Wild-born versus captive-bred: a comparison of survival and refuge selection by translocated numbats (Myrmecobius fasciatus)
Nicola Palmer A , Michael J. Smith
A B D , Laura Ruykys A C , Chantelle Jackson A , Georgia Volck A , Noel Riessen A , Adele Thomasz A , Carly Moir A and Bryony Palmer A B
A Australian Wildlife Conservancy, PO Box 8070, Subiaco East, WA 6008, Australia.
B Ecosystem Restoration and Intervention Ecology Research Group, School of Biological Sciences, The University of Western Australia, 35 Stirling Highway, Crawley, WA 6009, Australia.
C Present address: Flora and Fauna Division, Department of Environment and Natural Resources, Northern Territory Government, PO Box 496, Palmerston, NT 0831, Australia.
D Corresponding author. Email: Michael.Smith@australianwildlife.org
Wildlife Research 47(3) 217-223 https://doi.org/10.1071/WR19105
Submitted: 24 June 2019 Accepted: 2 November 2019 Published: 5 May 2020
Abstract
Context: To re-establish a population of the threatened numbat (Myrmecobius fasciatus) in a newly created safe haven at Mount Gibson Wildlife Sanctuary, in the semi-arid zone of Western Australia, wild-born and captive-bred individuals of both sexes were translocated.
Aim: To compare: (1) the use of refuges by wild-born numbats pre- and post-translocation, and (2) the survival and refuge use of captive-bred numbats compared with wild-sourced numbats post-translocation.
Methods: Monitoring via radio-tracking facilitated the gathering of information on survival and behaviour of numbats pre- and post-translocation, and allowed a comparison of how different factors (e.g. captive-bred or wild-born; male or female) influenced survival and establishment in a new environment.
Key results: There were no significant differences in survival between sexes or between wild-born and captive-bred individuals. However, there were some differences in behaviour between sexes and source populations. Captive-bred numbats, regardless of sex, made greater use of tree hollows as nocturnal refuges than did their wild-born counterparts. Among wild-born numbats, there was a comparatively greater use of tree hollows and logs on the ground by males at Mount Gibson than at Scotia. The use of diurnal escape refuges did not vary between sexes or between captive-bred and wild-born individuals.
Conclusions: On the basis of the information presented here, we conclude that, in the absence of predation by mammalian predators, and with suitable release habitat, captive-bred-to-wild translocations of numbats may be as likely to succeed as are wild-to-wild translocations, at least over the first few months post-translocation.
Implications: Optimising the size and genetic diversity of the founding population by using animals from a variety of sources may not need to be heavily constrained by concerns about the ability of captive-bred numbats to adapt to and survive life in the wild.
Additional keywords: conservation biology, population management, wildlife management.
References
Armstrong, D. P., and Seddon, P. J. (2008). Directions in reintroduction biology. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 23, 20–25.| Directions in reintroduction biology.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Baynes, A. (2002). Final report on the original mammal fauna of Mt Gibson Station. Australian Wildlife Conservancy, Perth, WA, Australia.
Bester, A. J., and Rusten, K. (2009). Trial translocation of the numbat (Myrmecobius fasciatus) into arid Australia. Australian Mammalogy 31, 9–16.
| Trial translocation of the numbat (Myrmecobius fasciatus) into arid Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Burbidge, A. A., and McKenzie, N. L. (1989). Patterns in the modern decline of Western Australia’s vertebrate fauna: causes and conservation implications. Biological Conservation 50, 143–198.
| Patterns in the modern decline of Western Australia’s vertebrate fauna: causes and conservation implications.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Burnham, K. P., and Anderson, D. A. (2002). ‘Model Selection and Inference: a Practical Information-theoretic Approach.’ (Springer-Verlag: New York, NY, USA.)
Calaby, J. H. (1960). Observations on the banded anteater Myrmecobius f. fasciatus Waterhouse (Marsupialia), with particular reference to its food habits. Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London 135, 183–207.
| Observations on the banded anteater Myrmecobius f. fasciatus Waterhouse (Marsupialia), with particular reference to its food habits.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Christensen, P., Maisey, K., and Perry, D. (1984). Radiotracking the numbat, Myrmecobius fasciatus, in the Perup Forest of Western Australia. Wildlife Research 11, 275–288.
| Radiotracking the numbat, Myrmecobius fasciatus, in the Perup Forest of Western Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Cooper, C. E., and Withers, P. C. (2002). Metabolic physiology of the numbat (Myrmecobius fasciatus). Journal of Comparative Physiology B 172, 669–675.
| Metabolic physiology of the numbat (Myrmecobius fasciatus).Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Cooper, C. E., and Withers, P. C. (2004). Influence of season and weather on activity patterns of the numbat (Myrmecobius fasciatus) in captivity. Australian Journal of Zoology 52, 475–485.
| Influence of season and weather on activity patterns of the numbat (Myrmecobius fasciatus) in captivity.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Cooper, C., and Withers, P. (2005). Physiological significance of the microclimate in night refuges of the numbat Myrmecobius fasciatus. Australian Mammalogy 27, 169–174.
| Physiological significance of the microclimate in night refuges of the numbat Myrmecobius fasciatus.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Cremona, T., Crowther, M. S., and Webb, J. K. (2017). High mortality and small population size prevent population recovery of a reintroduced mesopredator. Animal Conservation 20, 555–563.
| High mortality and small population size prevent population recovery of a reintroduced mesopredator.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Department of Parks and Wildlife (2017). ‘Numbat (Myrmecobius fasciatus) Recovery Plan.’ (Western Australian Department of Parks and Wildlife: Perth, WA, Australia.) Available at https://www.environment.gov.au/system/files/resources/5b1825c3-becb-4b3c-8755-700767e8181d/files/numbat-recovery-plan.docx [verified 19 January 2020].
Doherty, T. S., Glen, A. S., Nimmo, D. G., Ritchie, E. G., and Dickman, C. R. (2016). Invasive predators and global biodiversity loss. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 113, 11261–11265.
| Invasive predators and global biodiversity loss.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 27638204PubMed |
Friend, J. A. (1990). The numbat Myrmecobius fasciatus (Myrmecobiidae): history of decline and potential for recovery. Proceedings of the Ecological Society of Australia 16, 369–377.
Friend, J. A., and Thomas, N. D. (1994). Reintroduction and numbat recovery programme. In ‘Reintroduction Biology of Australian and New Zealand fauna’. (Ed. M. Serena.) pp. 189–198. (Surrey Beatty: Sydney, NSW, Australia.)
Friend, J., and Thomas, N. (2003). Conservation of the numbat (Myrmecobius fasciatus). In ‘Predators with Pouches: the Biology of Carnivorous Marsupials’. (Eds M. Jones, C. Dickman, and M. Archer.) pp. 452–463. (CSIRO Publishing: Melbourne, Vic., Australia.)
Hayward, M. W., Poh, A. S. L., Cathcart, J., Churcher, C., Bentley, J., Herman, K., Kemp, L., Riessen, N., Scully, P., Diong, C. H., Legge, S., Carter, A., Gibb, H., and Friend, J. A. (2015). Numbat nirvana: conservation ecology of the endangered numbat (Myrmecobius fasciatus) (Marsupialia : Myrmecobiidae) reintroduced to Scotia and Yookamurra sanctuaries, Australia. Australian Journal of Zoology 63, 258–269.
| Numbat nirvana: conservation ecology of the endangered numbat (Myrmecobius fasciatus) (Marsupialia : Myrmecobiidae) reintroduced to Scotia and Yookamurra sanctuaries, Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Johnson, C. N., and Isaac, J. L. (2009). Body mass and extinction risk in Australian marsupials: The ‘Critical Weight Range’ revisited Austral Ecology 34, 35–40.
| Body mass and extinction risk in Australian marsupials: The ‘Critical Weight Range’ revisitedCrossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Kanowski, J., Roshier, D., Smith, M. J., and Fleming, A. (2018). Effective conservation of critical weight range mammals: reintroduction projects of the Australian Wildlife Conservancy. In ‘Recovering Australian Threatened Species: a Book of Hope’. (Eds S. T. Garnett, P. Latch, D. B. Lindenmayer, and J. Woinarski) pp 269–280 (CSIRO Publishing: Melbourne, Vic, Australia.)
Kruschke, J. K. (2015). ‘Doing Bayesian Data Analysis. A Tutorial with R, JAGS, and Stan,’ 2nd edn. (Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands.)
Moseby, K. E., Read, J. L., Paton, D. C., Copley, P., Hill, B. M., and Crisp, H. A. (2011). Predation determines the outcome of 10 reintroduction attempts in arid South Australia. Biological Conservation 144, 2863–2872.
| Predation determines the outcome of 10 reintroduction attempts in arid South Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Plummer, M. (2017). ‘JAGS Version 4.3.0 User Manual.’ Available at https://web.sgh.waw.pl/~atoroj/ekonometria_bayesowska/jags_user_manual.pdf [verified 16 January 2020].
Power, V., Lambert, C., and Matson, P. (2009). Reproduction of the numbat (Myrmecobius fasciatus): observations from a captive breeding program. Australian Mammalogy 31, 25–30.
| Reproduction of the numbat (Myrmecobius fasciatus): observations from a captive breeding program.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
R Core Team (2013). ‘R: a Language and Environment for Statistical Computing.’ (R Foundation for Statistical Computing: Vienna, Austria.) Available at http://www.R-project.org/ [verified 16 January 2020].
Royle, A. J., Chandler, R. B., Sollmann, R., and Gardner, B. (2013). ‘Spatial Capture–Recapture.’ (Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands.)
Therneau, T. M. (2015). ‘A Package for Survival Analysis in S.’ Available at https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=survival [verified 16 January 2020].
Tracy, L. N., Wallis, G. P., Efford, M. G., and Jamieson, I. G. (2011). Preserving genetic diversity in threatened species reintroductions: how many individuals should be released? Animal Conservation 14, 439–446.
| Preserving genetic diversity in threatened species reintroductions: how many individuals should be released?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
