Free Standard AU & NZ Shipping For All Book Orders Over $80!
Register      Login
Wildlife Research Wildlife Research Society
Ecology, management and conservation in natural and modified habitats
Shopping Cart: ( empty )
You are here: Home > Journals > WR > WR24054
RESEARCH ARTICLE (Open Access)
Contents Vol 51(12)

Foraging habitat locations of flatback (Natator depressus) and olive ridley turtles (Lepidochelys olivacea) in northern Australia

Justin S. Smith A , Colin J. Limpus B , Takahiro Shimada A B , Laurie Booth C , Eve C. Hinchliffe https://orcid.org/0009-0004-5289-3733 A , Mariana M. P. B. Fuentes D , Frank Loban A , Shane Preston A and Mark Hamann https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4588-7955 A *
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A College of Science and Engineering, James Cook University, Townsville, Qld 4811, Australia.

B Queensland Department of Environment and Science, PO Box 2454, Brisbane, Qld 4001, Australia.

C Mapoon Land and Sea Rangers, P.O Box 213, Weipa 4874, Qld, Australia.

D Earth, Ocean and Atmospheric Science, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL 32306-4320, USA.

* Correspondence to: mark.hamann@jcu.edu.au

Handling Editor: Adam Stow

Wildlife Research 51, WR24054 https://doi.org/10.1071/WR24054
Submitted: 8 April 2024  Accepted: 4 November 2024  Published: 22 November 2024

© 2024 The Author(s) (or their employer(s)). Published by CSIRO Publishing. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND)

Abstract

Context

Understanding the spatial ecology of endangered species is important for their management. With flatback turtles (Natator depressus) Vulnerable and the olive ridley turtle (Lepidochelys olivacea) Endangered under Australia’s EPBC Act 1999, it is important to understand their movement activity to assess exposure to threats better and appropriately manage population demographics.

Aims

Describe, quantify, and compare the foraging patterns of flatback turtles from the Arafura Sea genetic stock and olive ridley turtles from the eastern Gulf of Carpentaria (GoC) genetic stock.

Methods

Satellite telemetry was used to track post-nesting flatbacks (n = 16) and olive ridleys (n = 8) to identify foraging-activity behaviour and locations between 2013 and 2017.

Key results

Overall, core foraging home ranges showed considerable variability from strong site fidelity to extensive spatial movement (flatback: 1–1065 km2, olive ridley: 2–113 km2). Foraging areas for both species were identified to cross over state and international boundaries (Torres Strait, eastern GoC, western GoC, Kakadu coast, Joseph Bonaparte Gulf and the Arafura Sea within Australia and Indonesia), with nine individuals foraging in Indonesian waters and five foraging in both Indonesian and Australian waters.

Conclusions

Flatback and olive ridley turtles in northern Australia have a large, widespread spatial distribution with varying use levels across the space. Foraging hot spots identified in this study can improve and guide the designation of biologically important areas. Inter- and intra-specific overlaps between foraging grounds were consistent with previous research, strengthening the understanding of foraging hot spots for flatbacks and olive ridleys in Indonesia and the Joseph Bonaparte Gulf.

Implications

This study thus emphasises the importance of area-based management to benefit highly mobile species from multiple populations and taxa, potentially from all life-cycle phases.

Keywords: competition, distribution, flatback, foraging, management, movement, olive ridley, satellite-tracking, spatial ecology.

References

Armstrong AJ, Armstrong AO, McGregor F, Richardson AJ, Bennett MB, Townsend KA, Hays GC, van Keulen M, Smith J, Dudgeon CL (2020) Satellite tagging and photographic identification reveal connectivity between two UNESCO world heritage areas for reef manta rays. Frontiers in Marine Science 7, 725.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Barr CE, Hamann M, Shimada T, Bell I, Limpus CJ, Ferguson J (2021) Post-nesting movements and feeding ground distribution by the hawksbill turtle (Eretmochelys imbricata) from rookeries in the Torres Strait. Wildlife Research 48(7), 598-608.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Benhamou S (2011) Dynamic approach to space and habitat use based on biased random bridges. PLoS ONE 6(1), e14592.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

Block BA, Jonsen ID, Jorgensen SJ, Winship AJ, Shaffer SA, Bograd SJ, Hazen EL, Foley DG, Breed GA, Harrison A-L, Ganong JE, Swithenbank A, Castleton M, Dewar H, Mate BR, Shillinger GL, Schaefer KM, Benson SR, Weise MJ, Henry RW, Costa DP (2011) Tracking apex marine predator movements in a dynamic ocean. Nature 475, 86-90.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

Blumenthal JM, Solomon JL, Bell CD, Austin TJ, Ebanks-Petrie G, Coyne MS, Broderick AC, Godley BJ (2006) Satellite tracking highlights the need for international cooperation in marine turtle management. Endangered Species Research 2, 51-61.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Calenge C (2006) The package ‘adehabitat’ for the R software: a tool for the analysis of space and habitat use by animals. Ecological Modelling 197(3–4), 516-519.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Department of Environment and Science (2021) ‘Queensland marine turtle conservation strategy (2021–2031).’ (Queensland Government: Brisbane, Qld, Australia)

Dryden J, Grech A, Moloney J, Hamann M (2008) Rezoning of the Great Barrier Reef World Heritage Area: does it afford greater protection for marine turtles? Wildlife Research 35(5), 477-485.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Dujon AM, Schofield G, Lester RE, Papafitsoros K, Hays GC (2018) Complex movement patterns by foraging loggerhead sea turtles outside the breeding season identified using Argos-linked Fastloc-Global Positioning System. Marine Ecology 39(1), e12489.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

FitzSimmons NN, Limpus CJ (2014) Marine turtle genetic stocks of the Indo-Pacific: identifying boundaries and knowledge gaps. Indian Ocean Turtle Newsletter 20, 2-18.
| Google Scholar |

Fuentes MMPB, Wildermann N, Gandra TBR, Domit C (2020) Cumulative threats to juvenile green turtles in the coastal waters of southern and southeastern Brazil. Biodiversity and Conservation 29, 1783-1803.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Fukuoka T, Suganuma H, Kondo S, Sato K (2022) Long dive capacity of olive ridley turtles (Lepidochelys olivacea) at high water temperature during the post-nesting foraging period in the Arafura Sea. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 546, 151649.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Godley BJ, Richardson S, Broderick AC, Coyne MS, Glen F, Hays GC (2002) Long-term satellite telemetry of the movements and habitat utilisation by green turtles in the Mediterranean. Ecography 25, 352-362.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Godley BJ, Blumenthal JM, Broderick AC, Coyne MS, Godfrey MH, Hawkes LA, Witt MJ (2008) Satellite tracking of sea turtles: where have we been and where do we go next? Endangered Species Research 4, 3-22.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Gredzens C, Shaver DJ (2020) Satellite tracking can inform population-level dispersal to foraging grounds of post-nesting kemp’s ridley sea turtles. Frontiers in Marine Science 7, 559.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Gredzens C, Marsh H, Fuentes MMPB, Limpus CJ, Shimada T, Hamann M (2014) Satellite tracking of sympatric marine megafauna can inform the biological basis for species co-management. PLoS ONE 9, e98944.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

Hawkes LA, Broderick AC, Coyne MS, Godfrey MH, Lopez-Jurado L-F, Lopez-Suarez P, Merino SE, Varo-Cruz N, Godley BJ (2006) Phenotypically linked dichotomy in sea turtle foraging requires multiple conservation approaches. Current Biology 16(10), 990-995.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

Hays GC, Hawkes LA (2018) Satellite tracking sea turtles: opportunities and challenges to address key questions. Frontiers in Marine Science 5, 432.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Hays GC, Bailey H, Bograd SJ, Bowen WD, Campagna C, Carmichael RH, Casale P, Chiaradia A, Costa DP, Cuevas E, Nico de Bruyn PJ, Dias MP, Duarte CM, Dunn DC, Dutton PH, Esteban N, Friedlaender A, Goetz KT, Godley BJ, Halpin PN, Hamann M, Hammerschlag N, Harcourt R, Harrison A-L, Hazen EL, Heupel MR, Hoyt E, Humphries NE, Kot CY, Lea JSE, Marsh H, Maxwell SM, McMahon CR, Notarbartolo di Sciara G, Palacios DM, Phillips RA, Righton D, Schofield G, Seminoff JA, Simpfendorfer CA, Sims DW, Takahashi A, Tetley MJ, Thums M, Trathan PN, Villegas-Amtmann S, Wells RS, Whiting SD, Wildermann NE, Sequeira AMM (2019) Translating marine animal tracking data into conservation policy and management. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 34(5), 459-473.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

Hounslow JL, Fossette S, Chong W, Bali R, Tucker AD, Whiting SD, Gleiss AC (2023) Behaviour-specific spatiotemporal patterns of habitat use by sea turtles revealed using biologging and supervised machine learning. Journal of Applied Ecology 60(9), 1828-1840.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Hussey NE, Kessel ST, Aarestrup K, Cooke SJ, Cowley PD, Fisk AT, Harcourt RG, Holland KN, Iverson SJ, Kocik JF, Mills Flemming JE, Whoriskey FG (2015) Aquatic animal telemetry: a panoramic window into the underwater world. Science 348(6240), 1255642.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

Hyrenbach KD, Forney KA, Dayton PK (2000) Marine protected areas and ocean basin management. Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems 10(6), 437-458.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Limpus CJ (2009) Flatback turtle Natator depressus (Garman). In ‘A biological review of Australian marine turtles’. (Ed. L Fien) p. 54. (Environmental Protection Agency)

Lucchetti A, Pulcinella J, Angelini V, Pari S, Russo T, Cataudella S (2016) An interaction index to predict turtle bycatch in a Mediterranean bottom trawl fishery. Ecological Indicators 60, 557-564.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

McMahon CR, Bradshaw CJA, Hays GC (2007) Satellite tracking reveals unusual diving characteristics for a marine reptile, the olive ridley turtle Lepidochelys olivacea. Marine Ecology Progress Series 329, 239-252.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Miller RL, Marsh H, Benham C, Hamann M (2019) A framework for improving the cross-jurisdictional governance of a marine migratory species. Conservation Science and Practice 1(8), e58.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Miller RL, Marsh H, Benham C, Hamann M (2020) Stakeholder engagement in the governance of marine migratory species: barriers and building blocks. Endangered Species Research 43, 1-19.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Pendoley KL, Schofield G, Whittock PA, Ierodiaconou D, Hays GC (2014) Protected species use of a coastal marine migratory corridor connecting marine protected areas. Marine Biology 161, 1455-1466.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Perez MA, Limpus CJ, Hofmeister K, Shimada T, Strydom A, Webster E, Hamann M (2022) Satellite tagging and flipper tag recoveries reveal migration patterns and foraging distribution of loggerhead sea turtles (Caretta caretta) from eastern Australia. Marine Biology 169, 80.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Pilcher NJ, Welly M (2021) Draft regional sea turtle action plan for the Arafura and Timor Seas. Report to the Arafura and Timor Seas Ecosystem Action Phase 2 (ATSEA-2) Project, Bali, Indonesia.

Poiner IR, Buckworth RC, Harris ANM (1990) Incidental capture and mortality of Sea Turtles in Australia’s northern Prawn Fishery. Australian Journal of Marine and Freshwater Research 41(1), 97-110.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Polovina JJ, Balazs GH, Howell EA, Parker DM, Seki MP, Dutton PH (2004) Forage and migration habitat of loggerhead (Caretta caretta) and olive ridley (Lepidochelys olivacea) sea turtles in the central North Pacific Ocean. Fisheries Oceanography 13(1), 36-51.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Riskas KA, Fuentes MMPB, Hamann M (2016) Justifying the need for collaborative management of fisheries bycatch: a lesson from marine turtles in Australia. Biological Conservation 196, 40-47.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Robins JB (1995) Estimated catch and mortality of sea turtles from the east coast otter trawl fishery of Queensland, Australia. Biological Conservation 74(3), 157-167.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Robins CM, Bache SJ, Kalish SR (2002) Bycatch of Sea Turtles in Pelagic Longline Fisheries – Australia. Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry Australia. Available at https://www.bmis-bycatch.org/system/files/zotero_attachments/library_1/8E38W9FW%20-%20Robins_etal_2002_Turtle_bycatch_LL_Aus.pdf

Santos AJB, Bellini C, Santos EAP, Sales G, Ramos R, Vieira DHG, Marcovaldi MA, Gillis A, Wildermann N, Mills M, Gandra T, Fuentes MMPB (2021) Effectiveness and design of marine protected areas for migratory species of conservation concern: a case study of post-nesting hawksbill turtles in Brazil. Biological Conservation 261, 109229.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Schofield G, Hobson VJ, Fossette S, Lilley MKS, Katselidis KA, Hays GC (2010) Biodiversity research: fidelity to foraging sites, consistency of migration routes and habitat modulation of home range by sea turtles. Diversity and Distributions 16(5), 840-853.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Shimada T, Jones R, Limpus C, Hamann M (2012) Improving data retention and home range estimates by data-driven screening. Marine Ecology Progress Series 457, 171-180.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Shimada T, Jones R, Limpus C, Groom R, Hamann M (2016) Long-term and seasonal patterns of sea turtle home ranges in warm coastal foraging habitats: implications for conservation. Marine Ecology Progress Series 562, 163-179.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Shimada T, Limpus C, Jones R, Hamann M (2017) Aligning habitat use with management zoning to reduce vessel strike of sea turtles. Ocean & Coastal Management 142, 163-172.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Shimada T, Limpus CJ, Hamann M, Bell I, Esteban N, Groom R, Hays GC (2020) Fidelity to foraging sites after long migrations. Journal of Animal Ecology 89(4), 1008-1016.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

Shimada T, Thums M, Hamann M, Limpus CJ, Hy G, FitzSimmons NN, Wildermann NE, Duarte CM, Meekan MG (2021) Optimising sample sizes for animal distribution analysis using tracking data. Methods in Ecology and Evolution 12(2), 288-297.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Shuter JL, Broderick AC, Agnew DJ, Jonzén N, Godley BJ, Milner-Gulland EJ, Thirgood S (2011) Conservation and management of migratory species. In ‘Animal migration: a synthesis’. (Eds EJ Milner-Gulland, JM Fryxell, ARE Sinclair) pp. 172–206. (Oxford University Press) doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199568994.003.0011

Sperling JB, Guinea ML (2004) A harness for attachment of satellite transmitters on flatback turtles. Marine Turtle Newsletter 103, 11-13.
| Google Scholar |

Thums M, Waayers D, Huang Z, Pattiaratchi C, Bernus J, Meekan M (2017) Environmental predictors of foraging and transit behaviour in flatback turtles Natator depressus. Endangered Species Research 32, 333-349.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Whiting SD, Long JL, Coyne M (2007) Migration routes and foraging behaviour of olive ridley turtles Lepidochelys olivacea in northern Australia. Endangered Species Research 3, 1-9.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Whittock PA, Pendoley KL, Hamann M (2014) Inter-nesting distribution of flatback turtles Natator depressus and industrial development in Western Australia. Endangered Species Research 26, 25-38.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Whittock PA, Pendoley KL, Hamann M (2016) Flexible foraging: post-nesting flatback turtles on the Australian continental shelf. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 477, 112-119.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Wilcox C, Hardesty BD, Sharples R, Griffin DA, Lawson TJ, Gunn R (2013) Ghostnet impacts on globally threatened turtles, a spatial risk analysis for northern Australia. Conservation Letters 6(4), 247-254.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Wildermann N, Critchell K, Fuentes MMPB, Limpus CJ, Wolanski E, Hamann M (2017) Does behaviour affect the dispersal of flatback post-hatchlings in the Great Barrier Reef? Royal Society Open Science 4(5), 170164.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |