Scat DNA as a non-invasive method for estimating the abundance of the vulnerable mala (Lagorchestes hirsutus)
Shannon Treloar
A * , Cheryl Lohr B , Anna J. M. Hopkins A , Kym Ottewell B , Shelley McArthur B and Robert A. Davis A
A Centre for Ecosystem Management, School of Science, Edith Cowan University, 270 Joondalup Drive, Joondalup, WA 6027, Australia.
B Biodiversity and Conservation Science, Department of Biodiversity Conservation and Attractions, Locked Bag 104, Bentley Delivery Centre, Bentley, WA 6983, Australia.
Abstract
Population-monitoring programs often use direct (e.g. live capture or spotlighting) or indirect (e.g. scats sightings) observations to estimate population abundance. Such methods, however, are often inadequate for rare, elusive, or cryptic species due to the difficulty in achieving sufficient encounters or detection rates. The mala (Lagorchestes hirsutus), a small native Australian macropod, listed as Vulnerable by the IUCN, is difficult to capture, susceptible to capture myopathy, and not easily sighted in their dense habitat; consequently, the population size cannot always be estimated. The use of molecular markers to identify individual genotypes from non-invasively collected samples is increasingly being used in wildlife conservation and may be an alternative approach for mala.
The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of non-invasive scat DNA sampling to estimate the population abundance of mala.
A panel of microsatellite markers was developed for the identification of individual mala via profiling of their scats. Scats were systematically collected from a wild mala population located in an 1100-ha fenced reserve in Western Australia. Individual genotypes were determined using the microsatellite markers, and the abundance of mala was estimated using the genotypes with spatially explicit capture–recapture (SECR) and mark–resight analyses.
The genetic markers proved variable and with sufficient exclusionary power to confidently identify unique individuals (mean locus genotyping error rate: 3.1%). Individual genetic identification from scat sampling, when used with traditional mark–recapture/resight analytical models, provides feasible estimates of population abundance. This is the first reliable abundance estimate of this mala population, suggesting a >70% increase in population size since the initial reintroduction of 64 individuals in 2011–13.
Given the inherent difficulties in surveying mala, this approach would be valuable to ensure effective monitoring of the few remaining fenced and island mala populations to prevent further decline of this vulnerable species.
This is the first study to identify species-specific microsatellite markers for mala and use genetic-capture sampling with scat DNA to estimate the abundance of a mala population. The study provides an evaluation of a valuable species monitoring technique that can be applied to other rare, elusive, or cryptic threatened species.
Keywords: abundance, arid zone, cryptic species, eDNA, environmental DNA, fenced reserve, mala, scat.
References
Alonso RS, McClintock BT, Lyren LM, Boydston EE, Crooks KR (2015) Mark–recapture and mark–resight methods for estimating abundance with remote cameras: a carnivore case study. PLoS ONE 10, e0123032.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Arnason AN, Mills KH (1981) Bias and loss of precision due to tag loss in Jolly–Seber estimates for mark–recapture experiments. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 38, 1077-1095.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Australian Bureau of Meteorology (2021) Monthly mean maximum temperature: Wiluna Aero. Available at http://www.bom.gov.au/jsp/ncc/cdio/weatherData/av?p_nccObsCode=36&p_display_type=dataFile&p_startYear=&p_c=&p_stn_num=013044 [Accessed 27 April 2021]
Banks SC, Piggott MP (2022) Non-invasive genetic sampling is one of our most powerful and ethical tools for threatened species population monitoring: a reply to Lavery et al. Biodiversity and Conservation 31, 723-728.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Banks SC, Hoyle SD, Horsup A, Sunnucks P, Taylor AC (2003) Demographic monitoring of an entire species (the northern hairy-nosed wombat, Lasiorhinus krefftii) by genetic analysis of non-invasively collected material. Animal Conservation 6, 101-107.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Bear GD, White GC, Carpenter LH, Gill RB, Essex DJ (1989) Evaluation of aerial mark–resighting estimates of elk populations. The Journal of Wildlife Management 53, 908-915.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Bellemain E, Swenson JE, Tallmon D, Brunberg S, Taberlet P (2005) Estimating population size of elusive animals with DNA from hunter-collected feces: four methods for brown bears. Conservation Biology 19, 150-161.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Bonin A, Bellemain E, Bronken Eidesen P, Pompanon F, Brochmann C, Taberlet P (2004) How to track and assess genotyping errors in population genetics studies. Molecular Ecology 13, 3261-3273.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Burbidge AA, Woinarski JCZ (2016) Lagorchestes hirsutus. The IUCN red list of threatened species 2016: e.T11162A21954429. Available at https://dx.doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.UK.2016-2.RLTS.T11162A21954429.en [Accessed 18 March 2020]
Burbidge AA, Johnson KA, Fuller PJ, Southgate RI (1988) Aboriginal knowledge of the mammals of the central deserts of Australia. Australian Wildlife Research 15, 9-39.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Carpenter FM, Dziminski MA (2017) Breaking down scats: degradation of DNA from greater bilby (Macrotis lagotis) faecal pellets. Australian Mammalogy 39, 197-204.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Cowen S, Smith M, Mcarthur S, Rayner K, Jackson C, Anderson G, Ottewell K (2022) Novel microsatellites and investigation of faecal DNA as a non-invasive population monitoring tool for the banded hare-wallaby (Lagostrophus fasciatus). Australian Journal of Zoology 69, 55-66.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Deuter R, Pietsch S, Hertel S, Müller O (1995) A method for preparation of fecal DNA suitable for PCR. Nucleic Acids Research 23, 3800-3801.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Dziminski MA, Carpenter FM, Morris F (2021) Monitoring the abundance of wild and reintroduced bilby populations. The Journal of Wildlife Management 85, 240-253.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Efford MG (2019) openCR: open population capture–recapture models. R package version 1.4.1. Available at https://cran.r-project.org/package=openCR
Efford MG (2020) secr: spatially explicit capture–recapture models. R package version 4.2.2. Available at https://cran.r-project.org/package=secr
Eggert LS, Eggert JA, Woodruff DS (2003) Estimating population sizes for elusive animals: the forest elephants of Kakum National Park, Ghana. Molecular Ecology 12, 1389-1402.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Evans M (1996) Home ranges and movement schedules of sympatric bridled nailtail and black-striped wallabies. Wildlife Research 23, 547-555.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Ferreira CM, Sabino-Marques H, Barbosa S, Costa P, Encarnação C, Alpizar-Jara R, Pita R, Beja P, Mira A, Searle JB, Paupério J, Alves PC (2018) Genetic non-invasive sampling (gNIS) as a cost-effective tool for monitoring elusive small mammals. European Journal of Wildlife Research 64, 46.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Frantz AC, Pope LC, Carpenter PJ, Roper TJ, Wilson GJ, Delahay RJ, Burke T (2003) Reliable microsatellite genotyping of the Eurasian badger (Meles meles) using faecal DNA. Molecular Ecology 12, 1649-1661.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Galpern P, Manseau M, Hettinga P, Smith K, Wilson P (2012) Allelematch: an R package for identifying unique multilocus genotypes where genotyping error and missing data may be present. Molecular Ecology Resources 12, 771-778.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Graves JAM, Dawson GW (1988) The relationship between position and expression of genes on the kangaroo X chromosome suggests a tissue-specific spread of inactivation from a single control site. Genetical Research 51, 103-109.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Harmsen BJ, Foster RJ, Doncaster CP (2011) Heterogeneous capture rates in low density populations and consequences for capture–recapture analysis of camera-trap data. Population Ecology 53, 253-259.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Hein EW, Andelt WF (1995) Estimating coyote density from mark–resight surveys. Journal of Wildlife Management 59, 164-169.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Hettinga PN, Arnason AN, Manseau M, Cross D, Whaley K, Wilson PJ (2012) Estimating size and trend of the north interlake woodland caribou population using fecal-DNA and capture–recapture models. The Journal of Wildlife Management 76, 1153-1164.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Jones OR, Wang J (2010) COLONY: a program for parentage and sibship inference from multilocus genotype data. Molecular Ecology Resources 10, 551-555.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Kay B, Gifford E, Perry R, van de Ven R (2000) Trapping efficiency for foxes (Vulpes vulpes) in central New South Wales: age and sex biases and the effects of reduced fox abundance. Wildlife Research 27, 547-552.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Laurance WF (1992) Abundance estimates of small mammals in Australian tropical rainforest: a comparison of four trapping methods. Wildlife Research 19, 651-655.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
MacDonald AJ, Fitzsimmons NN, Chambers B, Renfree MB, Sarre SD (2014) Sex-linked and autosomal microsatellites provide new insights into island populations of the tammar wallaby. Heredity 112, 333-342.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Magle SB, McClintock BT, Teipp DW, White GC, Antolin MF, Crooks KR (2007) Mark–resight methodology for estimating population densities for prairie dogs. Journal of Wildlife Management 71, 2067-2073.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Marks CA, Gigliotti F, McPhee S, Piggott MP, Taylor A, Glen AS (2009) DNA genotypes reveal red fox (Vulpes vulpes) abundance, response to lethal control and limitations of contemporary survey techniques. Wildlife Research 36, 647-658.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
McClintock BT, White GC, Burnham KP (2006) A robust design mark–resight abundance estimator allowing heterogeneity in resighting probabilities. Journal of Agricultural, Biological, and Environmental Statistics 11, 231-248.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
McClintock BT, White GC, Antolin MF, Tripp DW (2009) Estimating abundance using mark–resight when sampling is with replacement or the number of marked individuals is unknown. Biometrics 65, 237-246.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Meglécz E, Pech N, Gilles A, Dubut V, Hingamp P, Trilles A, Grenier R, Martin J-F (2014) QDD version 3.1: a user-friendly computer program for microsatellite selection and primer design revisited: experimental validation of variables determining genotyping success rate. Molecular Ecology Resources 14, 1302-1313.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Mondol S, Ullas Karanth K, Samba Kumar N, Gopalaswamy AM, Andheria A, Ramakrishnan U (2009) Evaluation of non-invasive genetic sampling methods for estimating tiger population size. Biological Conservation 142, 2350-2360.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Morris K, Sims C, Himbeck K, Christensen P, Sercombe N, Ward B, Noakes N (2004) Project Eden – fauna recovery on Peron Peninsula, Shark Bay: Western Shield review – February 2003. Conservation Science Western Australia 5, 202-234.
| Google Scholar |
Newson SE, Evans KL, Noble DG, Greenwood JJD, Gaston KJ (2008) Use of distance sampling to improve estimates of national population sizes for common and widespread breeding birds in the UK. Journal of Applied Ecology 45, 1330-1338.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Ottewell K, Thavornkanlapachai R, McArthur S, Spencer PBS, Tedeschi J, Durrant B, Knuckey C, Armstrong K, Byrne M (2020) Development and optimisation of molecular assays for microsatellite genotyping and molecular sexing of non-invasive samples of the ghost bat, Macroderma gigas. Molecular Biology Reports 47, 5635-5641.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Peakall R, Smouse PE (2006) GENALEX 6: genetic analysis in Excel. Population genetic software for teaching and research. Molecular Ecology Notes 6, 288-295.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Peakall R, Smouse PE (2012) GenAlEx 6.5: genetic analysis in Excel. Population genetic software for teaching and research – an update. Bioinformatics 28, 2537-2539.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Perez I, Geffen E, Mokady O (2006) Critically Endangered Arabian leopards Panthera pardus nimr in Israel: estimating population parameters using molecular scatology. Oryx 40, 295-301.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Piggott MP (2004) Effect of sample age and season of collection on the reliability of microsatellite genotyping of faecal DNA. Wildlife Research 31, 485-493.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Piggott MP, Taylor AC (2003a) Extensive evaluation of faecal preservation and DNA extraction methods in Australian native and introduced species. Australian Journal of Zoology 51, 341-355.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Piggott MP, Taylor AC (2003b) Remote collection of animal DNA and its applications in conservation management and understanding the population biology of rare and cryptic species. Wildlife Research 30, 1-13.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Piggott MP, Banks SC, Stone N, Banffy C, Taylor AC (2006) Estimating population size of endangered brush-tailed rock-wallaby (Petrogale penicillata) colonies using faecal DNA. Molecular Ecology 15, 81-91.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Pompanon F, Bonin A, Bellemain E, Taberlet P (2005) Genotyping errors: causes, consequences and solutions. Nature Reviews Genetics 6, 847-859.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Possingham HP, Lindenmayer DB, Norton TW (1994) A framework for the improved management of threatened species based on population viability analysis (PVA). Pacific Conservation Biology 1, 39-45.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Pradel R (1996) Utilization of capture-mark-recapture for the study of recruitment and population growth rate. International Biometric Society 52, 703-709.
| Google Scholar |
Raymond M, Rousset F (1995) GENEPOP (version 1.2): population genetics software for exact tests and ecumenicism. Journal of Heredity 86, 248-249.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
R Core Team (2020) R: a language and environment for statistical computing version 4.0.3. Available at https://www.r-project.org/
Reed JM, Murphy DD, Brussard PF (1998) Efficacy of population viability analysis. Wildlife Society Bulletin 26, 244-251.
| Google Scholar |
Rees MW, Pascoe JH, Wintle BA, Le Pla M, Birnbaum EK, Hradsky BA (2019) Unexpectedly high densities of feral cats in a rugged temperate forest. Biological Conservation 239, 108287.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Roon DA, Waits LP, Kendall KC (2005) A simulation test of the effectiveness of several methods for error-checking non-invasive genetic data. Animal Conservation 8, 203-215.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Rousset F (2008) Genepop’007: a complete re-implementation of the Genepop software for Windows and Linux. Molecular Ecology Resources 8, 103-106.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Ruibal M, Peakall R, Claridge A, Firestone K (2009) Field-based evaluation of scat DNA methods to estimate population abundance of the spotted-tailed quoll (Dasyurus maculatus), a rare Australian marsupial. Wildlife Research 36, 721-736.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Schipper J (2007) Camera-trap avoidance by kinkajous Potos flavus: rethinking the “non-invasive” paradigm. Small Carnivore Conservation 36, 38-41.
| Google Scholar |
Short J, Turner B (1992) The distribution and abundance of the banded and rufous hare-wallabies, Lagostrophus fasciatus and Lagorchestes hirsutus. Biological Conservation 60, 157-166.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Short J, Turner B, Majors C (1998) The fluctuating abundance of endangered mammals on Bernier and Dorre Islands, Western Australia – conservation implications. Australian Mammalogy 20, 53-61.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Sunnucks P, Hales DF (1996) Numerous transposed sequences of mitochondrial cytochrome oxidase I-II in aphids of the genus Sitobion (Hemiptera: Aphididae). Molecular Biology and Evolution 13, 510-524.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Taberlet P, Waits LP, Luikart G (1999) Noninvasive genetic sampling: look before you leap. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 14, 323-327.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Time and Date AS (2022) Wiluna, Western Australia, Australia – sunrise, sunset, and daylength. Available at https://www.timeanddate.com/sun/australia/wiluna?month=7&year=2021 [Accessed 27 April 2021]
Treloar S, Lohr C, Hopkins AJM, Davis RA (2021) Rapid population expansion of boodie (burrowing bettong, Bettongia lesueur) creates potential for resource competition with mala (rufous hare-wallaby, Lagorchestes hirsutus). Ecological Management & Restoration 22, 54-57.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Waits LP, Luikart G, Taberlet P (2001) Estimating the probability of identity among genotypes in natural populations: cautions and guidelines. Molecular Ecology 10, 249-256.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Wegge P, Bakke BB, Odden M, Rolstad J (2019) DNA from scats combined with capture–recapture modeling: a promising tool for estimating the density of red foxes – a pilot study in a boreal forest in southeast Norway. Mammal Research 64, 147-154.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
