Free Standard AU & NZ Shipping For All Book Orders Over $80!
Register      Login
Wildlife Research Wildlife Research Society
Ecology, management and conservation in natural and modified habitats
RESEARCH ARTICLE (Open Access)

Sign surveys can be more efficient and cost effective than driven transects and camera trapping: a comparison of detection methods for a small elusive mammal, the numbat (Myrmecobius fasciatus)

Anke Seidlitz https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1857-4777 A E , Kate A. Bryant https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5264-5260 B , Nicola J. Armstrong https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4477-293X C , Michael C. Calver https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9082-2902 A and Adrian F. Wayne https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3102-4617 D
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Environmental and Conservation Sciences, Murdoch University, Murdoch, WA 6150, Australia.

B Centre for Climate-Impacted Terrestrial Ecosystems, Harry Butler Institute, Murdoch University, Murdoch, WA 6150, Australia.

C Mathematics and Statistics, Murdoch University, Murdoch, WA 6150, Australia.

D Department of Biodiversity, Conservation and Attractions, Locked Bag 2, Manjimup, WA 6258, Australia.

E Corresponding author. Email: anke.seidlitz@gmx.net

Wildlife Research - https://doi.org/10.1071/WR20020
Submitted: 3 February 2020  Accepted: 25 January 2021   Published online: 10 March 2021

Journal Compilation © CSIRO 2021 Open Access CC BY

Abstract

Context: Determining the most efficient detection method for a target species is key for successful wildlife monitoring and management. Driven transects and sign surveys are commonly used to monitor populations of the endangered numbat (Myrmecobius fasciatus). Camera trapping is being explored as a new method. These methods were unevaluated for efficacy and cost for numbat detection.

Aims: To compare efficacy and costing of driven transects, sign surveys and camera trapping for detecting numbats in the Upper Warren region, Western Australia.

Methods: Seven repeat sign surveys and driven transects, as well as 4 months of camera trapping, were conducted concurrently at 50 sites along three transects. Numbat detection rates and costing of the three techniques were compared, and detection probabilities were compared between sign surveys and camera trapping.

Key results: Numbat signs were detected during 88 surveys at 39 sites, exceeding camera trapping (26 detections at 13 sites) and driven transects (seven detections near five sites). The estimated probability for detecting a numbat or a sign thereof (at a site where numbats were present) ranged from 0.21 to 0.35 for a sign survey, and 0.02 to 0.06 for 7 days of camera trapping. Total survey costs were lowest for driven transects, followed by camera trapping and sign surveys. When expressed as cost per numbat detection, sign surveys were cheapest.

Conclusions: Comparative studies of survey methods are essential for optimal, cost-effective wildlife monitoring. Sign surveys were more successful and cost effective than camera trapping or driven transects for detecting numbats in the Upper Warren region. Together with occupancy modelling, sign surveys are appropriate to investigate changes in occupancy rates over time, which could serve as a metric for long-term numbat monitoring.

Implications: There is no ‘best’ method for wildlife surveys. Case-specific comparison of animal detection methods is recommended to ensure optimal methods. For the numbat population in the Upper Warren region, further studies are needed to improve numbat detection rates from camera trapping, and to test sign surveys in autumn (March to May), when surviving juvenile numbats have established their own territory and assumptions regarding population closure are less likely to be violated.

Keywords: Animal signs, diggings, non-invasive techniques, numbat, sampling efficiency, scat, wildlife management, wildlife monitoring.


References

Akaike, H. (1974). A new look at the statistical model identification. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control 19, 716–723.
A new look at the statistical model identification.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Anile, S., Ragni, B., Randi, E., Mattucci, F., and Rovero, F. (2014). Wildcat population density on the Etna volcano, Italy: a comparison of density estimation methods. Journal of Zoology 293, 252–261.
Wildcat population density on the Etna volcano, Italy: a comparison of density estimation methods.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Apps, P., and McNutt, J. W. (2018a). Are camera traps fit for purpose? A rigorous, reproducible and realistic test of camera trap performance. African Journal of Ecology 56, 710–720.
Are camera traps fit for purpose? A rigorous, reproducible and realistic test of camera trap performance.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Apps, P. J., and McNutt, J. W. (2018b). How camera traps work and how to work them. African Journal of Ecology 56, 702–709.
How camera traps work and how to work them.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Bartolommei, P., Manzo, E., and Cozzolino, R. (2012). Evaluation of three indirect methods for surveying European pine marten in a forested area of central Italy. Hystrix, the Italian Journal of Mammalogy 23, 91–94.
Evaluation of three indirect methods for surveying European pine marten in a forested area of central Italy.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Berry, L. E., L’ Hotellier, F. A., Carter, A., Kemp, L., Kavanagh, R. P., and Roshier, D. A. (2019). Patterns of habitat use by three threatened mammals 10 years after reintroduction into a fenced reserve free of introduced predators. Biological Conservation 230, 1–9.
Patterns of habitat use by three threatened mammals 10 years after reintroduction into a fenced reserve free of introduced predators.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Boyce, M. S. (1995). Anticipating consequences of wolves in Yellowstone: model validation. In ‘Ecology and Conservation of Wolves in a Changing World’. (Eds L. N. Carbyn, S. H. Fritts and D. R. Seip.) pp. 199–209. (Canadian Circumpolar Institute: Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.)

Buckland, S. T., Anderson, D. R., Burnham, K. P., Laake, J. L., Borchers, D. L., and Thomas, L. N. (2001). ‘Introduction to Distance Sampling: Estimating Abundance of Biological Populations.’ (Oxford University Press: Oxford.)

Burnham, K. P., and Anderson, D. R. (2002). ‘Model Selection and Multimodel Inference: A Practical Information–Theoretic Approach.’ 2nd edn. (Springer: New York.)

Burrows, N. D., and Christensen, P. E. S. (2002). Long-term trends in native mammal capture rates in a jarrah forest in south-western Australia. Australian Forestry 65, 211–219.
Long-term trends in native mammal capture rates in a jarrah forest in south-western Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Calaby, J. H. (1960). Observations on the banded ant-eater Myrmecobius f. fasciatus Waterhouse (marsupialia), with particular reference to its food habits. Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London 135, 183–207.
Observations on the banded ant-eater Myrmecobius f. fasciatus Waterhouse (marsupialia), with particular reference to its food habits.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Caughley, G., and Gunn, A. (1996) ‘Conservation Biology in Theory and Practice.’ (Blackwell Science: Cambridge, MA, USA.)

Christensen, P., Maisey, K., and Perry, D. (1984). Radiotracking the numbat, Myrmecobius fasciatus, in the Perup Forest of Western Australia. Wildlife Research 11, 275–288.
Radiotracking the numbat, Myrmecobius fasciatus, in the Perup Forest of Western Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Connell, G. W., and Friend, A. J. (1985). Searching for numbats. Landscope 1, 21–26.

Cooper, C. E. (2011). Myrmecobius fasciatus (Dasyuromorphia: Myrmecobiidae). Mammalian Species 43, 129–140.
Myrmecobius fasciatus (Dasyuromorphia: Myrmecobiidae).Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Croose, E., Birks, J. D. S., Martin, J., Ventress, G., MacPherson, J., and O’Reilly, C. (2019). Comparing the efficacy and cost-effectiveness of sampling methods for estimating population abundance and density of a recovering carnivore: the European pine marten (Martes martes). European Journal of Wildlife Research 65, 37.
Comparing the efficacy and cost-effectiveness of sampling methods for estimating population abundance and density of a recovering carnivore: the European pine marten (Martes martes).Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Damm, P. E., Grand, J. B., and Barnett, S. W. (2010). Variation in detection among passive infrared triggered-cameras used in wildlife research. Proceedings of the Annual Conference of the Southeastern Association of Fish and Wildlife Agencies 64, 125–130.

Di Cerbo, A. R., and Biancardi, C. M. (2013). Monitoring small and arboreal mammals by camera traps: effectiveness and applications. Acta Theriologica 58, 279–283.
Monitoring small and arboreal mammals by camera traps: effectiveness and applications.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Driessen, M. M., Jarman, P. J., Troy, S., and Callander, S. (2017). Animal detections vary among commonly used camera trap models. Wildlife Research 44, 291–297.
Animal detections vary among commonly used camera trap models.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Ellis, K. S., Larsen, R. T., Whiting, J. C., Wilson, T. L., and McMillan, B. R. (2017). Assessing indirect measures of abundance and distribution with remote cameras: simplifying indices of activity at pygmy rabbit burrows. Ecological Indicators 77, 23–30.
Assessing indirect measures of abundance and distribution with remote cameras: simplifying indices of activity at pygmy rabbit burrows.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Fancourt, B. A., Sweaney, M., and Fletcher, D. B. (2018). More haste, less speed: pilot study suggests camera trap detection zone could be more important than trigger speed to maximise species detections. Australian Mammalogy 40, 118–121.
More haste, less speed: pilot study suggests camera trap detection zone could be more important than trigger speed to maximise species detections.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

FastStone Soft (2019). FastStone Image Viewer for Windows. Available at www.faststone.org [verified 20 February 2019].

Friend, J. A. (1989). 22. Myrmecobiidae. In ‘Fauna of Australia’. (Eds D. W. Walton and B. J. Richardson.) pp. 1–18. (AGPS Canberra: Canberra, ACT, Australia.)

Friend, J. A. (1990). The numbat Myrmecobius fasciatus (Myrmecobiidae): history of decline and potential for recovery. Proceedings of the Ecological Society of Australia 16, 369–377.

Friend, J. A., and Page, M. J. (2017). Numbat (Myrmecobius fasciatus) Recovery Plan. Wildlife Management Program No. 60. WA Department of Parks and Wildlife, Perth, WA.

Friend, J. A., and Thomas, N. D. (2003). Conservation of the numbat (Myrmecobius fasciatus). In ‘Predators with Pouches: The Biology of Carnivorous Marsupials’. (Eds M. Jones, C. Dickman and M. Archer.) pp. 452–463. (CSIRO Publishing: Melbourne, Vic., Australia.)

Gálvez, N., Guillera-Arroita, G., Morgan, B. J. T., and Davies, Z. G. (2016). Cost-efficient effort allocation for camera-trap occupancy surveys of mammals. Biological Conservation 204, 350–359.
Cost-efficient effort allocation for camera-trap occupancy surveys of mammals.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Gaston, K. J., Blackburn, T. M., Greenwood, J. J. D., Gregory, R. D., Quinn, R. M., and Lawton, J. H. (2000). Abundance–occupancy relationships. Journal of Applied Ecology 37, 39–59.
Abundance–occupancy relationships.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Gese, E. M. (2001). Monitoring of terrestrial carnivore populations. In ‘Carnivore Conservation’. (Eds J. L. Gittleman, S. M. Funk, D. W. MacDonald and R. K. Wayne.) pp. 372–396. (Cambridge University Press: Cambridge.)

Gillespie, G. R., Brennan, K., Gentles, T., Hill, B., Low Choy, J., Mahney, T., Stevens, A., and Stokeld, D. (2015). A guide for the use of remote cameras for wildlife survey in northern Australia. National Environmental Research Program, Northern Australia Hub. (Charles Darwin University: Casuarina, NT, Australia.)

Glover-Kapfer, P., Soto-Navarro, C. A., and Wearn, O. R. (2019). Camera-trapping version 3.0: current constraints and future priorities for development. Remote Sensing in Ecology and Conservation 5, 209–223.
Camera-trapping version 3.0: current constraints and future priorities for development.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Gompper, M. E., Kays, R. W., Ray, J. C., Lapoint, S. D., Bogan, D. A., and Cryan, J. R. (2006). A comparison of noninvasive techniques to survey carnivore communities in northeastern North America. Wildlife Society Bulletin 34, 1142–1151.
A comparison of noninvasive techniques to survey carnivore communities in northeastern North America.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Greene, D. U., McCleery, R. A., Wagner, L. M., and Garrison, E. P. (2016). A comparison of four survey methods for detecting fox squirrels in the southeastern United States. Journal of Fish and Wildlife Management 7, 99–106.
A comparison of four survey methods for detecting fox squirrels in the southeastern United States.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Gu, W., and Swihart, R. K. (2004). Absent or undetected? Effects of non-detection of species occurrence on wildlife–habitat models. Biological Conservation 116, 195–203.
Absent or undetected? Effects of non-detection of species occurrence on wildlife–habitat models.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Guillera-Arroita, G., Lahoz-Monfort, J. J., MacKenzie, D. I., Wintle, B. A., and McCarthy, M. A. (2014). Ignoring imperfect detection in biological surveys is dangerous: a response to ‘Fitting and Interpreting Occupancy Models’. PLoS One 9, e99571.
Ignoring imperfect detection in biological surveys is dangerous: a response to ‘Fitting and Interpreting Occupancy Models’.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 25075615PubMed |

Harris, G., Farley, S., Russell, G. J., Butler, M. J., and Selinger, J. (2013). Sampling designs matching species biology produce accurate and affordable abundance indices. PeerJ 1, e227.
Sampling designs matching species biology produce accurate and affordable abundance indices.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 24392290PubMed |

Hayward, M. W., Poh, A. S. L., Cathcart, J., Churcher, C., Bentley, J., Herman, K., Kemp, L., Riessen, N., Scully, P., Diong, C. H., Legge, S., Carter, A., Gibb, H., and Friend, J. A. (2015). Numbat nirvana: conservation ecology of the endangered numbat (Myrmecobius fasciatus) (Marsupialia: Myrmecobiidae) reintroduced to Scotia and Yookamurra Sanctuaries, Australia. Australian Journal of Zoology 63, 258–269.
Numbat nirvana: conservation ecology of the endangered numbat (Myrmecobius fasciatus) (Marsupialia: Myrmecobiidae) reintroduced to Scotia and Yookamurra Sanctuaries, Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Heinemeyer, K. S., Ulizio, T. J., and Harrison, R. L. (2008). Natural sign: tracks and scats. In ‘Noninvasive Survey Methods for Carnivores’. (Eds R. A. Long, P. MacKay, W. J. Zielinski and J. C. Ray.) pp. 45–74. (Island Press: Washington, DC, USA.)

Jędrzejewski, W., Puerto, M. F., Goldberg, J. F., Hebblewhite, M., Abarca, M., Gamarra, G., Calderón, L. E., Romero, J. F., Viloria, Á. L., Carreño, R., Robinson, H. S., Lampo, M., Boede, E. O., Biganzoli, A., Stachowicz, I., Velásquez, G., and Schmidt, K. (2017). Density and population structure of the jaguar (Panthera onca) in a protected area of Los Llanos, Venezuela, from 1 year of camera trap monitoring. Mammal Research 62, 9–19.
Density and population structure of the jaguar (Panthera onca) in a protected area of Los Llanos, Venezuela, from 1 year of camera trap monitoring.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Jumeau, J., Petrod, L., and Handrich, Y. (2017). A comparison of camera trap and permanent recording video camera efficiency in wildlife underpasses. Ecology and Evolution 7, 7399–7407.
A comparison of camera trap and permanent recording video camera efficiency in wildlife underpasses.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 28944025PubMed |

Kindberg, J., Swenson, J. E., Ericsson, G., Bellemain, E., Miquel, C., and Taberlet, P. (2011). Estimating population size and trends of the Swedish brown bear Ursus arctos population. Wildlife Biology 17, 114–123.
Estimating population size and trends of the Swedish brown bear Ursus arctos population.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Lancia, R. A., Kendall, W. L., Pollock, K. H., and Nichols, J. D. (2005). Estimating the number of animals in wildlife populations. In ‘Techniques for Wildlife Investigations and Management’. (Ed. E. B. Clait.) pp. 106–153. (Wildlife Society: Bethesda, MD, USA.)

MacKenzie, D. I., and Bailey, L. L. (2004). Assessing the fit of site-occupancy models. Journal of Agricultural, Biological, and Environmental Statistics 9, 300–318.
Assessing the fit of site-occupancy models.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

MacKenzie, D., and Hines, J. (2018). RPresence: R Interface for Program PRESENCE. R package version 2.12.33. Available at https://www.usgs.gov/software/presence [verified 5 April 2018].

MacKenzie, D. I., Nichols, J. D., Lachman, G. B., Droege, S., Royle, J. A., and Langtimm, C. A. (2002). Estimating site occupancy rates when detection probabilities are less than one. Ecology 83, 2248–2255.
Estimating site occupancy rates when detection probabilities are less than one.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

MacKenzie, D. I., Nichols, J. D., Royle, J. A., Pollock, K. H., Bailey, L. L., and Hines, J. E. (2018). ‘Occupancy Estimation and Modeling: Inferring Patterns and Dynamics of Species Occurrence.’ 2nd edn. (Academic Press: London, UK.)

Meek, P., Fleming, P., Ballard, G., Banks, P., Claridge, A., Sanderson, J., and Swann, D. (Eds) (2014). ‘Camera Trapping: Wildlife Management and Research.’ (CSIRO Publishing: Melbourne, Vic., Australia.)

Meek, P., Ballard, G., Fleming, P., and Falzon, G. (2016). Are we getting the full picture? Animal responses to camera traps and implications for predator studies. Ecology and Evolution 6, 3216–3225.
Are we getting the full picture? Animal responses to camera traps and implications for predator studies.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 27096080PubMed |

Mondol, S., Karanth, K. U., Samba Kumar, N., Gopalaswamy, A. M., Andheria, A., and Ramakrishnan, U. (2009). Evaluation of non-invasive genetic sampling methods for estimating tiger population size. Biological Conservation 142, 2350–2360.
Evaluation of non-invasive genetic sampling methods for estimating tiger population size.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Myers, N., Mittermeier, R. A., Mittermeier, C. G., da Fonseca, G. A. B., and Kent, J. (2000). Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities. Nature 403, 853–858.
Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 10706275PubMed |

O’Brien, T. G. (2011). Abundance, density and relative abundance: a conceptual framework. In ‘Camera Traps in Animal Ecology: Methods and Analyses’. (Eds A. F. O’Connell, J. D. Nichols and K. U. Karanth.) pp. 71–96. (Springer: New York, NY, USA.)

O’Connor, K. M., Nathan, L. R., Liberati, M. R., Tingley, M. W., Vokoun, J. C., and Rittenhouse, T. A. G. (2017). Camera trap arrays improve detection probability of wildlife: investigating study design considerations using an empirical dataset. PLoS One 12, .
Camera trap arrays improve detection probability of wildlife: investigating study design considerations using an empirical dataset.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 28422973PubMed |

Okes, N. C., and O’Riain, M. J. (2017). Otter occupancy in the Cape Peninsula: estimating the probability of river habitat use by Cape clawless otters, Aonyx capensis, across a gradient of human influence. Aquatic Conservation 27, 706–716.
Otter occupancy in the Cape Peninsula: estimating the probability of river habitat use by Cape clawless otters, Aonyx capensis, across a gradient of human influence.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Oksanen, J., Blanchet, F. G., Friendly, M., Kindt, R., Legendre, P., McGlinn, D., Minchin, P. R., O’Hara, R. B., Simpson, G. L., Solymos, P., Stevens, M. H. H., Szoecs, E., and Wagner, H. (2019). vegan: Community Ecology Package, R package version 2.5–5. Available at https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=vegan [verified 20 December 2019].

Paull, D. J., Claridge, A. W., and Cunningham, R. B. (2012). Effective detection methods for medium-sized ground-dwelling mammals: a comparison between infrared digital cameras and hair tunnels. Wildlife Research 39, 546–553.
Effective detection methods for medium-sized ground-dwelling mammals: a comparison between infrared digital cameras and hair tunnels.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Pease, B. S., Nielsen, C. K., and Holzmueller, E. J. (2016). Single-camera trap survey designs miss detections: impacts on estimates of occupancy and community metrics. PLoS One 11, .
Single-camera trap survey designs miss detections: impacts on estimates of occupancy and community metrics.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 27902733PubMed |

Piggott, M. P., Banks, S. C., Stone, N., Banffy, C., and Taylor, A. C. (2006). Estimating population size of endangered brush-tailed rock-wallaby (Petrogale penicillata) colonies using faecal DNA. Molecular Ecology 15, 81–91.
Estimating population size of endangered brush-tailed rock-wallaby (Petrogale penicillata) colonies using faecal DNA.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 16367832PubMed |

QGIS Development Team (2019). QGIS Geographic Information System. Open Source Geospatial Foundation Project. Available at http://qgis.osgeo.org [verified 15 February 2019].

R Core Team (2018). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Available at http://www.r-project.org [verified 20 December 2019].

Reconyx Inc. (2017). Reconyx Hyperfire Instruction Manual Version 20151130v1. Available at https://www.reconyx.com/img/file/HyperFireManual.pdf [verified 10 July 2020].

Romano, A., Costa, A., Salvidio, S., Menegon, M., Garollo, E., Tabarelli de Fatis, K., Miserocchi, D., Matteucci, G., and Pedrini, P. (2018). Forest management and conservation of an elusive amphibian in the Alps: habitat selection by the golden alpine salamander reveals the importance of fine woody debris. Forest Ecology and Management 424, 338–344.
Forest management and conservation of an elusive amphibian in the Alps: habitat selection by the golden alpine salamander reveals the importance of fine woody debris.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Rovero, F., and Marshall, A. R. (2009). Camera trapping photographic rate as an index of density in forest ungulates. Journal of Applied Ecology 46, 1011–1017.
Camera trapping photographic rate as an index of density in forest ungulates.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Rowcliffe, J. M., Carbone, C., Jansen, P. A., Kays, R., and Kranstauber, B. (2011). Quantifying the sensitivity of camera traps: an adapted distance sampling approach. Methods in Ecology and Evolution 2, 464–476.
Quantifying the sensitivity of camera traps: an adapted distance sampling approach.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Seidlitz, A., Bryant, K. A., Armstrong, N., Calver, M., and Wayne, A. (2020). Optimising camera trap height and model increases detection and individual identification rates for a small mammal, the numbat (Myrmecobius fasciatus). Australian Mammalogy , .
Optimising camera trap height and model increases detection and individual identification rates for a small mammal, the numbat (Myrmecobius fasciatus).Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Silveira, L., Jácomo, A. T. A., and Diniz-Filho, J. A. F. (2003). Camera trap, line transect census and track surveys: a comparative evaluation. Biological Conservation 114, 351–355.
Camera trap, line transect census and track surveys: a comparative evaluation.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Silveira, M., Tomas, W. M., Fischer, E., and Bordignon, M. O. (2018). Habitat occupancy by Artibeus planirostris bats in the Pantanal wetland, Brazil. Mammalian Biology 91, 1–6.
Habitat occupancy by Artibeus planirostris bats in the Pantanal wetland, Brazil.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Sutherland, W. J. (Ed.) (2006). ‘Ecological Census Techniques: a Handbook.’ 2nd edn. (Cambridge University Press: Cambridge.)

Swann, D. E., and Perkins, N. (2014). Camera trapping for animal monitoring and management: a review of applications. In ‘Camera Trapping: Wildlife Management and Research’. (Eds P. D. Meek, P. J. S. Fleming, G. Ballard, P. Banks, A. W. Claridge, J. Sanderson and D. Swann.) pp. 3–12. (CSIRO Publishing: Melbourne, Vic., Australia.)

Thompson, W. L., White, G. C., and Gowan, C. (1998) ‘Monitoring Vertebrate Populations.’ (Academic Press: San Diego, CA, USA.)

Tobler, M. W., Carrillo‐Percastegui, S. E., Pitman, R. L., Mares, R., and Powell, G. (2008). An evaluation of camera traps for inventorying large‐ and medium‐sized terrestrial rainforest mammals. Animal Conservation 11, 169–178.
An evaluation of camera traps for inventorying large‐ and medium‐sized terrestrial rainforest mammals.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Tyre, A. J., Tenhumberg, B., Field, S. A., Darren, N., Kirsten, P., and Possingham, H. P. (2003). Improving precision and reducing bias in biological surveys: estimating false-negative error rates. Ecological Applications 13, 1790–1801.
Improving precision and reducing bias in biological surveys: estimating false-negative error rates.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Urbanek, R. E., Ferreira, H. J., Olfenbuttel, C., Dukes, C. G., and Albers, G. (2019). See what you’ve been missing: an assessment of Reconyx® PC900 hyperfire cameras. Wildlife Society Bulletin , .
See what you’ve been missing: an assessment of Reconyx® PC900 hyperfire cameras.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Vine, S. J., Crowther, M. S., Lapidge, S. J., Dickman, C. R., Mooney, N., Piggott, M. P., and English, A. W. (2009). Comparison of methods to detect rare and cryptic species: a case study using the red fox (Vulpes vulpes). Wildlife Research 36, 436–446.
Comparison of methods to detect rare and cryptic species: a case study using the red fox (Vulpes vulpes).Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Wayne, A. F., Cowling, A., Ward, C. G., Rooney, J. F., Vellios, C. V., Lindenmayer, D. B., and Donnelly, C. F. (2005). A comparison of survey methods for arboreal possums in jarrah forest, Western Australia. Wildlife Research 32, 701–714.
A comparison of survey methods for arboreal possums in jarrah forest, Western Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Wayne, A. F., Maxwell, M. A., Ward, C. G., Vellios, C. V., Ward, B. G., Liddelow, G. L., Wilson, I., Wayne, J. C., and Williams, M. R. (2013). Importance of getting the numbers right: quantifying the rapid and substantial decline of an abundant marsupial, Bettongia penicillata. Wildlife Research 40, 169–183.
Importance of getting the numbers right: quantifying the rapid and substantial decline of an abundant marsupial, Bettongia penicillata.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Wearn, O. R., and Glover-Kapfer, P. (2019). Snap happy: camera traps are an effective sampling tool when compared with alternative methods. Royal Society Open Science 6, 181748.
Snap happy: camera traps are an effective sampling tool when compared with alternative methods.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 31032031PubMed |

Woinarski, J., Harrison, P., and Burbidge, A. (2014) ‘The Action Plan for Australian Mammals 2012.’ (CSIRO Publishing: Melbourne, Vic., Australia.)

Yeatman, G. J., Wayne, A. F., Mills, H. R., and Prince, J. (2016). Temporal patterns in the abundance of a critically endangered marsupial relates to disturbance by roads and agriculture. PLoS One 11, e0160790.
Temporal patterns in the abundance of a critically endangered marsupial relates to disturbance by roads and agriculture.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 27501320PubMed |

Zosky, K. L., Wayne, A. F., Bryant, K. A., Calver, M. C., and Scarff, F. R. (2017). Diet of the critically endangered woylie (Bettongia penicillata ogilbyi) in south-western Australia. Australian Journal of Zoology 65, 302–312.
Diet of the critically endangered woylie (Bettongia penicillata ogilbyi) in south-western Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |