three persons representing varying levels of predation risk. Key results. We found that flock size had a limited effect on birds’ escape decisions, including FID, DF, FD and refuge-seeking behavior, with some species-specific effects. Predation risk (number of approachers) also had a subtle influence on birds’ escape decisions. Conclusions. Urban birds generally exhibit consistent escape behavior regardless of flock size or predation risk. Implications. Urban birds might maintain a minimum antipredator response to approaching humans due to their extensive habituation to human occurrence. Future research should examine how urban birds’ responses to humans compare with their reactions to natural predators and investigate the varying impacts of urbanization on these behaviors.

WR23042  Accepted 04 November 2024

© CSIRO 2024

Committee on Publication Ethics