Register      Login
Wildlife Research Wildlife Research Society
Ecology, management and conservation in natural and modified habitats
Shopping Cart: ( empty )
You are here: Home > Journals > WR > WR24114
RESEARCH ARTICLE (Open Access)
Contents Vol 52(4)

Hunter movement and habitat use affect observation rate of white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus)

Alyssa Meier A F , Andrew R. Little B , Kenneth L. Gee C , Stephen Demarais D , Stephen L. Webb https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6034-5164 E and Dustin H. Ranglack https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4534-9487 A G *
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A University of Nebraska at Kearney, Kearney, NE 68849, USA.

B School of Natural Resources, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, 3310 Holdrege Street, Lincoln, NE 68583, USA.

C Oaks and Prairies Joint Venture, Gene Autry, OK 73401, USA.

D Department of Wildlife, Fisheries, and Aquaculture, Mississippi State University, Mississippi State, MS 39762, USA.

E Texas A&M Natural Resources Institute, and Department of Rangeland, Wildlife and Fisheries Management, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843, USA.

F Present address: Colorado Parks and Wildlife, Gunnison, CO 81230, USA.

G Present address: USDA APHIS WS National Wildlife Research Center Utah Field Station, 4200 S 600 E Cache County Road, Millville, UT 84326, USA.

* Correspondence to: dustin.ranglack@usda.gov

Handling Editor: Tom Sullivan

Wildlife Research 52, WR24114 https://doi.org/10.1071/WR24114
Submitted: 13 July 2024  Accepted: 11 March 2025  Published: 8 April 2025

© 2025 The Author(s) (or their employer(s)). Published by CSIRO Publishing. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY)

Abstract

Context

Hunting by humans is the primary tool for population control for many ungulate species across the United States, including white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus). Previous research has focused primarily on the effects of hunting on prey behavior, while neglecting the potential effects that the hunter behavior has on the probability of harvest success.

Aims

Our objectives were to assess hunter behavior (i.e. movement and habitat use) and evaluate how these behaviors influence deer observation rates.

Methods

During the 2008 and 2009 Oklahoma hunting seasons, we recorded GPS and observation data from 83 individual hunters over 487 total hunts. We examined hunter movement speed, path shape, and the proportion of time hunters spent in different vegetation types, and the average distance from landscape features such as roads, water sources, etc. for each recorded hunt.

Key results

On average, hunters spent 3.7 h (s.e. = 0.1 h) afield during each recorded hunt, traveled 2085 m (s.e. = 79.0 m), and observed 2.7 deer/outing (s.e. = 0.15 deer). Hunters used areas with 25–50% forested cover and greater topographic roughness, and hunted close to water sources (i.e. ponds) but >50 m from roads. Behavior of hunters influenced the probability of observing deer; observation rates of deer increased as hunters used greater forested cover and as their movement rate increased.

Conclusions

Our results suggest that hunter movement and habitat use influence the number of deer observed during a hunt.

Implications

Our findings showed that land managers can leverage understanding hunter behaviors to adjust harvest success to meet various management objectives.

Keywords: behavior, habitat use, harvest, hunter, hunting, movement, population management, resource selection.

References

Akaike H (2011) Akaike’s information criterion. In ‘International encyclopedia of statistical science’. (Ed. M Lovric) p. 25. (Springer: Berlin, Heidelberg, Germany). 10.1007/978-3-642-04898-2_110

Bastille-Rousseau G, Potts JR, Yackulic CB, Frair JL, Hance Ellington E, Blake S (2015) Flexible characterization of animal movement pattern using net squared displacement and a latent state model. Movement Ecology 4(1), 15.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Bates D, Mächler M, Bolker B, Walker S (2015) Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software 67(1), 1-48.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Bonnot N, Morellet N, Verheyden H, Cargnelutti B, Lourtet B, Klein F, Hewison AJM (2013) Habitat use under predation risk: hunting, roads and human dwellings influence the spatial behaviour of roe deer. European Journal of Wildlife Research 59(2), 185-193.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Bovet P, Benhamou S (1988) Spatial analysis of animals’ movements using a correlated random walk model. Journal of Theoretical Biology 131(4), 419-433.
| Google Scholar |

Bracis C, Bildstein KL, Mueller T (2018) Revisitation analysis uncovers spatio-temporal patterns in animal movement data. Ecography 41(11), 1801-1811.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Calenge C (2006) The package ‘adehabitat’ for the R software: a tool for the analysis of space and habitat use by animals. Ecological Modelling 197(3–4), 516-519.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Conner MM, White GC, Freddy DJ (2001) Elk movement in response to early-season hunting in Northwest Colorado. Journal of Wildlife Management 65(4), 926-940.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Cromsigt JPGM, Kuijper DPJ, Adam M, Beschta RL, Churski M, Eycott A, Kerley GIH, Mysterud A, Schmidt K, West K (2013) Hunting for fear: innovating management of human–wildlife conflicts. Journal of Applied Ecology 50(3), 544-549.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Diefenbach DR, Finley JC, Luloff AE, Stedman R, Swope CB, Zinn HC, San Julian GJ (2005) Bear and deer hunter density and distribution on public land in Pennsylvania. Human Dimensions of Wildlife 10(3), 201-212.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Doerr ML, McAninch JB, Wiggers EP (2001) Comparison of 4 methods to reduce white-tailed deer abundance in an urban community. Wildlife Society Bulletin 29(4), 1105-1113.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Dzialak MR, Webb SL, Harju SM, Winstead JB, Wondzell JJ, Mudd JP, Hayden-Wing LD (2011) The spatial pattern of demographic performance as a component of sustainable landscape management and planning. Landscape Ecology 26(6), 775-790.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Franklin AB, Anderson DR, Gutiérrez RJ, Burnham KP (2000) Climate, habitat quality, and fitness in northern spotted owl populations in northwestern California. Ecological Monographs 70(4), 539-590.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Frid A, Dill L (2002) Human-caused disturbance stimuli as a form of predation risk. Ecology and Society 6(1), 11.
| Google Scholar |

Gee KL, Porter MD, Demarais S, Bryant FC (2011) ‘White-tailed deer: their foods and management in the Cross Timbers’, 3rd edn. NF-WF-11-02. (Samuel Roberts Noble Foundation Publication: Ardmore, OK, USA)

Gelman A (2008) Scaling regression inputs by dividing by two standard deviations. Statistics in Medicine 27, 2865-2873.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

Gillies CS, Hebblewhite M, Nielsen SE, Krawchuk MA, Aldridge CL, Frair JL, Saher DJ, Stevens CE, Jerde CL (2006) Application of random effects to the study of resource selection by animals. Journal of Animal Ecology 75(4), 887-898.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

Gratson MW, Whitman C (2000) Characteristics of Idaho elk hunters relative to road access on public lands. Wildlife Society Bulletin 28(4), 1016-1022.
| Google Scholar |

Grau GA, Grau BL (1980) Effects of hunting on hunter effort and white-tailed deer behavior. Ohio Journal of Science 80(4), 150-156.
| Google Scholar |

Green D, Askins GR, West PD (1997) Developing urban deer management plans: the need for public education. In ‘Proceedings of the Eighth Eastern Wildlife Damage Management Conference’, 16–19 October 1997, Roanoke, Virginia. (Ed. JA Parkhurst) pp. 95–103. Available at https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/ewdcc8/15

Hansen L, Beringer J (1997) Managed hunts to control white-tailed deer populations on urban public areas in Missouri. Wildlife Society Bulletin 25(2), 484-487.
| Google Scholar |

Harden CD, Woolf A, Roseberry J (2005) Influence of exurban development on hunting opportunity, hunter distribution, and harvest efficiency of white-tailed deer. Wildlife Society Bulletin 33(1), 233-242.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Haus JM, Webb SL, Strickland BK, McCarthy KP, Rogerson JE, Bowman JL (2020) Individual heterogeneity in resource selection has implications for mortality risk in white-tailed deer. Ecosphere 11(4), e03064.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Hewitt DG (2011) ‘Biology and management of white-tailed deer.’ (CRC Press)

Hijmans RJ, Van Etten J, Cheng J, Mattiuzzi M, Sumner M, Greenberg JA, Lamigueiro OP, Bevan A, Racine EB, Shortridge A, Hijmans MR (2015) Package ‘raster’. R package 734, 473.
| Google Scholar |

Hygnstrom SE, Vercauteren KC, Groepper SR, Garabrandt GW, Gubanyi JA (2011) Effects of seasons and hunting on space use by female white-tailed deer in a developed landscape in southeastern Nebraska. Wildlife Society Bulletin 35(3), 220-226.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Iijima H (2017) The effects of landscape components, wildlife behavior and hunting methods on hunter effort and hunting efficiency of sika deer. Wildlife Biology 2017(1), 1-6.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Jacques CN, van Deelen TR, Hall WH, Jr., Martin KJ, Vercauteren KC (2011) Evaluating how hunters see and react to telemetry collars on white-tailed deer. Journal of Wildlife Management 75(1), 221-231.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Johnson-Bice SM, Gable TD, Homkes AT, Windels SK, Bump JK, Bruggink JG (2023) Logging, linear features, and human infrastructure shape the spatial dynamics of wolf predation on an ungulate neonate. Ecological Applications 33(7), e2911.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Kilgo JC, Labisky RF, Fritzen DE (1998) Influences of hunting on the behavior of white-tailed deer: implications for conservation of the Florida panther. Conservation Biology 12(6), 1359-1364.
| Google Scholar |

Kilpatrick HJ, Walter WD (1999) A controlled archery deer hunt in a residential community: cost, effectiveness, and deer recovery rates. Wildlife Society Bulletin 27(1), 115-123.
| Google Scholar |

Kilpatrick HJ, Spohr SM, Chasko GG (1997) A controlled deer hunt on a state-owned coastal reserve in Connecticut: controversies, strategies, and results. Wildlife Society Bulletin 25(2), 451-456.
| Google Scholar |

Kilpatrick HJ, LaBonte AM, Seymour JT (2002) A shotgun-archery deer hunt in a residential community: evaluation of hunt strategies and effectiveness. Wildlife Society Bulletin 30(2), 478-486.
| Google Scholar |

Kilpatrick HJ, LaBonte AM, Barclay JS (2007) Acceptance of deer management strategies by suburban homeowners and bowhunters. Journal of Wildlife Management 71(6), 2095-2101.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Kufeld RC, Bowden DC, Schrupp DL (1988) Influence of hunting on movements of female mule deer. Journal of Range Management 41(1), 70-72.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Laliberte AS, Ripple WJ (2004) Range contractions of North American Carnivores and Ungulates. BioScience 54(2), 123-138.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Lebel F, Dussault C, Massé A, Côté SD (2012) Influence of habitat features and hunter behavior on white-tailed deer harvest. Journal of Wildlife Management 76(7), 1431-1440.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Lele SR (2009) A new method for estimation of resource selection probability function. Journal of Wildlife Management 73(1), 122-127.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Little AR (2011) Human predation risk effects on adult, male white-tailed deer antipredator behavior. Masters thesis. Mississippi State University.

Little AR, Demarais S, Gee KL, Webb SL, Riffell SK, Gaskamp JA, Belant JL (2014) Does human predation risk affect harvest susceptibility of white-tailed deer during hunting season? Wildlife Society Bulletin 38(4), 797-805.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Little AR, Webb SL, Demarais S, Gee KL, Riffell SK, Gaskamp JA (2016) Hunting intensity alters movement behaviour of white-tailed deer. Basic and Applied Ecology 17(4), 360-369.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Lone K, Loe LE, Meisingset EL, Stamnes I, Mysterud A (2015) An adaptive behavioural response to hunting: surviving male red deer shift habitat at the onset of the hunting season. Animal Behaviour 102, 127-138.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Marantz SA, Long JA, Webb SL, Gee KL, Little AR, Demarais S (2016) Impacts of human hunting on spatial behavior of white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus). Canadian Journal of Zoology 94(12), 853-861.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

McGhee KE, Pintor LM, Bell AM (2013) Reciprocal behavioral plasticity and behavioral types during predator–prey interactions. The American Naturalist 182(6), 704-717.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

McLean DJ, Skowron Volponi MA (2018) trajr: an R package for characterisation of animal trajectories. Ethology 124(6), 440-448.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Meier AN (2021) Effects of hunter movement and habitat use on observation rate of white-tailed deer (Odocoileus viginianus). Masters thesis. University of Nebraska at Kearney. Available at https://openspaces.unk.edu/bio-etd/4

Miller CA, Graefe AR (2001) Effect of harvest success on hunter attitudes toward white-tailed deer management in pennsylvania. Human Dimensions of Wildlife 6(3), 189-203.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Montgomery RA, Raupp J, Miller SA, Wijers M, Lisowsky R, Comar A, Bugir CK, Hayward MW (2022) The hunting modes of human predation and potential nonconsumptive effects on animal populations. Biological Conservation 265, 109398.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Murphy DA (1965) Effects of various opening days on deer. Proceedings of the Annual Conference, Southeastern Association of Game and Fish Commissioners 19, 141-146.
| Google Scholar |

Norum JK, Lone K, Linnell JDC, Odden J, Loe LE, Mysterud A (2015) Landscape of risk to roe deer imposed by lynx and different human hunting tactics. European Journal of Wildlife Research 61(6), 831-840.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

O’Connor BJ, Fryda NJ, Ranglack DH (2018) Effects of environmental and anthropogenic landscape features on mule deer harvest in Nebraska. PeerJ 6(1), e5510.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Paton DG, Ciuti S, Quinn M, Boyce MS (2017) Hunting exacerbates the response to human disturbance in large herbivores while migrating through a road network. Ecosphere 8(6), e01841.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Plante S, Dussault C, Côté SD (2017) Landscape attributes explain migratory caribou vulnerability to sport hunting. Journal of Wildlife Management 81(2), 238-247.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Ranglack DH, Proffitt KM, Canfield JE, Gude JA, Rotella J, Garrott RA (2017) Security areas for elk during archery and rifle hunting seasons. Journal of Wildlife Management 81(5), 778-791.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Rowland MM, Nielson RM, Wisdom MJ, Johnson BK, Findholt S, Clark D, Didonato GT, Hafer JM, Naylor BJ (2021) Influence of landscape characteristics on hunter space use and success. Journal of Wildlife Management 85(7), 1394-1409.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Rowland MM, Nielson RM, Wisdom MJ, Clark DA, DiDonato GT, Hafer JM, Naylor BJ, Johnson BK (2023) Success is dependent on effort: unraveling characteristics of successful deer and elk hunters. Wildlife Society Bulletin 47(2), e1414.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Ryan EL, Shaw B (2011) Improving hunter recruitment and retention. Human Dimensions of Wildlife 16(5), 311-317.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Schuttler SG, Parsons AW, Forrester TD, Baker MC, McShea WJ, Costello R, Kays R (2017) Deer on the lookout: how hunting, hiking and coyotes affect white-tailed deer vigilance. Journal of Zoology 301(4), 320-327.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Springer R (1977) A geography of deer hunting in the United States. Masters thesis. Oklahoma State University.

Stankowich T (2008) Ungulate flight responses to human disturbance: a review and meta-analysis. Biological Conservation 141(9), 2159-2173.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Swenson JE (1982) Effects of hunting on habitat use by mule deer on mixed-grass prairie in Montana. Wildlife Society Bulletin 10(2), 115-120.
| Google Scholar |

Urbanek RE, Allen KR, Nielsen CK (2011) Urban and suburban deer management by state wildlife-conservation agencies. Wildlife Society Bulletin 35(3), 310-315.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Wagner T, Diefenbach DR, Christensen SA, Norton AS (2011) Using multilevel models to quantify heterogeneity in resource selection. Journal of Wildlife Management 75(8), 1788-1796.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |