Activity of dingoes (Canis familiaris) and their use of anthropogenic resources in the Strzelecki Desert, South Australia
Paul D. Meek A B * , Guy A. Ballard B C , James Abell C , Heath Milne C , Deane Smith B C and Peter J. S. Fleming B DA
B
C
D
Abstract
Managing human–wildlife conflict where anthropogenic resources are provided is difficult. Providing food, water and shelter can result in over-abundant dingo populations, especially in Australian desert mine sites where managing dingoes, wildlife and humans around waste-management facilities and camps is problematic.
To measure and characterise the spatial activities of a population of arid-zone dingoes in relation to resources provided by a Cooper Basin (Strzelecki Desert, South Australia mining operation). The results were used to facilitate effective dingo management.
Free-roaming dingoes were captured, their morphometrics and ectoparasite presence recorded, and they were fitted with Iridium (GPS) radio collars. These were used to collect high-fidelity data about individual dingo activity and movements in relation to mine-site infrastructure and the Cooper Basin ecosystem.
A high density of dingoes (181 trapped in 2 km2 per 4 years) was associated with the mining operation. Home range/activity area sizes and usage of the anthropogenic landscape showed the following three categories of dingo: desert, peripatetic and tip dingoes. Dingoes reliant on food provisioning at the waste-management facility (WMF) displayed activity areas with a strong focus on the WMF (tip dingoes). Temporal activity patterns of another group of dingoes (peripatetic dingoes) were associated with regular waste-dumping times and normal nocturnal activity away from the WMF. Of the 27 dingoes collared, 30% (i.e. desert dingoes) were not dependent on the WMF, spending more time and a greater area of use in the desert dune system than in the mine-site area.
On the basis of the capture of 181 dingoes over 4 years and home-range analysis, it is likely that anthropogenic resource provisioning has caused an overabundance of dingoes in the Cooper Basin mine site. However, some of the dingo population remains reliant on native wildlife and resources in the surrounding desert. Managing food waste and excluding dingoes from food, water and shelter will result in a change in the prevalence of dingoes in the mine site, and subsequent reduction in the risk of disease transmission, native wildlife impacts, human conflicts and social pressures on dingoes, influencing them to revert to domestic-dog behaviours.
Waste-management facilities where food is dumped provide resources that lead to a change in wild-dingo behaviour, on the basis of their acceptance of human-provided resources, and high abundance. Managing access to anthropogenic resources will reduce the population as well as unwanted or aggressive encounters with humans. Dingoes reliant on food scraps will be encouraged to adjust their activity areas to desert habitat, thereby providing natural hunting opportunities and reduced contact rates with conspecifics, thus potentially reducing pathogen transmission.
Keywords: desert, ecology, food and water use, free roaming dog, home range, human–wildlife conflict, management, wild dog.
References
Allen BL (2012) Do desert dingoes drink daily? Visitation rates at remote waterpoints in the Strzelecki Desert. Australian Mammalogy 34, 251-256.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Altmann J, Muruthi P (1988) Differences in daily life between semiprovisioned and wild-feeding baboons. American Journal of Primatology 15, 213-221.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
Appleby R, Smith B, Bernede L, Jones D (2017) Utilising aversive conditioning to manage the behaviour of K’gari (Fraser Island) dingoes (Canis dingo). Pacific Conservation Biology 23, 335-358.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Becker DJ, Hall RJ (2014) Too much of a good thing: resource provisioning alters infectious disease dynamics in wildlife. Biology Letters 10, 20140309.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
Behrendorff L, Leung LK-P, McKinnon A, Hanger J, Belonje G, Tapply J, Jones D, Allen BL (2016) Insects for breakfast and whales for dinner: the diet and body condition of dingoes on Fraser Island (K’gari). Scientific Reports 6, 23469.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
Behrendorff L, King R, Allen BL (2023) Efficacy of management efforts to reduce food-related dingo–human interactions and conflict on K’gari (fraser island), Australia. Animals 13, 204.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
Brawata RL, Neeman T (2011) Is water the key? Dingo management, intraguild interactions and predator distribution around water points in arid Australia. Wildlife Research 38, 426-436.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Davies KF, Melbourne BA, James CD, Cunningham RB (2010) Using traits of species to understand responses to land use change: birds and livestock grazing in the Australian arid zone. Biological Conservation 143, 78-85.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Diamond J (2002) Evolution, consequences and future of plant and animal domestication. Nature 418, 700-707.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
Driscoll CA, Macdonald DW (2010) Top dogs: wolf domestication and wealth. Journal of Biology 9, 10.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
Déaux EC, Crowe T, Charrier I (2018) Recreational fishing alters dingo foraging behavior on Fraser Island. The Journal of Wildlife Management 82, 85-92.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Eldridge DJ (1996) Distribution and floristics of terricolous lichens in soil crusts in arid and semi-arid New South Wales, Australia. Australian Journal of Botany 44, 581-599.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Fancourt BA, Allen BL, Jackson SM, Meek PD, Zewe F, Ballard AG, Behrendorff L, Claridge AW, Fleming PJS (2022) Eutherian carnivores. In ‘Wildlife research in Australia: practical and applied method’. (Ed. BP Smith, HP Waudby, C Alberthsen, JO Hampton) pp. 428–436. (CSIRO Publishing: Melbourne, Vic., Australia)
Gabriele-Rivet V, Arsenault J, Wilhelm B, Brookes VJ, Newsome TM, Ward MP (2019) A scoping review of dingo and wild-living dog ecology and biology in australia to inform parameterisation for disease spread modelling. Frontiers in Veterinary Science 6, 47.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Gabriele-Rivet V, Arsenault J, Brookes VJ, Fleming PJS, Nury C, Ward MP (2020) Dingo density estimates and movements in equatorial Australia: spatially explicit mark–resight models. Animals 10, 865.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
Harrington R, Owen-Smith N, Viljoen PC, Biggs HC, Mason DR, Funston P (1999) Establishing the causes of the roan antelope decline in the Kruger National Park, South Africa. Biological Conservation 90, 69-78.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Herrero S, Higgins A (2003) Human injuries inflicted by bears in Alberta: 1960-98. Ursus 14, 44-54.
| Google Scholar |
Jackson SM, Groves CP, Fleming PJS, Aplin KP, Eldridge MDB, Gonzalez A, Helgen KM (2017) The wayward dog: is the Australian native dog or dingo a distinct species? Zootaxa 4317, 201-224.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Jackson SM, Fleming PJS, Eldridge MDB, Ingelby S, Flannery T, Johnson RN, Cooper SJB, MIitchel KJ, Souilmi Y, Cooper A, Wilson DE, Helgen KM (2019) The dogma of dingoes: taxonomic status of the dingo: a reply to smith et al. Zootaxa 4564, 198-212.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Jackson SM, Fleming PJS, Eldridge MDB, Archer M, Ingleby S, Johnson RN, Helgen KM (2021) Taxonomy of the dingo: it’s an ancient dog. Australian Zoologist 41, 347-357.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
James CD, Landsberg J, Morton SR (1995) Ecological functioning in arid Australia and research to assist conservation of biodiversity. Pacific Conservation Biology 2, 126-142.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
James CD, Landsberg J, Morton SR (1999) Provision of watering points in the Australian arid zone: a review of effects on biota. Journal of Arid Environments 41, 87-121.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Johnston DE (1975) Hygroma of the elbow in dogs. Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association 167, 213-219.
| Google Scholar | PubMed |
Matthews A, Ruykys L, Ellis B, FitzGibbon S, Lunney D, Crowther MS, Glen AS, Purcell B, Moseby K, Stott J, Fletcher D, Wimpenny C, Allen BL, Van Bommel L, Roberts M, Davies N, Green K, Newsome T, Ballard G, Fleming P, Dickman CR, Eberhart A, Troy S, McMahon C, Wiggins N (2013) The success of GPS collar deployments on mammals in Australia. Australian Mammalogy 35, 65-83.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Meek PD, Brown SC (2017) It’s a dog eat dog world: observations of dingo (Canis familiaris) cannibalism. Australian Mammalogy 39, 92-94.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Meek PD, Shorter K, Falzon G (2018) Do lethal trap devices threaten foot-hold trap capture efficacy? International Journal of Pest Management 65, 66-71.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Meek PD, Brown SC, Wishart J, Milne H, Aylett P, Humphrys S, Ballard G, Fleming P (2019a) Efficacy of lethal-trap devices to improve the welfare of trapped wild dogs. Wildlife Research 46, 89-95.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Meek PD, Shorter K, Falzon G (2019b) Do lethal trap devices threaten foot-hold trap capture efficacy? International Journal of Pest Management 65, 66-71.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Meek PD, Ballard GA, Falzon G, Williamson J, Milne H, Farrell R, Stover J, Mather-Zardain AT, Bishop J, C. Ka-Wai Cheung E, Lawson CK, Munezero AM, Schneider D, Johnston BE, Kiani E, Shahinfar S, Sadgrove EJ, Fleming PJS (2020) Camera trapping technology and advances: into the new millennium. Australian Zoologist 40(3), 392-403.
| Google Scholar |
Murray M, Edwards MA, Abercrombie B, St. Clair CC (2015) Poor health is associated with use of anthropogenic resources in an urban carnivore. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 282, 20150009.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Newsome TM, Van Eeden LM (2017) The effects of food waste on wildlife and humans. Sustainability1269 9,.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Newsome TM, Ballard G-A, Dickman CR, Fleming PJS, Howden C (2013a) Anthropogenic resource subsidies determine space use by Australian arid zone dingoes: an improved resource selection modelling approach. PLoS ONE 8, e63931.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
Newsome TM, Ballard G-A, Dickman CR, Fleming PJS, van de Ven R (2013b) Home range, activity and sociality of a top predator, the dingo: a test of the Resource Dispersion Hypothesis. Ecography 36, 914-925.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Newsome TM, Ballard G-A, Fleming PJS, van de Ven R, Story GL, Dickman CR (2014) Human-resource subsidies alter the dietary preferences of a mammalian top predator. Oecologia 175, 139-150.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
Newsome TM, Dellinger JA, Pavey CR, Ripple WJ, Shores CR, Wirsing AJ, Dickman CR (2015) The ecological effects of providing resource subsidies to predators. Global Ecology and Biogeography 24, 1-11.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Newsome TM, Howden C, Wirsing AJ (2019) Restriction of anthropogenic foods alters a top predator’s diet and intraspecific interactions. Journal of Mammalogy 100, 1522-1532.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Osborn TGB, Wood JG, Paltridge TB (1932) On the growth and reaction to grazing of the perennial saltbush, Atriplex vesicarium. An ecological study of the biotic factor. Proceedings of the Linnean Society of New South Wales 57, 377-402.
| Google Scholar |
Peterson MN, Lopez RR, Laurent EJ, Frank PA, Silvy NJ, Liu J (2005) Wildlife loss through domestication: the case of endangered key deer. Conservation Biology 19, 939-944.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Petroelje TR, Belant JL, Beyer DE, Jr, Svoboda NJ (2019) Subsidies from anthropogenic resources alter diet, activity, and ranging behavior of an apex predator (Canis lupus). Scientific Reports 9, 13438.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
Pini-Fitzsimmons J, Knott NA, Brown C (2018) Effects of food provisioning on site use in the short-tail stingray Bathytoshia brevicaudata. Marine Ecology Progress Series 600, 99-110.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
RStudio Team (2022) ‘Rstudio: integrated development environment for R.’ (RStudio PBC, Boston, MA, USA) Available at http://www.rstudio.com/
Smith BP, Morrant DS, Vague A-L, Doherty TS (2020) High rates of cannibalism and food waste consumption by dingoes living at a remote mining operation in the Great Sandy Desert, Western Australia. Australian Mammalogy 42, 230-234.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Stephens D, Wilton AN, Fleming PJS, Berry O (2015) Death by sex in an Australian icon: a continent-wide survey reveals extensive hybridization between dingoes and domestic dogs. Molecular Ecology 24, 5643-5656.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
Stephens D, Fleming PJS, Sawyers E, Mayr TP (2022) An isolated population reveals greater genetic structuring of the Australian dingo. Scientific Reports 12, 19105.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
Tapply J (2018) Contemporary dingo management on K’gari (Fraser Island, Great Sandy National Park) under the Queensland Parks and Wildlife Service. Australasian Journal of Environmental Management 25, 119-131.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Tatler J, Currie SE, Cassey P, Scharf AK, Roshier DA, Prowse TAA (2021) Accelerometer informed time-energy budgets reveal the importance of temperature to the activity of a wild, arid zone canid. Movement Ecology 9, 11.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
Thomson PC (1992) The behavioural ecology of dingoes in north-western Australia. II. Activity patterns, breeding season and pup rearing. Wildlife Research 19, 519-529.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Trut L (1999) Early canid domestication: the farm-fox experiment: foxes bred for tamability in a 40-year experiment exhibit remarkable transformations that suggest an interplay between behavioral genetics and development. American Scientist 87, 160-169.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Wilton AN, Steward DJ, Zafiris K (1999) Microsatellite variation in the Australian dingo. Journal of Heredity 90(1), 108-111.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Wysong ML, Hradsky BA, Iacona GD, Valentine LE, Morris K, Ritchie EG (2020) Space use and habitat selection of an invasive mesopredator and sympatric, native apex predator. Movement Ecology 8, 18.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
Zeder MA (2012) Pathways to animal domestication. In ‘Biodiversity in agriculture: domestication, evolution, and sustainability. Vol. 10’. (Eds P Gepts, T Famula, R Bettinger, S Brush, A Damania, P McGuire) pp. 227–259. (Cambridge University Press: Cambridge) doi:10.1017/CBO9781139019514.013