Free Standard AU & NZ Shipping For All Book Orders Over $80!
Register      Login
Wildlife Research Wildlife Research Society
Ecology, management and conservation in natural and modified habitats
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Inter-specific competition influences apex predator–prey populations

Chidanand S. Reddy A , Reuven Yosef https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4331-9866 B C F , Gianpiero Calvi D E and Lorenzo Fornasari E
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Tadoba Andhari Tiger Reserve, Chandrapur, Maharashtra, India.

B Ben Gurion University of the Negev, Eilat Campus, PO Box 272, Eilat 88000, Israel.

C Sevadal Mahila Mahavidyalaya College, Sakardara Square, Nagpur, India.

D Studio Pteryx, Via Risorgimento 9, 20060, Basiano, Italy.

E FaunaViva, Via Angelo Fumagalli 6, 20143 Milano, Italy.

F Corresponding author. Email: ryosef60@gmail.com

Wildlife Research 46(7) 628-638 https://doi.org/10.1071/WR19011
Submitted: 2 June 2018  Accepted: 11 July 2019   Published: 23 October 2019

Abstract

Context: Tiger (Panthera tigris), leopard (Panthera pardus) and dhole (Cuon alpinus) represent a typical multi-predator system of species of conservation concern. Several studies have addressed this system, with heterogeneous results, and there’s a lack of information on population dynamics of multi-species assemblages. We studied a time series (1998–2009) of abundance indices for three predators and five prey species in Bor Wildlife Sanctuary (BWS), Maharashtra, India, before it was declared as Bor Tiger Reserve (BTR) in 2009.

Aims: To analyse the complex relationships within a predator–prey system in a dynamic fashion, to analyse data collected in a stable and undisturbed area and to form a comparison basis for future studies within the sanctuary after its declaration as a Tiger Reserve.

Methods: A 24-h effort was made annually to census the BWS. Predators were counted at waterholes from arboreal hideouts. The prey populations were censused along 353-km line-transects. For each species, we analysed the yearly growth rate, testing the effect of inter-species abundance.

Key results: Tiger growth rate did not depend on any particular prey, whereas mesopredators seemed to depend on medium-sized prey. A die-out of dholes in 2001 was followed by an increase in tiger populations (from 4 to 11), which, in turn, negatively affected leopard numbers (from 6 to 2).We found no direct evidence of top-down effect, but the density dependence for three of five prey species could be linked to predation pressure. We found some evidence of interspecific competition among prey species, especially among ungulates, potentially being mediated by predation pressure.

Conclusions: The relationships among species in a predator–prey system are very complex and often could be explained only by more-than-two-species interactions. The disappearance of one predator, not necessarily the top predator, could bring multiple effects, for which it could be difficult to detect causal relationships.

Implications: All subsequent changes in human activities in the sanctuary, as a consequence of its designation as the BTR in 2009, should be evaluated with respect to the results of the present study. The conservation of large predators should rely on the maintenance of a rich and abundant prey base, in which different-sized prey could lessen interactive-competition among the predators.

Additional keywords: Bor Tiger Reserve, Cuon alpinus, Panthera pardus, Panthera tigris.


References

Allen, B. L., Allen, L. R., Andrén, H., Ballard, G., Boitani, L., Engeman, R. M., Fleming, P. J., Ford, A. T., Haswell, P. M., and Kowalczyk, R. (2017). Can we save large carnivores without losing large carnivore science? Food Webs 12, 64–75.
Can we save large carnivores without losing large carnivore science?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Anderson, K. (1954). ‘Nine Man-eaters and One Rogue’. (Allen & Unwin: London, UK.)

Andheria, A. P., Karanth, K. U., and Kumar, N. S. (2007). Diet and prey profiles of three sympatric large carnivores in Bandipur Tiger Reserve, India. Journal of Zoology 273, 169–175.
Diet and prey profiles of three sympatric large carnivores in Bandipur Tiger Reserve, India.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Bagchi, S., Goyal, S. P., and Sankar, K. (2003a). Niche relationships of an ungulate assemblage in a dry tropical forest. Journal of Mammalogy 84, 981–988.
Niche relationships of an ungulate assemblage in a dry tropical forest.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Bagchi, S., Goyal, S. P., and Sankar, K. (2003b). Prey abundance and prey selection by tigers (Panthera tigris) in a semi-arid, dry deciduous forest in western India. Journal of Zoology 260, 285–290.
Prey abundance and prey selection by tigers (Panthera tigris) in a semi-arid, dry deciduous forest in western India.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Barlow, A. C., McDougal, C., Smith, J. L., Gurung, B., Bhatta, S. R., Kumal, S., Mahato, B., and Tamang, D. B. (2009). Temporal variation in tiger (Panthera tigris) populations and its implications for monitoring. Journal of Mammalogy 90, 472–478.
Temporal variation in tiger (Panthera tigris) populations and its implications for monitoring.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Bartoń, K. (2016). ‘MuMIn: Multi-Model Inference.’ R package version 1.15.6. Available at https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=MuMIn [verified 20 January 2019].

Berger, J., Stacey, P. B., Bellis, L., and Johnson, M. P. (2001). A mammalian predator-prey imbalance: grizzly bear and wolf extinction affect avian neotropical migrants. Ecological Applications 11, 947–960.

Björklund, H., Santangeli, A., Blanchet, F. G., Huitu, O., Lehtoranta, H., Lindén, H., Valkama, J., and Laaksonen, T. (2016). Intraguild predation and competition impacts on a subordinate predator. Oecologia 181, 257–269.
Intraguild predation and competition impacts on a subordinate predator.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 26841931PubMed |

Borah, J., Deka, K., Dookia, S., and Gupta, R. P. (2009). Food habits of dholes (Cuon alpinus) in Satpura Tiger Reserve, Madhya Pradesh, India. Mammalia 73, 85–88.
Food habits of dholes (Cuon alpinus) in Satpura Tiger Reserve, Madhya Pradesh, India.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Chapron, G., Miquelle, D. G., Lambert, A., Goodrich, J. M., Legendre, S., and Clobert, J. (2008). The impact on tigers of poaching versus prey depletion. Journal of Applied Ecology 45, 1667–1674.
The impact on tigers of poaching versus prey depletion.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Check, E. (2006). The tiger’s retreat. Nature 441, 927–930.
The tiger’s retreat.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 16791169PubMed |

Connell, W. (1944). Wild dogs attacking a tiger. Journal of the Bombay Natural History Society 44, 468–470.

Conover, M. R. (2002). ‘Resolving Human–wildlife Conflicts. The Science of Wildlife Damage Management.’ (Lewis Publishers, CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA.)

Crooks, K. R., and Soulé, M. E. (1999). Mesopredator release and avifaunal extinctions in a fragmented system. Nature 400, 563–566.
Mesopredator release and avifaunal extinctions in a fragmented system.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Dave, C., and Jhala, Y. (2011). Is competition with livestock detrimental for native wild ungulates? A case study of chital (Axis axis) in Gir Forest, India. Journal of Tropical Ecology 27, 239–247.
Is competition with livestock detrimental for native wild ungulates? A case study of chital (Axis axis) in Gir Forest, India.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Dinerstein, E. (1979). An ecological survey of the Royal Karnali–Bardia wildlife reserve, Nepal. Part II: habitat/animal interactions. Biological Conservation 16, 265–300.
An ecological survey of the Royal Karnali–Bardia wildlife reserve, Nepal. Part II: habitat/animal interactions.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Dinerstein, E., Loucks, C., Wikramanayake, E., Ginsberg, J., Sanderson, E., Seidensticker, J., Forrest, J., Bryja, G., Heydlauff, A., and Klenzendorf, S. (2007). The fate of wild tigers. A.I.B.S. Bulletin 57, 508–514.

Duffy, J. E. (2003). Biodiversity loss, trophic skew and ecosystem functioning. Ecology Letters 6, 680–687.
Biodiversity loss, trophic skew and ecosystem functioning.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Fortin, D., Beyer, H. L., Boyce, M. S., Smith, D. W., Duchesne, T., and Mao, J. S. (2005). Wolves influence elk movements: behavior shapes a trophic cascade in Yellowstone National Park. Ecology 86, 1320–1330.
Wolves influence elk movements: behavior shapes a trophic cascade in Yellowstone National Park.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Gilg, O., Hanski, I., and Sittler, B. (2003). Cyclic dynamics in a simple vertebrate predator–prey community. Science 302, 866–868.
Cyclic dynamics in a simple vertebrate predator–prey community.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 14593179PubMed |

Giller, P. (1984). ‘Community Structure and the Niche.’ (Chapman & Hall: London, UK.)

Graham, K., Beckerman, A. P., and Thirgood, S. (2005). Human–predator–prey conflicts: ecological correlates, prey losses and patterns of management. Biological Conservation 122, 159–171.
Human–predator–prey conflicts: ecological correlates, prey losses and patterns of management.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Harihar, A., Pandav, B., and Goyal, S. P. (2011). Responses of leopard Panthera pardus to the recovery of a tiger Panthera tigris population. Journal of Applied Ecology 48, 806–814.
Responses of leopard Panthera pardus to the recovery of a tiger Panthera tigris population.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Hayward, M. W., Jędrzejewski, W., and Jedrzejewska, B. (2012). Prey preferences of the tiger Panthera tigris. Journal of Zoology 286, 221–231.
Prey preferences of the tiger Panthera tigris.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Hayward, M. W., Lyngdoh, S., and Habib, B. (2014). Diet and prey preferences of dholes (Cuon alpinus): dietary competition within Asia’s apex predator guild: prey preferences of dholes. Journal of Zoology 294, 255–266.
Diet and prey preferences of dholes (Cuon alpinus): dietary competition within Asia’s apex predator guild: prey preferences of dholes.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Holt, R. D., and Huxel, G. R. (2007). Alternative prey and the dynamics of intraguild predation: theoretical perspectives. Ecology 88, 2706–2712.
Alternative prey and the dynamics of intraguild predation: theoretical perspectives.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 18051637PubMed |

Hope, A. C. A. (1968). A simplified Monte Carlo significance test procedure. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B. Methodological 30, 582–598.
A simplified Monte Carlo significance test procedure.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Horev, A., Yosef, R., Tryjanowski, P., and Ovadia, O. (2012). Consequences of variation in male harem size to population persistence: modeling poaching and extinction risk of Bengal tigers (Panthera tigris). Biological Conservation 147, 22–31.
Consequences of variation in male harem size to population persistence: modeling poaching and extinction risk of Bengal tigers (Panthera tigris).Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

IUCN (2016). ‘IUCN Red List of Threatened Species.’ Available at https://www.iucnredlist.org/ [verified 25 October 2018].

Jankowiak, L., and Tryjanowski, P. (2013). Cooccurrence and food niche overlap of two common predators (red fox Vulpes vulpes and common buzzard Buteo buteo) in an agricultural landscape. Turkish Journal of Zoology 37, 157–162.

Jhala, Y., Qureshi, Q., and Gopal, R. (2011). Can the abundance of tigers be assessed from their signs? Journal of Applied Ecology 48, 14–24.
Can the abundance of tigers be assessed from their signs?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Johnsingh, A. J. T. (1992). Prey selection in three large sympatric carnivores in Bandipur. Mammalia 56, 517–526.
Prey selection in three large sympatric carnivores in Bandipur.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Kamler, J. F., Songsasen, N., Jensk, K., Srivathsa, A., Sheng, L., and Kunkel, K. (2015). ‘Cuon alpinus. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2015: e.T5953A72477893.’ Available at http://dx.doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.UK.2015-4.RLTS.T5953A72477893.en [verified 7 January 2019].

Karanth, K. U., and Nichols, J. D. (2017). ‘Methods for Monitoring Tiger and Prey Populations.’ (Springer: Singapore.)

Karanth, K. U., and Stith, B. M. (1999). Prey depletion as a critical determinant of tiger population viability. In ‘Riding the tiger: Tiger Conservation in Human Dominated Landscapes’. (Eds J. Seidensticker, S. Christie, and P. Jackson.) pp. 100–113. (Cambridge University Press and the Zoological Society of London: Cambridge, UK.)

Karanth, K. U., and Sunquist, M. E. (1995). Prey selection by tiger, leopard and dhole in tropical forests. Journal of Animal Ecology 64, 439–450.
Prey selection by tiger, leopard and dhole in tropical forests.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Karanth, K. U., and Sunquist, M. E. (2000). Behavioural correlates of predation by tiger (Panthera tigris), leopard (Panthera pardus) and dhole (Cuon alpinus) in Nagarahole, India. Journal of Zoology 250, 255–265.
Behavioural correlates of predation by tiger (Panthera tigris), leopard (Panthera pardus) and dhole (Cuon alpinus) in Nagarahole, India.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Karanth, K. U., Nichols, J. D., Kumar, N. S., Link, W. A., and Hines, J. E. (2004). Tigers and their prey: predicting carnivore densities from prey abundance. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 101, 4854–4858.
Tigers and their prey: predicting carnivore densities from prey abundance.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Karanth, K. U., Nichols, J. D., Kumar, N. S., and Hines, J. E. (2006). Assessing tiger population dynamics using photographic capture–recapture sampling. Ecology 87, 2925–2937.
Assessing tiger population dynamics using photographic capture–recapture sampling.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 17168036PubMed |

Keddy, P. A. (1989). ‘Competition. Population and Community Biology.’ (Chapman and Hall, Springer Nature: Switzerland.)

Kumaraguru, A., Saravanamuthu, R., Brinda, K., and Asokan, S. (2011). Prey preference of large carnivores in Anamalai Tiger Reserve, India. European Journal of Wildlife Research 57, 627–637.
Prey preference of large carnivores in Anamalai Tiger Reserve, India.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Lamichhane, B. R., Leirs, H., Persoon, G. A., Subedi, N., Dhakal, M., Oll, B. N., Reynaert, S., Sluydts, V., Pokheral, C. P., Poudyal, L. P., Malla, S., and de Longh, H. H. (2019). Factors associated with co-occurence of large predators in a human-dominated landscape. Biodiversity and Conservation 28, 1473–1491.
Factors associated with co-occurence of large predators in a human-dominated landscape.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Laundré, J. W. (2010). Behavioral response races, predator–prey shell games, ecology of fear, and patch use of pumas and their ungulate prey. Ecology 91, 2995–3007.
Behavioral response races, predator–prey shell games, ecology of fear, and patch use of pumas and their ungulate prey.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 21058559PubMed |

Laundré, J. W., Hernández, L., and Altendorf, K. B. (2001). Wolves, elk, and bison: reestablishing the ‘landscape of fear’ in Yellowstone National Park, USA. Canadian Journal of Zoology 79, 1401–1409.
Wolves, elk, and bison: reestablishing the ‘landscape of fear’ in Yellowstone National Park, USA.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Laundré, J. W., Hernández, L., Medina, P. L., Campanella, A., López-Portillo, J., González-Romero, A., Grajales-Tam, K. M., Burke, A. M., Gronemeyer, P., and Browning, D. M. (2014). The landscape of fear: the missing link to understand top‐down and bottom‐up controls of prey abundance? Ecology 95, 1141–1152.
The landscape of fear: the missing link to understand top‐down and bottom‐up controls of prey abundance?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 25000746PubMed |

Lovari, S., Pokheral, C. P., Jnawali, S. R., Fusani, L., and Ferretti, F. (2015). Coexistence of the tiger and the common leopard in a prey‐rich area: the role of prey partitioning. Journal of Zoology 295, 122–131.
Coexistence of the tiger and the common leopard in a prey‐rich area: the role of prey partitioning.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

MacCallum, H. (2000). ‘Population Parameters: Estimation of Ecological Models.’ (Blackwell Science: Oxford, UK.)

Macdonald, D., and Loveridge, A. (2010). ‘The Biology and Conservation of Wild Felids.’ (Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK)

Madhusudan, M. D. (2004). Recovery of wild large herbivores following livestock decline in a tropical Indian wildlife reserve. Journal of Applied Ecology 41, 858–869.
Recovery of wild large herbivores following livestock decline in a tropical Indian wildlife reserve.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Magee, L. (1990). R2 measures based on Wald and likelihood ratio joint significance tests. The American Statistician 44, 250–253.
R2 measures based on Wald and likelihood ratio joint significance tests.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Majumder, A., Sankar, K., and Qureshi, Q. (2013). Co-existence patterns of large sympatric carnivores as influenced by their habitat use in a tropical deciduous forest of central India. Journal of Biological Research (Thessaloniki) 19, 89–98.

Majumder, A., Qureshi, Q., Sankar, K., and Kumar, A. (2017). Long-term monitoring of a Bengal tiger (Panthera tigris tigris) population in a human-dominated landscape of central India. European Journal of Wildlife Research 63, 17.
Long-term monitoring of a Bengal tiger (Panthera tigris tigris) population in a human-dominated landscape of central India.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Mondal, K., Gupta, S., Bhattacharjee, S., Qureshi, Q., and Sankar, K. (2012). Prey selection, food habits and dietary overlap between leopard Panthera pardus (Mammalia: Carnivora) and re-introduced tiger Panthera tigris (Mammalia: Carnivora) in a semi-arid forest of Sariska Tiger Reserve, Western India. The Italian Journal of Zoology 79, 607–616.
Prey selection, food habits and dietary overlap between leopard Panthera pardus (Mammalia: Carnivora) and re-introduced tiger Panthera tigris (Mammalia: Carnivora) in a semi-arid forest of Sariska Tiger Reserve, Western India.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Newton, P. N. (1989). Associations between langur monkeys (Presbytis entellus) and chital deer (Axis axis): chance encounters or a mutualism? Ethology 83, 89–120.
Associations between langur monkeys (Presbytis entellus) and chital deer (Axis axis): chance encounters or a mutualism?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Nishijima, S., Takimoto, G., and Miyashita, T. (2014). Roles of alternative prey for mesopredators on trophic cascades in intraguild predation systems: a theoretical perspective. American Naturalist 183, 625–637.
Roles of alternative prey for mesopredators on trophic cascades in intraguild predation systems: a theoretical perspective.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 24739195PubMed |

Noor, A., Habib, B., and Kumar, S. (2013). Habitat selection and niche segregation between chital and nilgai in Keoladeo National Park, India. European Journal Zoological Research 2, 1–9.

Odden, M., Wegge, P., and Fredriksen, T. (2010). Do tigers displace leopards? If so, why? Ecological Research 25, 875–881.
Do tigers displace leopards? If so, why?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Oppenheimer, J. R. (1977). Presbytis entellus, the Hanuman langur. In ‘Primate Conservation’. (Eds P. Rainer III, and G. H. Bourne.) pp. 469–512. (Academic Press: New York, NY, USA.)

Pfister, C. A. (1995). Estimating competition coefficients from census data: a test with field manipulations of tidepool fishes. American Naturalist 146, 271–291.
Estimating competition coefficients from census data: a test with field manipulations of tidepool fishes.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Pinheiro, J., Bates, D., DebRoy, S., Sarkar, D., Heisterkamp, S., Van Willigen, B., and Maintainer, R. (2017). ‘Package ‘nlme’. Linear and Nonlinear Mixed Effects Models, Version, 3-1.’ Available at https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=nlme [verified 20 December 2018.]

Pokheral, C. P., and Wegge, P. (2018). Coexisting large carnivores: spatial relationships of tigers and leopards and their prey in a prey-rich area in lowland Nepal. Ecoscience 26:1-9, .
Coexisting large carnivores: spatial relationships of tigers and leopards and their prey in a prey-rich area in lowland Nepal.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Polis, G. A., Myers, C. A., and Holt, R. D. (1989). The ecology and evolution of intraguild predation: potential competitors that eat each other. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 20, 297–330.
The ecology and evolution of intraguild predation: potential competitors that eat each other.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Polis, G. A., Sears, A. L., Huxel, G. R., Strong, D. R., and Maron, J. (2000). When is a trophic cascade a trophic cascade? Trends in Ecology & Evolution 15, 473–475.
When is a trophic cascade a trophic cascade?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

R Core Team (2017). ‘R: a Language and Environment for Statistical Computing.’ Available at https://www.R-project.org/ [verified 15 December 2018].

Rahaman, H. (1973). Langurs of Gir: a preliminary survey. Journal of the Bombay Natural History Society 70, 295–314.

Ramesh, T. (2010). Prey selection and food habits of large carnivores: tiger Panthera tigris, leopard Panthera pardus and dhole Cuon alpinus in Mudumalai Tiger Reserve, Tamil Nadu. Ph.D. Thesis, Saurashtra University Wildlife Institute of India, Chandrabani Dehradun, India.

Ramesh, T., Kalle, R., Sankar, K., and Qureshi, Q. (2012). Dietary partitioning in sympatric large carnivores in a tropical forest of Western Ghats, India. Mammal Study 37, 313–321.
Dietary partitioning in sympatric large carnivores in a tropical forest of Western Ghats, India.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Reddy, C. S., and Yosef, R. (2016). Living on the edge: attitudes of rural communities toward Bengal tigers (Panthera tigris) in central India. Anthrozoos 29, 311–322.
Living on the edge: attitudes of rural communities toward Bengal tigers (Panthera tigris) in central India.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Roelke, M. E., Martenson, J. S., and O’Brien, S. J. (1993). The consequences of demographic reduction and genetic depletion in the endangered Florida panther. Current Biology 3, 340–350.
The consequences of demographic reduction and genetic depletion in the endangered Florida panther.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 15335727PubMed |

Schaller, G. B. (1984). ‘The Deer and the Tiger.’ (University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL, USA.)

Schmitz, O. J. (2003). Top predator control of plant biodiversity and productivity in an old‐field ecosystem. Ecology Letters 6, 156–163.
Top predator control of plant biodiversity and productivity in an old‐field ecosystem.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Schmitz, O. J., Beckerman, A. P., and O’Brien, K. M. (1997). Behaviorally mediated trophic cascades: effects of predation risk on food web interactions. Ecology 78, 1388–1399.
Behaviorally mediated trophic cascades: effects of predation risk on food web interactions.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Schmitz, O. J., Hambäck, P. A., and Beckerman, A. P. (2000). Trophic cascades in terrestrial systems: a review of the effects of carnivore removals on plants. American Naturalist 155, 141–153.
Trophic cascades in terrestrial systems: a review of the effects of carnivore removals on plants.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 10686157PubMed |

Selvan, K. M., Veeraswami, G. G., Lyngdoh, S., Habib, B., and Hussain, S. A. (2013). Prey selection and food habits of three sympatric large carnivores in a tropical lowland forest of the Eastern Himalayan Biodiversity Hotspot. Mammalian Biology-Zeitschrift für Säugetierkunde 78, 296–303.
Prey selection and food habits of three sympatric large carnivores in a tropical lowland forest of the Eastern Himalayan Biodiversity Hotspot.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Singh, J., and Jugade, A. K. (2005). Management Plan of Bor Wildlife Sanctuary from 2006–2016. Maharashtra Forest Department, Nagpur, India.

Srivastava, D. S., and Vellend, M. (2005). Biodiversity-ecosystem function research: is it relevant to conservation? Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics 36, 267–294.
Biodiversity-ecosystem function research: is it relevant to conservation?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Starin, E. D. (1978). A preliminary investigation of home range use in the Gir Forest langur. Primates 19, 551–567.
A preliminary investigation of home range use in the Gir Forest langur.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Steinmetz, R., Seuaturien, N., and Chutipong, W. (2013). Tigers, leopards, and dholes in a half-empty forest: assessing species interactions in a guild of threatened carnivores. Biological Conservation 163, 68–78.
Tigers, leopards, and dholes in a half-empty forest: assessing species interactions in a guild of threatened carnivores.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Taylor, L. R., and Woiwod, I. P. (1982). Comparative synoptic dynamics. I. Relationships between inter-and intra-specific spatial and temporal variance/mean population parameters. Journal of Animal Ecology 51, 879–906.
Comparative synoptic dynamics. I. Relationships between inter-and intra-specific spatial and temporal variance/mean population parameters.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Terborgh, J., Lopez, L., Nuñez, P., Rao, M., Shahabuddin, G., Orihuela, G., Riveros, M., Ascanio, R., Adler, G. H., and Lambert, T. D. (2001). Ecological meltdown in predator-free forest fragments. Science 294, 1923–1926.
Ecological meltdown in predator-free forest fragments.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 11729317PubMed |

Thinley, P., Kamler, J. F., Wang, S. W., Lham, K., Stenkewitz, U., and Macdonald, D. W. (2011). Seasonal diet of dholes (Cuon alpinus) in northwestern Bhutan. Mammalian Biology 76, 518–520.
Seasonal diet of dholes (Cuon alpinus) in northwestern Bhutan.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Turchin, P., Oksanen, L., Ekerholm, P., Oksanen, T., and Henttonen, H. (2000). Are lemmings prey or predators? Nature 405, 562–565.
Are lemmings prey or predators?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 10850713PubMed |

Venkataraman, A. B. (1995). Do dholes (Cuon alpinus) live in packs in response to competition with or predation by large cats? Current Science 69, 934–936.

Wang, S. W., and Macdonald, D. W. (2009). Feeding habits and niche partitioning in a predator guild composed of tigers, leopards and dholes in a temperate ecosystem in central Bhutan. Journal of Zoology 277, 275–283.
Feeding habits and niche partitioning in a predator guild composed of tigers, leopards and dholes in a temperate ecosystem in central Bhutan.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Wangchuk, T. (2004). Predator-prey dynamics: the role of predators in the control of problem species. Journal of Bhutan Studies 10, 68–89.

Wegge, P., Odden, M., Pokharel, C. P., and Storaas, T. (2009). Predator–prey relationships and responses of ungulates and their predators to the establishment of protected areas: a case study of tigers, leopards and their prey in Bardia National Park, Nepal. Biological Conservation 142, 189–202.
Predator–prey relationships and responses of ungulates and their predators to the establishment of protected areas: a case study of tigers, leopards and their prey in Bardia National Park, Nepal.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Woodroffe, R. (2000). Predators and people: using human densities to interpret declines of large carnivores. Animal Conservation Forum 3, 165–173.
Predators and people: using human densities to interpret declines of large carnivores.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Zuur, A. F., Ieno, E. N., Walker, N. J., Saveliev, A. A., and Smith, G. M. (2009). ‘Mixed Effects Models and Extensions in Ecology with R.’ (Springer: Switzerland.)