Do indirect bite count surveys accurately represent diet selection of white-tailed deer in a forested environment?
Marcus A. Lashley A C , M. Colter Chitwood B , Garrett M. Street A , Christopher E. Moorman B and Christopher S. DePerno BA Department of Wildlife, Fisheries, and Aquaculture, Mississippi State University, PO Box 9690, Mississippi State, MS 39762, USA.
B Department of Forestry and Environmental Resources, Fisheries, Wildlife, and Conservation Biology, North Carolina State University, 110 Brooks Avenue, Raleigh, NC 27606, USA.
C Corresponding author. Email: marcus.lashley@msstate.edu
Wildlife Research 43(3) 254-260 https://doi.org/10.1071/WR15008
Submitted: 16 January 2015 Accepted: 13 March 2016 Published: 3 June 2016
Abstract
Context: Diet selection is studied in herbivores using three predominant methods: (1) microhistological surveys (identification of plants cell walls remaining in gut contents or faecal excretions); (2) direct bite counts (of tame animals); and (3) indirect bite counts (identifying herbivory on damaged plant tissues). Microhistological surveys and direct bite counts are accurate and provide the potential advantage of linking diet selection to particular individuals. Also, they allow diet selection to be measured in systems with sympatric herbivores more easily than indirect bite counts. However, they require expertise in cell wall structure identification or access to tame animals, and generally require greater expense than indirect bite counts. Conversely, indirect bite counts have the advantages of relatively low cost and time commitment for gathering data and do not require animal observation, but may not be accurate.
Aims: We tested for similarity between diet-selection estimates calculated by indirect bite counts and microhistological surveys.
Methods: We performed concurrent indirect bite count and faecal microhistological surveys on white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus) at Fort Bragg Military Installation, NC.
Key results: The indirect bite count survey assignment of selection was 48% similar to assignments derived from the microhistological survey, based on Jaccard’s similarity index. Out of 23 plant species determined to be selected by indirect bite counts, 15 of those species were selected according to microhistological surveys. According to the microhistological survey, eight of the selected plants made up 51% of the overall diet, and seven of those eight were selected according to the indirect bite counts.
Conclusions: Our data indicate that indirect bite counts may provide a relatively accurate index of the deer-selected plants most important in the white-tailed deer diet, but may be less appropriate to determine selection of plants that infrequently occur in their diet, plants that are typically consumed in entirety, or plants where herbivory damage is poorly identified.
Implications: Indirect bite counts are a relatively inexpensive and time-efficient tool that may be useful to determine plant species most important to white-tailed deer within a forested landscape, particularly if additional research can improve on associated inaccuracies.
Additional keywords: Chesson Index, diet selection transect, herbivory, indirect bite count, microhistological survey, white-tailed deer.
References
Alipayo, D., Valdez, R., Holechek, J. L., and Cardenas, M. (1992). Evaluation of microhistological analysis for determining ruminant diet botanical composition. Journal of Range Management 45, 148–152.| Evaluation of microhistological analysis for determining ruminant diet botanical composition.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Barboza, P. S., Parker, K. L., and Hume, I. D. (2009). Integrative wildlife nutrition. Berlin, Springer.
Chesson, J. (1978). Measuring preference in selective predation. Ecology 59, 211–215.
| Measuring preference in selective predation.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Chesson, J. (1983). The estimation and analysis of preference and its relationship to foraging models. Ecology 64, 1297–1304.
| The estimation and analysis of preference and its relationship to foraging models.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Côté, S. D., Rooney, T. P., Tremblay, J. P., Dussault, C., and Waller, D. M. (2004). Ecological impacts of deer overabundance. Annual Review of Ecology Evolution and Systematics 35, 113–147.
| Ecological impacts of deer overabundance.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Edwards, S. L., Demarais, S., Watkins, B., and Strickland, B. K. (2004). White-tailed deer forage production in managed and unmanaged pine stands and summer food plots in Mississippi. Wildlife Society Bulletin 32, 739–745.
| White-tailed deer forage production in managed and unmanaged pine stands and summer food plots in Mississippi.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Gill, R. M. A. (1992). A review of damage by mammals in north temperate forests: impact on trees and forests. Forestry 65, 363–388.
| A review of damage by mammals in north temperate forests: impact on trees and forests.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Gill, R. B., Carpenter, L. H., Bartmann, R. M., Baker, D. L., and Schoonveld, G. G. (1983). Fecal analysis to estimate mule deer diets. The Journal of Wildlife Management 47, 902–915.
| Fecal analysis to estimate mule deer diets.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Hanley, T. A. (1997). A nutritional view of understanding and complexity in the problem of diet selection by deer (Cervidae). Oikos 79, 209–218.
| A nutritional view of understanding and complexity in the problem of diet selection by deer (Cervidae).Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DyaK2sXjs1Cktrs%3D&md5=58f59251ec15e54353a54240ab9a1339CAS |
Hewitt, D. G. (2011). Nutrition. In ‘Biology and Management of White-Tailed Deer’. (Ed. Hewitt, D. G.) pp. 75–105. (Taylor and Francis Group.)
Holechek, J. L., Vavra, M., and Pieper, R. D. (1982). Botanical composition determination of range herbivore diets: a review. Journal of Range Management 35, 309–315.
| Botanical composition determination of range herbivore diets: a review.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Jaccard, P. (1901). Étude comparative de la distribution florale dans une portion des Alpes et des Jura Bulletin de la Société Vaudoise des Sciences Naturelles 37, 547–579.
Jung, T. S., Stotyn, S. A., and Czetwertynski, S. M. (2015). Dietary overlap and potential competition in a dynamic ungulate community in northwestern Canada. The Journal of Wildlife Management 79, 1277–1285.
| Dietary overlap and potential competition in a dynamic ungulate community in northwestern Canada.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Lashley, M. A., and Harper, C. A. (2012). The effects of extreme drought on native forage nutritional quality and white-tailed deer diet selection. Southeastern Naturalist (Steuben, ME) 11, 699–710.
| The effects of extreme drought on native forage nutritional quality and white-tailed deer diet selection.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Lashley, M. A., Harper, C. A., Bates, G. E., and Keyser, P. D. (2011). Forage availability for white‐tailed deer following silvicultural treatments in hardwood forests. The Journal of Wildlife Management 75, 1467–1476.
| Forage availability for white‐tailed deer following silvicultural treatments in hardwood forests.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Lashley, M. A., Chitwood, M. C., Harper, C. A., Moorman, C. E., and DePerno, C. S. (2014a). Collection, handling and analysis of forages for concentrate selectors. Wildlife Biology in Practice 10, 29–38.
| Collection, handling and analysis of forages for concentrate selectors.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Lashley, M. A., Chitwood, M. C., Prince, A., Elfelt, M. B., Kilburg, E. L., DePerno, C. S., and Moorman, C. E. (2014b). Subtle effects of a managed fire regime: a case study in the longleaf pine ecosystem. Ecological Indicators 38, 212–217.
| Subtle effects of a managed fire regime: a case study in the longleaf pine ecosystem.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Lashley, M. A., Chitwood, M. C., Kays, R., Harper, C. A., DePerno, C. S., and Moorman, C. E. (2015). Prescribed fire affects female white-tailed deer habitat use during summer lactation. Forest Ecology and Management 348, 220–225.
| Prescribed fire affects female white-tailed deer habitat use during summer lactation.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Marrero, P., and Nogales, M. (2005). A microhistological survey on the trees of a relict subtropical laurel forest from the Macaronesian Islands as a base for assessing vertebrate plant diet. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 148, 409–426.
| A microhistological survey on the trees of a relict subtropical laurel forest from the Macaronesian Islands as a base for assessing vertebrate plant diet.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Newmaster, S. G., Thompson, I. D., Steeves, R. A., Rodgers, A. R., Fazekas, A. J., Maloles, J. R., McMullin, R. T., and Fryxell, J. M. (2013). Examination of two new technologies to assess the diet of woodland caribou: video recorders attached to collars and DNA barcoding. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 43, 897–900.
| Examination of two new technologies to assess the diet of woodland caribou: video recorders attached to collars and DNA barcoding.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC3sXhsVCntbrN&md5=70b15830e70008fe303ec027ef7625eeCAS |
Norbury, G. L., and Sanson, G. D. (1992). Problems with measuring diet selection of terrestrial, mammalian herbivores. Australian Journal of Ecology 17, 1–7.
| Problems with measuring diet selection of terrestrial, mammalian herbivores.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Parker, D. M., and Bernard, R. T. F. (2006). A comparison of two diet analysis techniques for a browsing megaherbivore. The Journal of Wildlife Management 70, 1477–1480.
| A comparison of two diet analysis techniques for a browsing megaherbivore.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Platt, W. J. (1999). Southeastern pine savannas. In ‘Savannas, Barrens, and Rock Outcrop Plant Communities of North America’. (Eds Anderson, R.C., J.S. Fralish, and J.M. Baskin.). pp. 23–51. (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.)
Poorter, H., Niklas, K. J., Reich, P. B., Oleksyn, J., Poot, P., and Mommer, L. (2012). Biomass allocation to leaves, stems and roots: meta‐analyses of interspecific variation and environmental control. New Phytologist 193, 30–50.
| Biomass allocation to leaves, stems and roots: meta‐analyses of interspecific variation and environmental control.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC38XitVKgtr0%3D&md5=3c144b5ad95c28d9059133885d573948CAS | 22085245PubMed |
Pulliam, D. E. (1978). Determination of digestibility coefficients for quantification of elk fecal analysis. M.Sc. Thesis, Washington State University, Pullman, WA.
Real, R., and Vargas, J. M. (1996). The probabilistic basis of Jaccard’s index of similarity. Systematic Biology 45, 380–385.
| The probabilistic basis of Jaccard’s index of similarity.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Sæther, B. E., Engen, S., and Andersen, R. (1989). Resource utilization of moose Alces alces during winter: constraints and options. Finnish Game Research 46, 79–86.
Shipley, L. A., Blomquist, S., and Danell, K. (1998). Diet choices made by free-ranging moose in northern Sweden in relation to plant distribution, chemistry, and morphology. Canadian Journal of Zoology 76, 1722–1733.
| Diet choices made by free-ranging moose in northern Sweden in relation to plant distribution, chemistry, and morphology.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Sorrie, B. A., Gray, J. B., and Crutchfield, P. J. (2006). The vascular flora of the longleaf pine ecosystem of Fort Bragg and Weymouth Woods, North Carolina. Castanea 71, 129–161.
| The vascular flora of the longleaf pine ecosystem of Fort Bragg and Weymouth Woods, North Carolina.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Spalinger, D. E., Robbins, C. T., and Hanley, T. A. (1986). The assessment of handling time in ruminants: the effect of plant chemical and physical structure on the rate of breakdown of plant particles in the rumen of mule deer and elk. Canadian Journal of Zoology 64, 312–321.
| The assessment of handling time in ruminants: the effect of plant chemical and physical structure on the rate of breakdown of plant particles in the rumen of mule deer and elk.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Spalinger, D. E., Cooper, S. M., Martin, D. J., and Shipley, L. A. (1997). Is social learning an important influence on foraging behavior in white-tailed deer? The Journal of Wildlife Management 61, 611–621.
| Is social learning an important influence on foraging behavior in white-tailed deer?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Vavra, M., and Holechek, J. L. (1980). Factors influencing microhistological analysis of herbivore diets. Journal of Range Management 33, 371–374.
| Factors influencing microhistological analysis of herbivore diets.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Vivas, H. J., and Sæther, B. E. (1987). Interactions between a generalist herbivore, the moose Alces alces and its food resources: an experimental study of winter foraging behaviour in relation to browse availability. Journal of Animal Ecology 56, 509–520.
| Interactions between a generalist herbivore, the moose Alces alces and its food resources: an experimental study of winter foraging behaviour in relation to browse availability.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Wam, H. K., and Hjeljord, O. (2010). Moose summer diet from faeces and field surveys: a comparative study. Rangeland Ecology and Management 63, 387–395.
| Moose summer diet from faeces and field surveys: a comparative study.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
