Free Standard AU & NZ Shipping For All Book Orders Over $80!
Register      Login
Wildlife Research Wildlife Research Society
Ecology, management and conservation in natural and modified habitats
Shopping Cart: ( empty )
You are here: Home > Journals > WR > WR18170
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Contents Vol 47(3)

Evaluating the use of risk assessment frameworks in the identification of population units for biodiversity conservation

Erin Liddell https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6451-8816 A B , Carly N. Cook https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4855-6409 A and Paul Sunnucks https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8139-7059 A
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A School of Biological Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, Vic. 3800, Australia.

B Corresponding author. Email: eglid1@student.monash.edu, erin.9liddell@gmail.com

Wildlife Research 47(3) 208-216 https://doi.org/10.1071/WR18170
Submitted: 1 November 2018  Accepted: 2 November 2019   Published: 8 April 2020

Abstract

Context: Managing small, isolated populations requires conservation practitioners to weigh up the risks of inbreeding depression and outbreeding depression when assessing alternative management actions aimed at preventing species extinction. Accordingly, it is important that research intended to guide these management decisions provides the relevant evidence to inform them.

Aims: To determine the extent to which studies that use genetic analyses to characterise population units for conservation consider the key theoretical concepts necessary for making sound management recommendations regarding the desirability of gene flow among units, notably the consequences and relative risks of inbreeding depression and outbreeding depression.

Methods: A systematic search was conducted of peer-reviewed literature for studies that attempted to identify population units of threatened birds and mammals. Using content analysis, the theoretical framing of these studies was assessed, based on the discussion of key concepts concerning differences among populations.

Key results: There has been a significant increase over time in the number of published studies that use genetics to identify population units for conservation. Many do not consider theoretical concepts relevant to the effective management of fragmented populations of threatened species. Mammals were more common than birds as focal species of studies, but the number of concepts used in the framing of the studies was similar for these two taxa, despite differences in their ecology and biology that might be expected to affect perceptions of distinctiveness. Nevertheless, species of greater conservation concern tended to have a slightly more comprehensive theoretical framing.

Conclusions: There is great potential for more studies to implement theoretical guidelines and practical decision support tools when considering the best course of action for identifying appropriate population units for conservation management.

Implications: The gap in the identified literature is likely to be impacting the ability of conservation practitioners to make evidence-informed decisions about how to manage the genetic health of threatened species; it would be valuable to improve this situation.

Additional keywords: conservation genetics, conservation management, gene flow, inbreeding depression, outbreeding depression, population units.


References

Anthonysamy, W. J. B., Dreslik, M. J., Douglas, M. R., Thompson, D., Klut, G. M., Kuhns, A. R., Mauger, D., Kirk, D., Glowacki, G. A., Douglas, M. E., and Phillips, C. A. (2018). Population genetic evaluations within a co-distributed taxonomic group: a multi-species approach to conservation planning. Animal Conservation 21, 137–147.
| Population genetic evaluations within a co-distributed taxonomic group: a multi-species approach to conservation planning.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Bell, D. A., Robinson, Z. L., Funk, W. C., Fitzpatrick, S. W., Allendorf, F. W., Tallmon, D. A., and Whiteley, A. R. (2019). The exciting potential and remaining uncertainties of genetic rescue. Trends in Ecology & Evolution , .
| The exciting potential and remaining uncertainties of genetic rescue.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Burridge, C. P. (2019). Politics and pride: maintaining genetic novelty may be detrimental for the conservation of Formosa landlocked salmon Oncorhynchus formosanus. Aquatic Conservation 29, 840–847.
| Politics and pride: maintaining genetic novelty may be detrimental for the conservation of Formosa landlocked salmon Oncorhynchus formosanus.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Cook, C. N., and Sgrò, C. M. (2017). Aligning science and policy to achieve evolutionarily enlightened conservation. Conservation Biology 31, 501–512.
| Aligning science and policy to achieve evolutionarily enlightened conservation.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 27862324PubMed |

Cook, C. N., and Sgrò, C. M. (2018). Understanding managers and scientists’ perspectives on opportunities to achieve more evolutionarily enlightened management in conservation. Evolutionary Applications 11, 1371–1388.
| Understanding managers and scientists’ perspectives on opportunities to achieve more evolutionarily enlightened management in conservation.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 30151046PubMed |

Cook, C. N., and Sgrò, C. M. (2019). Conservation practitioners’ understanding of how to manage evolutionary processes. Conservation Biology , .
| Conservation practitioners’ understanding of how to manage evolutionary processes.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 30950531PubMed |

Crandall, K. A., Bininda-Emonds, O. R. P., Mace, G. M., and Wayne, R. K. (2000). Considering evolutionary processes in conservation biology. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 15, 290–295.
| Considering evolutionary processes in conservation biology.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Frankham, R. (2015). Genetic rescue of small inbred populations: meta‐analysis reveals large and consistent benefits of gene flow. Molecular Ecology 24, 2610–2618.
| Genetic rescue of small inbred populations: meta‐analysis reveals large and consistent benefits of gene flow.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 25740414PubMed |

Frankham, R. (2016). Genetic rescue benefits persist to at least the F3 generation, based on a meta-analysis. Biological Conservation 195, 33–36.
| Genetic rescue benefits persist to at least the F3 generation, based on a meta-analysis.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Frankham, R., Lees, K., Montgomery, M. E., England, P. R., Lowe, E. H., and Briscoe, D. A. (1999). Do population size bottlenecks reduce evolutionary potential? Animal Conservation 2, 255–260.
| Do population size bottlenecks reduce evolutionary potential?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Frankham, R., Ballou, J. D., Eldridge, M. D. B., Lacy, R. C., Ralls, K., Dudash, M. R., and Fenster, C. B. (2011). Predicting the probability of outbreeding depression. Conservation Biology 25, 465–475.
| Predicting the probability of outbreeding depression.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 21486369PubMed |

Frankham, R., Ballou, J. D., Ralls, K., Eldridge, M. D. B., Dudash, M. R., Fenster, C. B., Lacy, R. C., and Sunnucks, P. (2017). ‘Genetic Management of Fragmented Animal and Plant Populations.’ (Oxford University Press: Oxford.)

Frankham, R., Ballou, J. D., Ralls, K., Eldridge, M. D. B., Dudash, M. R., Fenster, C. B., Lacy, R. C., and Sunnucks, P. (2019). ‘A Practical Guide for Genetic Management of Fragmented Animal and Plant Populations.’ (Oxford University Press: Oxford.)

Garnett, S. T., and Christidis, L. (2017). Taxonomy anarchy hampers conservation. Nature 546, 25–27.
| Taxonomy anarchy hampers conservation.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 28569833PubMed |

Harrisson, K. A., Pavlova, A., da Silva, A. G., Rose, R., Bull, J. K., Lancaster, M. L., Murray, N., Quin, B., Menkhorst, P., Magrath, M. J. L., and Sunnucks, P. (2016). Scope for genetic rescue of an endangered subspecies though re-establishing natural gene flow with another subspecies. Molecular Ecology 25, 1242–1258.
| Scope for genetic rescue of an endangered subspecies though re-establishing natural gene flow with another subspecies.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 26820991PubMed |

Harrisson, K. A., Magrath, M. J. L., Yen, J. D. L., Pavlova, A., Murray, N., Quin, B., Menkhorst, P., Miller, K. A., Cartwright, K., and Sunnucks, P. (2019). Lifetime fitness costs of inbreeding and being inbred in a critically endangered bird. Current Biology , .
| Lifetime fitness costs of inbreeding and being inbred in a critically endangered bird.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 31378604PubMed |

Hedrick, P. W., and Fredrickson, R. (2010). Genetic rescue guidelines with examples from Mexican wolves and Florida panthers. Conservation Genetics 11, 615–626.
| Genetic rescue guidelines with examples from Mexican wolves and Florida panthers.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Jost, L., Archer, F., Flanagan, S., Gaggiotti, O., Hoban, S., and Latch, E. (2018). Differentiation measures for conservation genetics. Evolutionary Applications 11, 1139–1148.
| Differentiation measures for conservation genetics.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 30026802PubMed |

Keller, L., and Waller, D. (2002). Inbreeding effects in wild populations. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 17, 230–241.
| Inbreeding effects in wild populations.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Li, W. H. (1978). Maintenance of genetic variability under the joint effect of mutation, selection and random drift. Genetics 90, 349–382.
| 17248867PubMed |

Love Stowell, S. M., Pinzone, C. A., and Martin, A. P. (2017). Overcoming barriers to active interventions for genetic diversity. Biodiversity and Conservation 26, 1753–1765.
| Overcoming barriers to active interventions for genetic diversity.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Marko, P. B., and Hart, M. W. (2011). The complex analytical landscape of gene flow inference. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 26, 448–456.
| The complex analytical landscape of gene flow inference.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Milligan, B. G., Archer, F. I., Ferchaud, A. L., Hand, B. K., Kierepka, E. M., and Waples, R. S. (2018). Disentangling genetic structure for genetic monitoring of complex populations. Evolutionary Applications 11, 1149–1161.
| Disentangling genetic structure for genetic monitoring of complex populations.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 30026803PubMed |

Nieminen, M., Singer, M. C., Fortelius, W., Schops, K., and Hanski, I. (2001). Experimental confirmation that inbreeding depression increases extinction risk in butterfly populations. American Naturalist 157, 237–244.
| Experimental confirmation that inbreeding depression increases extinction risk in butterfly populations.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 18707275PubMed |

Ottewell, K. M., Bickerton, D. C., Byrne, M., and Lowe, A. J. (2016). Bridging the gap: a genetic assessment framework for population-level threatened plant conservation prioritization and decision-making. Diversity & Distributions 22, 174–188.
| Bridging the gap: a genetic assessment framework for population-level threatened plant conservation prioritization and decision-making.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Patton, M. Q. (2002). ‘Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods.’ (Sage Publications: Thousand Oaks, CA.)

Pavlova, A., Selwood, P., Harrisson, K. A., Murray, N., Quin, B., Menkhorst, P., Smales, I., and Sunnucks, P. (2014). Integrating phylogeography and morphometrics to assess conservation merits and inform conservation strategies for an endangered subspecies of a common bird species. Biological Conservation 174, 136–146.
| Integrating phylogeography and morphometrics to assess conservation merits and inform conservation strategies for an endangered subspecies of a common bird species.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Pavlova, A., Beheregaray, L. B., Coleman, R., Gilligan, D., Harrisson, K. A., Ingram, B. A., Kearns, J., Lamb, A. M., Lintermans, M., Lyon, J., Nguyen, T. T. T., Sasaki, M., Tonkin, Z., Yen, J. D. L., and Sunnucks, P. (2017). Severe consequences of habitat fragmentation on genetic diversity of an endangered Australian freshwater fish: a call for assisted gene flow. Evolutionary Applications 10, 531–550.
| Severe consequences of habitat fragmentation on genetic diversity of an endangered Australian freshwater fish: a call for assisted gene flow.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 28616062PubMed |

Perrin, N., and Mazalov, V. (2000). Local competition, inbreeding, and the evolution of sex-biased dispersal. American Naturalist 155, 116–127.
| Local competition, inbreeding, and the evolution of sex-biased dispersal.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 10657181PubMed |

Pickup, M., and Young, A. G. (2008). Population size, self-incompatibility and genetic rescue in diploid and tetraploid races of Rutidosis leptorrhynchoides (Asteraceae). Heredity 100, 268–274.
| Population size, self-incompatibility and genetic rescue in diploid and tetraploid races of Rutidosis leptorrhynchoides (Asteraceae).Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 17940547PubMed |

Pierson, J. C., Beissinger, S. R., Bragg, J. G., Coates, D. J., Oostermeijer, J. G. B., Sunnucks, P., Schumaker, N. H., Trotter, M. V., and Young, A. G. (2015). Incorporating evolutionary processes into population viability models. Conservation Biology 29, 755–764.
| Incorporating evolutionary processes into population viability models.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 25494697PubMed |

Pierson, J. C., Coates, D. J., Oostermeijer, J. G. B., Beissinger, S. R., Bragg, J. G., Sunnucks, P., Schumaker, N. H., and Young, A. G. (2016). Genetic factors in threatened species recovery plans on three continents. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 14, 433–440.
| Genetic factors in threatened species recovery plans on three continents.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Ralls, K., Ballou, J. D., Dudash, M. R., Eldridge, M. D. B., Fenster, C. B., Lacy, R. C., Sunnucks, P., and Frankham, R. (2018). Call for a paradigm shift in the genetic management of fragmented populations. Conservation Letters 11, e12412.
| Call for a paradigm shift in the genetic management of fragmented populations.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Rich, S. S., Bell, A. E., and Wilson, S. P. (1979). Genetic drift in small populations of Tribolium. Evolution 33, 579–584.
| Genetic drift in small populations of Tribolium.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 28563951PubMed |

Saccheri, I., Kuussaari, M., Kankare, M., Vikman, P., Fortelius, W., and Hanski, I. (1998). Inbreeding and extinction in a butterfly metapopulation. Nature 392, 491–494.
| Inbreeding and extinction in a butterfly metapopulation.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Sutherland, G. D., Harestad, A. S., Price, K., and Lertzman, K. P. (2000). Scaling of natal dispersal distances in terrestrial birds and mammals. Conservation Ecology 4, .
| Scaling of natal dispersal distances in terrestrial birds and mammals.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Taylor, H. R., Dussex, N., and van Heezik, Y. (2017). Bridging the conservation genetics gap by identifying barriers to implementation for conservation practitioners. Global Ecology and Conservation 10, 231–242.
| Bridging the conservation genetics gap by identifying barriers to implementation for conservation practitioners.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Templeton, A. R. (1986). Coadaptation and outbreeding depression. In ‘Conservation Biology: the Science of Scarcity and Diversity’. (Ed. M. E. Soule.) pp. 105–121. (Sinauer Associates: Sunderland, MA.)

Templeton, A. R., and Read, B. (1994). Inbreeding: One word, several meanings, much confusion. In ‘Conservation Genetics’. (Eds V. Loeschcke, J. Tomiuk and S. K. Jain.) pp. 91–105. (Birkhauser Verlag: Basel, Switzerland.)

Weeks, A. R., Sgrò, C. M., Young, A. G., Frankham, R., Mitchell, N. J., Miller, K. A., Byrne, M., Coates, D. J., Eldridge, M. D. B., Sunnucks, P., Breed, M. F., James, E. A., and Hoffmann, A. A. (2011). Assessing the benefits and risks of translocations in changing environments: a genetic perspective. Evolutionary Applications 4, 709–725.
| Assessing the benefits and risks of translocations in changing environments: a genetic perspective.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 22287981PubMed |

Weeks, A. R., Stoklosa, J., and Hoffmann, A. A. (2016). Conservation of genetic uniqueness of populations may increase extinction likelihood of endangered species: the case of Australian mammals. Frontiers in Zoology 13, 31.
| Conservation of genetic uniqueness of populations may increase extinction likelihood of endangered species: the case of Australian mammals.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 27398088PubMed |

Weeks, A., Heinze, D., Perrin, L., Stoklosa, J., Hoffmann, A., van Rooyen, A., Kelly, T., and Mansergh, I. (2017). Genetic rescue increases fitness and aids rapid recovery of an endangered marsupial population. Nature Communications 8, 1071.
| Genetic rescue increases fitness and aids rapid recovery of an endangered marsupial population.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 29057865PubMed |

Weir, B. S., and Cockerham, C. C. (1984). Estimating F-statistics for the analysis of population structure. Evolution 38, 1358–1370.
| Estimating F-statistics for the analysis of population structure.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 28563791PubMed |

Whiteley, A., Fitzpatrick, S., Funk, W. C., and Tallmon, D. (2015). Genetic rescue to the rescue. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 30, 42–49.
| Genetic rescue to the rescue.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |