Register      Login
Wildlife Research Wildlife Research Society
Ecology, management and conservation in natural and modified habitats
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Multiple cameras required to reliably detect feral cats in northern Australian tropical savanna: an evaluation of sampling design when using camera traps

Danielle Stokeld A B G , Anke S. K. Frank C , Brydie Hill A , Jenni Low Choy A , Terry Mahney A B , Alys Stevens A , Stuart Young A B , Djelk Rangers D , Warddeken Rangers E and Graeme R. Gillespie A F
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Flora and Fauna Division, Department of Land Resource Management, Palmerston, NT 0830, Australia.

B Research Institute for the Environment and Livelihoods, Charles Darwin University, Darwin, NT 0909, Australia.

C School of Biological Sciences, University of Tasmania, Tas. 7001, Australia.

D Bawinanga Aboriginal Corporation, PMB 102, Winnellie, NT 0821, Australia

E Warddeken Land Management Limited, PO Box 785, Nightcliff, NT 0814, Australia

F Department of Zoology, University of Melbourne, Vic. 3010, Australia.

G Corresponding author. Email: danielle.stokeld@nt.gov.au

Wildlife Research 42(8) 642-649 https://doi.org/10.1071/WR15083
Submitted: 23 April 2015  Accepted: 16 October 2015   Published: 18 December 2015

Abstract

Context: Feral cats are a major cause of mammal declines and extinctions in Australia. However, cats are elusive and obtaining reliable ecological data is challenging. Although camera traps are increasingly being used to study feral cats, their successful use in northern Australia has been limited.

Aims: We evaluated the efficacy of camera-trap sampling designs for detecting cats in the tropical savanna of northern Australia. We aimed to develop a camera-trapping method that would yield detection probabilities adequate for precise occupancy estimates.

Methods: First, we assessed the influence of two micro-habitat placements and three lure types on camera-trap detection rates of feral cats. Second, using multiple camera traps at each site, we examined the relationship between sampling effort and detection probability by using a multi-method occupancy model.

Key results: We found no significant difference in detection rates of feral cats using a variety of lures and micro-habitat placement. The mean probability of detecting a cat on one camera during one week of sampling was very low (p = 0.15) and had high uncertainty. However, the probability of detecting a cat on at least one of five cameras deployed concurrently on a site was 48% higher (p = 0.22) and had a greater precision.

Conclusions: The sampling effort required to achieve detection rates adequate to infer occupancy of feral cats by camera trap is considerably higher in northern Australia than has been observed elsewhere in Australia. Adequate detection of feral cats in the tropical savanna of northern Australia will necessitate inclusion of more camera traps and a longer survey duration.

Implications: Sampling designs using camera traps need to be rigorously trialled and assessed to optimise detection of the target species for different Australian biomes. A standard approach is suggested for detecting feral cats in northern Australian savannas.

Additional keywords: camera trap, detection probability, Felis catus, sampling effort.


References

Bailey, L. L., Simons, T. R., and Pollock, K. H. (2004). Estimating site occupancy and species detection probability parameters for terrestrial salamanders. Ecological Applications 14, 692–702.
Estimating site occupancy and species detection probability parameters for terrestrial salamanders.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Ballard, G., Meek, P. D., Doak, S., Fleming, P. J. S., and Sparkes, J. (2014). Camera traps, sand plots and known events: what do camera traps miss? In ‘Camera Trapping in Wildlife Research and Management’. (Eds P. D. Meek, A. G. Ballard, P. B. Banks, A. W. Claridge, P. J. S. Fleming, J. G. Sanderson and D. E. Swann.) pp. 189–202. (CSIRO Publishing: Melbourne.)

Bengsen, A., Butler, J., and Masters, P. (2011). Estimating and indexing feral cat population abundances using camera traps. Wildlife Research 38, 732–739.
Estimating and indexing feral cat population abundances using camera traps.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Burnham, K. P., and Anderson, D. R. (2002). ‘Model Selection and Multimodel Inference: a Practical Information-theoretic Approach.’ 2nd edn. (Springer-Verlag: New York.)

Denny, E. A., and Dickman, C. R. (2010). ‘Review of Cat Ecology and Management Strategies in Australia.’ (Invasives Animals Cooperative Research Centre: Canberra.)

Edwards, G. P., de Preu, N., Shakeshaft, B. J., and Crealy, I. V. (2000). An evaluation of two methods of assessing feral cat and dingo abundance in central Australia. Wildlife Research 27, 143–149.
An evaluation of two methods of assessing feral cat and dingo abundance in central Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Edwards, G. P., de Preu, N., Shakeshaft, B. J., Crealy, I. V., and Paltridge, R. M. (2001). Home range and movements of male feral cats (Felis catus) in a semiarid woodland environment in central Australia. Austral Ecology 26, 93–101.

Fitzsimons, J., Legge, S., Traill, B., and Woinarski, J. C. Z. (2010). ‘Into Oblivion? The Disappearing Native Mammals of Northern Australia.’ (Nature Conservancy: Melbourne.)

Foresman, K. R., and Pearson, D. E. (1998). Comparison of proposed survey procedures for detection of forest carnivores. The Journal of Wildlife Management 62, 1217–1226.
Comparison of proposed survey procedures for detection of forest carnivores.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Hines, J. E. (2006). ‘PRESENCE: Software to Estimate Patch Occupancy and Related Parameters.’ (USGS–PWRC.) Available at http://www.mbr-pwrc.usgs.gov/software/presence.html [Accessed 10 September 2014]

Long, R. A. (2008). ‘Noninvasive Survey Methods for Carnivores.’ (Island Press: Washington, DC.)

MacKenzie, D. I., and Bailey, L. L. (2004). Assessing the fit of site-occupancy models. Journal of Agricultural Biological & Environmental Statistics 9, 300–318.
Assessing the fit of site-occupancy models.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

MacKenzie, D. I., and Royle, J. A. (2005). Designing occupancy studies: general advice and allocating survey effort. Journal of Applied Ecology 42, 1105–1114.
Designing occupancy studies: general advice and allocating survey effort.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

MacKenzie, D. I., Nichols, J. D., Lachman, G. D., and Langtimm, C. A. (2002). Estimating site occupancy rates when detection probabilities are less than one. Ecology 83, 2248–2255.
Estimating site occupancy rates when detection probabilities are less than one.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

MacKenzie, D. I., Nichols, J. D., Royle, J. A., Pollock, K. H., Bailey, L. L., and Hines, J. E. (2006). ‘Occupancy Estimation and Modeling: Inferring Patterns and Dynamics of Species Occurrence.’ (Academic Press: Burlington, MA, USA)

Mahon, P. S., Bates, P. B., and Dickman, C. R. (1998). Population indices for wild carnivores: a critical study in sand-dune habitat, south-western Queensland. Wildlife Research 25, 11–22.
Population indices for wild carnivores: a critical study in sand-dune habitat, south-western Queensland.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

McGregor HW (2015). Density, movements and hunting of feral cats in relation to fire and grazing in northern Australia. PhD thesis, University of Tasmania, Hobart.

McGregor, H. W., Legge, S., Jones, M. E., and Johnson, C. N. (2014). Landscape management of fire and grazing regimes alters the fine-scale habitat utilisation by feral cats. PLoS One 9, e109097.
Landscape management of fire and grazing regimes alters the fine-scale habitat utilisation by feral cats.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 25329902PubMed |

Meek, P., Fleming, P., Ballard, G., Banks, P., Claridge, A., Sanderson, J., and Swann, D. (Eds) (2014). ‘Camera Trapping: Wildlife Management and Research.’ (CSIRO Publishing: Melbourne.)

Mordecai, R. S., Mattsson, B. J., Tzilkowski, C. J., and Cooper, R. J. (2011). Addressing challenges when studying mobile or episodic species: hierarchical Bayes estimation of occupancy and use. Journal of Applied Ecology 48, 56–66.
Addressing challenges when studying mobile or episodic species: hierarchical Bayes estimation of occupancy and use.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Moseby, K., Stott, J., and Crisp, H. (2009). Movement patterns of feral predators in an arid environment - Implications for control through poison baiting. Wildlife Research 36, 422–435.
Movement patterns of feral predators in an arid environment - Implications for control through poison baiting.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Nichols, J. D., Bailey, L. L., O’Connell, A. F., Talancy, N. W., Grant, E. H. C., Gilbert, A. T., Annand, E. M., Husband, T. P., and Hines, J. E. (2008). Multi-scale occupancy estimation and modelling using multiple detection methods. Journal of Animal Ecology 45, 1321–1329.
Multi-scale occupancy estimation and modelling using multiple detection methods.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

O’Connell, A. F., Talancy, N. W., Bailey, L. L., Sauer, J. R., Cook, R., and Gilbert, A. T. (2006). Estimating site occupancy and detection probability parameters for meso- and large mammals in a coastal ecosystem. The Journal of Wildlife Management 70, 1625–1633.
Estimating site occupancy and detection probability parameters for meso- and large mammals in a coastal ecosystem.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

R Core Team (2014). ‘R: a Language and Environment for Statistical Computing.’ (Vienna.) Available at http://www.R-project.org/. [Accessed 5 June 2014]

Read, J., and Eldridge, S. (2010). An optimised rapid detection technique for simultaneously monitoring activity of rabbits, cats, foxes and dingoes in the rangelands. The Rangeland Journal 32, 389–394.
An optimised rapid detection technique for simultaneously monitoring activity of rabbits, cats, foxes and dingoes in the rangelands.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Read, J. L., Bengsen, A. J., Meek, P. D., and Moseby, K. (2015). How to snap your cat: optimum lures and their placement for attracting mammalian predators in arid Australia. Wildlife Research 42, 1–12.
How to snap your cat: optimum lures and their placement for attracting mammalian predators in arid Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Robley, A., Ramsey, D., Woodford, L., Lindeman, M., Johnston, M., and Forsyth, D. (2008). Evaluation of detection methods and sampling designs used to determine the abundance of feral cats. Arthur Rylah Institute for Environmental Research Technical Report Series No. 181, Department of Sustainability and Environment, Melbourne.

Robley, A., Gormley, A., Woodford, L., Lindeman, M., Whitehead, B., Albert, R., Bowd, M., and Smith, A. (2010). Evaluation of camera trap sampling designs used to determine change in occupancy rate and abundance of feral cats. Arthur Rylah Institute for Environmental Research Technical Series No. 201, Department of Sustainability and Environment, Melbourne.

Royle, J. A., and Nichols, J. D. (2003). Estimating abundance from repeated presence–absence data or point counts. Ecology 84, 777–790.
Estimating abundance from repeated presence–absence data or point counts.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Tyre, A. J., Tenhumberg, B., Field, S. A., Niejalke, D., and Possingham, H. P. (2003). Improving precision and reducing bias in biological surveys: estimating false-negative error rates. Ecological Applications 13, 1790–1801.
Improving precision and reducing bias in biological surveys: estimating false-negative error rates.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Wayne, A. F., Maxwell, M. A., Ward, C. G., Vellios, C. V., Wilson, I. J., and Dawson, K. (2013). Woylie Conservation and Research Project: Progress report 2010–2013. Department of Parks and Wildlife, Perth.

Wegge, P., Pokheral, C. P., and Jnawali, S. R. (2004). Effects of trapping effort and trap shyness on estimates of tiger abundance from camera trap studies. Animal Conservation 7, 251–256.
Effects of trapping effort and trap shyness on estimates of tiger abundance from camera trap studies.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Woinarski, J. C. Z., Armstrong, M., Brennan, K., Fisher, A., Griffiths, A. D., Hill, B., Milne, D. J., Palmer, C., Ward, S., Watson, M., Winderlich, S., and Young, S. (2010). Monitoring indicates rapid and severe decline of native small mammals in Kakadu National Park, northern Australia. Wildlife Research 37, 116–126.
Monitoring indicates rapid and severe decline of native small mammals in Kakadu National Park, northern Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Woinarski, J. C. Z., Legge, S., Fitzsimons, J. A., Traill, B. J., Burbidge, A. A., Fisher, A., Firth, R. S. C., Gordon, I. J., Griffiths, A. D., Johnson, C. N., McKenzie, N. L., Palmer, C., Radford, I., Rankmore, B., Ritchie, E. G., Ward, S., and Ziembicki, M. (2011). The disappearing mammal fauna of northern Australia: context, cause, and response. Conservation Letters 4, 192–201.
The disappearing mammal fauna of northern Australia: context, cause, and response.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Woinarski, J. C. Z., Burbidge, A. A., and Harrison, P. (2014). ‘The Action plan for Australian Mammals 2012.’ (CSIRO Publishing: Melbourne.)

Woinarski, J. C., Burbidge, A. A., and Harrison, P. (2015). A review of the conservation status of Australian mammals. Therya 6, 155–166.