Register      Login
Wildlife Research Wildlife Research Society
Ecology, management and conservation in natural and modified habitats
Shopping Cart: ( empty )
You are here: Home > Journals > WR > WR24108
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Contents Vol 52(3)

Monitoring and habitat inferences change with population metric: a case study with mesocarnivores

Andrew R. Butler https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9694-1670 A * , Mairi K. P. Poisson A , Patrick Tate B , Daniel H. Bergeron C and Remington J. Moll A
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Department of Natural Resources and the Environment, University of New Hampshire, Durham, NH 03824, USA.

B New Hampshire Fish & Game Department, Durham, NH 03824, USA.

C New Hampshire Fish & Game Department, Concord, NH 03301, USA.

* Correspondence to: andrew.r.butler@unh.edu

Handling Editor: Thomas Newsome

Wildlife Research 52, WR24108 https://doi.org/10.1071/WR24108
Submitted: 29 June 2024  Accepted: 15 February 2025  Published: 6 March 2025

© 2025 The Author(s) (or their employer(s)). Published by CSIRO Publishing

Abstract

Context

Accurate and precise estimates of wildlife abundance and distribution are critical for robust ecological inference and effective management. However, obtaining this information for mesocarnivores is challenging because they are elusive and highly mobile.

Aims

To compare four common population metrics (occupancy, local abundance, relative abundance, and density) for monitoring unmarked populations and the influence of three habitat covariates on these population metrics.

Methods

For five mesocarnivores species we used data collected at 74 camera traps deployed in the northeastern USA in summer 2021 to fit (1) models that estimated probabilistic occupancy, (2) Royle–Nichols models that estimated local abundance, (3) Poisson distributed general linear models that estimated relative abundance, and (4) random encounter and staying time (REST) models that estimated density. We also quantified habitat relationships across these four different models and compared the resultant inferences.

Key results

Density and relative abundance had the highest correlation (Pearson correlation (r) = 0.91), whereas occupancy and density had the lowest correlation (r = 0.19). Density estimates for all species were consistent with expectations and similar to those reported in previous studies. The effects of habitat covariates changed across metrics, such that a significant effect of a covariate on one metric was not indicative of a significant influence on the other metrics. There were only two instances of a significant effect of a covariate on all metrics, and two instances where the influence of a covariate had opposite, albeit insignificant, effects on two metrics.

Conclusions

Estimates of occupancy and local abundance for mesocarnivores derived from camera traps may not be reliable proxies for density. However, relative abundance, as derived from detection rates, could be a promising means of monitoring density with less intensive data processing. Mesocarnivore habitat relationships changed across these metrics.

Implications

When designing monitoring or research programs, practitioners should be cautious about assuming that inferences derived from camera trap estimates of these four population metrics are interchangeable. Further, we highlight how the REST model offers a promising new means for monitoring multiple mesocarnivores simultaneously, and likely other unmarked species, via density estimates.

Keywords: Canis latrans, density, furbearer, habitat-relationships, Lynx rufus, mesocarnivores, occupancy, Pekania pennanti, REST, Royle–Nichols, Urocyon cinereoargenteus, Vulpes vulpes.

References

Allen ML, Roberts NM, Bauder JM (2020) Relationships of catch-per-unit-effort metrics with abundance vary depending on sampling method and population trajectory. PLoS ONE 15, e0233444.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Anderson DR (2001) The need to get the basics right in wildlife field studies. Wildlife Society Bulletin 29, 1294-1297.
| Google Scholar |

Anderson AK, Waller JS, Thornton DH (2023) Canada lynx occupancy and density in Glacier National Park. The Journal of Wildlife Management 87, e22383.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Bauder JM, Allen ML, Ahlers AA, Benson TJ, Miller CA, Stodola KW (2020a) Identifying and controlling for variation in canid harvest data. The Journal of Wildlife Management 84, 1234-1245.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Bauder JM, Stodola KW, Benson TJ, Miller CA, Allen ML (2020b) Raccoon pelt price and trapper harvest relationships are temporally inconsistent. The Journal of Wildlife Management 84, 1601-1610.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Bauder JM, Allen ML, Benson TJ, Miller CA, Stodola KW (2021) An approach for using multiple indices for monitoring long-term trends of mesopredators at broad spatial scales. Biodiversity and Conservation 30, 3529-3547.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Broadley K, Burton AC, Avgar T, Boutin S (2019) Density-dependent space use affects interpretation of camera trap detection rates. Ecology and Evolution 9, 14031-14041.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

Burgar JM, Stewart FEC, Volpe JP, Fisher JT, Burton AC (2018) Estimating density for species conservation: comparing camera trap spatial count models to genetic spatial capture–recapture models. Global Ecology and Conservation 15, e00411.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Burton AC, Neilson E, Moreira D, Ladle A, Steenweg R, Fisher JT, Bayne E, Boutin S (2015) Review: Wildlife camera trapping: a review and recommendations for linking surveys to ecological processes. Journal of Applied Ecology 52, 675-685.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Carter A, Potts JM, Stephens J, Roshier DA (2023) A comparison of methods for monitoring a sparse population of the red fox (Vulpes vulpes) subject to lethal control using GPS telemetry, camera traps and sand plots. Wildlife Research 50, 366-380.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Clare JDJ, Anderson EM, MacFarland DM (2015) Predicting bobcat abundance at a landscape scale and evaluating occupancy as a density index in central Wisconsin. The Journal of Wildlife Management 79, 469-480.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

DeGraaf RM, Yamasaki M (2001) ‘New England wildlife: habitat, natural history, and distribution.’ (University Press of New England: Lebanon, New Hampshire, USA)

DeGraaf RM, Yamasaki M, Leak W, Lester A (2006) ‘Technical guide to forest wildlife habitat management in New England.’ (University Press of New England: Hanover, New Hampshire, USA)

Donovan TM, Freeman M, Abouelezz H, Royar K, Howard A, Mickey R (2011) Quantifying home range habitat requirements for bobcats (Lynx rufus) in Vermont, USA. Biological Conservation 144, 2799-2809.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Doran-Myers D, Kenney AJ, Krebs CJ, Lamb CT, Menzies AK, Murray D, Studd EK, Whittington J, Boutin S (2021) Density estimates for Canada lynx vary among estimation methods. Ecosphere 12, e03774.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Efford MG, Dawson DK (2012) Occupancy in continuous habitat. Ecosphere 3, 1-15.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Engeman RM (2005) Indexing principles and a widely applicable paradigm for indexing animal populations. Wildlife Research 32, 203-210.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Erb J (2021) Carnivore scent station survey summary, 2021. Minnesota Department of Natural Resources, Grand Rapids, Minnesota, USA.

Feldhamer GA, Thompson BC, Chapman JA (2003) ‘Wildlife mammals of North America: Biology, management, and conservation.’ (Johns Hopkins University Press: Baltimore, Maryland, USA)

Ferguson AW, Currit NA, Weckerly FW (2009) Isometric scaling in home-range size of male and female bobcats (Lynx rufus). Canadian Journal of Zoology 87, 1052-1060.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Fryxell JM, Sinclair ARE, Caughley G (2014) ‘Wildlife ecology, conservation, and management.’ 3rd edn. (John Wiley & Sons: Chichester, West Sussex)

Fuller TK, York EC, Powell SM, Decker TA, DeGraaf RM (2001) An evaluation of territory mapping to estimate fisher density. Canadian Journal of Zoology 79, 1691-1696.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Fuller AK, Linden DW, Royle JA (2016) Management decision making for fisher populations informed by occupancy modeling: fisher occupancy. The Journal of Wildlife Management 80, 794-802.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Fuller AK, Augustine BC, Morin DJ, Pigeon K, Boulanger J, Lee DC, Bisi F, Garshelis DL (2022) The occupancy-abundance relationship and sampling designs using occupancy to monitor populations of Asian bears. Global Ecology and Conservation 35, e02075.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Garland L, Neilson E, Avgar T, Bayne E, Boutin S (2020) Random encounter and staying time model testing with human volunteers. The Journal of Wildlife Management 84, 1179-1184.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Gelman A, Hill J (2007) ‘Data analysis using regression and multilevel/hierarchical models.’ (Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK)

Gibbs JP (2000) Monitoring populations. In ‘Research techniques in animal ecology: controversies and consequences’. (Eds L Boitani, TK Fuller) pp. 213–252. (Columbia University: New York, New York, USA)

Gilbert NA, Clare JDJ, Stenglein JL, Zuckerberg B (2021) Abundance estimation of unmarked animals based on camera-trap data. Conservation Biology 35, 88-100.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

Gompper ME, Gittleman JL (1991) Home range scaling: intraspecific and comparative trends. 87, 343-348.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Greenberg S, Godin T, Whittington J (2019) Design patterns for wildlife-related camera trap image analysis. Ecology and Evolution 9, 13706-13730.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

Hinton JW, Chamberlain MJ (2022) Evidence of reduced abundance, density, and survival of coyotes under federal management for red wolf recovery. Ecosphere 13, e4216.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Homer C, Dewitz J, Jin S, Xian G, Costello C, Danielson P, Gass L, Funk M, Wickham J, Stehman S, Auch R, Riitters K (2020) Conterminous United States land cover change patterns 2001–2016 from the 2016 National Land Cover Database. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing 162, 184-199.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

Jensen PO, Wirsing AJ, Thornton DH (2022) Using camera traps to estimate density of snowshoe hare (Lepus americanus): a keystone boreal forest herbivore. Journal of Mammalogy 103, 693-710.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Jones JPG (2011) Monitoring species abundance and distribution at the landscape scale. Journal of Applied Ecology 48, 9-13.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Jordan MJ, Barrett RH, Purcell KL (2011) Camera trapping estimates of density and survival of fishers Martes pennanti. Wildlife Biology 17, 266-276.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Kapfer PM, Potts KB (2012) Socioeconomic and ecological correlates of bobcat harvest in Minnesota. The Journal of Wildlife Management 76, 237-242.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Kéry M (2010) ‘Introduction to WinBUGS for ecologists: Bayesian approach to regression, ANOVA, mixed models and related analyses.’ (Academic Press)

Kery M, Royle JA (2015) ‘Applied hierarchical modeling in ecology: Volume 1: Prelude and static models.’ (Academic Press)

Kluever BM, Main MB, Breck SW, Lonsinger RC, Humphrey JH, Fischer JW, Milleson MP, Piaggio AJ (2022) Using noninvasive genetics for estimating density and assessing diet of urban and rural coyotes in Florida, USA. Urban Naturalist 9, 1-24.
| Google Scholar |

Koen EL, Bowman J, Findlay CS, Zheng L (2007) Home range and population density of fishers in eastern Ontario. The Journal of Wildlife Management 71, 1484-1493.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Krausman PR, Cain JW (Eds) (2022) ‘Wildlife management and conservation: contemporary principles and practices.’ 2nd edn. (Johns Hopkins University Press: Baltimore, Maryland, USA)

Latham MC, Latham ADM, Webb NF, Mccutchen NA, Boutin S (2014) Can occupancy–abundance models be used to monitor wolf abundance? PLoS ONE 9, e102982.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Lepard CC, Moll RJ, Cepek JD, Lorch PD, Dennis PM, Robison T, Montgomery RA (2019) The influence of the delay-period setting on camera-trap data storage, wildlife detections and occupancy models. Wildlife Research 46, 37-53.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Linden DW, Fuller AK, Royle JA, Hare MP (2017) Examining the occupancy–density relationship for a low-density carnivore. Journal of Applied Ecology 54, 2043-2052.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Litvaitis JA, Sherburne JA, Bissonette JA (1986) Bobcat habitat use and home range size in relation to prey density. The Journal of Wildlife Management 50, 110-117.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Lonsinger RC, Lukacs PM, Gese EM, Knight RN, Waits LP (2018) Estimating densities for sympatric kit foxes (Vulpes macrotis) and coyotes (Canis latrans) using noninvasive genetic sampling. Canadian Journal of Zoology 96, 1080-1089.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Loonam KE, Ausband DE, Lukacs PM, Mitchell MS, Robinson HS (2021) Estimating abundance of an unmarked, low-density species using cameras. The Journal of Wildlife Management 85, 87-96.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Lyons JE, Runge MC, Laskowski HP, Kendall WL (2008) Monitoring in the context of structured decision-making and adaptive management. The Journal of Wildlife Management 72, 1683-1692.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

MacKenzie DI, Nichols JD, Lachman GB, Droege S, Andrew Royle J, Langtimm CA (2002) Estimating site occupancy rates when detection probabilities are less than one. Ecology 83, 2248-2255.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Marneweck C, Butler AR, Gigliotti LC, Harris SN, Jensen AJ, Muthersbaugh M, Newman BA, Saldo EA, Shute K, Titus KL, Yu SW, Jachowski DS (2021) Shining the spotlight on small mammalian carnivores: global status and threats. Biological Conservation 255, 109005.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Marneweck CJ, Allen BL, Butler AR, Do Linh San E, Harris SN, Jensen AJ, Saldo EA, Somers MJ, Titus K, Muthersbaugh M, Vanak A, Jachowski DS (2022) Middle-out ecology: small carnivores as sentinels of global change. Mammal Review 52, 471-479.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

McGarigal K, Cushman SA, Ene E (2012) FRAGSTATS v4: Spatial pattern analysis program for categorical and continuous maps. Computer software program produced by the authors at the University of Massachusetts, Amherst. Available at http://www.umass.edu/landeco/research/fragstats/fragstats.htm

Meek PD, Vernes K, Falzon G (2013) On the reliability of expert identification of small-medium sized mammals from camera trap photos. Wildlife Biology in Practice 9, 1-19.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Meek PD, Ballard G, Claridge A, Kays R, Moseby K, O’Brien T, O’Connell A, Sanderson J, Swann DE, Tobler M, Townsend S (2014) Recommended guiding principles for reporting on camera trapping research. Biodiversity and Conservation 23, 2321-2343.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Meek PD, Ballard G-A, Vernes K, Fleming PJS (2015a) The history of wildlife camera trapping as a survey tool in Australia. Australian Mammalogy 37, 1-12.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Meek PD, Ballard G-A, Fleming PJS (2015b) The pitfalls of wildlife camera trapping as a survey tool in Australia. Australian Mammalogy 37, 13-22.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Moeller AK, Lukacs PM, Horne JS (2018) Three novel methods to estimate abundance of unmarked animals using remote cameras. Ecosphere 9, e02331.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Moll RJ, Kilshaw K, Montgomery RA, Abade L, Campbell RD, Harrington LA, Millspaugh JJ, Birks JDS, Macdonald DW (2016) Clarifying habitat niche width using broad-scale, hierarchical occupancy models: a case study with a recovering mesocarnivore. Journal of Zoology 300, 177-185.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Moll RJ, Poisson MKP, Heit DR, Jones H, Pekins PJ, Kantar L (2022) A review of methods to estimate and monitor moose density and abundance. Alces 58, 31-49.
| Google Scholar |

Moll RJ, Butler AR, Poisson MKP, Tate P, Bergeron DH, Ellingwood MR (2023) Monitoring mesocarnivores with tracks and technology using multi-method modeling. The Journal of Wildlife Management 87, e22382.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Morin DJ, Kelly MJ, Waits LP (2016) Monitoring coyote population dynamics with fecal DNA and spatial capture–recapture: estimating coyote population parameters. The Journal of Wildlife Management 80, 824-836.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Morin DJ, Boulanger J, Bischof R, Lee DC, Ngoprasert D, Fuller AK, McLellan B, Steinmetz R, Sharma S, Garshelis D, Gopalaswamy A, Nawaz MA, Karanth U (2022) Comparison of methods for estimating density and population trends for low-density Asian bears. Global Ecology and Conservation 35, e02058.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Morrison ML, Marcot BG, Mannan RW (2006) ‘Wildlife-habitat relationships: concepts and applications.’ 3rd edn. (Island Press: Washington D.C., USA)

Nakashima Y, Fukasawa K, Samejima H (2018) Estimating animal density without individual recognition using information derivable exclusively from camera traps. Journal of Applied Ecology 55, 735-744.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Nakashima Y, Hongo S, Akomo-Okoue EF (2020) Landscape-scale estimation of forest ungulate density and biomass using camera traps: applying the REST model. Biological Conservation 241, 108381.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Neilson EW, Avgar T, Burton AC, Broadley K, Boutin S (2018) Animal movement affects interpretation of occupancy models from camera-trap surveys of unmarked animals. Ecosphere 9, e02092.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

NHFG (2015) New Hampshire wildlife action plan. New Hampshire Fish and Game Department, Concord, New Hampshire, USA.

Nichols J, Williams B (2006) Monitoring for conservation. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 21, 668-673.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

Northrup JM, Gerber BD (2018) A comment on priors for Bayesian occupancy models. PLoS ONE 13, e0192819.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Palencia P, Rowcliffe JM, Vicente J, Acevedo P (2021) Assessing the camera trap methodologies used to estimate density of unmarked populations. Journal of Applied Ecology 58, 1583-1592.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Pearman-Gillman SB, Katz JE, Mickey RM, Murdoch JD, Donovan TM (2020) Predicting wildlife distribution patterns in New England USA with expert elicitation techniques. Global Ecology and Conservation 21, e00853.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Plummer M (2003) JAGS: a program for analysis of Bayesian graphical models using Gibbs sampling. In ‘Proceedings of the 3rd international workshop on distributed statistical computing’. vol. 124, pp. 1–10. Vienna, Austria.

Pollock KH, Nichols JD, Simons TR, Farnsworth GL, Bailey LL, Sauer JR (2002) Large scale wildlife monitoring studies: statistical methods for design and analysis. Environmetrics 13, 105-119.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Pozzanghera CB (2015) Non-invasive methods for obtaining occupancy probabilities and density estimates of Interior Alaska’s mesocarnivore populations. Master thesis, University of Alaska Fairbanks, Fairbanks, AK, USA.

R Core Team (2018) ‘R: a language and environment for statistical computing.’ (R Development Core Team)

Rabe MJ, Rosenstock SS, de Vos JC (2002) Review of big-game survey methods used by wildlife agencies of the Western United States. Wildlife Society Bulletin 30, 46-52.
| Google Scholar |

Roemer GW, Gompper ME, Van Valkenburgh B (2009) The ecological role of the mammalian mesocarnivore. BioScience 59, 165-173.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Rogan MS, Balme GA, Distiller G, Pitman RT, Broadfield J, Mann GKH, Whittington-Jones GM, Thomas LH, O’Riain MJ (2019) The influence of movement on the occupancy–density relationship at small spatial scales. Ecosphere 10, e02807.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Rowcliffe J, Carbone C, Jansen PA, Kays R, Kranstauber B (2011) Quantifying the sensitivity of camera traps: an adapted distance sampling approach. Methods in Ecology and Evolution 2, 464-476.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Rowcliffe JM, Kays R, Kranstauber B, Carbone C, Jansen PA (2014) Quantifying levels of animal activity using camera trap data. Methods in Ecology and Evolution 5, 1170-1179.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Royle JA, Nichols JD (2003) Estimating abundance from repeated presence-absence data or point counts. Ecology 84, 777-790.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Sargeant GA, Johnson DH, Berg WE (1998) Interpreting carnivore scent-station surveys. The Journal of Wildlife Management 62, 1235-1245.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Sasse DB (2003) Job-related mortality of wildlife workers in the United States, 1937–2000. Wildlife Society Bulletin 31, 1015-1020.
| Google Scholar |

Shannon C, Weaver W (1949) ‘The mathematical theory of communication.’ (University of Illinois: Urbana, IL, USA)

Stephens PA, Pettorelli N, Barlow J, Whittingham MJ, Cadotte MW (2015) Management by proxy? The use of indices in applied ecology. Journal of Applied Ecology 52, 1-6.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Stevens DL, Jr, Olsen AR (2003) Variance estimation for spatially balanced samples of environmental resources. Environmetrics 14, 593-610.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Su YS, Yajima M (2012) R2jags: a package for running jags from R. Available at https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/R2jags/index.html

Tempel DJ, Gutiérrez RJ (2013) Relation between occupancy and abundance for a territorial species, the California spotted owl. Conservation Biology 27, 1087-1095.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

Theobald DM (2004) Placing exurban land-use change in a human modification framework. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 2, 139-144.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Thornton DH, Pekins CE (2015) Spatially explicit capture–recapture analysis of bobcat (Lynx rufus) density: implications for mesocarnivore monitoring. Wildlife Research 42, 394-404.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Trewartha GT, Horn LH (1980) ‘An introduction to climate.’ 5th edn. (McGraw-Hill: New York)

Trewhella WJ, Harris S, McAllister FE (1988) Dispersal distance, home-range size and population density in the red fox (Vulpes vulpes): a quantitative analysis. The Journal of Applied Ecology 25, 423-434.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Tucker JM, Moriarty KM, Ellis MM, Golding JD (2021) Effective sampling area is a major driver of power to detect long-term trends in multispecies occupancy monitoring. Ecosphere 12, e03519.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Vine SJ, Crowther MS, Lapidge SJ, Dickman CR, Mooney N, Piggott MP, English AW (2009) Comparison of methods to detect rare and cryptic species: a case study using the red fox (Vulpes vulpes). Wildlife Research 36, 436-446.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

White HB, Decker T, O’Brien MJ, Organ JF, Roberts NM (2015) Trapping and furbearer management in North American wildlife conservation. International Journal of Environmental Studies 72, 756-769.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

Williams BK, Nichols JD, Conroy MJ (2002) ‘Analysis and management of animal populations.’ (Academic Press: San Francisco, CA, USA)

Wilson GJ, Delahay RJ (2001) A review of methods to estimate the abundance of terrestrial carnivores using field signs and observation. Wildlife Research 28, 151-164.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Witmer GW (2005) Wildlife population monitoring: some practical considerations. Wildlife Research 32, 259-263.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Woodruff SP, Eacker DR, Waits LP (2021) Estimating coyote densities with local, discrete Bayesian capture–recapture models. The Journal of Wildlife Management 85, 73-86.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |