Effects of sardines as an attractant on carnivore detection and temporal activity patterns at remote camera traps
Anna C. Siegfried A , Stephen N. Harris
A * , Colleen Olfenbuttel B and David S. Jachowski A
A
B
Abstract
Adding an attractant to remote camera traps has become a popular method to increase detections of cryptic carnivores. However, there is ongoing debate about whether this practice can bias the behaviour and activity patterns of these species.
Our aim was to determine how using a popular attractant at camera traps could affect carnivore detection probabilities and temporal activity.
We used an experimental design in which we randomly set half of our camera traps on arrays at two sites in western North Carolina with an attractant: canned sardines in oil. Halfway through the survey season, we switched which camera traps had sardines and which did not. We estimated detection probability for each carnivore species observed using occupancy models, and we used kernel density estimations to evaluate changes in diel activity patterns between camera traps with and without an attractant.
We found that when sardines were used at camera traps, detectability of bobcats (Lynx rufus), coyotes (Canis latrans), northern raccoons (Procyon lotor), Virginia opossums (Didelphis virginiana), and eastern spotted skunks (Spilogale putorius) more than doubled, but there was little or no effect on striped skunk (Mephitis mephitis) detectability. Of the species we most frequently detected (coyotes, raccoons, and opossums), activity patterns between camera traps with and without a sardine attractant overlapped moderately to highly, and a significant effect on diel activity patterns was observed only for raccoons.
Use of attractants can greatly increase the probability of detecting nearly all carnivores at camera traps. The effects of attractants on diel activity patterns are species-specific, with two of our three most-detected species unaffected by their use, suggesting that attractants can be used to effectively study these behaviours in some carnivore species.
A sardine attractant can increase the detection of many carnivore species, using camera traps, without causing a significant deviation of diel activity patterns, thus allowing for unbiased investigations into most species’ spatio–temporal behaviour in the Appalachian Mountains – and likely other systems.
Keywords: attractant, camera, Canis latrans, carnivore, detection, Didelphis virginiana, Lynx rufus, Mephitis mephitis, Procyon lotor, sardine, Spilogale putorius, temporal activity.
References
Allen ML, Wilmers CC, Elbroch LM, Golla JM, Wittmer HU (2016) The importance of motivation, weapons, and foul odors in driving encounter competition in carnivores. Ecology 97, 1905-1912.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
Arnold TW (2010) Uninformative parameters and model selection using Akaike’s Information Criterion. The Journal of Wildlife Management 74, 1175-1178.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Arts KJ, Hudson MK, Sharp NW, Edelman AJ (2022) Eastern spotted skunks alter nightly activity and movement in response to environmental conditions. The American Midland Naturalist 188, 33-55.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Avrin AC, Pekins CE, Sperry JH, Wolff PJ, Allen ML (2021a) Efficacy of attractants for detecting eastern spotted skunks: an experimental approach. Wildlife Biology 2021, wlb.00880.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Avrin AC, Pekins CE, Sperry JH, Allen ML (2021b) Evaluating the efficacy and decay of lures for improving carnivore detections with camera traps. Ecosphere 12, e03710.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Barton K (2020) MuMIn: multi-model Inference (version 1.43.17). Available at https://cran.r-project.org/package=MuMIn [Accessed 10 August 2021]
Benson IW, Sprayberry TL, Cornelison WC, Edelman AJ (2019) Rest-site activity patterns of eastern spotted skunks in Alabama. Southeastern Naturalist 18, 165-172.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Bischof R, Ali H, Kabir M, Hameed S, Nawaz MA (2014) Being the underdog: an elusive small carnivore uses space with prey and time without enemies. Journal of Zoology 293, 40-48.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Braczkowski AR, Balme GA, Dickman A, Fattebert J, Johnson P, Dickerson T, Macdonald DW, Hunter L (2016) Scent lure effect on camera-trap based leopard density estimates. PLoS ONE 11, e0151033.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
Chandler R, Kellner K, Fiske I, Miller D, Royle A, Hostetler J, Hutchinson R, Smith A, Kery M, Meredith M, Fournier A, Muldoon A, Baker C (2020) unmarked: models for data from unmarked animals (version 1.0.1). Available at https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=unmarked [Accessed 10 August 2021]
Chitwood MC, Lashley MA, Higdon SD, DePerno CS, Moorman CE (2020) Raccoon vigilance and activity patterns when sympatric with coyotes. Diversity 12, 341.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Clare JDJ, Anderson EM, MacFarland DM (2015) Predicting bobcat abundance at a landscape scale and evaluating occupancy as a density index in central Wisconsin. The Journal of Wildlife Management 79, 469-480.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Cove MV, Spinola RM, Jackson VL, Saenz J (2014) Camera trapping ocelots: an evaluation of felid attractants. Hystrix 25, 113-116.
| Google Scholar |
Dart MM, Perkins LB, Jenks JA, Hatfield G, Lonsinger RC (2023) The effect of scent lures on detection is not equitable among sympatric species. Wildlife Research 50, 190-200.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Detweiler GP, Harris SN, Olfenbuttel C, Jachowski DS (2021) Burrow excavation by an eastern spotted skunk and visitation by a long-tailed weasel. Southeastern Naturalist 20(sp11), 234-240.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Dukes CG, Jachowski DS, Harris SN, Dodd LE, Edelman AJ, LaRose SH, Lonsinger RC, Sasse DB, Allen ML (2022) A review of camera-trapping methodology for eastern spotted skunks. Journal of Fish and Wildlife Management 13, 295-305.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Eng RYY, Jachowski DS (2019) Evaluating detection and occupancy probabilities of eastern spotted skunks. The Journal of Wildlife Management 83, 1244-1253.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Farias V, Fuller TK, Wayne RK, Sauvajot RM (2005) Survival and cause-specific mortality of gray foxes (Urocyon cinereoargenteus) in southern California. Journal of Zoology 266, 249-254.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Fidino M, Barnas GR, Lehrer EW, Murray MH, Magle SB (2020) Effect of lure on detecting mammals with camera traps. Wildlife Society Bulletin 44, 543-552.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Gerber BD, Karpanty SM, Kelly MJ (2012) Evaluating the potential biases in carnivore capture-recapture studies associated with the use of lure and varying density estimation techniques using photographic-sampling data of the Malagasy civet. Population Ecology 54, 43-54.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Gompper ME, Kays RW, Ray JC, Lapoint SD, Bogan DA, Cryan JR (2006) A comparison of noninvasive techniques to survey carnivore communities in northeastern North America. Wildlife Society Bulletin 34, 1142-1151.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Hackett HM, Lesmeister DB, Desanty-Combes J, Montague WG, Millspaugh JJ, Gompper ME (2007) Detection rates of eastern spotted skunks (Spilogale putorius) in Missouri and Arkansas using live-capture and non-invasive techniques. The American Midland Naturalist 158, 123-131.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Heinlein BW, Urbanek RE, Olfenbuttel C, Dukes CG (2020) Effects of different attractants and human scent on mesocarnivore detection at camera traps. Wildlife Research 47, 338-348.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Higdon SD, Gompper ME (2020) Rest-site use and the apparent rarity of an Ozark population of plains spotted skunk (Spilogale putorius interrupta). Southeastern Naturalist 19, 74-89.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Holinda D, Burgar JM, Burton AC (2020) Effects of scent lure on camera trap detections vary across mammalian predator and prey species. PLoS ONE 15, e0229055.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
Hunter JS (2009) Familiarity breeds contempt: effects of striped skunk color, shape, and abundance on wild carnivore behavior. Behavioral Ecology 20, 1315-1322.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Iannarilli F, Erb J, Arnold TW, Fieberg JR (2021) Evaluating species-specific responses to camera-trap survey designs. Wildlife Biology 2021, wlb.00726.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Jachowski DS, Marneweck CJ, Olfenbuttel C, Harris SN (2023) Support for the size-mediated sensitivity hypothesis within a diverse carnivore community. Journal of Animal Ecology
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Kinlaw A (1995) Spilogale putorius. Mammalian Species 511, 1-7.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Lashley MA, Cove MV, Chitwood MC, Penido G, Gardner B, DePerno CS, Moorman CE (2018) Estimating wildlife activity curves: comparison of methods and sample size. Scientific Reports 8, 4173.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
Lazenby BT, Mooney NJ, Dickman CR (2015) Detecting species interactions using remote cameras: effects on small mammals of predators, conspecifics, and climate. Ecosphere 6, 266.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Lesmeister DB, Gompper ME, Millspaugh JJ (2009) Habitat selection and home range dynamics of eastern spotted skunks in the Ouachita Mountains, Arkansas, USA. Journal of Wildlife Management 73, 18-25.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Lesmeister DB, Millspaugh JJ, Gompper ME, Mong TW (2010) Eastern spotted skunk (Spilogale putorius) survival and cause-specific mortality in the Ouachita Mountains, Arkansas. The American Midland Naturalist 164, 52-60.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Lesmeister DB, Nielsen CK, Schauber EM, Hellgren EC (2015) Spatial and temporal structure of a mesocarnivore guild in midwestern north America. Wildlife Monographs 191, 1-61.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Linkie M, Ridout MS (2011) Assessing tiger–prey interactions in Sumatran rainforests. Journal of Zoology 284, 224-229.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Lund U, Agostinelli C, Arai H, Gagliardi A, Portugues EG, Giunchi D, Irsson JO, Pocernich M, Rotolo F (2017) circular: circular statistics (version 0.4-93). Available at https://cran.r-project.org/package=circular [Accessed 10 August 2021]
Madsen AE, Corral L, Fontaine JJ (2020) Weather and exposure period affect coyote detection at camera traps. Wildlife Society Bulletin 44, 342-350.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Meredith M, Ridout M (2021) Overlap: estimates of coefficient of overlapping for animal activity patterns (version 0.3.4). Available at https://cran.r-project.org/package=overlap [Accessed 10 August 2021]
Mills D, Fattebert J, Hunter L, Slotow R (2019) Maximising camera trap data: using attractants to improve detection of elusive species in multi-species surveys. PLoS ONE 14, e0216447.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
Mos J, Hofmeester TR (2020) The Mostela: an adjusted camera trapping device as a promising non-invasive tool to study and monitor small mustelids. Mammal Research 65, 843-853.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Niedballa J, Sollmann R, Courtiol A, Wilting A (2016) camtrapR: an R package for efficient camera trap data management. Methods in Ecology and Evolution 7, 1457-1462.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
O’Connell AF, Talancy NW, Bailey LL, Sauer JR, Cook R, Gilbert AT (2006) Estimating site occupancy and detection probability parameters for meso- and large mammals in a coastal ecosystem. Journal of Wildlife Management 70, 1625-1633.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
O’Connor KM, Nathan LR, Liberati MR, Tingley MW, Vokoun JC, Rittenhouse TAG (2017) Camera trap arrays improve detection probability of wildlife: investigating study design considerations using an empirical dataset. PLoS ONE 12, e0175684.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
Prugh LR, Sivy KJ (2020) Enemies with benefits: integrating positive and negative interactions among terrestrial carnivores. Ecology Letters 23, 902-918.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
R Core Team (2020) R: a language and environment for statistical computing (version 4.0.3). Available at https://www.r-project.org/ [Accessed 10 August 2021]
Randa LA, Yunger JA (2004) The influence of prey availability and vegetation characteristics on scent station visitation rates of coyotes, Canis latrans, in a heterogeneous environment. The Canadian Field-Naturalist 118, 341-353.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Randler C, Katzmaier T, Kalb J, Kalb N, Gottschalk TK (2020) Baiting/luring improves detection probability and species identification—a case study of mustelids with camera traps. Animals 10, 2178.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
Reed SE (2011) Non-invasive methods to assess co-occurrence of mammalian carnivores. The Southwestern Naturalist 56, 231-240.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Ridout MS, Linkie M (2009) Estimating overlap of daily activity patterns from camera trap data. Journal of Agricultural, Biological, and Environmental Statistics 14, 322-337.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Robinson L, Cushman SA, Lucid MK (2017) Winter bait stations as a multispecies survey tool. Ecology and Evolution 7, 6826-6838.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
Rocha DG, Ramalho EE, Magnusson WE (2016) Baiting for carnivores might negatively affect capture rates of prey species in camera-trap studies. Journal of Zoology 300, 205-212.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Sorensen A, van Beest FM, Brook RK (2014) Impacts of wildlife baiting and supplemental feeding on infectious disease transmission risk: a synthesis of knowledge. Preventive Veterinary Medicine 113, 356-363.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
Sprayberry TR, Edelman AJ (2018) Den-site selection of eastern spotted skunks in the southern Appalachian Mountains. Journal of Mammalogy 99, 242-251.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Stewart FEC, Volpe JP, Fisher JT (2019) The debate about bait: a red herring in wildlife research. The Journal of Wildlife Management 83, 985-992.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Sunquist ME (1974) Winter activity of striped skunks (Mephitis mephitis) in East-Central Minnesota. The American Midland Naturalist 92, 434-446.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Thorn M, Scott DM, Green M, Bateman PW, Cameron EZ (2009) Estimating brown hyaena occupancy using baited camera traps. South African Journal of Wildlife Research 39, 1-10.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Thorne ED, Waggy C, Jachowski DS, Kelly MJ, Ford WM (2017) Winter habitat associations of eastern spotted skunks in Virginia. The Journal of Wildlife Management 81, 1042-1050.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Wade-Smith J, Verts BJ (1982) Mephitis mephitis. Mammalian Species 173, 1-7.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Wang Y, Allen ML, Wilmers CC (2015) Mesopredator spatial and temporal responses to large predators and human development in the Santa Cruz Mountains of California. Biological Conservation 190, 23-33.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Webster SC, Beasley JC (2019) Influence of lure choice and survey duration on scent stations for carnivore surveys. Wildlife Society Bulletin 43, 661-668.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Weissinger MD, Theimer TC, Bergman DL, Deliberto TJ (2009) Nightly and seasonal movements, seasonal home range, and focal location photo-monitoring of urban striped skunks (Mephitis mephitis): implications for rabies transmission. Journal of Wildlife Diseases 45, 388-397.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
Wilson SB, Colquhoun R, Klink A, Lanini T, Riggs S, Simpson B, Williams A, Jachowski DS (2016) Recent detections of Spilogale putorius (eastern spotted skunk) in South Carolina. Southeastern Naturalist 15, 269-274.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Zapata-Ríos G, Branch LC (2016) Altered activity patterns and reduced abundance of native mammals in sites with feral dogs in the high Andes. Biological Conservation 193, 9-16.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Zhang VY, Williams CT, Theimer TC, Buck CL (2019) Reproductive and environmental drivers of time and activity budgets of striped skunks. Integrative Organismal Biology 1, obz013.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
