Register      Login
Wildlife Research Wildlife Research Society
Ecology, management and conservation in natural and modified habitats
REVIEW

Sampling effort determination in bird surveys: do current norms meet best-practice recommendations?

David M. Watson
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

Institute for Land, Water and Society, Charles Sturt University, PO Box 789, Albury Wodonga, NSW 2640, Australia. Email: dwatson@csu.edu.au

Wildlife Research 44(3) 183-193 https://doi.org/10.1071/WR16226
Submitted: 13 December 2016  Accepted: 17 April 2017   Published: 26 May 2017

Abstract

A critical design component of studies measuring diversity is sampling effort. Allocation of sampling effort dictates how many sites can be sampled within a particular time-frame or budget, as well as sample duration, frequency and intensity, thereby determining the resolution and reliability of emergent inferences. Conventional survey techniques use fixed-effort methods that assume invariant detectabilities among sites and species. Several approaches have been developed in the past decade that account for variable detectability by using alternative sampling methods or by adjusting standard counts before analysis, but it is unclear how widely adopted these techniques have been or how current bird surveying norms compare with best-practice recommendations. I conducted a systematic search of the primary literature to ascertain how sampling effort is determined, how much effort is devoted to sampling each site and how variation in detectability is dealt with. Of 225 empirical studies of bird diversity published between 2004 and 2016, five used results-based stopping rules (each derived independently), 54 used proportional sampling, and 159 (71%) used implicit effort-based stopping rules (fixed effort). Effort varied widely, but 61% of studies used samples of 10 min or less and 62% of studies expended total effort per datum of 2 h or less, with 78% providing no justification for sampling efforts used and just 15% explicitly accounting for estimated detectability. Given known variation in detectability, relying on short-duration fixed-effort approaches without validation or post hoc correction means that most bird diversity studies necessarily under-sample some sites and/or species. Having identified current bird surveying norms and highlighted their shortcomings, I provide five practical solutions to improve sampling effort determination, urging contributors and consumers of empirical ecological literature to consider survey data in terms of sample completeness.

Additional keywords: completeness, detectability, diversity, stopping rule.


References

Aerts, R., Lerouge, F., November, E., Lens, L., Hermy, M., and Muys, B. (2008). Land rehabilitation and the conservation of birds in a degraded Afromontane landscape in northern Ethiopia. Biodiversity and Conservation 1, 53–69.
Land rehabilitation and the conservation of birds in a degraded Afromontane landscape in northern Ethiopia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Archaux, F., Gosselin, F., Bergès, L., and Chevalier, R. (2006). Effects of sampling time, species richness and observer on the exhaustiveness of plant censuses. Journal of Vegetation Science 17, 299–306.
Effects of sampling time, species richness and observer on the exhaustiveness of plant censuses.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Azhar, B., Lindenmayer, D. B., Wood, J., Fischer, J., Manning, A., McElhinny, C., and Zakaria, M. (2013). The influence of agricultural system, stand structural complexity and landscape context on foraging birds in oil palm landscapes. The Ibis 155, 297–312.
The influence of agricultural system, stand structural complexity and landscape context on foraging birds in oil palm landscapes.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Banks-Leite, C., Pardini, R., Boscolo, D., Cassano, C. R., Püttker, T., Barros, C. S., and Barlow, J. (2014). Assessing the utility of statistical adjustments for imperfect detection in tropical conservation science. Journal of Applied Ecology 51, 849–859.
Assessing the utility of statistical adjustments for imperfect detection in tropical conservation science.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Bebber, D. P., Marriott, F. H. C., Gaston, K. J., Harris, S. A., and Scotland, R. W. (2007). Predicting unknown species numbers using discovery curves. Proceedings of the Royal Society B 274, 1651–1658.
Predicting unknown species numbers using discovery curves.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Beck, J., and Schwanghart, W. (2010). Comparing measures of species diversity from incomplete inventories: an update. Methods in Ecology and Evolution 1, 38–44.
Comparing measures of species diversity from incomplete inventories: an update.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Biaduń, W., and Zmihorski, M. (2011). Factors shaping a breeding bird community along an urbanization gradient: 26-year study in medium size city (Lublin, SE Poland). Polish Journal of Ecology 59, 381–389.

Buckland, S. T., Anderson, D. R., Burnham, K. P., and Laake, J. L. (1993). ‘Distance Sampling: Estimating Abundance of Biological Populations.’ (Chapman & Hall: London.)

Cam, E., Nichols, J. D., Sauer, J. R., and Hines, J. E. (2002). On the estimation of species richness based on the accumulation of previously unrecorded species. Ecography 25, 102–108.
On the estimation of species richness based on the accumulation of previously unrecorded species.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Chao, A., Colwell, R. K., Lin, C.-W., and Gotelli, N. J. (2009). Sufficient sampling for asymptotic minimum species richness estimators. Ecology 90, 1125–1133.
Sufficient sampling for asymptotic minimum species richness estimators.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Colwell, R. K., Chao, A., Gotelli, N. J., Lin, S.-Y., Mao, C. X., Chazdon, R. L., and Longino, J. T. (2012). Models and estimators linking individual-based and sample-based rarefaction, extrapolation and comparison of assemblages. Journal of Plant Ecology 5, 3–21.
Models and estimators linking individual-based and sample-based rarefaction, extrapolation and comparison of assemblages.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Crates, R., Terauds, A., Rayner, L., Stejanovic, D., Ingwersen, D., and Webb, M. (2017). An occupancy approach to monitoring regent honeyeaters. The Journal of Wildlife Management 81, 699–377.
An occupancy approach to monitoring regent honeyeaters.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Cunningham, R. B., Lindenmayer, D. B., Crane, M., Michael, D. R., Barton, P. S., Gibbons, P., Okada, S., Ikin, K., and Stein, J. A. R. (2014). The law of diminishing returns: woodland birds respond to native vegetation cover at multiple spatial scales and over time. Diversity & Distributions 20, 59–71.
The law of diminishing returns: woodland birds respond to native vegetation cover at multiple spatial scales and over time.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Davis, R. A., Gole, C., and Roberts, J. D. (2013). Impacts of urbanisation on the native avifauna of Perth, Western Australia. Urban Ecosystems 16, 427–452.
Impacts of urbanisation on the native avifauna of Perth, Western Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

de Solla, S. R., Shirose, L. J., Fernie, K. J., Barrett, G. C., Brousseau, C. S., and Bishop, C. A. (2005). Effect of sampling effort and species detectability on volunteer based anuran monitoring programs. Biological Conservation 121, 585–594.
Effect of sampling effort and species detectability on volunteer based anuran monitoring programs.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Ellison, A. M., Record, S., Arguello, A., and Gotelli, N. J. (2007). Rapid inventory of the ant assemblage in a temperate hardwood forest: species composition and assessment of sampling methods. Environmental Entomology 36, 766–775.
Rapid inventory of the ant assemblage in a temperate hardwood forest: species composition and assessment of sampling methods.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Elphick, C. S. (2008). How you count counts: the importance of methods research in applied ecology. Journal of Applied Ecology 45, 1313–1320.
How you count counts: the importance of methods research in applied ecology.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Evans, K. L., Greenwood, J. J. D., and Gaston, K. J. (2005). Relative contribution of abundant and rare species to species-energy relationships. Biology Letters 1, 87–90.
Relative contribution of abundant and rare species to species-energy relationships.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Farnsworth, G. L., Pollock, K. H., Nichols, J. D., Simons, T. R., Hines, J. E., and Sauer, J. R. (2002). A removal model for estimating detection probabilities from point-count surveys. The Auk 119, 414–425.
A removal model for estimating detection probabilities from point-count surveys.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Flohre, A., Fischer, C., Aavik, T., Bengtsson, J., Berendse, F., Bommarco, R., Ceryngier, P., Clement, L. W., Dennis, C., Eggers, S., Emmerson, M., Geiger, F., Guerrero, I., Hawro, V., Inchausti, P., Liira, J., Morales, M. B., Oñate, J. J., Pärt, T., Weisser, W. W., Winqvist, C., Thies, C., and Tscharntke, T. (2011). Agricultural intensification and biodiversity partitioning in European landscapes comparing plants, carabids, and birds. Ecological Applications 21, 1772–1781.
Agricultural intensification and biodiversity partitioning in European landscapes comparing plants, carabids, and birds.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Fontana, C. S., Burger, M. I., and Magnusson, W. E. (2011). Bird diversity in a subtropical South-American city: effects of noise levels, arborisation and human population density. Urban Ecosystems 14, 341–360.
Bird diversity in a subtropical South-American city: effects of noise levels, arborisation and human population density.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Gaston, K. J. (2010). Valuing common species. Science 327, 154–155.
Valuing common species.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC3cXosFGnsg%3D%3D&md5=925980183e424db39374717b5f0ed96cCAS |

Gotelli, N., and Colwell, R. (2011). Estimating species richness. In ‘Biological Diversity: Frontiers in Measurement and Assessment’. (Eds A. E. Magurran and B. J. McGill.) pp. 39–54. (Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK.)

Gu, W., and Swihart, R. K. (2004). Absent or undetected? Effects of non-detection of species occurrence on wildlife–habitat models. Biological Conservation 116, 195–203.
Absent or undetected? Effects of non-detection of species occurrence on wildlife–habitat models.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Guillera-Arroita, G., Lahoz-Monfort, J. J., MacKenzie, D. I., Wintle, B. A., and McCarthy, M. A. (2014). Ignoring imperfect detection in biological surveys is dangerous: a response to ‘fitting and interpreting occupancy models’. PLoS ONE 9, e99571.

Guldemond, R. A. R., and van Aarde, R. J. (2010). Forest patch size and isolation as drivers of bird species richness in Maputaland, Mozambique. Journal of Biogeography 37, 1884–1893.

Haila, Y. (1986). North European land birds in forest fragments: evidence for area effects? In ‘Wildlife 2000. Modelling Habitat Relationships of Terrestrial Vertebrates’. (Eds J. Verner, M. L. Morrison and C. J. Ralph.) pp. 315–319. (The University of Wisconsin Press: Madisson, WI.)

Horn, D., Fletcher, R., and Koford, R. K. (2000). Detecting area sensitivity: a comment on previous studies. American Midland Naturalist 144, 28–35.
Detecting area sensitivity: a comment on previous studies.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Hutto, R. L. (2016). Should scientists be required to use a model-based solution to adjust for possible distance-based detectability bias? Ecological Applications 26, 1287–1294.
Should scientists be required to use a model-based solution to adjust for possible distance-based detectability bias?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Kéry, M., and Schmid, H. (2004). Monitoring programs need to take into account imperfect species detectability. Basic and Applied Ecology 5, 65–73.
Monitoring programs need to take into account imperfect species detectability.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Kéry, M., Royle, J. A., Schmid, H., Schaub, M., Volet, B., Häfliger, G., and Zbinden, N. (2010). Site-occupancy distribution modelling to correct population-trend estimates derived from opportunistic observations. Conservation Biology 24, 1388–1397.
Site-occupancy distribution modelling to correct population-trend estimates derived from opportunistic observations.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

La, V. T., and Nudds, T. D. (2016). Effect of revisitation surveys on detection of wetland birds with different diel vocalization patterns. Journal of Fish and Wildlife Management 7, 509–519.
Effect of revisitation surveys on detection of wetland birds with different diel vocalization patterns.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Larsen, F. W., Bladt, J., Balmford, A., and Rahbek, C. (2012). Birds as biodiversity surrogates: will supplementing birds with other taxa improve effectiveness? Journal of Applied Ecology 49, 349–356.
Birds as biodiversity surrogates: will supplementing birds with other taxa improve effectiveness?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Linden, D. W., Roloff, G. J., and Kroll, A. J. (2012). Conserving avian richness through structure retention in managed forests of the Pacific Northwest, USA. Forest Ecology and Management 284, 174–184.
Conserving avian richness through structure retention in managed forests of the Pacific Northwest, USA.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Longino, J. T., Coddington, J. A., and Colwell, R. K. (2002). The ant fauna of a tropical rain forest: estimating species richness three different ways. Ecology 83, 689–702.
The ant fauna of a tropical rain forest: estimating species richness three different ways.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Loss, S. R., Ruiz, M. O., and Brawn, J. D. (2009). Relationships between avian diversity, neighborhood age, income, and environmental characteristics of an urban landscape. Biological Conservation 142, 2578–2585.
Relationships between avian diversity, neighborhood age, income, and environmental characteristics of an urban landscape.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

MacGregor-Fors, I., and Schondube, J. E. (2011). Use of tropical dry forests and agricultural areas by neotropical bird communities. Biotropica 43, 365–370.
Use of tropical dry forests and agricultural areas by neotropical bird communities.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

MacKenzie, D. I., and Royle, J. A. (2005). Designing occupancy studies: general advice and allocating survey effort. Journal of Applied Ecology 42, 1105–1114.
Designing occupancy studies: general advice and allocating survey effort.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

MacKenzie, D. I., Nichols, J. D., Hines, J. E., Knutson, M. G., and Franklin, A. B. (2003). Estimating site occupancy, colonization, and local extinction when a species is detected imperfectly. Ecology 84, 2200–2207.
Estimating site occupancy, colonization, and local extinction when a species is detected imperfectly.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Marques, T. A., Thomas, L., Fancy, S. G., and Buckland, S. T. (2007). Improving estimates of bird density using multiple-covariate distance sampling. The Auk 124, 1229–1243.
Improving estimates of bird density using multiple-covariate distance sampling.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Matsuoka, S. M., Mahon, C. L., Handel, C. M., Sólymos, P., Bayne, E. M., Fontaine, P. C., and Ralph, C. J. (2014). Reviving common standards in point-count surveys for broad inference across studies. The Condor 116, 599–608.
Reviving common standards in point-count surveys for broad inference across studies.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Matthews, T. J., Cottee-Jones, H. E., and Whittaker, R. J. (2014). Habitat fragmentation and the species–area relationship: a focus on total species richness obscures the impact of habitat loss on habitat specialists. Diversity & Distributions 20, 1136–1146.
Habitat fragmentation and the species–area relationship: a focus on total species richness obscures the impact of habitat loss on habitat specialists.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

McMahon, B. J., Carnus, T., and Whelan, J. (2013). A comparison of winter bird communities in agricultural grassland and cereal habitats in Ireland: implications for Common Agricultural Policy reform. Bird Study 60, 176–184.
A comparison of winter bird communities in agricultural grassland and cereal habitats in Ireland: implications for Common Agricultural Policy reform.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Merikallio, E. (1958). Finnish birds: their distribution and numbers. Fauna Fennica 5, 1–81.

Murray, L. D., Gates, R. G., and Spinola, R. M. (2011). Evaluation of three methods to estimate density and detectability from roadside point counts. The Journal of Wildlife Management 75, 1072–1081.
Evaluation of three methods to estimate density and detectability from roadside point counts.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Paker, Y., Yom-Tov, Y., Alon-Mozes, T., and Barnea, A. (2014). The effect of plant richness and urban garden structure on bird species richness, diversity and community structure. Landscape and Urban Planning 122, 186–195.
The effect of plant richness and urban garden structure on bird species richness, diversity and community structure.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Peterson, A. T., and Slade, N. A. (1998). Extrapolating inventory results into biodiversity estimates and the importance of stopping rules. Diversity & Distributions 4, 95–105.
Extrapolating inventory results into biodiversity estimates and the importance of stopping rules.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Pineda-Diez de Bonilla, E., León-Cortés, J. L., and Rangel-Salazar, J. L. (2012). Diversity of bird feeding guilds in relation to habitat heterogeneity and land-use cover in a human-modified landscape in southern Mexico. Journal of Tropical Ecology 28, 369–376.
Diversity of bird feeding guilds in relation to habitat heterogeneity and land-use cover in a human-modified landscape in southern Mexico.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Quinn, G. P., and Keough, M. J. (2002). ‘Experimental Design and Data Analysis for Biologists.’ (Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK.)

R Core Team (2013). ‘R: a Language and Environment for Statistical Computing.’ (R Foundation for Statistical Computing: Vienna, Austria.) Available at http://www.R-project.org/ [verified 2 May 2017].

Royle, J. A., and Link, W. A. (2006). Generalized site occupancy models allowing for false positive and false negative errors. Ecology 87, 835–841.
Generalized site occupancy models allowing for false positive and false negative errors.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Sánchez-Oliver, J. S., Rey Benayas, J. M., and Carrascal, L. M. (2014). Differential effects of local habitat and landscape characteristics on bird communities in Mediterranean afforestations motivated by the EU Common Agrarian Policy. European Journal of Wildlife Research 60, 135–143.
Differential effects of local habitat and landscape characteristics on bird communities in Mediterranean afforestations motivated by the EU Common Agrarian Policy.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Shake, C. S., Moorman, C. E., Ridd Le, J. D., and Burchell, M. R. (2012). Influence of patch size and shape on occupancy by shrubland birds. The Condor 114, 268–278.
Influence of patch size and shape on occupancy by shrubland birds.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Šizling, A. L., Šizlingová, E., Storch, D., Reif, J., and Gaston, K. J. (2009). Rarity, commonness and the contribution of individual species to species richness patterns. American Naturalist 174, 82–93.
Rarity, commonness and the contribution of individual species to species richness patterns.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Suarez-Rubio, M., and Thomlinson, J. R. (2009). Landscape and patch-level factors influence bird communities in an urbanized tropical island. Biological Conservation 142, 1311–1321.
Landscape and patch-level factors influence bird communities in an urbanized tropical island.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Verner, J. (1985). Assessment of counting techniques. Current Ornithology 2, 247–302.
Assessment of counting techniques.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Watson, D. M. (2003). The ‘standardized search’: an improved way to conduct bird surveys. Austral Ecology 28, 515–525.
The ‘standardized search’: an improved way to conduct bird surveys.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Watson, D. M. (2004). Comparative evaluation of new approaches to survey birds. Wildlife Research 31, 1–11.
Comparative evaluation of new approaches to survey birds.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Watson, D. M. (2010). Optimizing inventories of diverse sites: insights from Barro Colorado Island birds. Methods in Ecology and Evolution 1, 280–291.

Welsh, A. H., Lindenmayer, D. B., and Donnelly, C. F. (2013). Fitting and interpreting occupancy models. PLoS One 8, e52015.
Fitting and interpreting occupancy models.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC3sXhtlCqtL0%3D&md5=bacce6e2432e1d014e4282b02964089fCAS |

Werling, B. P., Dickson, T. L., Isaacs, R., Gaines, H., Gratton, C., Gross, K. L., Liere, H., Malmstrom, C. M., Meehan, T. D., Ruan, L., Robertson, B. A., Robertson, G. P., Schmidt, T. M., Schrotenboer, A. C., Teal, T. K., Wilson, J. K., and Landis, D. A. (2014). Perennial grasslands enhance biodiversity and multiple ecosystem services in bioenergy landscapes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 111, 1652–1657.
Perennial grasslands enhance biodiversity and multiple ecosystem services in bioenergy landscapes.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC2cXhsF2qtbc%3D&md5=86622b63c40499bbe6b2993d80c4fa28CAS |

Wyshynski, S. A., and Nudds, T. D. (2009). Pattern and process in forest bird communities on boreal landscapes originating from wildfire and timber harvest. Forestry Chronicle 85, 218–226.
Pattern and process in forest bird communities on boreal landscapes originating from wildfire and timber harvest.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Zhang, J., Nielsen, S. E., Grainger, T. N., Kohler, M., Chipchar, T., and Farr, D. R. (2014). Sampling plant diversity and rarity at landscape scales: importance of sampling time in species detectability. PLoS One 9, e95334.
Sampling plant diversity and rarity at landscape scales: importance of sampling time in species detectability.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |