Free Standard AU & NZ Shipping For All Book Orders Over $80!
Register      Login
Wildlife Research Wildlife Research Society
Ecology, management and conservation in natural and modified habitats
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Rapid eradication assessment (REA): a tool for pest absence confirmation

Juliana H. K. Kim A , Peter Corson B , Nick Mulgan C and James C. Russell https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5901-6416 A C D
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A University of Auckland, Private Bag 92019, Auckland 1142, New Zealand.

B Department of Conservation, 99 Sala Street, Whakarewarewa, Rotorua 3010, New Zealand.

C Zero Invasive Predators, c/o Zealandia Sanctuary, PO Box 9267, Wellington 6141, New Zealand.

D Corresponding author. Email: j.russell@auckland.ac.nz

Wildlife Research 47(2) 128-136 https://doi.org/10.1071/WR18154
Submitted: 11 October 2018  Accepted: 8 September 2019   Published: 14 February 2020

Abstract

Context: Eradication of invasive species is necessary to protect and assist the recovery of native species and ecosystems. Knowing when to declare an eradication has been successful after ongoing non-detections is a challenge.

Aims: The rapid eradication assessment (REA) model is a powerful simulation framework to determine, given model parameters and a fixed level of monitoring effort, the level of confidence in declaring the success of pest eradication. The aim of the present study was to extend the current functionality of the REA model for broader applicability.

Methods: The REA model was advanced so that it was able to account for (1) usage of multiple static device types with different probabilities of detection, (2) incursion detection at a known location and (3) usage of mobile detection devices, which are increasingly being used in conservation.

Key results: An invasive rat incursion response on Great Mercury Island in New Zealand is used as a comprehensive example to demonstrate the distribution of estimated probability of pest absence among the cases using the current REA model and the extensions presented here.

Conclusions: Although Great Mercury Island already had a sparse but extensive island-wide network of static biosecurity surveillance devices, and deployed additional static devices around the area of incursion, the greatest improvement in the estimated probability of pest absence following a rat incursion was from additionally using a trained rodent-detection dog.

Implications: The added functionality in the REA model and demonstration of its use on a real-world scenario will allow more realistic application by wildlife managers.

Additional keywords: conservation, invasion, islands, management strategies, modelling, pest management, population modelling, statistics, vertebrates, wildlife management.


References

Bassett, I. E., Cook, J., Buchanan, F., and Russell, J. C. (2016). Treasure Islands: biosecurity in the Hauraki Gulf marine park. New Zealand Journal of Ecology 40, 250–266.
Treasure Islands: biosecurity in the Hauraki Gulf marine park.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Boakes, E. H., Rout, T. M., and Collen, B. (2015). Inferring species extinction: the use of sighting records. Methods in Ecology and Evolution 6, 678–687.
Inferring species extinction: the use of sighting records.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Brown, J. (2005). Sniffing with precision: detection dogs push the limits of field-monitoring techniques. Conservation in Practice 6, 94–95.
Sniffing with precision: detection dogs push the limits of field-monitoring techniques.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Clapperton, B. K., Murphy, E. C., and Razzaq, H. A. A. (2017). ‘Mammalian Pheromones: New Opportunities for Improved Predator Control in New Zealand.’ Science for Conservation 330. (Department of Conservation: Wellington.)

Clout, M. N., and Russell, J. C. (2006). The eradication of mammals from New Zealand islands. In ‘Assessment and Control of Biological Invasion Risks’. (Eds F. Koike, M. N. Clout, M. Kawamichi, M. De Poorter and K. Iwatsuki.) pp. 127–141. (International Union for Conservation of Nature: Gland, Switzerland.)

Garvey, P. M., Glen, A. S., and Pech, R. P. (2016). Dominant predator odour triggers caution and eavesdropping behaviour in a mammalian mesopredator. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 70, 481–492.
Dominant predator odour triggers caution and eavesdropping behaviour in a mammalian mesopredator.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Garvey, P. M., Glen, A. S., Clout, M. N., Wyse, S. V., Nichols, M., and Pech, R. P. (2017). Exploiting interspecific olfactory communication to monitor predators. Ecological Applications 27, 389–402.
Exploiting interspecific olfactory communication to monitor predators.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 27983773PubMed |

Glen, A. S., Russell, J. C., Veltman, C. J., and Fewster, R. M. (2018). I smell a rat! Estimating effective sweep width for searches using wildlife detector dogs. Wildlife Research 45, 500–504.
I smell a rat! Estimating effective sweep width for searches using wildlife detector dogs.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Gsell, A., Innes, J., de Monchy, P., and Brunton, D. (2010). The success of using trained dogs to locate sparse rodents in pest-free sanctuaries. Wildlife Research 37, 39–46.
The success of using trained dogs to locate sparse rodents in pest-free sanctuaries.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Holmes, N. D., Griffiths, R., Pott, M., Alifano, A., Will, D., Wegmann, A. S., and Russell, J. C. (2015). Factors associated with rodent eradication failure. Biological Conservation 185, 8–16.
Factors associated with rodent eradication failure.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Howald, G., Donlan, C., Galvan, J., Russell, J., Parkes, J., Samaniego, A., Wang, Y., Veitch, C. R., Genovesi, P., Pascal, M., Saunders, A., and Tershy, B. (2007). Invasive rodent eradication on islands. Conservation Biology 21, 1258–1268.
Invasive rodent eradication on islands.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 17883491PubMed |

McBride, G. B., and Johnstone, P. (2011). Calculating the probability of absence using the Credible Interval Value. New Zealand Journal of Ecology 35, 189–190.

Pellet, J., and Schmidt, B. R. (2005). Monitoring distributions using call surveys: estimating site occupancy, detection probabilities and inferring absence. Biological Conservation 123, 27–35.
Monitoring distributions using call surveys: estimating site occupancy, detection probabilities and inferring absence.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Rout, T. M. (2017). Declaring eradication of invasive species. In ‘Invasive Species: Risk Assessment and Management’. (Eds A. P. Robinson, T. Walshe, M. A. Burgman and M. Nunn.) pp. 334–347. (Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK.)

Rout, T. M., Kirkwood, R., Sutherland, D. R., Murphy, S., and McCarthy, M. A. (2014). When to declare successful eradication of an invasive predator? Animal Conservation 17, 125–132.
When to declare successful eradication of an invasive predator?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Russell, J. C., Towns, D. R., Anderson, S. H., and Clout, M. N. (2005). Intercepting the first rat ashore. Nature 437, 1107.
Intercepting the first rat ashore.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 16237434PubMed |

Russell, J. C., Beaven, B. M., MacKay, J. W., Towns, D. R., and Clout, M. N. (2008a). Testing island biosecurity systems for invasive rats. Wildlife Research 35, 215–221.
Testing island biosecurity systems for invasive rats.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Russell, J. C., Towns, D. R., and Clout, M. N. (2008b). ‘Review of Rat Invasion Biology: Implications for Island Biosecurity.’ Science for Conservation 286. (Department of Conservation: Wellington.)

Russell, J. C., McMorland, A. J. C., and MacKay, J. W. B. (2010). Exploratory behaviour of colonizing rats in novel environments. Animal Behaviour 79, 159–164.
Exploratory behaviour of colonizing rats in novel environments.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Russell, J. C., Binnie, H. R., Oh, J., Anderson, D. P., and Samaniego-Herrera, A. (2017). Optimizing confirmation of invasive species eradication with rapid eradication assessment. Journal of Applied Ecology 54, 160–169.
Optimizing confirmation of invasive species eradication with rapid eradication assessment.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Samaniego-Herrera, A., Anderson, D. P., Parkes, J. P., and Aguirre-Munoz, A. (2013). Rapid assessment of rat eradication after aerial baiting. Journal of Applied Ecology 50, 1415–1421.
Rapid assessment of rat eradication after aerial baiting.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Smith, D. A., Ralls, K., Davenport, B., Adams, B., and Maldonado, J. E. (2001). Canine assistants for conservationists. Science 291, 435.
Canine assistants for conservationists.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 11228135PubMed |

Towns, D. R., Borrelle, S. B., Thoresen, J., Buxton, R. T., and Evans, A. (2016). Mercury Islands and their role in understanding seabird island restoration. New Zealand Journal of Ecology 40, 235–249.
Mercury Islands and their role in understanding seabird island restoration.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Yackel Adams, A. A., Lardner, B., Knox, A. J., and Reed, R. N. (2018). Inferring the absence of an incipient population during a rapid response for an invasive species. PLoS One 13, e0204302.
Inferring the absence of an incipient population during a rapid response for an invasive species.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 30260994PubMed |